Trial Outcomes & Findings for Effect of Ultra-processed Versus Unprocessed Diets on Energy Metabolism (NCT NCT05290064)

NCT ID: NCT05290064

Last Updated: 2026-08-12

Results Overview

Energy intake averaged over 7 days for each diet, measured in kilocalories (kcal) per day. Primary comparisons will be between UPF HH \& UPF HL, UPF HL \& UPF LL, UPF LL \& UNF LL, UPF HH \& UNF LL.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

38 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Four 1-week diets

Results posted on

2026-08-12

Participant Flow

Adult subjects were recruited to the study via the NIH Patient Recruitment and Public Liaison Office from 11/24/2022 to 8/15/2025.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
1/UPF HH, UPF HL, UNF LL, UPF LL
Four diets in the following order: ultra-processed food (UPF) high in both non-beverage energy density and hyperpalatable foods (HH); UPF high in non-beverage energy density and low hyperpalatable foods (HL); Unprocessed food (UNF) with low non-beverage energy density and low hyperpalatable foods (LL); UPF low in both non-beverage energy density and hyperpalatable foods (LL).
2/ UPF HL, UPF LL, UPF HH, UNF LL
Four diets in the following order: ultra-processed food (UPF) high in non-beverage energy density and low hyperpalatable foods (HL); UPF low in both non-beverage energy density and hyperpalatable foods; UPF high in both non-beverage energy density and hyperpalatable foods (HH); Unprocessed food with low non-beverage energy density and low hyperpalatable foods.
3/ UPF LL, UNF LL, UPF HL, UPF HH
Four diets in the following order: ultra-processed food (UPF) with low non-beverage energy density and low hyperpalatable foods (LL); Unprocessed food with low non-beverage energy density and low hyperpalatable foods (UNF LL); UPF high in non-beverage energy density and low hyperpalatable foods (HL); UPF high in both non-beverage energy density and hyperpalatable foods (HH).
4/ UNF LL, UPF HH, UPF LL, UPF HL
Four diets in the following order: Unprocessed food with low non-beverage energy density and low hyperpalatable foods (UNF LL);ultra-processed food (UPF) high in both non-beverage energy density and hyperpalatable foods (HH); UPF with low non-beverage energy density and low hyperpalatable foods (LL); UPF high in non-beverage energy density and low hyperpalatable foods (HL).
Overall Study
STARTED
10
10
9
9
Overall Study
COMPLETED
9
9
9
9
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
1
1
0
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
1/UPF HH, UPF HL, UNF LL, UPF LL
Four diets in the following order: ultra-processed food (UPF) high in both non-beverage energy density and hyperpalatable foods (HH); UPF high in non-beverage energy density and low hyperpalatable foods (HL); Unprocessed food (UNF) with low non-beverage energy density and low hyperpalatable foods (LL); UPF low in both non-beverage energy density and hyperpalatable foods (LL).
2/ UPF HL, UPF LL, UPF HH, UNF LL
Four diets in the following order: ultra-processed food (UPF) high in non-beverage energy density and low hyperpalatable foods (HL); UPF low in both non-beverage energy density and hyperpalatable foods; UPF high in both non-beverage energy density and hyperpalatable foods (HH); Unprocessed food with low non-beverage energy density and low hyperpalatable foods.
3/ UPF LL, UNF LL, UPF HL, UPF HH
Four diets in the following order: ultra-processed food (UPF) with low non-beverage energy density and low hyperpalatable foods (LL); Unprocessed food with low non-beverage energy density and low hyperpalatable foods (UNF LL); UPF high in non-beverage energy density and low hyperpalatable foods (HL); UPF high in both non-beverage energy density and hyperpalatable foods (HH).
4/ UNF LL, UPF HH, UPF LL, UPF HL
Four diets in the following order: Unprocessed food with low non-beverage energy density and low hyperpalatable foods (UNF LL);ultra-processed food (UPF) high in both non-beverage energy density and hyperpalatable foods (HH); UPF with low non-beverage energy density and low hyperpalatable foods (LL); UPF high in non-beverage energy density and low hyperpalatable foods (HL).
Overall Study
Physician Decision
1
1
0
0

Baseline Characteristics

Effect of Ultra-processed Versus Unprocessed Diets on Energy Metabolism

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
1/UPF HH, UPF HL, UNF LL, UPF LL
n=9 Participants
Four diets in the following order: ultra-processed food (UPF) high in both non-beverage energy density and hyperpalatable foods (HH); UPF high in non-beverage energy density and low hyperpalatable foods (HL); Unprocessed food (UNF) with low non-beverage energy density and low hyperpalatable foods (LL); UPF low in both non-beverage energy density and hyperpalatable foods (LL).
2/ UPF HL, UPF LL, UPF HH, UNF LL
n=9 Participants
Four diets in the following order: ultra-processed food (UPF) high in non-beverage energy density and low hyperpalatable foods (HL); UPF low in both non-beverage energy density and hyperpalatable foods; UPF high in both non-beverage energy density and hyperpalatable foods (HH); Unprocessed food with low non-beverage energy density and low hyperpalatable foods.
3/ UPF LL, UNF LL, UPF HL, UPF HH
n=9 Participants
Four diets in the following order: ultra-processed food (UPF) with low non-beverage energy density and low hyperpalatable foods (LL); Unprocessed food with low non-beverage energy density and low hyperpalatable foods (UNF LL); UPF high in non-beverage energy density and low hyperpalatable foods (HL); UPF high in both non-beverage energy density and hyperpalatable foods (HH).
4/ UNF LL, UPF HH, UPF LL, UPF HL
n=9 Participants
Four diets in the following order: Unprocessed food with low non-beverage energy density and low hyperpalatable foods (UNF LL);ultra-processed food (UPF) high in both non-beverage energy density and hyperpalatable foods (HH); UPF with low non-beverage energy density and low hyperpalatable foods (LL); UPF high in non-beverage energy density and low hyperpalatable foods (HL).
Total
n=36 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
37.44 year
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.18 • n=1 Participants
37.44 year
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.68 • n=1 Participants
31.00 year
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.17 • n=1 Participants
39.33 year
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.05 • n=2 Participants
36.31 year
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.27
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants
n=1 Participants
3 Participants
n=1 Participants
3 Participants
n=1 Participants
4 Participants
n=2 Participants
14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants
n=1 Participants
6 Participants
n=1 Participants
6 Participants
n=1 Participants
5 Participants
n=2 Participants
22 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=1 Participants
0 Participants
n=1 Participants
0 Participants
n=1 Participants
0 Participants
n=2 Participants
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
n=1 Participants
0 Participants
n=1 Participants
2 Participants
n=1 Participants
0 Participants
n=2 Participants
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=1 Participants
0 Participants
n=1 Participants
0 Participants
n=1 Participants
0 Participants
n=2 Participants
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants
n=1 Participants
4 Participants
n=1 Participants
3 Participants
n=1 Participants
2 Participants
n=2 Participants
11 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
6 Participants
n=1 Participants
2 Participants
n=1 Participants
1 Participants
n=1 Participants
7 Participants
n=2 Participants
16 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants
n=1 Participants
1 Participants
n=1 Participants
3 Participants
n=1 Participants
0 Participants
n=2 Participants
5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=1 Participants
2 Participants
n=1 Participants
0 Participants
n=1 Participants
0 Participants
n=2 Participants
2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants
n=1 Participants
3 Participants
n=1 Participants
0 Participants
n=1 Participants
1 Participants
n=2 Participants
5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
8 Participants
n=1 Participants
6 Participants
n=1 Participants
9 Participants
n=1 Participants
8 Participants
n=2 Participants
31 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=1 Participants
0 Participants
n=1 Participants
0 Participants
n=1 Participants
0 Participants
n=2 Participants
0 Participants
Body Weight
100.46 kilogram
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.03 • n=1 Participants
91.67 kilogram
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29.23 • n=1 Participants
78.97 kilogram
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.19 • n=1 Participants
84.22 kilogram
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.31 • n=2 Participants
88.83 kilogram
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.86
Body Mass Index
33.28 kilogram per square meter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.58 • n=1 Participants
29.41 kilogram per square meter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.17 • n=1 Participants
27.45 kilogram per square meter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.44 • n=1 Participants
28.01 kilogram per square meter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.51 • n=2 Participants
29.54 kilogram per square meter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.03

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Four 1-week diets

Energy intake averaged over 7 days for each diet, measured in kilocalories (kcal) per day. Primary comparisons will be between UPF HH \& UPF HL, UPF HL \& UPF LL, UPF LL \& UNF LL, UPF HH \& UNF LL.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
UPF hh
n=36 Participants
Energy intake on UPF hh diet
UPF hl
n=36 Participants
Energy intake on UPF hl diet
UPF ll
n=36 Participants
Energy intake on UPF ll diet
UNF ll
n=36 Participants
Energy intake on UNF ll diet
Energy Intake (kcal Per Day)
3424.3 kcal/day
Standard Error 108.5
3265.9 kcal/day
Standard Error 108.5
2604.4 kcal/day
Standard Error 108.5
2476.0 kcal/day
Standard Error 108.5

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Four 1-week diets

This will be determined by the measured duration of the meals along with the measured mass of food consumed.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
UPF hh
n=36 Participants
Energy intake on UPF hh diet
UPF hl
n=36 Participants
Energy intake on UPF hl diet
UPF ll
n=36 Participants
Energy intake on UPF ll diet
UNF ll
n=36 Participants
Energy intake on UNF ll diet
Meal Eating Rate (Grams Per Minute)
39.21 gram/min
Standard Error 2.52
39.02 gram/min
Standard Error 2.52
39.04 gram/min
Standard Error 2.52
38.43 gram/min
Standard Error 2.52

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Four 1-week diets

Meal Palatability will be measured via questionnaires using visual analogue scales. The range of VAS is 0-100, where 0 = "Not at all palatable" and 100 = "Extremely palatable"

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
UPF hh
n=36 Participants
Energy intake on UPF hh diet
UPF hl
n=36 Participants
Energy intake on UPF hl diet
UPF ll
n=36 Participants
Energy intake on UPF ll diet
UNF ll
n=36 Participants
Energy intake on UNF ll diet
Meal Palatability
65.24 Score on a scale
Standard Error 3.16
62.41 Score on a scale
Standard Error 3.13
66.67 Score on a scale
Standard Error 3.13
64.18 Score on a scale
Standard Error 3.1

Adverse Events

UPF HH

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 1 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

UPF HL

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

UPF LL

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

UNF LL

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 1 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
UPF HH
n=36 participants at risk
ultra-processed food (UPF) high in both non-beverage energy density and hyperpalatable foods (HH)
UPF HL
n=36 participants at risk
ultra-processed food (UPF) high in non-beverage energy density and low hyperpalatable foods (HL)
UPF LL
n=36 participants at risk
ultra-processed food (UPF) with low non-beverage energy density and low hyperpalatable foods (LL)
UNF LL
n=36 participants at risk
Unprocessed food with low non-beverage energy density and low hyperpalatable foods (UNF LL)
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Right foot pain; mild severity grade; recovered without sequelae; treated with pain medication
2.8%
1/36 • From enrollment through the end of the study (exactly 4 weeks to complete all four dietary interventions).
0.00%
0/36 • From enrollment through the end of the study (exactly 4 weeks to complete all four dietary interventions).
0.00%
0/36 • From enrollment through the end of the study (exactly 4 weeks to complete all four dietary interventions).
2.8%
1/36 • From enrollment through the end of the study (exactly 4 weeks to complete all four dietary interventions).

Additional Information

Valerie L. Darcey, PhD, MS, RD

NIDDK

Phone: 301-402-9689

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place