Effect on Bronchodilation Response and Ventilation Heterogeneity of Different Inhalation Volumes in COPD

NCT05381415 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 30

Last updated 2026-05-04

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

During bronchodilator tests, it's common to ask patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to take bronchodilator therapy by inhaling after a maximal exhalation, when the respiratory system volume equals the residual volume. The same maneuver is required for the chronic therapy.

Nevertheless, in patients with COPD the distribution of ventilation is more heterogeneous, especially when lung volumes are closer to residual volume . It is therefore predictable that the distribution of air volume containing bronchodilator that has been inhaled at residual volume is more heterogeneous than at higher volumes, such as at functional residual capacity. Accordingly, the bronchodilator can be preferentially distributed in more open airways than in less patent ones, with a heterogeneous distribution of the medication. Therefore, the overall bronchodilation should be greater when the drug inhalation is performed at functional residual capacity than at residual volume.

It is common knowledge that the effectiveness of bronchodilator therapy with pMDI in subjects with COPD is greatly affected by the inhalation technique, which can be difficult to perform for many patients. Therefore, in addition to the possibility that inhalation of bronchilation therapy at residual volume could lower the drug effectiveness, this maneuver complicates the sequence of actions required to the patient, enhancing the risk of errors and decreasing the aderence to treatment.

The aim of this study is to investigate whether the inhalation of a bronchodilator at different lung volumes can affect its effectiveness in terms of respiratory function, in patients with COPD.

Assuming that the bronchodilator effectiveness is equal or greater when inhaled at functional residual capacity rather than at residual volume, the inhalation maneuver can be simplified for patients with COPD.

Conditions

Interventions

OTHER

Inhalation of bronchodilation therapy at FRC

the patient will be asked to inhale the bronchodilator (salbutamol pMDI, 400 µg) with a spacer from FRC (functional residual capacity, in a random order, with the assistance of an operator. The spacer will be connected to a Fleish flowmeter placed in series with the pMDI device. The valve included in the spacer will guarantee that only the air inhaled by the patient will pass through the flowmeter, reducing the risk of contamination. In both cases a low inspiratory flux and a period of apnea after inhalation of 10 seconds will be used. Before and after the administration it will be asked to the patient to execute a spirometry, a plethysmography, a lung diffusion test, and the NEP technique. These will allow the characterization of the bronchodilator effect in terms of static and dynamic volumes, heterogeneity of ventilation distribution and volume of closure, expiration flux-limitation.

OTHER

Inhalation of bronchodilation therapy at RV

the patient will be asked to inhale the bronchodilator (salbutamol pMDI, 400 µg) with a spacer from VR , with the assistance of an operator. The spacer will be connected to a Fleish flowmeter placed in series with the pMDI device. The valve included in the spacer will guarantee that only the air inhaled by the patient will pass through the flowmeter, reducing the risk of contamination. In both cases a low inspiratory flux and a period of apnea after inhalation of 10 seconds will be used. Before and after the administration it will be asked to the patient to execute a spirometry, a plethysmography, a lung diffusion test, and the NEP technique. These will allow the characterization of the bronchodilator effect in terms of static and dynamic volumes, heterogeneity of ventilation distribution and volume of closure, expiration flux-limitation.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Department of Clinical and Surgical Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan

    collaborator UNKNOWN
  • University of Milan

    lead OTHER

Eligibility

Min Age
40 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2026-12-01
Primary Completion
2027-12-01
Completion
2027-12-30

Countries

  • Italy

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05381415 on ClinicalTrials.gov