The Effect Of Oral Motor Stimulation And Nonnutritive Sucking To The Time Of Transition To Oral Nutrition In Preterm

NCT05310851 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 39

Last updated 2024-05-29

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Oral feeding difficulty is one of the problems that preterm infants frequently experience due to poorly developed oral musculature. Sucking and swallowing are present in early fetal life, but sucking-swallowing and swallowing-respiratory coordination are respectively occurs after the 32 and 33-34 gestational week (GA). For this reason, although there are sucking movements in preterm babies with gestational weeks of 31 and below, oral feeding is difficult because adequate coordination cannot be achieved during sucking-swallowing and breathing. Until these structures develop, preterm babies are fed by gavage (nasogastric/orogastric route) in intensive care units. Gavage feeding causes many negativities such as preventing the advantages of oral nutrition and creating an entry route for infectious agents, and the discharge is also delayed. Thus, infants are exposed to adverse intensive care conditions for a longer period of time. For this reason, it is important to ensure the transition to full oral nutrition as soon as possible.

There are various methods that facilitate the transition of infants to oral feeding. Pacifier and oral stimulation applications are some of them. Oral stimulation was first applied by Fucile et al (2002). It is a method consisting of a total of 15 minutes, in which therapeutic touches are made for 12 minutes before feeding, and in the last few minutes, non-nutritive sucking is applied. Later, Lessen thought that this intervention was longer than the fragile preterm babies with a small oral cavity and shortened the duration of the intervention and reformatted it. This intervention, called "Premature Infant Oral Motor Intervention (PIOMI)" (Preterm Infant Oral Motor Intervention), is a 5-minute application consisting of 3 minutes of massage and 2 minutes of non-nutritive sucking. In the literature review, a study comparing oral motor stimulation and pacifier method was reached. However, in this study, unlike our study, a pacifier was applied to one of the groups, a 12-minute stimulation to the second, and a 12-minute stimulation and pacifier to the third. In our study, there are 3 groups. one of the groups a pacifier will be applied to one group and a 5-minute oral stimulation program will be applied to the other group. The third group is the control group.

The aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of pacifier and oral stimulation applied to preterm infants on the transition time to oral feeding.

Conditions

  • Preterm
  • Nutrition Disorder, Infant
  • Feeding; Difficult, Newborn

Interventions

OTHER

PIOMI and non-nutritive sucking

PIOMI group; The first three minutes of the five minutes include massages aimed at strengthening the cheeks, lips, gums and tongue; the last two minutes consist of non-feeding suction application. Infants in the Non-nutritive sucking group will receive pacifier 3 minutes before 1 hour any feeding time and, 2 minutes before 10 minutes.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Eskisehir Osmangazi University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Merve Cakirli · Eskisehir Osmangazi University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
2 Days
Max Age
5 Days
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-01-10
Primary Completion
2023-04-10
Completion
2023-04-10

Countries

  • Turkey (Türkiye)

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05310851 on ClinicalTrials.gov