Trial Outcomes & Findings for Clinical and Microbiologic Outcomes of Adjunctive Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy in the Non-surgical and Surgical Treatment of Teeth With Periodontal Disease (NCT NCT05252000)
NCT ID: NCT05252000
Last Updated: 2026-03-12
Results Overview
Bleeding on probing will be evaluated by gently sweeping the periodontal probe just within the gingival sulcus of the tooth and the presence or absence of bleeding will be recorded .The change is reported as \[(number of bleeding sites (bleeding on probing) at the re-evaluation appointment(4 to 6 weeks after baseline) - (number of bleeding sites (bleeding on probing) at baseline)\] - a negative value indicated less bleeding sites.
COMPLETED
NA
20 participants
baseline, at the re-evaluation appointment(4 to 6 weeks after baseline)
2026-03-12
Participant Flow
20 participants were enrolled. Each participant served as their own control. For each participant 2 teeth were treated - 1 tooth was treated with Adjunctive aPDT and 1 tooth was treated with sham aPDT.
Unit of analysis: teeth
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Mechanical Debridement and Adjunctive aPDT
mechanical debridement: subjects will receive traditional non-surgical mechanical debridement of tooth surfaces with scalers and ultrasonics removing supragingival and subgingival plaque
adjunctive aPDT: Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy will be done at tooth sites by applying a photosensitizing dye methylene blue (0.1mg/ml) with a disposable syringe from the bottom of pocket in a coronal direction. After 3 minutes in situ, the surrounding gingival tissues will be irradiated at six sites around the tooth using a diode laser with a wavelength of 660nm, providing an energy density of 10 J/site, 100mW power, time equal to 100 seconds. After irradiation, the site will be thoroughly rinsed with saline.
|
Mechanical Debridement and Sham aPDT
mechanical debridement: subjects will receive traditional non-surgical mechanical debridement of tooth surfaces with scalers and ultrasonics removing supragingival and subgingival plaque
sham aPDT: subjects will receive saline and non-light emitting laser on the tooth
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
20 20
|
20 20
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
20 20
|
20 20
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0 0
|
0 0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Clinical and Microbiologic Outcomes of Adjunctive Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy in the Non-surgical and Surgical Treatment of Teeth With Periodontal Disease
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Mechanical Debridement and Sham aPDT
n=20 Teeth
mechanical debridement: subjects will receive traditional non-surgical mechanical debridement of tooth surfaces with scalers and ultrasonics removing supragingival and subgingival plaque sham aPDT: subjects will receive saline and non-light emitting laser on the tooth
|
Mechanical Debridement and Adjunctive aPDT
n=20 Teeth
mechanical debridement: subjects will receive traditional non-surgical mechanical debridement of tooth surfaces with scalers and ultrasonics removing supragingival and subgingival plaque adjunctive aPDT: Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy will be done at tooth sites by applying a photosensitizing dye methylene blue (0.1mg/ml) with a disposable syringe from the bottom of pocket in a coronal direction. After 3 minutes in situ, the surrounding gingival tissues will be irradiated at six sites around the tooth using a diode laser with a wavelength of 660nm, providing an energy density of 10 J/site, 100mW power, time equal to 100 seconds. After irradiation, the site will be thoroughly rinsed with saline.
|
Total
n=40 Teeth
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
61.90 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.78 • n=20 Participants
|
61.90 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.78 • n=20 Participants
|
61.90 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.78 • n=20 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
|
16 participants
n=20 Participants
|
16 participants
n=20 Participants
|
16 participants
n=20 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
|
4 participants
n=20 Participants
|
4 participants
n=20 Participants
|
4 participants
n=20 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
|
4 participants
n=20 Participants
|
4 participants
n=20 Participants
|
4 participants
n=20 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American
|
4 participants
n=20 Participants
|
4 participants
n=20 Participants
|
4 participants
n=20 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
|
11 participants
n=20 Participants
|
11 participants
n=20 Participants
|
11 participants
n=20 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Middle Eastern
|
1 participants
n=20 Participants
|
1 participants
n=20 Participants
|
1 participants
n=20 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
20 participants
n=20 Participants
|
20 participants
n=20 Participants
|
20 participants
n=20 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants with Hypertension
|
8 participants
n=20 Participants
|
8 participants
n=20 Participants
|
8 participants
n=20 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants with Diabetes
|
1 participants
n=20 Participants
|
1 participants
n=20 Participants
|
1 participants
n=20 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants with Osteoporosis
|
1 participants
n=20 Participants
|
1 participants
n=20 Participants
|
1 participants
n=20 Participants
|
|
Probing Depth (Periodontal Pocket Depth )
|
2.97 millimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.61 • n=20 Teeth
|
3.35 millimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.43 • n=20 Teeth
|
3.16 millimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.52 • n=40 Teeth
|
|
Number of Bleeding Sites (Bleeding On Probing)
|
3.60 bleeding sites
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.27 • n=20 Teeth
|
3.75 bleeding sites
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.45 • n=20 Teeth
|
3.675 bleeding sites
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.36 • n=40 Teeth
|
|
Initial Periodontal Diagnosis
Localized Stage II Grade B
|
5 participants
n=20 Participants
|
5 participants
n=20 Participants
|
5 participants
n=20 Participants
|
|
Initial Periodontal Diagnosis
Localized Stage III Grade B
|
5 participants
n=20 Participants
|
5 participants
n=20 Participants
|
5 participants
n=20 Participants
|
|
Initial Periodontal Diagnosis
Generalized Stage III Grade B
|
10 participants
n=20 Participants
|
10 participants
n=20 Participants
|
10 participants
n=20 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, at the re-evaluation appointment(4 to 6 weeks after baseline)Bleeding on probing will be evaluated by gently sweeping the periodontal probe just within the gingival sulcus of the tooth and the presence or absence of bleeding will be recorded .The change is reported as \[(number of bleeding sites (bleeding on probing) at the re-evaluation appointment(4 to 6 weeks after baseline) - (number of bleeding sites (bleeding on probing) at baseline)\] - a negative value indicated less bleeding sites.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mechanical Debridement and Sham aPDT
n=20 teeth
mechanical debridement: subjects will receive traditional non-surgical mechanical debridement of tooth surfaces with scalers and ultrasonics removing supragingival and subgingival plaque
sham aPDT: subjects will receive saline and non-light emitting laser on the tooth
|
Mechanical Debridement and Adjunctive aPDT
n=20 teeth
mechanical debridement: subjects will receive traditional non-surgical mechanical debridement of tooth surfaces with scalers and ultrasonics removing supragingival and subgingival plaque
adjunctive aPDT: Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy will be done at tooth sites by applying a photosensitizing dye methylene blue (0.1mg/ml) with a disposable syringe from the bottom of pocket in a coronal direction. After 3 minutes in situ, the surrounding gingival tissues will be irradiated at six sites around the tooth using a diode laser with a wavelength of 660nm, providing an energy density of 10 J/site, 100mW power, time equal to 100 seconds. After irradiation, the site will be thoroughly rinsed with saline.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Number of Bleeding Sites (Bleeding On Probing)
|
-1.60 bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 1.26
|
-1.40 bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 1.71
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 3 months after baselineBleeding on probing will be evaluated by gently sweeping the periodontal probe just within the gingival sulcus of the tooth and the presence or absence of bleeding will be recorded. The change is reported as \[(number of bleeding sites (bleeding on probing) at 3 months after baseline) - (number of bleeding sites (bleeding on probing) at baseline)\] - a negative value indicated less bleeding sites.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mechanical Debridement and Sham aPDT
n=20 teeth
mechanical debridement: subjects will receive traditional non-surgical mechanical debridement of tooth surfaces with scalers and ultrasonics removing supragingival and subgingival plaque
sham aPDT: subjects will receive saline and non-light emitting laser on the tooth
|
Mechanical Debridement and Adjunctive aPDT
n=20 teeth
mechanical debridement: subjects will receive traditional non-surgical mechanical debridement of tooth surfaces with scalers and ultrasonics removing supragingival and subgingival plaque
adjunctive aPDT: Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy will be done at tooth sites by applying a photosensitizing dye methylene blue (0.1mg/ml) with a disposable syringe from the bottom of pocket in a coronal direction. After 3 minutes in situ, the surrounding gingival tissues will be irradiated at six sites around the tooth using a diode laser with a wavelength of 660nm, providing an energy density of 10 J/site, 100mW power, time equal to 100 seconds. After irradiation, the site will be thoroughly rinsed with saline.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Number of Bleeding Sites (Bleeding On Probing)
|
-1.40 bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 1.58
|
-1.80 bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 1.40
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, at the re-evaluation appointment (4 to 6 weeks after baseline)Periodontal pocket depth is measured from the free gingival margin to the base of the pocket, with a UNC periodontal probe with 1mm measurement units. The change is reported as \[Periodontal pocket depth at the re-evaluation appointment(4 to 6 weeks after baseline) - (Periodontal pocket depth at baseline)\] - a negative value indicates a reduction in pocket depth
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mechanical Debridement and Sham aPDT
n=20 teeth
mechanical debridement: subjects will receive traditional non-surgical mechanical debridement of tooth surfaces with scalers and ultrasonics removing supragingival and subgingival plaque
sham aPDT: subjects will receive saline and non-light emitting laser on the tooth
|
Mechanical Debridement and Adjunctive aPDT
n=20 teeth
mechanical debridement: subjects will receive traditional non-surgical mechanical debridement of tooth surfaces with scalers and ultrasonics removing supragingival and subgingival plaque
adjunctive aPDT: Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy will be done at tooth sites by applying a photosensitizing dye methylene blue (0.1mg/ml) with a disposable syringe from the bottom of pocket in a coronal direction. After 3 minutes in situ, the surrounding gingival tissues will be irradiated at six sites around the tooth using a diode laser with a wavelength of 660nm, providing an energy density of 10 J/site, 100mW power, time equal to 100 seconds. After irradiation, the site will be thoroughly rinsed with saline.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Probing Depth (Periodontal Pocket Depth )
|
-0.18 millimeters
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
-0.53 millimeters
Standard Deviation 0.39
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 3 months after baselinePeriodontal pocket depth is measured from the free gingival margin to the base of the pocket, with a UNC periodontal probe with 1mm measurement units. The change is reported as \[(Periodontal pocket depth at 3 months after baseline) - (Periodontal pocket depth at baseline)\] - a negative value indicates a reduction in pocket depth
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mechanical Debridement and Sham aPDT
n=20 teeth
mechanical debridement: subjects will receive traditional non-surgical mechanical debridement of tooth surfaces with scalers and ultrasonics removing supragingival and subgingival plaque
sham aPDT: subjects will receive saline and non-light emitting laser on the tooth
|
Mechanical Debridement and Adjunctive aPDT
n=20 teeth
mechanical debridement: subjects will receive traditional non-surgical mechanical debridement of tooth surfaces with scalers and ultrasonics removing supragingival and subgingival plaque
adjunctive aPDT: Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy will be done at tooth sites by applying a photosensitizing dye methylene blue (0.1mg/ml) with a disposable syringe from the bottom of pocket in a coronal direction. After 3 minutes in situ, the surrounding gingival tissues will be irradiated at six sites around the tooth using a diode laser with a wavelength of 660nm, providing an energy density of 10 J/site, 100mW power, time equal to 100 seconds. After irradiation, the site will be thoroughly rinsed with saline.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Probing Depth (Periodontal Pocket Depth )
|
-0.03 millimeters
Standard Deviation 0.54
|
-0.60 millimeters
Standard Deviation 0.45
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baselinePlaque will be sampled, and the subgingival periodontal microbiome will be categorized into different clusters of bacterial species (referred to as Socransky's complexes). We report the percent abundance of 4 different complexes: 1) the Yellow Complex (consisting of S. mutans, S. parasanguinis\_clade\_411, S. sinensis, and S. vestibularis); the Blue Complex (consisting of Actinomyces gerencseriae, Actinomyces HMT\_169, and Actinomyces timonensis); the Orange Complex (consisting of Prevotella fusca, Prevotella histicola, Prevotella jejuni, Prevotella koreensis, Prevotella melaninogenica, Prevotella multiformis, Prevotella nigrescens, Prevotella oris, Prevotella pleuritidis, Prevotella salivae, Prevotella HMT\_292, Prevotella HMT\_314, Prevotella HMT\_443, Prevotella veroralis, Capnocytophaga HMT\_412, S. constellatus, and Campylobacter curvus); and the Red Complex (consisting of Porphyromonas gingivalis, Tannerella forsythia, Treponema denticola, Treponema HMT\_231, and Treponema HMT\_237).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mechanical Debridement and Sham aPDT
n=20 teeth
mechanical debridement: subjects will receive traditional non-surgical mechanical debridement of tooth surfaces with scalers and ultrasonics removing supragingival and subgingival plaque
sham aPDT: subjects will receive saline and non-light emitting laser on the tooth
|
Mechanical Debridement and Adjunctive aPDT
n=20 teeth
mechanical debridement: subjects will receive traditional non-surgical mechanical debridement of tooth surfaces with scalers and ultrasonics removing supragingival and subgingival plaque
adjunctive aPDT: Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy will be done at tooth sites by applying a photosensitizing dye methylene blue (0.1mg/ml) with a disposable syringe from the bottom of pocket in a coronal direction. After 3 minutes in situ, the surrounding gingival tissues will be irradiated at six sites around the tooth using a diode laser with a wavelength of 660nm, providing an energy density of 10 J/site, 100mW power, time equal to 100 seconds. After irradiation, the site will be thoroughly rinsed with saline.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Microbiologic Profile of Plaque as Indicated by Percent of Total Abundance of 4 Oral Bacterial Complexes
Yellow Complex
|
1.54 percentage of total bacterial abundance
Standard Deviation 0.05
|
1.80 percentage of total bacterial abundance
Standard Deviation 0.05
|
|
Microbiologic Profile of Plaque as Indicated by Percent of Total Abundance of 4 Oral Bacterial Complexes
Blue Complex
|
11.22 percentage of total bacterial abundance
Standard Deviation 0.15
|
11.42 percentage of total bacterial abundance
Standard Deviation 0.15
|
|
Microbiologic Profile of Plaque as Indicated by Percent of Total Abundance of 4 Oral Bacterial Complexes
Orange Complex
|
2.30 percentage of total bacterial abundance
Standard Deviation 0.06
|
1.96 percentage of total bacterial abundance
Standard Deviation 0.05
|
|
Microbiologic Profile of Plaque as Indicated by Percent of Total Abundance of 4 Oral Bacterial Complexes
Red Complex
|
1.38 percentage of total bacterial abundance
Standard Deviation 0.04
|
1.91 percentage of total bacterial abundance
Standard Deviation 0.04
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: at the re-evaluation appointment (4 to 6 weeks after baseline)Plaque will be sampled, and the subgingival periodontal microbiome will be categorized into different clusters of bacterial species (referred to as Socransky's complexes). We report the percent abundance of 4 different complexes: 1) the Yellow Complex (consisting of S. mutans, S. parasanguinis\_clade\_411, S. sinensis, and S. vestibularis); the Blue Complex (consisting of Actinomyces gerencseriae, Actinomyces HMT\_169, and Actinomyces timonensis); the Orange Complex (consisting of Prevotella fusca, Prevotella histicola, Prevotella jejuni, Prevotella koreensis, Prevotella melaninogenica, Prevotella multiformis, Prevotella nigrescens, Prevotella oris, Prevotella pleuritidis, Prevotella salivae, Prevotella HMT\_292, Prevotella HMT\_314, Prevotella HMT\_443, Prevotella veroralis, Capnocytophaga HMT\_412, S. constellatus, and Campylobacter curvus); and the Red Complex (consisting of Porphyromonas gingivalis, Tannerella forsythia, Treponema denticola, Treponema HMT\_231, and Treponema HMT\_237).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mechanical Debridement and Sham aPDT
n=20 Teeth
mechanical debridement: subjects will receive traditional non-surgical mechanical debridement of tooth surfaces with scalers and ultrasonics removing supragingival and subgingival plaque
sham aPDT: subjects will receive saline and non-light emitting laser on the tooth
|
Mechanical Debridement and Adjunctive aPDT
n=20 Teeth
mechanical debridement: subjects will receive traditional non-surgical mechanical debridement of tooth surfaces with scalers and ultrasonics removing supragingival and subgingival plaque
adjunctive aPDT: Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy will be done at tooth sites by applying a photosensitizing dye methylene blue (0.1mg/ml) with a disposable syringe from the bottom of pocket in a coronal direction. After 3 minutes in situ, the surrounding gingival tissues will be irradiated at six sites around the tooth using a diode laser with a wavelength of 660nm, providing an energy density of 10 J/site, 100mW power, time equal to 100 seconds. After irradiation, the site will be thoroughly rinsed with saline.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Microbiologic Profile of Plaque as Indicated by Percent of Total Abundance of 4 Oral Bacterial Complexes
Yellow Complex
|
2.06 percentage of total abundance
Standard Deviation 0.06
|
3.41 percentage of total abundance
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
|
Microbiologic Profile of Plaque as Indicated by Percent of Total Abundance of 4 Oral Bacterial Complexes
Blue Complex
|
16.25 percentage of total abundance
Standard Deviation 0.18
|
15.36 percentage of total abundance
Standard Deviation 0.15
|
|
Microbiologic Profile of Plaque as Indicated by Percent of Total Abundance of 4 Oral Bacterial Complexes
Orange Complex
|
2.02 percentage of total abundance
Standard Deviation 0.05
|
1.38 percentage of total abundance
Standard Deviation 0.03
|
|
Microbiologic Profile of Plaque as Indicated by Percent of Total Abundance of 4 Oral Bacterial Complexes
Red Complex
|
0.33 percentage of total abundance
Standard Deviation 0.01
|
0.08 percentage of total abundance
Standard Deviation 0.002
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 months after the debridement (3 months after baseline)Plaque will be sampled, and the subgingival periodontal microbiome will be categorized into different clusters of bacterial species (referred to as Socransky's complexes). We report the percent abundance of 4 different complexes: 1) the Yellow Complex (consisting of S. mutans, S. parasanguinis\_clade\_411, S. sinensis, and S. vestibularis); the Blue Complex (consisting of Actinomyces gerencseriae, Actinomyces HMT\_169, and Actinomyces timonensis); the Orange Complex (consisting of Prevotella fusca, Prevotella histicola, Prevotella jejuni, Prevotella koreensis, Prevotella melaninogenica, Prevotella multiformis, Prevotella nigrescens, Prevotella oris, Prevotella pleuritidis, Prevotella salivae, Prevotella HMT\_292, Prevotella HMT\_314, Prevotella HMT\_443, Prevotella veroralis, Capnocytophaga HMT\_412, S. constellatus, and Campylobacter curvus); and the Red Complex (consisting of Porphyromonas gingivalis, Tannerella forsythia, Treponema denticola, Treponema HMT\_231, and Treponema HMT\_237).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mechanical Debridement and Sham aPDT
n=20 teeth
mechanical debridement: subjects will receive traditional non-surgical mechanical debridement of tooth surfaces with scalers and ultrasonics removing supragingival and subgingival plaque
sham aPDT: subjects will receive saline and non-light emitting laser on the tooth
|
Mechanical Debridement and Adjunctive aPDT
n=20 teeth
mechanical debridement: subjects will receive traditional non-surgical mechanical debridement of tooth surfaces with scalers and ultrasonics removing supragingival and subgingival plaque
adjunctive aPDT: Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy will be done at tooth sites by applying a photosensitizing dye methylene blue (0.1mg/ml) with a disposable syringe from the bottom of pocket in a coronal direction. After 3 minutes in situ, the surrounding gingival tissues will be irradiated at six sites around the tooth using a diode laser with a wavelength of 660nm, providing an energy density of 10 J/site, 100mW power, time equal to 100 seconds. After irradiation, the site will be thoroughly rinsed with saline.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Microbiologic Profile of Plaque as Indicated by Percent of Total Abundance of 4 Oral Bacterial Complexes
Yellow Complex
|
2.52 percentage of total abundance
Standard Deviation 0.06
|
2.98 percentage of total abundance
Standard Deviation 0.06
|
|
Microbiologic Profile of Plaque as Indicated by Percent of Total Abundance of 4 Oral Bacterial Complexes
Blue Complex
|
13.62 percentage of total abundance
Standard Deviation 0.16
|
12.00 percentage of total abundance
Standard Deviation 0.17
|
|
Microbiologic Profile of Plaque as Indicated by Percent of Total Abundance of 4 Oral Bacterial Complexes
Orange Complex
|
1.81 percentage of total abundance
Standard Deviation 0.04
|
2.21 percentage of total abundance
Standard Deviation 0.05
|
|
Microbiologic Profile of Plaque as Indicated by Percent of Total Abundance of 4 Oral Bacterial Complexes
Red Complex
|
2.35 percentage of total abundance
Standard Deviation 0.05
|
1.13 percentage of total abundance
Standard Deviation 0.03
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, at the re-evaluation appointment (4 to 6 weeks after baseline), and 3 months after baselinePopulation: Data were not collected for this outcome measure because gingival crevicular fluid(GCF) were not collected therefore data is not available for any participant. The study protocol was not amended to reflect this collective team decision. Data collection and analysis for this outcome measure will not be conducted in the future. Therefore, no participants were measured or analyzed for this outcome measure.
GCF will be collected from the sulcus around the target tooth using paper strips (PerioPaper, Oraflow). With proper isolation using cotton rolls in the buccal and lingual aspects of the study site, the area will be dried for 5 seconds with compressed air. The paper strip will be gently introduced into the mucosal crevice around the tooth for 30 seconds per site in four sites.The strips will then be removed from the crevice, and the volume of fluid collected in each strip measured using a micromoisture metering device (Peritron, Oraflow). After confirming the adequateness of the volume, the paper strips from each tooth will be transferred into labeled tubes and stored at -80 C for later use. For analysis, the paper strips will be analyzed using multiplexed fluorescent bead-based immunoassay.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
Mechanical Debridement and Adjunctive aPDT
Mechanical Debridement and Sham aPDT
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Jennifer Chang, DDS
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place