Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of CDR132L in Patients With Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction After Myocardial Infarction (NCT NCT05350969)

The trial was conducted in 8 countries (Netherlands, Spain, Germany, Czech Republic, Poland, United Kingdom, Greece, and Hungary).

The study consisted of a 6-month double blind period and a 6-month prolonged follow-up period with the end of study visit at day 360/month 12.

Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of CDR132L in Patients With Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction After Myocardial Infarction

Percent change from baseline in LVESVI at Month 6 is presented. LVESVI is considered one of the standard echocardiography (ECHO) markers for assessing risks in ischemic heart failure (HF). The ECHO was performed to assess LVESVI.

Number of TEAEs were presented. TEAEs were defined as AEs that first occurred or worsened in severity after the first administration of study treatment and prior to 30 days after the last administration of study treatment.

Number of TESAEs are presented. TEAEs were defined as AEs that first occurred or worsened in severity after the first administration of study treatment and prior to 30 days after the last administration of study treatment. A SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: a) results in death, b) is life-threatening, c) requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, d) results in persistent disability/incapacity, e) is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, f) other situations where medical or scientific judgement should be excercised.

Number of participants with abnormalities in clinically relevant laboratory assessments up to month 6 is presented. Laboratory investigation included hematology, chemistry, coagulation and urinalysis parameters. Clinical relevance was decided by the investigator.

Number of participants with clinically relevant laboratory abnormalities in vital signs parameters on month 12 is presented. Vital signs included oral body temperature, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and pulse rate. Clinical relevance was decided by the investigator.

Number of participants with clinically relevant laboratory abnormalities in ECG parameters at month 12 is presented. The 12-lead ECGs were recorded after the participants have rested for at least 5 minutes in supine position. The parameters included heart rate (HR), Pulse Rate, QRS, QT interval. Clinical relevance was decided by the investigator.

Absolute change from baseline in LVEF at month 3 is presented. LVEF is an established method for evaluation of left ventricular systolic function. A 2D echocardiography (ECHO) was performed in the ECHO central laboratory by trained personnel to assess LVEF. Contrast ECHO was available as an option to enhance image quality.

Absolute change from baseline in LVEF at month 6 is reported. LVEF is an established method for evaluation of left ventricular systolic function. A 2D ECHO was performed in the ECHO central laboratory by trained personnel to assess LVEF. Contrast ECHO was available as an option to enhance image quality.

Absolute change from baseline in LVEF at month 12 is reported. LVEF is an established method for evaluation of left ventricular systolic function. A 2D ECHO was performed in the ECHO central laboratory by trained personnel to assess LVEF. Contrast ECHO was available as an option to enhance image quality.

Relative change from baseline in LVEF at month 3 is presented. LVEF is an established method for evaluation of left ventricular systolic function. A 2D ECHO was performed in the ECHO central laboratory by trained personnel to assess LVEF. Contrast ECHO was available as an option to enhance image quality.

Relative change from baseline in LVEF at month 6 is presented. LVEF is an established method for evaluation of left ventricular systolic function. A 2D ECHO was performed in the ECHO central laboratory by trained personnel to assess LVEF. Contrast ECHO was available as an option to enhance image quality.

Relative change from baseline in LVEF at month 12 is presented. LVEF is an established method for evaluation of left ventricular systolic function. A 2D ECHO was performed in the ECHO central laboratory by trained personnel to assess LVEF. Contrast ECHO was available as an option to enhance image quality.

Absolute change from baseline in LVESVI at month 3 is presented. LVESVI is considered one of the standard ECHO markers for assessing risks in ischemic HF. The ECHO was performed to assess LVESVI.

Absolute change from baseline in LVESVI at month 6 is presented. LVESVI is considered one of the standard ECHO markers for assessing risks in ischemic HF. The ECHO was performed to assess LVESVI.

Absolute change from baseline in LVESVI at month 12 is presented. LVESVI is considered one of the standard ECHO markers for assessing risks in ischemic HF. The ECHO was performed to assess LVESVI.

Relative change from baseline in LVESVI at month 3 is presented. LVESVI is considered one of the standard ECHO markers for assessing risks in ischemic HF. The ECHO was performed to assess LVESVI.

Relative change from baseline in LVESVI at month 12 is presented. LVESVI is considered one of the standard ECHO markers for assessing risks in ischemic HF. The ECHO was performed to assess LVESVI.

Absolute change from baseline in troponin T at month 3 is presented. Troponin T levels were measured by high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays.

Absolute change from baseline in troponin T at month 6 is presented. Troponin T levels were measured by hs-cTn assays.

Absolute change from baseline in troponin T at month 12 is presented. Troponin T levels were measured by hs-cTn assays.

Relative change from baseline in troponin T at month 3 is presented. Troponin T levels were measured by hs-cTn assays.

Relative change from baseline in troponin T at month 6 is presented. Troponin T levels were measured by hs-cTn assays.

Relative change from baseline in troponin T at month 12 is presented. Troponin T levels were measured by hs-cTn assays.

Absolute change from baseline in NT-proBNP at month 1 is presented.

Absolute change from baseline in NT-proBNP at month 2 is presented.

Absolute change from baseline in NT-proBNP at month 3 is presented.

Absolute change from baseline in NT-proBNP at month 6 is presented.

Absolute change from baseline in NT-proBNP at month 12 is presented.

Relative change from baseline in NT-proBNP at month 1 is presented.

Relative change from baseline in NT-proBNP at month 2 is presented.

Relative change from baseline in NT-proBNP at month 3 is presented.

Relative change from baseline in NT-proBNP at month 6 is presented.

Relative change from baseline in NT-proBNP at month 12 is presented.

Absolute change from baseline in mean Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) score (overall summary score) at month 6 is presented. The KCCQ is a 23-item, self-administered ques-tionnaire developed to independently measure the participant's perception of their health status. Scores range from 0 to 100, with 0 as lowest score and 100 as the highest score. Higher scores indi-cate better health status, fewer symptoms, and greater disease-specific health-related quality of life. The calculation is following the KCCQ scoring manual that states: "Overall Summary Score is defined as mean of the following available summary scores: Physical Limitation Score, Total Symptom Score, Quality of Life Score and Social Limitation Score". Because the manual states that the Overall Sum-mary Score should be calculated on available scores, then if physical limitation score is missing, but other sub scores are available the Overall Summary Score will be calculated anyhow based on other sub scores.

Absolute change from baseline in mean KCCQ score (overall summary score) at month 12 is presented. The KCCQ is a 23-item, self-administered ques-tionnaire developed to independently measure the participant's perception of their health status. Scores range from 0 to 100, with 0 as lowest score and 100 as the highest score. Higher scores indi-cate better health status, fewer symptoms, and greater disease-specific health-related quality of life. The calculation is following the KCCQ scoring manual that states: "Overall Summary Score is defined as mean of the following available summary scores: Physical Limitation Score, Total Symptom Score, Quality of Life Score and Social Limitation Score". Because the manual states that the Overall Summary Score should be calculated on available scores, then if physical limitation score is missing, but other sub scores are available the Overall Summary Score will be calculated anyhow based on other sub scores.

Absolute change from baseline in KCCQ subdomain score (symptom burden) at month 6 is presented. The KCCQ is a 23-item, self-administered questionnaire developed to independently measure the participant's perception of their health status, which includes HF symptoms, impact on physical and social function, and how their HF impacts their quality of life within a 2-week recall period. The 7 domains under KCCQ include: Physical Limitation (6 items), Symptom Stability (1 item), Symptom Frequency (4 items), Symptom Burden (3 items), Self-Efficacy (2 items), Quality of Life (3 items), Social Limitations (4 items). Symptom burden: scores on a scale of 0 to 100, higher scores means better outcome.

Absolute change from baseline in KCCQ subdomain score (symptom burden) at month 12 is presented. The KCCQ is a 23-item, self-administered questionnaire developed to independently measure the participant's perception of their health status, which includes HF symptoms, impact on physical and social function, and how their HF impacts their quality of life within a 2-week recall period. The 7 domains under KCCQ include: Physical Limitation (6 items), Symptom Stability (1 item), Symptom Frequency (4 items), Symptom Burden (3 items), Self-Efficacy (2 items), Quality of Life (3 items), Social Limitations (4 items). Symptom burden: scores on a scale of 0 to 100, higher scores means better outcome.

Absolute change from baseline in KCCQ subdomain score (physical limitation) at month 6 is presented. The KCCQ is a 23-item, self-administered questionnaire developed to independently measure the participant's perception of their health status, which includes HF symptoms, impact on physical and social function, and how their HF impacts their quality of life within a 2-week recall period. The 7 domains under KCCQ include: Physical Limitation (6 items), Symptom Stability (1 item), Symptom Frequency (4 items), Symptom Burden (3 items), Self-Efficacy (2 items), Quality of Life (3 items), Social Limitations (4 items). Physical limitation: scores on a scale of 0 to 100, higher scores means better outcome.

Absolute change from baseline in KCCQ subdomain score (physical limitation) at month 12 is presented. The KCCQ is a 23-item, self-administered questionnaire developed to independently measure the participant's perception of their health status, which includes HF symptoms, impact on physical and social function, and how their HF impacts their quality of life within a 2-week recall period. The 7 domains under KCCQ include: Physical Limitation (6 items), Symptom Stability (1 item), Symptom Frequency (4 items), Symptom Burden (3 items), Self-Efficacy (2 items), Quality of Life (3 items), Social Limitations (4 items). Physical limitation: scores on a scale of 0 to 100, higher scores means better outcome.

Absolute change from baseline in KCCQ subdomain score (quality of life) at month 6 is presented. The KCCQ is a 23-item, self-administered questionnaire developed to independently measure the participant's perception of their health status, which includes HF symptoms, impact on physical and social function, and how their HF impacts their quality of life within a 2-week recall period. The 7 domains under KCCQ include: Physical Limitation (6 items), Symptom Stability (1 item), Symptom Frequency (4 items), Symptom Burden (3 items), Self-Efficacy (2 items), Quality of Life (3 items), Social Limitations (4 items). Quality of life: scores on a scale of 0 to 100, higher scores means better outcome.

Absolute change from baseline in KCCQ subdomain score (quality of life) at month 12 is presented. The KCCQ is a 23-item, self-administered questionnaire developed to independently measure the participant's perception of their health status, which includes HF symptoms, impact on physical and social function, and how their HF impacts their quality of life within a 2-week recall period. The 7 domains under KCCQ include: Physical Limitation (6 items), Symptom Stability (1 item), Symptom Frequency (4 items), Symptom Burden (3 items), Self-Efficacy (2 items), Quality of Life (3 items), Social Limitations (4 items). Quality of life: scores on a scale of 0 to 100, higher scores means better outcome.