Maternal Positioning to Correct Fetal Occiput Posterior
NCT05307393 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 465
Last updated 2023-03-08
Summary
In evaluating a patient's ability to have a normal vaginal delivery, a practitioner must consider three factors. Commonly referred to as the three P's, these include Power (contractions), Passage (pelvis and soft tissue) and passenger (baby). Power can be controlled through induction and augmentation agents. Passage is determined by the women's body habitus. Passenger includes the baby's estimated fetal weight (EFW) and position. Throughout the history of obstetrics, the baby's position has been a factor that has acted as a strong predictor of a woman's ability to deliver vaginally. Several researchers have looked into the percentage of babies born in the Occiput Anterior (fetus facing down) vs. Occiput Posterior (fetus facing up aka "sunny side up") position. Studies have shown that the majority of babies are born in OA position and that the finding of an OA positioned baby is associated with a greater likelihood of a successful vaginal delivery. OP position is associated with higher risk of 3rd and 4th degree perineal lacerations, operative delivery (vacuum/forceps) and cesarean section. Therefore OP position poses a higher risk of morbidity to the patient and fetus. Multiple studies exist in the obstetrics and midwifery literature regarding maternal positioning to correct fetal malposition. Many of these studies have shown no significance and those that do have generated conflicting results and are consistently lacking in power. The aim of this prospective study is to determine if maternal positioning to either the side of fetal movement (contralateral/opposite to the fetal spine) or opposite of the side of fetal movement (ipsilateral to the fetal spine) during the first stage of labor is associated with correction of fetal OP to OA position. Upon admission to labor and delivery, following an initial ultrasound to confirm fetal OP position, women in this study will be randomly assigned to one of three groups; one control (Group A), and two experimental (Groups B and C) groups. Those assigned to Group A will be allowed to remain in any position they chose during their labor and delivery course. Group B will be placed in a dorsal recumbent, modified sims position on the side of fetal movement. Group C, will be placed in the same position but opposite that of which fetal kicks are felt. Subjects in the experimental group will be asked to remain in these positions throughout the majority of their labor and delivery course, up until the second stage of labor (10 cm dilated). They will be allowed to change positions for up to 10 min per hour for maternal comfort and any fetal resuscitation efforts. Anything longer than this will be considered a deviation from the protocol and will be documented as such, but all necessary intervention for fetal well-being will be allowed including changes in maternal position for longer than 10 minutes. Once a cervical dilation of 10cm is achieved all study interventions will be discontinued. Peanut balls and manual rotational maneuvers will not be allowed as they are considered confounding factors which may individually affect fetal position. Data will be collected from the hospital record. This data will include: maternal age, BMI, race, maternal medical complications, delivery type, laceration, fetal position at delivery, dilation on admission and weight of the baby.
Conditions
- Obstetric Complication
Interventions
- BEHAVIORAL
-
Positioning
Upon admission to labor and delivery, following an initial ultrasound to confirm fetal OP position, women in this study will be randomly assigned to one of three groups; one control (Group A), and two experimental (Groups B and C) groups. Those assigned to Group A will be allowed to remain in any position they chose during their labor and delivery course. Group B will be placed in a dorsal recumbent, modified sims position on the side of fetal movement. Group C, will be placed in the same position but opposite that of which fetal kicks are felt.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Northwell Health
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Valerie Schulz, MD · Northwell Health
-
Sarah Pachtman, MD · Northwell Health
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-01-01
- Primary Completion
- 2025-01-01
- Completion
- 2025-01-01
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Foley Bulb Traction for Cervical Ripening
NCT00976703 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Maternal Position's Effect on Labor Progression in Occiput Posterior Deliveries
NCT06928038 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Rebozo and Maternal Procedures to Reduce Persistent Occiput Posterior Position of the Fetal Head
NCT06887634 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Bed Rest After Preterm Premature Rupture of the Membranes
NCT03814278 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
PROPENSITY-ID: Sonographic and Clinical Assessment of Head Position Prior to Instrumental Delivery and Labour Outcomes
NCT05557097 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Repeated Hands-and-Knees Positioning During Labour
NCT01720004 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Evaluation of the Impact of Rotating Posterior and Transverse Presentations At 2 Hours of Full Dilation
NCT06886854 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Maternal Maneuvers During Prolonged Labor
NCT06636149 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
PROphylactic Manual RotatIon in the Second stagE of Labor
NCT05175040 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
The Proactive Support of Labor Study
NCT03056313 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Early Versus Delayed Pushing in the Second Stage of Labor
NCT03121274 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cross-legged Versus Traditional Sitting Position for the Success of Epidural Analgesia During Labor
NCT04754282 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of the Length of Second Stage of Labor in Primigravidae on Maternal & Neonatal Outcomes
NCT02676505 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
The Effect of Combined Spinal-Epidural Analgesia on the Success of External Cephalic Version (ECV) for Breech Position
NCT00565383 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Activity Restriction for Women With Arrested Preterm Labor
NCT03501030 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Modified Intrapartum Sims Position-related Efficiency in Correction of Persistent Foetal OP Positions
NCT02209090 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of the Use of Peanut Ball on Labor Time in Nulliparous Women
NCT04998149 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction During Outpatient Versus Inpatient Foley Catheter Induction of Labor
NCT02975167 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Safe Delivery Using a Belt on the Belly of Pregnant Woman
NCT01566331 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Patient Satisfaction During Physiological Water or Land Birth: a Prospective Study in an French Tertiary Maternity Unit.
NCT06441370 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Amniotic Fluid Analysis
NCT06131684 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Active Versus Expectant Management of the Third Stage of Labor
NCT00473707 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Can Cervical Stiffness in the Second Trimester Predict Preterm Birth in High-Risk Singleton Pregnancies?
NCT05837390 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Breech Pelvimetry by EOS® Technique With Change of Maternal Position and Delivery Route
NCT05224908 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cervical Traction vs. Active Management of 3rd Stage of Labor
NCT04747015 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA