Trial Outcomes & Findings for An Open-label Study of Ozanimod in Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis in Clinical Practice (NCT NCT05369832)

NCT ID: NCT05369832

Last Updated: 2026-02-10

Results Overview

Clinical response is defined as meeting all of the following improvements from baseline in the Modified Mayo Score: * Decrease from baseline ≥ 2 points, * Decrease from baseline ≥ 35%, * Decrease from baseline in the Rectal Bleeding (RB) subscore ≥ 1 point or absolute RB subscore ≤ 1 The Modified Mayo Score is a tool that helps doctors measure how active ulcerative colitis is. It combines three components: * Stool Frequency (SF): scored 0-3 (higher score = more frequent stools), * Rectal Bleeding (RB): scored 0-3 (higher score = more bleeding), * Endoscopic Subscore (ES): scored 0-3 (higher score = more severe inflammation seen during endoscopy). The total score ranges from 0 to 9, with higher scores meaning more severe disease activity and lower scores meaning less disease activity and better clinical condition.

Recruitment status

TERMINATED

Study phase

PHASE4

Target enrollment

139 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

At week 12

Results posted on

2026-02-10

Participant Flow

Total 139 participants were enrolled and treated.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Cohort 1: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Naïve
Advanced therapy naïve participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Cohort 2: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Exposed
Advanced therapy exposed participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Overall Study
STARTED
99
40
Overall Study
COMPLETED
0
0
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
99
40

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Cohort 1: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Naïve
Advanced therapy naïve participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Cohort 2: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Exposed
Advanced therapy exposed participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Overall Study
Physician Decision
17
6
Overall Study
Adverse Event
6
3
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
1
0
Overall Study
Study terminated by sponsor
57
24
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
15
6
Overall Study
Site is closing, site decided to early terminate participant
1
0
Overall Study
Missing
2
1

Baseline Characteristics

An Open-label Study of Ozanimod in Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis in Clinical Practice

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Cohort 1: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Naïve
n=99 Participants
Advanced therapy naïve participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Cohort 2: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Exposed
n=40 Participants
Advanced therapy exposed participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Total
n=139 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
41.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.70 • n=41 Participants
41.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.51 • n=1581 Participants
41.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.32 • n=4626 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
47 Participants
n=41 Participants
18 Participants
n=1581 Participants
65 Participants
n=4626 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
52 Participants
n=41 Participants
22 Participants
n=1581 Participants
74 Participants
n=4626 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
16 Participants
n=41 Participants
7 Participants
n=1581 Participants
23 Participants
n=4626 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
75 Participants
n=41 Participants
29 Participants
n=1581 Participants
104 Participants
n=4626 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
8 Participants
n=41 Participants
4 Participants
n=1581 Participants
12 Participants
n=4626 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=41 Participants
0 Participants
n=1581 Participants
0 Participants
n=4626 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
7 Participants
n=41 Participants
1 Participants
n=1581 Participants
8 Participants
n=4626 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=41 Participants
1 Participants
n=1581 Participants
1 Participants
n=4626 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
10 Participants
n=41 Participants
3 Participants
n=1581 Participants
13 Participants
n=4626 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
75 Participants
n=41 Participants
34 Participants
n=1581 Participants
109 Participants
n=4626 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
1 Participants
n=41 Participants
1 Participants
n=1581 Participants
2 Participants
n=4626 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown or Not Reported
6 Participants
n=41 Participants
0 Participants
n=1581 Participants
6 Participants
n=4626 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: Treated participants with observed cases and non responder imputation. Pre-specified to be reported for Cohort 1 only.

Clinical response is defined as meeting all of the following improvements from baseline in the Modified Mayo Score: * Decrease from baseline ≥ 2 points, * Decrease from baseline ≥ 35%, * Decrease from baseline in the Rectal Bleeding (RB) subscore ≥ 1 point or absolute RB subscore ≤ 1 The Modified Mayo Score is a tool that helps doctors measure how active ulcerative colitis is. It combines three components: * Stool Frequency (SF): scored 0-3 (higher score = more frequent stools), * Rectal Bleeding (RB): scored 0-3 (higher score = more bleeding), * Endoscopic Subscore (ES): scored 0-3 (higher score = more severe inflammation seen during endoscopy). The total score ranges from 0 to 9, with higher scores meaning more severe disease activity and lower scores meaning less disease activity and better clinical condition.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Naïve
n=99 Participants
Advanced therapy naïve participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Cohort 2: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Exposed
Advanced therapy exposed participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Percent of Participants Achieving Clinical Response Measured by Modified Mayo Score for Cohort 1 at Week 12
Observed Cases
65.8 Percent of Participants
Interval 54.0 to 76.3
Percent of Participants Achieving Clinical Response Measured by Modified Mayo Score for Cohort 1 at Week 12
Non Responder Imputation
50.5 Percent of Participants
Interval 40.3 to 60.7

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 26

Population: Treated participants with observed cases. Pre-specified to be reported for Cohort 2 only.

Clinical response is defined as meeting all of the following improvements from baseline in the Modified Mayo Score: * Decrease from baseline ≥ 2 points, * Decrease from baseline ≥ 35%, * Decrease from baseline in the Rectal Bleeding (RB) subscore ≥ 1 point or absolute RB subscore ≤ 1 The Modified Mayo Score is a tool that helps doctors measure how active ulcerative colitis is. It combines three components: * Stool Frequency (SF): scored 0-3 (higher score = more frequent stools), * Rectal Bleeding (RB): scored 0-3 (higher score = more bleeding), * Endoscopic Subscore (ES): scored 0-3 (higher score = more severe inflammation seen during endoscopy). The total score ranges from 0 to 9, with higher scores meaning more severe disease activity and lower scores meaning less disease activity and better clinical condition.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Naïve
n=25 Participants
Advanced therapy naïve participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Cohort 2: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Exposed
Advanced therapy exposed participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Percent of Participants Achieving Clinical Response Measured by Modified Mayo Score for Cohort 2 at Week 26
88.0 Percent of Participants
Interval 68.8 to 97.5

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From first dose of study medication through post-medication follow-up visit (Up to approximately 812 days)

Population: Treated participants

An Adverse Event (AE) is any new medical problem or worsening of a preexisting condition in a study participant who receives the study treatment. It does not have to be caused by the treatment. An AE can be any unfavorable and unintended sign (such as an abnormal lab finding), symptom, or disease that happens around the time the study treatment is used, whether or not it is related to the treatment. A Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) is an AE that meets any of the following: * Starts after the first dose of the study treatment (or within 84 days after stopping it) and was not present before; or * Was already present before treatment but gets worse after the first dose (or within 84 days after stopping it); or * Has missing onset and end dates, making it unclear whether it occurred outside the treatment-emergent period. Participants meeting any of these conditions are counted as having at least one TEAE.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Naïve
n=99 Participants
Advanced therapy naïve participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Cohort 2: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Exposed
n=40 Participants
Advanced therapy exposed participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
61 Participants
22 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From first dose of study medication through post-medication follow-up visit (Up to approximately 812 days)

Population: Treated participants

Serious Adverse Event (SAE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, requires in-patient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, or results in persistent/significant disability/incapacity. Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Event (TE SAE) is a SAE that meets any of the following: * Starts after the first dose of the study treatment (or within 84 days after stopping it) and was not present before; or * Was already present before treatment but gets worse after the first dose (or within 84 days after stopping it); or * Has missing onset and end dates, making it unclear whether it occurred outside the treatment-emergent period. Participants meeting any of these conditions are counted as having at least one TESAE.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Naïve
n=99 Participants
Advanced therapy naïve participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Cohort 2: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Exposed
n=40 Participants
Advanced therapy exposed participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)
7 Participants
4 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From first dose of study medication through post-medication follow-up visit (Up to approximately 812 days)

Population: Treated participants

This endpoint reports the number of participants who experienced Adverse Events of Interest (AEIs) during the study. AEIs include bradycardia, heart conduction abnormalities (second-degree and higher atrioventricular block), macular edema, malignancy, serious or opportunistic infection, pulmonary effects, hepatic effects, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), and events associated with orthostatic hypotension (e.g., dizziness, lightheadedness, syncope, seizure). The Sponsor may request additional information for nonserious AEIs. A Treatment Emergent AEI is an AEI that starts after the first dose (or within 84 days after stopping), worsens relative to baseline in this period (or within 84 days after stopping), or has missing dates making the timing unclear. Participants meeting any of these conditions are counted as having at least one AEI.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Naïve
n=99 Participants
Advanced therapy naïve participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Cohort 2: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Exposed
n=40 Participants
Advanced therapy exposed participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event of Interest
7 Participants
4 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From first dose of study medication through post-medication follow-up visit (Up to approximately 812 days)

Population: Treated participants

This endpoint measures the number of participants who experienced Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) that resulted in discontinuation of study treatment. An Adverse Event (AE) is any new medical problem or worsening of a preexisting condition in a study participant who receives the study treatment. It does not have to be caused by the treatment. An AE can be any unfavorable and unintended sign (such as an abnormal lab finding), symptom, or disease that happens around the time the study treatment is used, whether or not it is related to the treatment. A TEAE is an AE that: starts after the first dose (or within 84 days after stopping) and was not present before; or was preexisting but worsens after the first dose (or within 84 days after stopping); or has missing dates that prevent determining whether it occurred outside the treatment emergent period.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Naïve
n=99 Participants
Advanced therapy naïve participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Cohort 2: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Exposed
n=40 Participants
Advanced therapy exposed participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation
5 Participants
3 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From first dose of study medication through end of study (Up to approximately 728 days)

Population: Treated participants

Number of participants experiencing clinically significant abnormalities in laboratory testing including hematology, chemistry and urinalysis.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Naïve
n=99 Participants
Advanced therapy naïve participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Cohort 2: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Exposed
n=40 Participants
Advanced therapy exposed participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Laboratory Assessments
0 Participants
0 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 52 and week 104

Population: Treated participants with observed cases

Clinical remission is defined as a Partial Mayo Score of ≤ 2.5. The Partial Mayo Score is a tool that helps doctors measure how active ulcerative colitis is without using endoscopy. It combines three components: * Stool Frequency (SF) subscore: range 0-3 (higher score = more frequent stools) * Rectal Bleeding (RB) subscore: range 0-3 (higher score = more bleeding) * Physician's Global Assessment (PGA): range 0-3 (higher score = worse overall condition based on physician's judgment) The total score ranges from 0 to 9, with lower scores meaning fewer symptoms and better disease control, and higher scores meaning more severe disease activity. A score of 2.5 or below suggests the disease is in remission.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Naïve
n=15 Participants
Advanced therapy naïve participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Cohort 2: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Exposed
n=9 Participants
Advanced therapy exposed participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Percent of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission by Partial Mayo Score at Week 52 and 104
Week 52 - Observed Cases
80.0 Percent of Participants
Interval 51.9 to 95.7
88.9 Percent of Participants
Interval 51.8 to 99.7
Percent of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission by Partial Mayo Score at Week 52 and 104
Week 104 - Observed Cases
100.0 Percent of Participants
Interval 2.5 to 100.0
50.0 Percent of Participants
Interval 1.3 to 98.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 52 and week 104

Population: Treated participants with observed cases

Corticosteroid-free Clinical Remission (Partial Mayo Score) is defined as: * Meeting the criteria for clinical remission by Partial Mayo Score \<=2.5, and * No use of oral systemic corticosteroids in the prior 90 days. The Partial Mayo Score is a tool that helps doctors measure ulcerative colitis activity without endoscopy. It combines three components: * Stool Frequency (SF) subscore: range 0-3 (higher score = more frequent stools) * Rectal Bleeding (RB) subscore: range 0-3 (higher score = more bleeding) * Physician's Global Assessment (PGA): range 0-3 (higher score = worse overall condition based on physician's judgment) The total score ranges from 0 to 9, with lower scores meaning fewer symptoms and better disease control, and higher scores meaning more severe disease activity

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Naïve
n=15 Participants
Advanced therapy naïve participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Cohort 2: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Exposed
n=9 Participants
Advanced therapy exposed participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Percent of Participants Achieving Corticosteroid-free Clinical Remission by Partial Mayo Score at Week 52 and 104
Week 52 - Observed Cases
80.0 Percent of Participants
Interval 51.9 to 95.7
77.8 Percent of Participants
Interval 40.0 to 97.2
Percent of Participants Achieving Corticosteroid-free Clinical Remission by Partial Mayo Score at Week 52 and 104
Week 104 - Observed Cases
100.0 Percent of Participants
Interval 2.5 to 100.0
50.0 Percent of Participants
Interval 1.3 to 98.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 52 and week 104

Population: Treated participants with observed cases

Clinical Response by Partial Mayo Score is defined as: * Decrease in partial Mayo score ⩾ 2 points and ⩾ 30% from baseline, and * Decrease in rectal bleeding subscore \> 1 point or absolute rectal bleeding score \< 1 This represents a marked improvement in disease activity. The Partial Mayo Score is a tool that helps doctors measure ulcerative colitis activity without endoscopy. It combines three components: * Stool Frequency (SF) subscore: range 0-3 (higher score = more frequent stools) * Rectal Bleeding (RB) subscore: range 0-3 (higher score = more bleeding) * Physician's Global Assessment (PGA): range 0-3 (higher score = worse overall condition based on physician's judgment) The total score ranges from 0 to 9, with lower scores meaning fewer symptoms and better disease control, and higher scores meaning more severe disease activity.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Naïve
n=15 Participants
Advanced therapy naïve participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Cohort 2: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Exposed
n=9 Participants
Advanced therapy exposed participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Percent of Participants Achieving Clinical Response by Partial Mayo Score at Week 52 and 104
Week 52 - Observed Cases
93.33 Percent of Participants
Interval 68.1 to 99.8
100.0 Percent of Participants
Interval 66.4 to 100.0
Percent of Participants Achieving Clinical Response by Partial Mayo Score at Week 52 and 104
Week 104 - Observed Cases
100.0 Percent of Participants
Interval 2.5 to 100.0
100.0 Percent of Participants
Interval 15.8 to 100.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: Treated participants with observed cases and non responder imputation. Pre-specified to be reported for Cohort 1 only.

Clinical remission by Modified Mayo Score is defined as meeting all of the following criteria: * Stool Frequency (SF) subscore ≤ 1, with at least a 1-point decrease from baseline * Rectal Bleeding (RB) subscore = 0 * Endoscopic Subscore (ES) ≤ 1 The Modified Mayo Score is the sum of the following components (Range: 0-9): * SF subscore: range 0-3 (higher score = more frequent stools) * RB subscore: range 0-3 (higher score = more bleeding) * ES: range 0-3 (higher score = more severe inflammation seen during endoscopy) The total score ranges from 0 to 9, with lower scores meaning less disease activity and better clinical condition, and higher scores meaning more severe disease activity.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Naïve
n=99 Participants
Advanced therapy naïve participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Cohort 2: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Exposed
Advanced therapy exposed participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Percent of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Measured by Modified Mayo Score for Cohort 1 at Week 12
Observed Cases
27.6 Percent of Participants
Interval 18.0 to 39.1
Percent of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Measured by Modified Mayo Score for Cohort 1 at Week 12
Non Responder Imputation
21.2 Percent of Participants
Interval 13.6 to 30.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: Treated participants with observed cases and non responder imputation. Pre-specified to be reported for Cohort 1 only.

Endoscopic Response is defined as: • A decrease from baseline of ≥ 1 point in the Mayo Endoscopic Score (ES). Mayo Endoscopic Score: range 0-3 * Higher ES scores = more severe inflammation and worse mucosal appearance * Lower ES scores = less inflammation and better mucosal healing

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Naïve
n=99 Participants
Advanced therapy naïve participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Cohort 2: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Exposed
Advanced therapy exposed participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Percent of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Response for Cohort 1 at Week 12
Observed Cases
51.2 Percent of Participants
Interval 40.0 to 62.3
Percent of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Response for Cohort 1 at Week 12
Non Responder Imputation
43.4 Percent of Participants
Interval 33.5 to 53.8

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: Treated participants with observed cases and non responder imputation. Pre-specified to be reported for Cohort 1 only.

Endoscopic Improvement is defined as: • Mayo Endoscopic Score (ES) ≤ 1 Mayo Endoscopic Score (ES): range 0-3 * Higher ES scores = more severe inflammation and worse mucosal appearance * Lower ES scores = less inflammation and better mucosal healing

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Naïve
n=99 Participants
Advanced therapy naïve participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Cohort 2: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Exposed
Advanced therapy exposed participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Percent of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Improvement for Cohort 1 at Week 12
Observed Cases
42.9 Percent of Participants
Interval 32.1 to 54.1
Percent of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Improvement for Cohort 1 at Week 12
Non Responder Imputation
36.4 Percent of Participants
Interval 26.9 to 46.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: Treated participants with observed cases and non responder imputation. Pre-specified to be reported for Cohort 1 only.

Histological Improvement is defined as: • Achieving a Geboes score \< 3.1 The Geboes score is a grading system used to assess inflammation in tissue samples under a microscope. * Each domain is graded on a scale, and the total score ranges from 0 to 5.4, with higher scores indicating more severe histologic disease activity. * Higher Geboes scores = more severe microscopic inflammation * Lower Geboes scores = less inflammation and better healing

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Naïve
n=99 Participants
Advanced therapy naïve participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Cohort 2: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Exposed
Advanced therapy exposed participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Percent of Participants Achieving Histological Improvement for Cohort 1 at Week 12
Observed Cases
45.1 Percent of Participants
Interval 34.1 to 56.5
Percent of Participants Achieving Histological Improvement for Cohort 1 at Week 12
Non Responder Imputation
37.4 Percent of Participants
Interval 27.9 to 47.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At baseline and week 12

Population: Treated participants. Pre-specified to be reported for Cohort 1 only.

IBDQ is a tool to assess patient experience in inflammatory bowel diseases (Ulcerative Colitis \[UC\] and Crohn's Disease \[CD\]). It includes 32 questions across 4 dimensions: * Bowel symptoms (10 items) * Systemic symptoms (5 items) * Emotional function (12 items) * Social function (5 items) Scoring: Each question ranges from 1 ("worst") to 7 ("best"). Total score: 32-224, with higher scores indicating better quality of life (QOL). An increase from baseline reflects improved health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The IBDQ is used in registrational studies to evaluate bowel symptoms, functional abdominal symptoms, and overall HRQOL.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Naïve
n=85 Participants
Advanced therapy naïve participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Cohort 2: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Exposed
Advanced therapy exposed participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Change in the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score From Baseline to Week 12 for Cohort 1
51.2 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 42.86

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At baseline and week 12

Population: Treated participants with observed cases and non responder imputation. Pre-specified to be reported for Cohort 1 only.

IBDQ is a tool to assess patient experience in inflammatory bowel diseases (Ulcerative Colitis \[UC\] and Crohn's Disease \[CD\]). It includes 32 questions across 4 dimensions: * Bowel symptoms: 10 items * Systemic symptoms: 5 items * Emotional function: 12 items * Social function: 5 items Scoring: * Each question ranges from 1 ("worst") to 7 ("best"). * Total score: 32-224, with higher scores indicating better quality of life (QOL). A change from baseline in total score of ≥16 points reflect meaningful IBDQ response. The IBDQ is used in registrational studies to evaluate bowel symptoms, functional abdominal symptoms, and overall health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Naïve
n=99 Participants
Advanced therapy naïve participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Cohort 2: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Exposed
Advanced therapy exposed participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Percent of Participants Achieving Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Response [Change in Total Score (≥16 Points) From Baseline to Week 12] for Cohort 1
Observed Cases
81.2 Percent of Participants
Interval 71.2 to 88.8
Percent of Participants Achieving Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Response [Change in Total Score (≥16 Points) From Baseline to Week 12] for Cohort 1
Non Responder Imputation
69.7 Percent of Participants
Interval 59.6 to 78.5

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: Treated participants with observed cases and non responder imputation. Pre-specified to be reported for Cohort 1 only.

IBDQ is a tool to assess patient experience in inflammatory bowel diseases (Ulcerative Colitis \[UC\] and Crohn's Disease \[CD\]). It includes 32 questions across 4 dimensions: * Bowel symptoms: 10 items * Systemic symptoms: 5 items * Emotional function: 12 items * Social function: 5 items Scoring: * Each question ranges from 1 ("worst") to 7 ("best"). * Total score: 32-224, with higher scores indicating better quality of life (QOL). A total score of ≥170 points reflects IBDQ remission, meaning the participant reports very few symptoms and good overall quality of life. The IBDQ is used in registrational studies to evaluate bowel symptoms, functional abdominal symptoms, and overall health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Naïve
n=99 Participants
Advanced therapy naïve participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Cohort 2: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Exposed
Advanced therapy exposed participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Percent of Participants Achieving Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Remission [Total Score (≥170 Points)] for Cohort 1 at Week 12
Observed Cases
66.3 Percent of Participants
Interval 55.5 to 76.0
Percent of Participants Achieving Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Remission [Total Score (≥170 Points)] for Cohort 1 at Week 12
Non Responder Imputation
59.6 Percent of Participants
Interval 49.3 to 69.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 26

Population: Treated participants with observed cases. Pre-specified to be reported for Cohort 2 only.

Clinical remission by Modified Mayo Score is defined as meeting all of the following criteria: * Stool Frequency (SF) subscore ≤ 1, with at least a 1-point decrease from baseline * Rectal Bleeding (RB) subscore = 0 * Endoscopic Subscore (ES) ≤ 1 The Modified Mayo Score is the sum of the following components (Range: 0-9): * SF subscore: range 0-3 (higher score = more frequent stools) * RB subscore: range 0-3 (higher score = more bleeding) * ES: range 0-3 (higher score = more severe inflammation seen during endoscopy) The total score ranges from 0 to 9, with lower scores meaning less disease activity and better clinical condition, and higher scores meaning more severe disease activity.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Naïve
n=25 Participants
Advanced therapy naïve participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Cohort 2: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Exposed
Advanced therapy exposed participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Percent of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Measured by Modified Mayo Score for Cohort 2 at Week 26
68.0 Percent of Participants
Interval 46.5 to 85.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 26

Population: Treated participants with observed cases. Pre-specified to be reported for Cohort 2 only.

Endoscopic Response is defined as: • A decrease from baseline of ≥ 1 point in the Mayo Endoscopic Sub score (ES). This represents the percentage of treated participants who achieved a decrease from baseline of at least 1 point in the Mayo ES, indicating improvement in mucosal appearance during endoscopy. Mayo Endoscopic Subscore (ES): range 0-3 * Higher ES scores = more severe inflammation and worse mucosal appearance * Lower ES scores = less inflammation and better mucosal healing

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Naïve
n=30 Participants
Advanced therapy naïve participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Cohort 2: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Exposed
Advanced therapy exposed participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Percent of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Response for Cohort 2 at Week 26
76.7 Percent of Participants
Interval 57.7 to 90.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 26

Population: Treated participants with observed cases. Pre-specified to be reported for Cohort 2 only.

Endoscopic Improvement is defined as: • Mayo Endoscopic Subscore (ES) ≤ 1 This represents the percentage of treated participants with Mayo ES ≤ 1, indicating mild or no inflammation. Mayo Endoscopic Subscore (ES): range 0-3 * Higher ES scores = more severe inflammation and worse mucosal appearance * Lower ES scores = less inflammation and better mucosal healing

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Naïve
n=30 Participants
Advanced therapy naïve participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Cohort 2: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Exposed
Advanced therapy exposed participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Percent of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Improvement for Cohort 2 at Week 26
63.3 Percent of Participants
Interval 43.9 to 80.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 26

Population: Treated participants with observed cases. Pre-specified to be reported for Cohort 2 only.

Endoscopic Remission is defined as: • Mayo Endoscopic Sub score (ES) = 0 This represents the percentage of treated participants with Mayo ES = 0, indicating complete mucosal healing. Mayo Endoscopic Sub score (ES): range 0-3 * Higher ES scores = more severe inflammation and worse mucosal appearance * Lower ES scores = less inflammation and better mucosal healing

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Naïve
n=30 Participants
Advanced therapy naïve participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Cohort 2: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Exposed
Advanced therapy exposed participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Percent of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Remission for Cohort 2 at Week 26
33.3 Percent of Participants
Interval 17.3 to 52.8

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 26

Population: Treated participants with observed cases. Pre-specified to be reported for Cohort 2 only.

Histological Improvement is defined as: • Achieving a Geboes score \< 3.1 The Geboes score is a grading system used to assess inflammation in tissue samples under a microscope. * Each domain is graded on a scale, and the total score ranges from 0 to 5.4, with higher scores indicating more severe histologic disease activity. * Higher Geboes scores = more severe microscopic inflammation * Lower Geboes scores = less inflammation and better healing

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Naïve
n=30 Participants
Advanced therapy naïve participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Cohort 2: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Exposed
Advanced therapy exposed participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Percent of Participants Achieving Histological Improvement for Cohort 2 at Week 26
63.3 Percent of Participants
Interval 43.9 to 80.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 26

Population: Treated participants with observed cases. Pre-specified to be reported for Cohort 2 only.

Histological Remission is defined as: • Achieving a Geboes score \< 2 The Geboes score is a grading system used to assess inflammation in tissue samples under a microscope. * Each domain is graded on a scale, and the total score ranges from 0 to 5.4, with higher scores indicating more severe histologic disease activity. * Higher Geboes scores = more severe microscopic inflammation * Lower Geboes scores = minimal or no inflammation and better healing

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Naïve
n=30 Participants
Advanced therapy naïve participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Cohort 2: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Exposed
Advanced therapy exposed participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Percent of Participants Achieving Histological Remission for Cohort 2 at Week 26
53.3 Percent of Participants
Interval 34.3 to 71.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At baseline and week 26

Population: Treated participants. Pre-specified to be reported for Cohort 2 only.

IBDQ is a tool to assess patient experience in inflammatory bowel diseases (Ulcerative Colitis \[UC\] and Crohn's Disease \[CD\]). It includes 32 questions across 4 dimensions: * Bowel symptoms (10 items) * Systemic symptoms (5 items) * Emotional function (12 items) * Social function (5 items) Scoring: Each question ranges from 1 ("worst") to 7 ("best"). Total score: 32-224, with higher scores indicating better quality of life (QOL). An increase from baseline reflects improved health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The IBDQ is used in registrational studies to evaluate bowel symptoms, functional abdominal symptoms, and overall HRQOL.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Naïve
n=32 Participants
Advanced therapy naïve participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Cohort 2: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Exposed
Advanced therapy exposed participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Change in the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score From Baseline to Week 26 for Cohort 2
63.3 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 42.81

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At baseline and week 26

Population: Treated participants with observed cases. Pre-specified to be reported for Cohort 2 only.

IBDQ is a tool to assess patient experience in inflammatory bowel diseases (Ulcerative Colitis \[UC\] and Crohn's Disease \[CD\]). It includes 32 questions across 4 dimensions: * Bowel symptoms: 10 items * Systemic symptoms: 5 items * Emotional function: 12 items * Social function: 5 items Scoring: * Each question ranges from 1 ("worst") to 7 ("best"). * Total score: 32-224, with higher scores indicating better quality of life (QOL). A change from baseline in total score of ≥16 points reflect meaningful IBDQ response. The IBDQ is used in registrational studies to evaluate bowel symptoms, functional abdominal symptoms, and overall health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Naïve
n=32 Participants
Advanced therapy naïve participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Cohort 2: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Exposed
Advanced therapy exposed participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Percent of Participants Achieving Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Response [Change in Total Score (≥16 Points) From Baseline to Week 26] for Cohort 2
84.4 Percent of Participants
Interval 67.2 to 94.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 26

Population: Treated participants with observed cases. Pre-specified to be reported for Cohort 2 only.

IBDQ is a tool to assess patient experience in inflammatory bowel diseases (Ulcerative Colitis \[UC\] and Crohn's Disease \[CD\]). It includes 32 questions across 4 dimensions: * Bowel symptoms: 10 items * Systemic symptoms: 5 items * Emotional function: 12 items * Social function: 5 items Scoring: * Each question ranges from 1 ("worst") to 7 ("best"). * Total score: 32-224, with higher scores indicating better quality of life (QOL). A total score of ≥170 points reflect IBDQ remission, meaning the participant reports very few symptoms and good overall quality of life. The IBDQ is used in registrational studies to evaluate bowel symptoms, functional abdominal symptoms, and overall health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Naïve
n=33 Participants
Advanced therapy naïve participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Cohort 2: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Exposed
Advanced therapy exposed participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Percent of Participants Achieving Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Remission [Total Score (≥170 Points)] for Cohort 2 at Week 26
63.6 Percent of Participants
Interval 45.1 to 79.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 26

Population: Treated participants with observed cases. Pre-specified to be reported for Cohort 2 only.

Corticosteroid-free Clinical Remission (modified mayo score) is defined as: * Meeting the criteria for clinical remission by Modified Mayo Score \[Stool Frequency (SF) subscore ≤ 1, with ≥ 1 point decrease from baseline and; Rectal Bleeding (RB) subscore = 0 and; Endoscopic Subscore (ES) ≤ 1\], and * No oral systemic steroid use in the prior 90 days. The Modified Mayo Score is the sum of the following components (Range: 0-9): * Stool Frequency (SF) subscore: range 0-3 (higher score = more frequent stools) * Rectal Bleeding (RB) subscore: range 0-3 (higher score = more bleeding) * Endoscopic Subscore (ES): range 0-3 (higher score = more severe inflammation seen during endoscopy) The total score ranges from 0 to 9, with: * Lower scores = less disease activity and better clinical condition * Higher scores = more severe disease activity

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Naïve
n=25 Participants
Advanced therapy naïve participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Cohort 2: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Exposed
Advanced therapy exposed participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Percent of Participants Achieving Corticosteroid-free Clinical Remission by Modified Mayo Score for Cohort 2 at Week 26
68.0 Percent of Participants
Interval 46.5 to 85.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 26

Population: Treated participants with observed cases. Pre-specified to be reported for Cohort 2 only.

Histo-endoscopic Mucosal Improvement (HEMI) is defined as: * Mayo Endoscopic Subscore (ES) ≤ 1, and * Geboes score \< 3.1 Mayo Endoscopic Subscore (ES): range 0-3 * Higher ES scores = more severe visible inflammation and worse mucosal appearance * Lower ES scores = less visible inflammation and better mucosal healing Geboes Score: * Each domain is graded on a scale, and the total score ranges from 0 to 5.4, with higher scores indicating more severe histologic disease activity * Higher Geboes scores = more severe microscopic inflammation * Lower Geboes scores = less microscopic inflammation and better tissue healing Meeting both criteria (ES ≤ 1 and Geboes \< 3.1) shows improvement in both endoscopic appearance and microscopic tissue health.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Naïve
n=30 Participants
Advanced therapy naïve participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Cohort 2: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Exposed
Advanced therapy exposed participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Percent of Participants Achieving Histo-endoscopic Mucosal Improvement (HEMI) for Cohort 2 at Week 26
60.0 Percent of Participants
Interval 40.6 to 77.3

Adverse Events

Cohort 1: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Naive

Serious events: 7 serious events
Other events: 28 other events
Deaths: 1 deaths

Cohort 2: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Exposed

Serious events: 4 serious events
Other events: 9 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Cohort 1: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Naive
n=99 participants at risk
Advanced therapy naïve participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Cohort 2: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Exposed
n=40 participants at risk
Advanced therapy exposed participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
1.0%
1/99 • Participants were assessed for all-cause mortality from first dose to study completion (up to approximately 847 days). SAEs and Other AEs were assessed from first dose of study medication through post-medication follow-up visit (Up to approximately 812 days).
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events represents all participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/40 • Participants were assessed for all-cause mortality from first dose to study completion (up to approximately 847 days). SAEs and Other AEs were assessed from first dose of study medication through post-medication follow-up visit (Up to approximately 812 days).
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events represents all participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis ulcerative
2.0%
2/99 • Participants were assessed for all-cause mortality from first dose to study completion (up to approximately 847 days). SAEs and Other AEs were assessed from first dose of study medication through post-medication follow-up visit (Up to approximately 812 days).
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events represents all participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication.
2.5%
1/40 • Participants were assessed for all-cause mortality from first dose to study completion (up to approximately 847 days). SAEs and Other AEs were assessed from first dose of study medication through post-medication follow-up visit (Up to approximately 812 days).
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events represents all participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis
1.0%
1/99 • Participants were assessed for all-cause mortality from first dose to study completion (up to approximately 847 days). SAEs and Other AEs were assessed from first dose of study medication through post-medication follow-up visit (Up to approximately 812 days).
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events represents all participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/40 • Participants were assessed for all-cause mortality from first dose to study completion (up to approximately 847 days). SAEs and Other AEs were assessed from first dose of study medication through post-medication follow-up visit (Up to approximately 812 days).
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events represents all participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Infections and infestations
Appendicitis
2.0%
2/99 • Participants were assessed for all-cause mortality from first dose to study completion (up to approximately 847 days). SAEs and Other AEs were assessed from first dose of study medication through post-medication follow-up visit (Up to approximately 812 days).
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events represents all participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/40 • Participants were assessed for all-cause mortality from first dose to study completion (up to approximately 847 days). SAEs and Other AEs were assessed from first dose of study medication through post-medication follow-up visit (Up to approximately 812 days).
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events represents all participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Comminuted fracture
1.0%
1/99 • Participants were assessed for all-cause mortality from first dose to study completion (up to approximately 847 days). SAEs and Other AEs were assessed from first dose of study medication through post-medication follow-up visit (Up to approximately 812 days).
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events represents all participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/40 • Participants were assessed for all-cause mortality from first dose to study completion (up to approximately 847 days). SAEs and Other AEs were assessed from first dose of study medication through post-medication follow-up visit (Up to approximately 812 days).
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events represents all participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Joint dislocation
1.0%
1/99 • Participants were assessed for all-cause mortality from first dose to study completion (up to approximately 847 days). SAEs and Other AEs were assessed from first dose of study medication through post-medication follow-up visit (Up to approximately 812 days).
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events represents all participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/40 • Participants were assessed for all-cause mortality from first dose to study completion (up to approximately 847 days). SAEs and Other AEs were assessed from first dose of study medication through post-medication follow-up visit (Up to approximately 812 days).
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events represents all participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Overdose
1.0%
1/99 • Participants were assessed for all-cause mortality from first dose to study completion (up to approximately 847 days). SAEs and Other AEs were assessed from first dose of study medication through post-medication follow-up visit (Up to approximately 812 days).
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events represents all participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/40 • Participants were assessed for all-cause mortality from first dose to study completion (up to approximately 847 days). SAEs and Other AEs were assessed from first dose of study medication through post-medication follow-up visit (Up to approximately 812 days).
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events represents all participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Road traffic accident
1.0%
1/99 • Participants were assessed for all-cause mortality from first dose to study completion (up to approximately 847 days). SAEs and Other AEs were assessed from first dose of study medication through post-medication follow-up visit (Up to approximately 812 days).
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events represents all participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/40 • Participants were assessed for all-cause mortality from first dose to study completion (up to approximately 847 days). SAEs and Other AEs were assessed from first dose of study medication through post-medication follow-up visit (Up to approximately 812 days).
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events represents all participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Nervous system disorders
Transient ischaemic attack
0.00%
0/99 • Participants were assessed for all-cause mortality from first dose to study completion (up to approximately 847 days). SAEs and Other AEs were assessed from first dose of study medication through post-medication follow-up visit (Up to approximately 812 days).
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events represents all participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication.
2.5%
1/40 • Participants were assessed for all-cause mortality from first dose to study completion (up to approximately 847 days). SAEs and Other AEs were assessed from first dose of study medication through post-medication follow-up visit (Up to approximately 812 days).
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events represents all participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
0.00%
0/99 • Participants were assessed for all-cause mortality from first dose to study completion (up to approximately 847 days). SAEs and Other AEs were assessed from first dose of study medication through post-medication follow-up visit (Up to approximately 812 days).
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events represents all participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication.
2.5%
1/40 • Participants were assessed for all-cause mortality from first dose to study completion (up to approximately 847 days). SAEs and Other AEs were assessed from first dose of study medication through post-medication follow-up visit (Up to approximately 812 days).
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events represents all participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Vascular disorders
Hypovolaemic shock
0.00%
0/99 • Participants were assessed for all-cause mortality from first dose to study completion (up to approximately 847 days). SAEs and Other AEs were assessed from first dose of study medication through post-medication follow-up visit (Up to approximately 812 days).
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events represents all participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication.
2.5%
1/40 • Participants were assessed for all-cause mortality from first dose to study completion (up to approximately 847 days). SAEs and Other AEs were assessed from first dose of study medication through post-medication follow-up visit (Up to approximately 812 days).
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events represents all participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Cohort 1: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Naive
n=99 participants at risk
Advanced therapy naïve participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Cohort 2: Ozanimod Advanced Therapy Exposed
n=40 participants at risk
Advanced therapy exposed participants received ozanimod 0.92 mg daily
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
5.1%
5/99 • Participants were assessed for all-cause mortality from first dose to study completion (up to approximately 847 days). SAEs and Other AEs were assessed from first dose of study medication through post-medication follow-up visit (Up to approximately 812 days).
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events represents all participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication.
2.5%
1/40 • Participants were assessed for all-cause mortality from first dose to study completion (up to approximately 847 days). SAEs and Other AEs were assessed from first dose of study medication through post-medication follow-up visit (Up to approximately 812 days).
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events represents all participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
0.00%
0/99 • Participants were assessed for all-cause mortality from first dose to study completion (up to approximately 847 days). SAEs and Other AEs were assessed from first dose of study medication through post-medication follow-up visit (Up to approximately 812 days).
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events represents all participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication.
10.0%
4/40 • Participants were assessed for all-cause mortality from first dose to study completion (up to approximately 847 days). SAEs and Other AEs were assessed from first dose of study medication through post-medication follow-up visit (Up to approximately 812 days).
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events represents all participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
7.1%
7/99 • Participants were assessed for all-cause mortality from first dose to study completion (up to approximately 847 days). SAEs and Other AEs were assessed from first dose of study medication through post-medication follow-up visit (Up to approximately 812 days).
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events represents all participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication.
2.5%
1/40 • Participants were assessed for all-cause mortality from first dose to study completion (up to approximately 847 days). SAEs and Other AEs were assessed from first dose of study medication through post-medication follow-up visit (Up to approximately 812 days).
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events represents all participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Nervous system disorders
Headache
5.1%
5/99 • Participants were assessed for all-cause mortality from first dose to study completion (up to approximately 847 days). SAEs and Other AEs were assessed from first dose of study medication through post-medication follow-up visit (Up to approximately 812 days).
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events represents all participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/40 • Participants were assessed for all-cause mortality from first dose to study completion (up to approximately 847 days). SAEs and Other AEs were assessed from first dose of study medication through post-medication follow-up visit (Up to approximately 812 days).
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events represents all participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis ulcerative
13.1%
13/99 • Participants were assessed for all-cause mortality from first dose to study completion (up to approximately 847 days). SAEs and Other AEs were assessed from first dose of study medication through post-medication follow-up visit (Up to approximately 812 days).
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events represents all participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication.
10.0%
4/40 • Participants were assessed for all-cause mortality from first dose to study completion (up to approximately 847 days). SAEs and Other AEs were assessed from first dose of study medication through post-medication follow-up visit (Up to approximately 812 days).
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events represents all participants that received at least 1 dose of study medication.

Additional Information

Bristol-Myers Squibb Study Director

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Phone: Please email

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. agreements with investigators vary; constant is our right to embargo communications regarding trial results prior to public release for a period ≤60 days from submittal for review. We will not prohibit investigators from publishing, but will prohibit the disclosure of previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results, and request postponement of single-center publications until after disclosure of the clinical trial's primary publication.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER