Trial Outcomes & Findings for Impaired Risk Awareness During Intoxication in DUI Offenders (NCT NCT05247788)

NCT ID: NCT05247788

Last Updated: 2026-05-12

Results Overview

Alcohol consumption will be assessed at monthly intervals from baseline to follow up and will be measured using a timeline follow back assessment. Participants will self-report data on number of days when the participant demonstrates binge drinking (5+ drinks per day for men; 4+ drinks per day for women).

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

112 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline, 30 and 60 days post intervention

Results posted on

2026-05-12

Participant Flow

Orientation session all subjects complete binge drinking measure (TLFB) and PACS. Up to 1 week later, participants attend a Pre-Intervention session, all receive 0.65 g/kg dose of alcohol or placebo on separate days in a counterbalanced order. Subjects are then randomized to intervention or no intervention.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Intervention Group
Received BAC and task performance feedback during the intervention session.
No Intervention Group
Did not receive any feedback during the intervention session.
Pre Intervention
STARTED
55
57
Pre Intervention
COMPLETED
55
57
Pre Intervention
NOT COMPLETED
0
0
Intervention Session
STARTED
55
57
Intervention Session
COMPLETED
55
57
Intervention Session
NOT COMPLETED
0
0
Post Intervention
STARTED
55
57
Post Intervention
COMPLETED
51
53
Post Intervention
NOT COMPLETED
4
4

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Intervention Group
Received BAC and task performance feedback during the intervention session.
No Intervention Group
Did not receive any feedback during the intervention session.
Post Intervention
Withdrawal by Subject
4
4

Baseline Characteristics

Impaired Risk Awareness During Intoxication in DUI Offenders

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Intervention Group
n=55 Participants
Participants will complete an intervention session in which they receive a controlled alcohol dose with structured feedback and training to accurately appraise the impairing effects of alcohol and estimate their blood alcohol concentration (BAC). Blood alcohol concentration (BAC) discrimination training: Subjects will receive 0.65 g/kg alcohol to yield a peak BAC of 85 mg/dl (0.085%). They will be trained to accurately estimate their BAC using the Body Scan Exercise with BAC feedback. Performance feedback training: This training element targets the driver's self-efficacy by increasing their awareness of the behavioral impairing effects of alcohol that are experienced at BACs at and even below the legal limit (50-80 mg/dl).
No Intervention Group
n=57 Participants
Participants assigned to the no intervention group undergo the same alcohol dose exposures over the session but receive a general body scan and do not receive feedback concerning BAC or performance. Blood alcohol concentration (BAC) discrimination training for controls: Subjects will receive 0.65 g/kg alcohol to yield a peak BAC of 85 mg/dl (0.085%). They will be given a general Body Scan Exercise with no feedback.
Total
n=112 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=1512 Participants
0 Participants
n=504 Participants
0 Participants
n=2016 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
n=1512 Participants
0 Participants
n=504 Participants
1 Participants
n=2016 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=1512 Participants
0 Participants
n=504 Participants
0 Participants
n=2016 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants
n=1512 Participants
1 Participants
n=504 Participants
4 Participants
n=2016 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
44 Participants
n=1512 Participants
50 Participants
n=504 Participants
94 Participants
n=2016 Participants
Age, Continuous
26 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.9 • n=1512 Participants
24 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.6 • n=504 Participants
25 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.3 • n=2016 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
26 Participants
n=1512 Participants
32 Participants
n=504 Participants
58 Participants
n=2016 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
29 Participants
n=1512 Participants
25 Participants
n=504 Participants
54 Participants
n=2016 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants
n=1512 Participants
0 Participants
n=504 Participants
3 Participants
n=2016 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
51 Participants
n=1512 Participants
57 Participants
n=504 Participants
108 Participants
n=2016 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
n=1512 Participants
0 Participants
n=504 Participants
1 Participants
n=2016 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
6 Participants
n=1512 Participants
6 Participants
n=504 Participants
12 Participants
n=2016 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
n=1512 Participants
0 Participants
n=504 Participants
1 Participants
n=2016 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
55 Participants
n=1512 Participants
57 Participants
n=504 Participants
112 Participants
n=2016 Participants
Blood Alcohol Content
.072 percentage of alcohol in blood
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.016 • n=1512 Participants
.072 percentage of alcohol in blood
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.015 • n=504 Participants
.072 percentage of alcohol in blood
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.015 • n=2016 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, 30 and 60 days post intervention

Population: Data provided for participants that completed timepoint

Alcohol consumption will be assessed at monthly intervals from baseline to follow up and will be measured using a timeline follow back assessment. Participants will self-report data on number of days when the participant demonstrates binge drinking (5+ drinks per day for men; 4+ drinks per day for women).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Group
n=55 Participants
Participants will complete an intoxicated risk awareness training session in which they receive a controlled alcohol dose with structured feedback and training to accurately appraise the impairing effects of alcohol and estimate their blood alcohol concentration (BAC). Blood alcohol concentration (BAC) discrimination training: Subjects will receive 0.65 g/kg alcohol to yield a peak BAC of 85 mg/dl (0.085%). They will be trained to accurately estimate their BAC using the Body Scan Exercise with BAC feedback. Performance feedback training: This training element targets the driver's self-efficacy by increasing their awareness of the behavioral impairing effects of alcohol that are experienced at BACs at and even below the legal limit (50-80 mg/dl).
No Intervention Group
n=57 Participants
Participants assigned to the alcohol-exposure-only condition undergo the same alcohol dose exposures over the session but receive a general body scan and do not receive feedback concerning BAC or performance. Blood alcohol concentration (BAC) discrimination training for controls: Subjects will receive 0.65 g/kg alcohol to yield a peak BAC of 85 mg/dl (0.085%). They will be given a general Body Scan Exercise with no feedback.
Mean Number of Alcohol Binges
60 days post intervention (T3)
2.45 Alcohol Binges
Standard Deviation 2.62
3.57 Alcohol Binges
Standard Deviation 3.34
Mean Number of Alcohol Binges
Baseline/Orientation (T1)
3.36 Alcohol Binges
Standard Deviation 3.57
4.05 Alcohol Binges
Standard Deviation 3.68
Mean Number of Alcohol Binges
30 days post intervention (T2)
2.69 Alcohol Binges
Standard Deviation 3.20
3.98 Alcohol Binges
Standard Deviation 3.41

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline

Change in tonic alcohol cravings over the past week will be assessed using the Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS) which is a five-item self-report indicated with strong psychometrics. 'Frequency' is the frequency of craving with a score on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 6 with higher scores meaning worse craving. 'Strong' is the intensity of craving with a score on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 6 with higher scores meaning worse craving. 'Time' is the duration of craving with a score on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 6 with higher scores meaning worse craving. 'Resist' is the inability to resist craving with a score on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 6 with higher scores meaning worse craving. 'Crave' is overall craving with a score on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 6 with higher scores meaning worse craving. PACS uses a 0-6 point Likert scale for each item where a higher number for each of the five items indicates more cravings. Total scores range from 0 to 30.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Group
n=55 Participants
Participants will complete an intoxicated risk awareness training session in which they receive a controlled alcohol dose with structured feedback and training to accurately appraise the impairing effects of alcohol and estimate their blood alcohol concentration (BAC). Blood alcohol concentration (BAC) discrimination training: Subjects will receive 0.65 g/kg alcohol to yield a peak BAC of 85 mg/dl (0.085%). They will be trained to accurately estimate their BAC using the Body Scan Exercise with BAC feedback. Performance feedback training: This training element targets the driver's self-efficacy by increasing their awareness of the behavioral impairing effects of alcohol that are experienced at BACs at and even below the legal limit (50-80 mg/dl).
No Intervention Group
n=57 Participants
Participants assigned to the alcohol-exposure-only condition undergo the same alcohol dose exposures over the session but receive a general body scan and do not receive feedback concerning BAC or performance. Blood alcohol concentration (BAC) discrimination training for controls: Subjects will receive 0.65 g/kg alcohol to yield a peak BAC of 85 mg/dl (0.085%). They will be given a general Body Scan Exercise with no feedback.
Mean Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS) at Baseline
Frequency
1.75 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.0
1.77 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.07
Mean Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS) at Baseline
Strong
1.62 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.22
1.49 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.07
Mean Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS) at Baseline
Time
1.22 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.81
1.30 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.78
Mean Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS) at Baseline
Resist
0.44 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.81
0.39 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.84
Mean Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS) at Baseline
Crave
1.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
1.79 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Post Intervention (up to 14 days)

Population: Data provided for participants that completed timepoint

Change in tonic alcohol cravings over the past week will be assessed using the Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS) which is a five-item self-report indicated with strong psychometrics. 'Frequency' is the frequency of craving with a score on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 6 with higher scores meaning worse craving. 'Strong' is the intensity of craving with a score on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 6 with higher scores meaning worse craving. 'Time' is the duration of craving with a score on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 6 with higher scores meaning worse craving. 'Resist' is the inability to resist craving with a score on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 6 with higher scores meaning worse craving. 'Crave' is overall craving with a score on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 6 with higher scores meaning worse craving. PACS uses a 0-6 point Likert scale for each item where a higher number for each of the five items indicates more cravings. Total scores range from 0 to 30.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Group
n=54 Participants
Participants will complete an intoxicated risk awareness training session in which they receive a controlled alcohol dose with structured feedback and training to accurately appraise the impairing effects of alcohol and estimate their blood alcohol concentration (BAC). Blood alcohol concentration (BAC) discrimination training: Subjects will receive 0.65 g/kg alcohol to yield a peak BAC of 85 mg/dl (0.085%). They will be trained to accurately estimate their BAC using the Body Scan Exercise with BAC feedback. Performance feedback training: This training element targets the driver's self-efficacy by increasing their awareness of the behavioral impairing effects of alcohol that are experienced at BACs at and even below the legal limit (50-80 mg/dl).
No Intervention Group
n=54 Participants
Participants assigned to the alcohol-exposure-only condition undergo the same alcohol dose exposures over the session but receive a general body scan and do not receive feedback concerning BAC or performance. Blood alcohol concentration (BAC) discrimination training for controls: Subjects will receive 0.65 g/kg alcohol to yield a peak BAC of 85 mg/dl (0.085%). They will be given a general Body Scan Exercise with no feedback.
Mean Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS) Post Intervention
Frequency
1.74 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.0
1.64 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.9
Mean Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS) Post Intervention
Strong
1.69 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.26
1.74 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.26
Mean Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS) Post Intervention
Time
1.37 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
1.32 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.87
Mean Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS) Post Intervention
Resist
0.48 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.89
0.62 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
Mean Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS) Post Intervention
Crave
1.54 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.0
1.75 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 30 Days Post-Intervention

Population: Data provided for participants that completed timepoint

Change in tonic alcohol cravings over the past week will be assessed using the Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS) which is a five-item self-report indicated with strong psychometrics. 'Frequency' is the frequency of craving with a score on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 6 with higher scores meaning worse craving. 'Strong' is the intensity of craving with a score on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 6 with higher scores meaning worse craving. 'Time' is the duration of craving with a score on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 6 with higher scores meaning worse craving. 'Resist' is the inability to resist craving with a score on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 6 with higher scores meaning worse craving. 'Crave' is overall craving with a score on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 6 with higher scores meaning worse craving. PACS uses a 0-6 point Likert scale for each item where a higher number for each of the five items indicates more cravings. Total scores range from 0 to 30.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Group
n=52 Participants
Participants will complete an intoxicated risk awareness training session in which they receive a controlled alcohol dose with structured feedback and training to accurately appraise the impairing effects of alcohol and estimate their blood alcohol concentration (BAC). Blood alcohol concentration (BAC) discrimination training: Subjects will receive 0.65 g/kg alcohol to yield a peak BAC of 85 mg/dl (0.085%). They will be trained to accurately estimate their BAC using the Body Scan Exercise with BAC feedback. Performance feedback training: This training element targets the driver's self-efficacy by increasing their awareness of the behavioral impairing effects of alcohol that are experienced at BACs at and even below the legal limit (50-80 mg/dl).
No Intervention Group
n=53 Participants
Participants assigned to the alcohol-exposure-only condition undergo the same alcohol dose exposures over the session but receive a general body scan and do not receive feedback concerning BAC or performance. Blood alcohol concentration (BAC) discrimination training for controls: Subjects will receive 0.65 g/kg alcohol to yield a peak BAC of 85 mg/dl (0.085%). They will be given a general Body Scan Exercise with no feedback.
Mean Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS) Post Intervention
Frequency
1.56 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
1.51 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
Mean Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS) Post Intervention
Strong
1.62 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.29
1.64 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.15
Mean Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS) Post Intervention
Time
1.29 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
1.21 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.84
Mean Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS) Post Intervention
Resist
0.73 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.12
0.55 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.97
Mean Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS) Post Intervention
Crave
1.69 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.16
1.57 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 60 Days Post-Intervention

Population: Data provided for participants that completed timepoint

Change in tonic alcohol cravings over the past week will be assessed using the Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS) which is a five-item self-report indicated with strong psychometrics. 'Frequency' is the frequency of craving with a score on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 6 with higher scores meaning worse craving. 'Strong' is the intensity of craving with a score on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 6 with higher scores meaning worse craving. 'Time' is the duration of craving with a score on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 6 with higher scores meaning worse craving. 'Resist' is the inability to resist craving with a score on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 6 with higher scores meaning worse craving. 'Crave' is overall craving with a score on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 6 with higher scores meaning worse craving. PACS uses a 0-6 point Likert scale for each item where a higher number for each of the five items indicates more cravings. Total scores range from 0 to 30.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Group
n=49 Participants
Participants will complete an intoxicated risk awareness training session in which they receive a controlled alcohol dose with structured feedback and training to accurately appraise the impairing effects of alcohol and estimate their blood alcohol concentration (BAC). Blood alcohol concentration (BAC) discrimination training: Subjects will receive 0.65 g/kg alcohol to yield a peak BAC of 85 mg/dl (0.085%). They will be trained to accurately estimate their BAC using the Body Scan Exercise with BAC feedback. Performance feedback training: This training element targets the driver's self-efficacy by increasing their awareness of the behavioral impairing effects of alcohol that are experienced at BACs at and even below the legal limit (50-80 mg/dl).
No Intervention Group
n=49 Participants
Participants assigned to the alcohol-exposure-only condition undergo the same alcohol dose exposures over the session but receive a general body scan and do not receive feedback concerning BAC or performance. Blood alcohol concentration (BAC) discrimination training for controls: Subjects will receive 0.65 g/kg alcohol to yield a peak BAC of 85 mg/dl (0.085%). They will be given a general Body Scan Exercise with no feedback.
Mean Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS) Post Intervention
Frequency
1.53 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.02
1.55 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
Mean Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS) Post Intervention
Strong
1.63 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.20
1.49 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.23
Mean Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS) Post Intervention
Time
1.41 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.89
1.18 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.73
Mean Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS) Post Intervention
Resist
0.71 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.0
0.57 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
Mean Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS) Post Intervention
Crave
1.63 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.11
1.45 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Intervention Session)

The Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness Ver. 2 (MAIA-2) is a 37-item self-report measure of 8 dimensions of self-perceived interoceptive ability. The dimensions are: Notice (awareness of uncomfortable, comfortable, or neutral body sensations), Not Distracted (tendency not to ignore or distract oneself from sensations of pain or discomfort), Not Worried (tendency not to worry or experience emotional distress with sensations of pain or discomfort), Attention Regulation (ability to sustain and control attention to body sensations), Emotion (awareness of the connection between body sensations and emotional states), Self-Regulation (ability to regulate distress by attention to body sensations), Body (tendency to actively "listen" to the body for insight), and Trust (experience of one's body as safe and trustworthy). The minimum score for each of the eight dimensions is 0 while the maximum score is 5, with higher scores indicating better outcomes/greater interoception.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Group
n=54 Participants
Participants will complete an intoxicated risk awareness training session in which they receive a controlled alcohol dose with structured feedback and training to accurately appraise the impairing effects of alcohol and estimate their blood alcohol concentration (BAC). Blood alcohol concentration (BAC) discrimination training: Subjects will receive 0.65 g/kg alcohol to yield a peak BAC of 85 mg/dl (0.085%). They will be trained to accurately estimate their BAC using the Body Scan Exercise with BAC feedback. Performance feedback training: This training element targets the driver's self-efficacy by increasing their awareness of the behavioral impairing effects of alcohol that are experienced at BACs at and even below the legal limit (50-80 mg/dl).
No Intervention Group
n=55 Participants
Participants assigned to the alcohol-exposure-only condition undergo the same alcohol dose exposures over the session but receive a general body scan and do not receive feedback concerning BAC or performance. Blood alcohol concentration (BAC) discrimination training for controls: Subjects will receive 0.65 g/kg alcohol to yield a peak BAC of 85 mg/dl (0.085%). They will be given a general Body Scan Exercise with no feedback.
Mean Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness Ver. 2 (MAIA-2) Scale
Notice
3.64 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.73
3.51 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.78
Mean Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness Ver. 2 (MAIA-2) Scale
Not Distracted
1.83 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.79
1.81 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.83
Mean Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness Ver. 2 (MAIA-2) Scale
Not Worried
2.96 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.65
2.81 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.78
Mean Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness Ver. 2 (MAIA-2) Scale
Attention Regulation
3.18 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.74
3.37 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.78
Mean Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness Ver. 2 (MAIA-2) Scale
Emotional Regulation
3.45 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
3.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.87
Mean Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness Ver. 2 (MAIA-2) Scale
Self Regulation
3.13 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
3.06 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
Mean Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness Ver. 2 (MAIA-2) Scale
Body
2.23 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.16
2.37 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.09
Mean Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness Ver. 2 (MAIA-2) Scale
Trust
3.86 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.88
4.14 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.84

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Post Intervention (up to 14 days)

Population: Data provided for participants that completed timepoint

The Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness Ver. 2 (MAIA-2) is a 37-item self-report measure of 8 dimensions of self-perceived interoceptive ability. The dimensions are: Notice (awareness of uncomfortable, comfortable, or neutral body sensations), Not Distracted (tendency not to ignore or distract oneself from sensations of pain or discomfort), Not Worried (tendency not to worry or experience emotional distress with sensations of pain or discomfort), Attention Regulation (ability to sustain and control attention to body sensations), Emotion (awareness of the connection between body sensations and emotional states), Self-Regulation (ability to regulate distress by attention to body sensations), Body (tendency to actively "listen" to the body for insight), and Trust (experience of one's body as safe and trustworthy). The minimum score for each of the eight dimensions is 0 while the maximum score is 5, with higher scores indicating better outcomes/greater interoception.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Group
n=53 Participants
Participants will complete an intoxicated risk awareness training session in which they receive a controlled alcohol dose with structured feedback and training to accurately appraise the impairing effects of alcohol and estimate their blood alcohol concentration (BAC). Blood alcohol concentration (BAC) discrimination training: Subjects will receive 0.65 g/kg alcohol to yield a peak BAC of 85 mg/dl (0.085%). They will be trained to accurately estimate their BAC using the Body Scan Exercise with BAC feedback. Performance feedback training: This training element targets the driver's self-efficacy by increasing their awareness of the behavioral impairing effects of alcohol that are experienced at BACs at and even below the legal limit (50-80 mg/dl).
No Intervention Group
n=54 Participants
Participants assigned to the alcohol-exposure-only condition undergo the same alcohol dose exposures over the session but receive a general body scan and do not receive feedback concerning BAC or performance. Blood alcohol concentration (BAC) discrimination training for controls: Subjects will receive 0.65 g/kg alcohol to yield a peak BAC of 85 mg/dl (0.085%). They will be given a general Body Scan Exercise with no feedback.
Mean Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA) Scale
Notice
3.53 score on a scale
Standard Deviation .67
3.46 score on a scale
Standard Deviation .83
Mean Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA) Scale
Not Distracted
1.83 score on a scale
Standard Deviation .85
1.79 score on a scale
Standard Deviation .83
Mean Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA) Scale
Not Worried
2.93 score on a scale
Standard Deviation .64
2.76 score on a scale
Standard Deviation .64
Mean Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA) Scale
Attention Regulation
3.15 score on a scale
Standard Deviation .74
3.36 score on a scale
Standard Deviation .87
Mean Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA) Scale
Emotional Regulation
3.56 score on a scale
Standard Deviation .77
3.48 score on a scale
Standard Deviation .9
Mean Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA) Scale
Self Regulation
3.10 score on a scale
Standard Deviation .91
3.20 score on a scale
Standard Deviation .91
Mean Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA) Scale
Body
2.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation .98
2.64 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.02
Mean Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA) Scale
Trust
3.85 score on a scale
Standard Deviation .88
4.08 score on a scale
Standard Deviation .86

Adverse Events

Intoxicated Risk Awareness Training Session

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Alcohol Exposure Only

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Dr. Mark Fillmore

University of Kentucky

Phone: 8592574728

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place