MedTrace Logo

IPACK Block Versus Adductor Canal Block in High Tibeal Osteotomy

NCT05271188 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2022-03-08

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

A comparison between IPACK block and adductor canal block in post operative pain management

Conditions

  • Pain, Postoperative

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Infiltration of local anaesthetic between popliteal artery and posterior knee capsule

Adductor canal block (ACB) is a popular peripheral nerve block that has been shown to decrease pain significantly and thereby opioid consumption with minimal effect on quadriceps function \[8\]. Though ACB provides analgesia to the peripatellar and intra-articular aspect of knee joint, it does not relieve posterior knee pain which is moderate to severe in intensity \[9, 10\]. The recent technique of an ultrasound (US)-guided local anesthetic infiltration of the interspace between popliteal artery and the capsule of posterior knee (IPACK) has shown to provide significant posterior knee analgesia without affecting the common peroneal nerve (CPN) \[11\]. We postulated that IPACK will provide better pain relief and improve knee function in the immediate postoperative period compared to ACB

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Assiut University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Salwa Hussein, Lecturer · Assiut University

Study Design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
40 Years
Max Age
60 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2022-03-15
Primary Completion
2023-02-28
Completion
2023-03-31

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05271188 on ClinicalTrials.gov