Trial Outcomes & Findings for Healthy And Positive Pathways for Young People With Type 1 Diabetes (HAPPY T1D) (NCT NCT05413239)
NCT ID: NCT05413239
Last Updated: 2026-03-12
Results Overview
CGM data will be downloaded every 3 months to assess percent time in range (TIR) (70-180 mg/dL). The primary outcome will be change in TIR from 0 to 12 months for intervention group vs. control group.
COMPLETED
NA
217 participants
0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 months (months 0-12 reported for primary outcome analysis)
2026-03-12
Participant Flow
217 participants provided informed consent and 191 were randomized.
26 participants consented but were not randomized (18 did not complete baseline data, 5 had an ineligible central lab A1c, 2 withdrew, and 1 was a sibling of a randomized participant)
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Intervention Group
The Intervention Group will receive the monthly intervention sessions during the first year of the study.
|
Control Group
The Control Group will receive the monthly intervention sessions during the second year of the study (after assessment of primary outcomes at 1 year).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
95
|
96
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
86
|
85
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
9
|
11
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Healthy And Positive Pathways for Young People With Type 1 Diabetes (HAPPY T1D)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Intervention Group
n=95 Participants
The Intervention Group will receive the monthly intervention sessions during the first year of the study.
|
Control Group
n=96 Participants
The Control Group will receive the monthly intervention sessions during the second year of the study (after assessment of primary outcomes at 1 year).
|
Total
n=191 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
19.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.6 • n=9 Participants
|
19.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.3 • n=9 Participants
|
19.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.4 • n=18 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
1 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
2 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
2 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
77 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
72 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
149 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
9 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
4 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
13 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
82 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
89 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
171 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
|
54 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
39 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
93 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
|
40 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
56 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
96 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Nonbinary or other
|
1 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 months (months 0-12 reported for primary outcome analysis)Population: Some participants did not have CGM data at some time points, and thus there are some missing data.
CGM data will be downloaded every 3 months to assess percent time in range (TIR) (70-180 mg/dL). The primary outcome will be change in TIR from 0 to 12 months for intervention group vs. control group.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention Group
n=95 Participants
The Intervention Group will receive the monthly intervention sessions during the first year of the study.
|
Control Group
n=96 Participants
The Control Group will receive the monthly intervention sessions during the second year of the study (after assessment of primary outcomes at 1 year).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time in Range (TIR)
Month 0
|
50.1 Percent of time
Standard Deviation 17.2
|
47.2 Percent of time
Standard Deviation 16.3
|
|
Time in Range (TIR)
Month 3
|
53.8 Percent of time
Standard Deviation 14.9
|
50.3 Percent of time
Standard Deviation 15.0
|
|
Time in Range (TIR)
Month 6
|
56.5 Percent of time
Standard Deviation 12.6
|
49.9 Percent of time
Standard Deviation 14.3
|
|
Time in Range (TIR)
Month 12
|
55.7 Percent of time
Standard Deviation 13.1
|
52.9 Percent of time
Standard Deviation 15.5
|
|
Time in Range (TIR)
Month 9
|
56.0 Percent of time
Standard Deviation 13.6
|
50.3 Percent of time
Standard Deviation 14.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months (months 0-12 reported for secondary outcome analysis)Population: Some participants did not complete the central lab A1c at some time points, and thus there are some missing data.
A1c will be assessed every 6 months. Blood samples will be collected locally using uniform procedures and sent to the central laboratory at the University of Minnesota for analysis. Change in A1c from 0 to 12 months will be compared within and between the intervention group and control group.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention Group
n=94 Participants
The Intervention Group will receive the monthly intervention sessions during the first year of the study.
|
Control Group
n=94 Participants
The Control Group will receive the monthly intervention sessions during the second year of the study (after assessment of primary outcomes at 1 year).
|
|---|---|---|
|
A1c
A1c at Month 6
|
7.5 A1c %
Standard Deviation 0.9
|
7.9 A1c %
Standard Deviation 0.9
|
|
A1c
A1c at Month 0
|
7.9 A1c %
Standard Deviation 1.3
|
8.1 A1c %
Standard Deviation 1.2
|
|
A1c
A1c at Month 12
|
7.6 A1c %
Standard Deviation 0.8
|
7.9 A1c %
Standard Deviation 1.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months (months 0-12 reported for secondary outcome analysis)Population: Some participants did not complete surveys at some time points, and thus there are some missing data.
Diabetes distress will be assessed every 6 months using the validated Problem Areas in Diabetes - Pediatric survey (PAID-Peds). The PAID-Peds measures self-reported diabetes distress. The total score can range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more diabetes distress. Change in diabetes distress from 0 to 12 months will be compared within and between the intervention group and control group.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention Group
n=95 Participants
The Intervention Group will receive the monthly intervention sessions during the first year of the study.
|
Control Group
n=96 Participants
The Control Group will receive the monthly intervention sessions during the second year of the study (after assessment of primary outcomes at 1 year).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Diabetes Distress
Month 0 - PAID-Peds score
|
46.2 Score on a survey
Standard Deviation 21.7
|
51.6 Score on a survey
Standard Deviation 21.1
|
|
Diabetes Distress
Month 6 - PAID-Peds score
|
42.9 Score on a survey
Standard Deviation 20.1
|
48.2 Score on a survey
Standard Deviation 21.9
|
|
Diabetes Distress
Month 12 - PAID-Peds score
|
41.3 Score on a survey
Standard Deviation 21.2
|
46.7 Score on a survey
Standard Deviation 23.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months (months 0-12 reported for secondary outcome analysis)Population: Some participants did not complete surveys at some time points, and thus there are some missing data.
Attitudes toward diabetes device use will be assessed every 6 months using the validated Glucose Monitoring Satisfaction Survey for Type 1 Diabetes (GMSS-T1D) and the Diabetes Technology Attitudes Scale (DTAS). The GMSS-T1D measures satisfaction with glucose monitoring device (e.g., meter, continuous glucose monitoring system). The total score can range from 1 to 5 and was calculated by averaging all 15 survey items. A higher score indicates more satisfaction. The DTAS measures attitudes about diabetes devices and technology. The total score can range from 5 to 25 and was calculated by summing all 5 survey items. A higher score indicates more positive attitudes about diabetes devices and technology. Change in attitudes toward device use from 0 to 12 months will be compared within and between the intervention group and control group.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention Group
n=95 Participants
The Intervention Group will receive the monthly intervention sessions during the first year of the study.
|
Control Group
n=96 Participants
The Control Group will receive the monthly intervention sessions during the second year of the study (after assessment of primary outcomes at 1 year).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Attitudes Toward Diabetes Device Use
GMSS Score at Month 0
|
3.97 Score on a survey
Standard Deviation .56
|
3.92 Score on a survey
Standard Deviation .56
|
|
Attitudes Toward Diabetes Device Use
DTAS Score at Month 12
|
22.58 Score on a survey
Standard Deviation 3.16
|
22.72 Score on a survey
Standard Deviation 2.62
|
|
Attitudes Toward Diabetes Device Use
GMSS Score at Month 6
|
3.98 Score on a survey
Standard Deviation .58
|
3.90 Score on a survey
Standard Deviation .60
|
|
Attitudes Toward Diabetes Device Use
GMSS Score at Month 12
|
3.93 Score on a survey
Standard Deviation .67
|
4.05 Score on a survey
Standard Deviation .54
|
|
Attitudes Toward Diabetes Device Use
DTAS Score at Month 0
|
22.24 Score on a survey
Standard Deviation 3.16
|
22.49 Score on a survey
Standard Deviation 2.75
|
|
Attitudes Toward Diabetes Device Use
DTAS Score at Month 6
|
22.56 Score on a survey
Standard Deviation 3.41
|
22.63 Score on a survey
Standard Deviation 2.63
|
Adverse Events
Intervention Group - Year 1 - Intervention Sessions
Intervention Group - Year 2 - No Intervention Sessions
Control Group - Year 1 - No Intervention Sessions
Control Group - Year 2 - Intervention Sessions
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Intervention Group - Year 1 - Intervention Sessions
n=95 participants at risk
The Intervention Group will receive the monthly intervention sessions during the first year of the study.
|
Intervention Group - Year 2 - No Intervention Sessions
n=95 participants at risk
The Intervention Group will receive the monthly intervention sessions during the first year of the study.
|
Control Group - Year 1 - No Intervention Sessions
n=96 participants at risk
The Control Group will receive the monthly intervention sessions during the second year of the study (after assessment of primary outcomes at 1 year).
|
Control Group - Year 2 - Intervention Sessions
n=96 participants at risk
The Control Group will receive the monthly intervention sessions during the second year of the study (after assessment of primary outcomes at 1 year).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Endocrine disorders
Hospitalization - Diabetes-related
|
2.1%
2/95 • From enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 2 years
For this study involving a behavioral intervention delivered remotely, adverse events met the definition of an SAE, were unexpected, or were related/possibly related to the study. Note: One participant in the Intervention Group and one participant in the Control group experienced both a diabetes-related hospitalization and a non-diabetes-related hospitalization while receiving intervention sessions (Year 1 for Intervention Group, Year 2 for Control Group).
|
3.2%
3/95 • From enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 2 years
For this study involving a behavioral intervention delivered remotely, adverse events met the definition of an SAE, were unexpected, or were related/possibly related to the study. Note: One participant in the Intervention Group and one participant in the Control group experienced both a diabetes-related hospitalization and a non-diabetes-related hospitalization while receiving intervention sessions (Year 1 for Intervention Group, Year 2 for Control Group).
|
7.3%
7/96 • From enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 2 years
For this study involving a behavioral intervention delivered remotely, adverse events met the definition of an SAE, were unexpected, or were related/possibly related to the study. Note: One participant in the Intervention Group and one participant in the Control group experienced both a diabetes-related hospitalization and a non-diabetes-related hospitalization while receiving intervention sessions (Year 1 for Intervention Group, Year 2 for Control Group).
|
3.1%
3/96 • From enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 2 years
For this study involving a behavioral intervention delivered remotely, adverse events met the definition of an SAE, were unexpected, or were related/possibly related to the study. Note: One participant in the Intervention Group and one participant in the Control group experienced both a diabetes-related hospitalization and a non-diabetes-related hospitalization while receiving intervention sessions (Year 1 for Intervention Group, Year 2 for Control Group).
|
|
General disorders
Hospitalization - Not diabetes-related
|
3.2%
3/95 • From enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 2 years
For this study involving a behavioral intervention delivered remotely, adverse events met the definition of an SAE, were unexpected, or were related/possibly related to the study. Note: One participant in the Intervention Group and one participant in the Control group experienced both a diabetes-related hospitalization and a non-diabetes-related hospitalization while receiving intervention sessions (Year 1 for Intervention Group, Year 2 for Control Group).
|
3.2%
3/95 • From enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 2 years
For this study involving a behavioral intervention delivered remotely, adverse events met the definition of an SAE, were unexpected, or were related/possibly related to the study. Note: One participant in the Intervention Group and one participant in the Control group experienced both a diabetes-related hospitalization and a non-diabetes-related hospitalization while receiving intervention sessions (Year 1 for Intervention Group, Year 2 for Control Group).
|
6.2%
6/96 • From enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 2 years
For this study involving a behavioral intervention delivered remotely, adverse events met the definition of an SAE, were unexpected, or were related/possibly related to the study. Note: One participant in the Intervention Group and one participant in the Control group experienced both a diabetes-related hospitalization and a non-diabetes-related hospitalization while receiving intervention sessions (Year 1 for Intervention Group, Year 2 for Control Group).
|
6.2%
6/96 • From enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 2 years
For this study involving a behavioral intervention delivered remotely, adverse events met the definition of an SAE, were unexpected, or were related/possibly related to the study. Note: One participant in the Intervention Group and one participant in the Control group experienced both a diabetes-related hospitalization and a non-diabetes-related hospitalization while receiving intervention sessions (Year 1 for Intervention Group, Year 2 for Control Group).
|
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place