Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study of GSK3965193 in Healthy Participants and Participants Living With Chronic Hepatitis B Infection (NCT NCT05330455)

The study was planned to be conducted in 4 parts. Part 1, a crossover study, consisted of 2 cohorts (Cohorts 1 and 2). Part 2 consisted of 2 sub-parts: Part 2A was a parallel group study comprised of 3 cohorts (Cohorts 3, 4, and 5); and Part 2B was a crossover study comprised of 1 cohort (Cohort 6). Part 3 was a parallel group study comprised of 1 cohort (Cohort 7). Part 4 was planned to be a parallel group study comprised of 1 cohort (Cohort 8).

The study enrolled 74 participants (20 in Part 1, 23 in Part 2A, 13 in Part 2B, and 18 in Part 3). Part 2B was planned to have 3 treatment periods (TPs). However, TP3 was not conducted following safety and tolerability findings in TP2. The study was terminated after completion of Part 3 as a strategic decision. Hence, no participants were enrolled in Part 4. Dose 1 (D1) was the lowest dose. Doses in ascending order are as follows: D1, D2, D3, D4, D9, D5, D10, D6, D7, and D8.

Study of GSK3965193 in Healthy Participants and Participants Living With Chronic Hepatitis B Infection

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An SAE is defined as any serious adverse event that, at any dose: results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity; is a congenital anomaly or birth defect; abnormal pregnancy outcomes or other situations as per the medical or scientific judgment of the investigator. An AE was considered treatment emergent if the AE onset date was on or after study intervention start date (i.e., Day 1) till Day 5 after study intervention administration. Any AE which started post Day 5 of study intervention administration was not considered as TEAE.

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An SAE is defined as any serious adverse event that, at any dose: results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity; is a congenital anomaly or birth defect; abnormal pregnancy outcomes or other situations as per the medical or scientific judgment of the investigator. An AE was considered treatment emergent if the AE onset date was on or after study intervention start date.

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An SAE is defined as any serious adverse event that, at any dose: results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity; is a congenital anomaly or birth defect; abnormal pregnancy outcomes or other situations as per the medical or scientific judgment of the investigator. An AE was considered treatment emergent if the AE onset date was on or after study intervention start date (i.e., Day 1) till Day 5 after study intervention administration. Any AE which started post Day 5 of study intervention administration was not considered as TEAE.

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An SAE is defined as any serious adverse event that, at any dose: results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity; is a congenital anomaly or birth defect; abnormal pregnancy outcomes or other situations as per the medical or scientific judgment of the investigator. An AE was considered treatment emergent if the AE onset or worsen date was on or after study intervention start date. Data for the placebo or GSK3965193 monotherapy phase were presented.

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An SAE is defined as any serious adverse event that, at any dose: results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity; is a congenital anomaly or birth defect; abnormal pregnancy outcomes or other situations as per the medical or scientific judgment of the investigator. An AE would be considered treatment emergent if the AE onset or worsen date was on or after study intervention start date.

Blood samples were collected to analyze hematology and clinical chemistry parameters: platelet count, red blood cell (RBC) count, hemoglobin, hematocrit, RBC indices (mean corpuscular volume \[MCV\] and mean corpuscular hemoglobin \[MCH\]), white blood cell (WBC) count with differential (neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils, and basophils), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, glucose (non-fasting), potassium, sodium, calcium, aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT), alanine aminotransferase (ALT)/serum glutamic-pyruvic transaminase (SGPT), alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin, indirect bilirubin, direct bilirubin, total protein, and albumin. Clinical significance of laboratory parameters was determined by the investigator.

Blood samples were collected to analyze hematology and clinical chemistry parameters: platelet count, RBC count, hemoglobin, hematocrit, RBC indices (MCV and MCH), WBC count with differential (neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils, and basophils), BUN, creatinine, glucose (non-fasting), potassium, sodium, calcium, AST/SGOT, ALT/SGPT, alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin, indirect bilirubin, direct bilirubin, total protein, and albumin. Urine samples were analyzed using automated urinalysis or urine dipstick. Microscopic examination was performed if abnormal blood or protein was present in the urine sample. Clinical significance of laboratory parameters was determined by the investigator.

Blood samples were collected to analyze hematology and clinical chemistry parameters: platelet count, RBC count, hemoglobin, hematocrit, RBC indices (MCV and MCH), WBC count with differential (neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils, and basophils), BUN, creatinine, glucose (non-fasting), potassium, sodium, calcium, AST/SGOT, ALT/SGPT, alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin, indirect bilirubin, direct bilirubin, total protein, and albumin. Urine samples were analyzed using automated urinalysis or urine dipstick. Microscopic examination was performed if abnormal blood or protein was present in the urine sample. Clinical significance of laboratory parameters was determined by the investigator.

Blood samples were collected to analyze hematology and clinical chemistry parameters: platelet count, RBC count, hemoglobin, hematocrit, RBC indices (MCV and MCH), WBC count with differential (neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils, and basophils), BUN, creatinine, glucose (non-fasting), potassium, sodium, calcium, AST/SGOT, ALT/SGPT, alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin, indirect bilirubin, direct bilirubin, total protein, and albumin. Clinical significance of laboratory parameters was determined by the investigator. Data for the placebo or GSK3965193 monotherapy phase were presented.

Urine samples were analyzed using automated urinalysis or urine dipstick. Microscopic examination was performed if abnormal blood or protein was present in the urine sample. Clinical significance of laboratory parameters was determined by the investigator. Data for the placebo or GSK3965193 monotherapy phase were presented.

Blood samples were planned to be collected to analyze hematology and clinical chemistry parameters: platelet count, RBC count, hemoglobin, hematocrit, RBC indices (MCV and MCH), WBC count with differential (neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils, and basophils), BUN, creatinine, glucose (non-fasting), potassium, sodium, calcium, AST/SGOT, ALT/SGPT, alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin, indirect bilirubin, direct bilirubin, total protein, and albumin. Urine samples were planned to be analyzed using automated urinalysis or urine dipstick. Microscopic examination was planned to be performed if abnormal blood or protein was present in the urine sample. Clinical significance of laboratory parameters would be determined by the investigator.

Vital signs included systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), pulse and respiratory rate and were measured with the participant in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest. Clinical significance of the vital sign findings was determined by the investigator.

Vital signs included SBP and DBP, pulse and respiratory rate and were measured with the participant in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest. Clinical significance of the vital sign findings was determined by the investigator.

Vital signs included SBP and DBP, pulse and respiratory rate and were measured with the participant in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest. Clinical significance of the vital sign findings was determined by the investigator.

Vital signs included temperature, SBP and DBP, pulse and respiratory rate and were measured with the participant in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest. Clinical significance of the vital sign findings was determined by the investigator. Data for the placebo or GSK3965193 monotherapy phase were presented.

Vital signs were planned to include temperature, SBP and DBP, pulse and respiratory rate and were planned to be measured with the participant in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest. Clinical significance of the vital sign findings would be determined by the investigator.

A 12-lead ECG was recorded with the participant in a semi-supine position after 5 minutes of rest using an ECG machine. The parameters collected were PR, QRS, QT, and corrected QT (QTc) intervals. Clinical significance of ECG parameters was determined by the investigator.

A 12-lead ECG was recorded with the participant in a semi-supine position after 5 minutes of rest using an ECG machine. The parameters collected were PR, QRS, QT, and QTc intervals. Clinical significance of ECG parameters was determined by the investigator.

A 12-lead ECG was recorded with the participant in a semi-supine position after 5 minutes of rest using an ECG machine. The parameters collected were PR, QRS, QT, and QTc intervals. Clinical significance of ECG parameters was determined by the investigator. Data for the placebo or GSK3965193 monotherapy phase were presented.

A 12-lead ECG was planned to be recorded with the participant in a semi-supine position after 5 minutes of rest using an ECG machine. The parameters planned to be collected were PR, QRS, QT, and QTc intervals. Clinical significance of ECG findings would be determined by the investigator.

Sensory nerve conduction testing was performed to detect neuropathy in participants. Nerve conduction velocity (NCV) and nerve conduction amplitude were determined. Sensory nerve conduction studies at Baseline were collected twice, one at the time of screen and one prior to dosing. Mean (arithmetic mean) of two measurements were considered as Baseline. Number of participants with 25 percent (%) decrease in NCV and 50% decrease in nerve conduction amplitude from Baseline at Day 7 was reported.

Sensory nerve conduction testing was performed to detect neuropathy in participants. NCV and nerve conduction amplitude were determined. Sensory nerve conduction studies at Baseline were collected twice, one at the time of screen and one prior to dosing. Mean (arithmetic mean) of two measurements were considered as Baseline. Number of participants with 25% decrease in NCV and 50% decrease in nerve conduction amplitude from Baseline at Day 14 was reported.

Sensory nerve conduction testing was performed to detect neuropathy in participants. NCV and nerve conduction amplitude were determined. Sensory nerve conduction studies at Baseline were collected twice, one at the time of screen and one prior to dosing. Mean (arithmetic mean) of two measurements were considered as Baseline. Number of participants with 25% decrease in NCV and 50% decrease in nerve conduction amplitude from Baseline at Day 42 was reported.

Sensory nerve conduction testing was performed to detect neuropathy in participants. NCV and nerve conduction amplitude were determined. The best measurement out of Screening and Day -1 was considered as Baseline, best being the higher measurement. Number of participants with 25% decrease in NCV and 50% decrease in nerve conduction amplitude from Baseline at Day 15 for the placebo or GSK3965193 monotherapy phase was reported.

Sensory nerve conduction testing was performed to detect neuropathy in participants. NCV and nerve conduction amplitude were determined. The best measurement out of Screening and Day -1 was considered as Baseline, best being the higher measurement. Number of participants with 25% decrease in NCV and 50% decrease in nerve conduction amplitude from Baseline at Day 29 for the placebo or GSK3965193 monotherapy phase was reported.

Sensory nerve conduction testing was planned to be performed to detect neuropathy in participants. NCV and nerve conduction amplitude were planned to be determined. Number of participants with 25% decrease in NCV and 50% decrease in nerve conduction amplitude from baseline was planned to be reported.

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of GSK3965193. PK analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for PK analysis of GSK3965193. PK analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods. As the dosing interval Tau was 12 hours, AUC(0-tau) is the same as AUC from time zero to 12 hours after dosing (AUC\[0-12\]).

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for PK analysis of GSK3965193. PK analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for PK analysis of GSK3965193. PK analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for PK analysis of GSK3965193. PK analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for PK analysis of GSK3965193. PK analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for PK analysis of GSK3965193. PK analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for PK analysis of GSK3965193. PK analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

Blood samples were collected from participants to assess HBsAg levels for the placebo or GSK3965193 monotherapy phase. Baseline was the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Posterior mean and associated 95 percent (%) credible interval were derived for maximum reduction of serum HBsAg levels from Baseline using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. The data presented are mean referring to posterior mean, with 95% confidence interval referring to 95% credible interval.

Blood samples were planned to be collected to assess HBsAg and hepatitis B virus (HBV) deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) levels. Complete response is defined HBsAg and HBV DNA below lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) for 6 consecutive months after the planned end of treatment.

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for PK analysis of GSK3965193. PK analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for PK analysis of GSK3965193. PK analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for PK analysis of GSK3965193. PK analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for PK analysis of GSK3965193. PK analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for PK analysis of GSK3965193. PK analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for PK analysis of GSK3965193. PK analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated time points to assess HBsAg levels.

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An SAE is defined as any serious adverse event that, at any dose: results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity; is a congenital anomaly or birth defect; abnormal pregnancy outcomes or other situations as per the medical or scientific judgment of the investigator.

Blood samples were planned to be collected to analyze clinical chemistry and hematology parameters: hemoglobin, leukocytes, lymphocytes/leukocytes, neutrophils/leukocytes, platelets, hematocrit, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, red blood cells, reticulocytes, ALT, albumin, alkaline phosphatase, AST, bilirubin, calcium corrected for albumin, creatinine, glucose, potassium, and sodium. Urine samples were planned to be analyzed using automated urinalysis or urine dipstick. Microscopic examination was performed if abnormal blood or protein was present in the urine sample. Number of participants with clinically significant clinical chemistry, hematology, and urinalysis parameters were reported. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator.

Vital signs were planned to include temperature and were planned to be measured with the participant in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest. Clinical significance of vital signs was determined by the investigator.

Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated time points to assess HBsAg levels. HBsAg loss is defined by two consecutive measurements of HBsAg below the LLOQ any time during the study (on-treatment and post-treatment).