Trial Outcomes & Findings for Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of 4-month Regimen of OPC-167832, Delamanid and Bedaquiline in Participants With Drug-Susceptible Pulmonary TB (NCT NCT05221502)
NCT ID: NCT05221502
Last Updated: 2026-08-12
Results Overview
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant administered an investigational medicinal product or trial treatment and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs are AEs with an onset date on or after the start of treatment. Serious AE are AEs that leads to death, is life threatening, requires or prolongs hospitalization, significant disability, congenital anomaly or birth defect, and other medically important serious advent. AEs were graded on a severity 3-point scale as follows: Mild: Discomfort noticed, but no disruption to daily activity.; Moderate: Discomfort sufficient to reduce or affect normal daily activity.;Severe: Inability to work or perform normal daily activity. As pre-specified in statistical analysis plan (SAP),Division of AIDS (DAIDS v2.1) criteria was used and AEs graded as follows:Grade 1-Mild;Grade 2-Moderate;Grade 3-Severe;Grade 4-Life Threatening;Grade 5-Death.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
122 participants
From first dose of study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
2026-08-12
Participant Flow
Participants took part in the study at 8 clinical sites in South Africa from 12 April 2022 to 19 May 2024.
A total of 306 participants were screened, of which 122 participants were randomized into the treatment arms of delamanid + bedaquiline + OPC-167832 (10 mg, 30 mg, or 90 mg) or rifampin, isoniazid, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide (RHEZ) in a ratio of 1:2:2:1.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 10 mg
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, once daily (QD), bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, thrice weekly (TIW) and OPC-167832, 10 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 30 mg
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, QD, bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, TIW and OPC-167832, 30 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 90 mg
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, QD, bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, TIW and OPC-167832, 90 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
RHEZ
Participants received RHEZ, orally, QD for 8 weeks followed by 18 weeks of rifampin and isoniazid for a total of 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
20
|
42
|
39
|
21
|
|
Overall Study
Safety Analysis Set
|
20
|
42
|
38
|
21
|
|
Overall Study
Modified Intent-to-treat (mITT) Analysis Set
|
20
|
42
|
38
|
21
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
20
|
39
|
38
|
21
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
3
|
1
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 10 mg
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, once daily (QD), bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, thrice weekly (TIW) and OPC-167832, 10 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 30 mg
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, QD, bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, TIW and OPC-167832, 30 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 90 mg
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, QD, bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, TIW and OPC-167832, 90 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
RHEZ
Participants received RHEZ, orally, QD for 8 weeks followed by 18 weeks of rifampin and isoniazid for a total of 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Randomized by Mistake With Trial Treatment
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Other
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of 4-month Regimen of OPC-167832, Delamanid and Bedaquiline in Participants With Drug-Susceptible Pulmonary TB
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 10 mg
n=20 Participants
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, QD, bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, TIW and OPC-167832, 10 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 30 mg
n=42 Participants
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, QD, bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, TIW and OPC-167832, 30 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 90 mg
n=39 Participants
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, QD, bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, TIW and OPC-167832, 90 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
RHEZ
n=21 Participants
Participants received RHEZ, orally, QD for 8 weeks followed by 18 weeks of rifampin and isoniazid for a total of 26 weeks.
|
Total
n=122 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
37.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.90 • n=1 Participants
|
32.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.92 • n=1 Participants
|
33.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.13 • n=1 Participants
|
32.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.91 • n=2 Participants
|
33.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.66
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
6 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=2 Participants
|
43 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
14 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=2 Participants
|
79 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race · Black or African American
|
13 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=2 Participants
|
83 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race · Other
|
7 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=2 Participants
|
39 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity · Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity · Not Hispanic or Latino
|
20 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
42 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
39 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=2 Participants
|
122 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)Population: Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study treatment.
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant administered an investigational medicinal product or trial treatment and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs are AEs with an onset date on or after the start of treatment. Serious AE are AEs that leads to death, is life threatening, requires or prolongs hospitalization, significant disability, congenital anomaly or birth defect, and other medically important serious advent. AEs were graded on a severity 3-point scale as follows: Mild: Discomfort noticed, but no disruption to daily activity.; Moderate: Discomfort sufficient to reduce or affect normal daily activity.;Severe: Inability to work or perform normal daily activity. As pre-specified in statistical analysis plan (SAP),Division of AIDS (DAIDS v2.1) criteria was used and AEs graded as follows:Grade 1-Mild;Grade 2-Moderate;Grade 3-Severe;Grade 4-Life Threatening;Grade 5-Death.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 10 mg
n=20 Participants
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, QD, bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, TIW and OPC-167832, 10 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 30 mg
n=42 Participants
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, QD, bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, TIW and OPC-167832, 30 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 90 mg
n=38 Participants
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, QD, bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, TIW and OPC-167832, 90 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
RHEZ
n=21 Participants
Participants received RHEZ, orally, QD for 8 weeks followed by 18 weeks of rifampin and isoniazid for a total of 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, Severe TEAEs, TEAEs Related to Study Drug, TEAEs Leading to Study Discontinuation, TEAEs Leading to Death, and All Grade TEAEs Based on DAIDS Criteria
TEAE Related to Study Drug
|
4 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, Severe TEAEs, TEAEs Related to Study Drug, TEAEs Leading to Study Discontinuation, TEAEs Leading to Death, and All Grade TEAEs Based on DAIDS Criteria
TEAE Leading to Study Discontinuation
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, Severe TEAEs, TEAEs Related to Study Drug, TEAEs Leading to Study Discontinuation, TEAEs Leading to Death, and All Grade TEAEs Based on DAIDS Criteria
TEAE Leading to Death
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, Severe TEAEs, TEAEs Related to Study Drug, TEAEs Leading to Study Discontinuation, TEAEs Leading to Death, and All Grade TEAEs Based on DAIDS Criteria
DAIDS Grade 1 TEAE
|
4 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, Severe TEAEs, TEAEs Related to Study Drug, TEAEs Leading to Study Discontinuation, TEAEs Leading to Death, and All Grade TEAEs Based on DAIDS Criteria
DAIDS Grade 2 TEAE
|
9 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, Severe TEAEs, TEAEs Related to Study Drug, TEAEs Leading to Study Discontinuation, TEAEs Leading to Death, and All Grade TEAEs Based on DAIDS Criteria
DAIDS Grade 3 TEAE
|
4 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, Severe TEAEs, TEAEs Related to Study Drug, TEAEs Leading to Study Discontinuation, TEAEs Leading to Death, and All Grade TEAEs Based on DAIDS Criteria
DAIDS Grade 4 TEAE
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, Severe TEAEs, TEAEs Related to Study Drug, TEAEs Leading to Study Discontinuation, TEAEs Leading to Death, and All Grade TEAEs Based on DAIDS Criteria
DAIDS Grade 5 TEAE
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, Severe TEAEs, TEAEs Related to Study Drug, TEAEs Leading to Study Discontinuation, TEAEs Leading to Death, and All Grade TEAEs Based on DAIDS Criteria
TEAE
|
17 Participants
|
37 Participants
|
30 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, Severe TEAEs, TEAEs Related to Study Drug, TEAEs Leading to Study Discontinuation, TEAEs Leading to Death, and All Grade TEAEs Based on DAIDS Criteria
Serious TEAE
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, Severe TEAEs, TEAEs Related to Study Drug, TEAEs Leading to Study Discontinuation, TEAEs Leading to Death, and All Grade TEAEs Based on DAIDS Criteria
Severe TEAE
|
3 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)Population: Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study treatment. "Number analyzed" indicates the number of participants evaluable for the specific category.
Laboratory assessments included clinical chemistry (Albumin, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Total Bilirubin, Calcium, Creatinine, estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR), Glucose, Fasting and Non-Fasting, Cholesterol, Inorganic Phosphorus, Magnesium, Potassium, Sodium, Triglycerides and Uric Acid), hematology (Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time, Prothrombin Time, Partial Thromboplastin Time, International Normalized Ratio (INR), Absolute CD4+ Count, Absolute Lymphocytes, Absolute Neutrophil Count, Hemoglobin, Platelet Count, White Blood Cell), and urinalysis (Urine Glucose, Blood and Protein). As pre-specified in statistical analysis plan (SAP), Division of AIDS (DAIDS) criteria was used and abnormalities were graded as follows:Grade 1 - Mild; Grade 2 - Moderate; Grade 3 - Severe; Grade 4 - Life Threatening; Grade 5 - Death. Laboratory values with DAIDS Grade ≥3 were considered as potentially clinically relevant abnormalities and are reported here.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 10 mg
n=20 Participants
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, QD, bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, TIW and OPC-167832, 10 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 30 mg
n=42 Participants
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, QD, bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, TIW and OPC-167832, 30 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 90 mg
n=38 Participants
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, QD, bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, TIW and OPC-167832, 90 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
RHEZ
n=21 Participants
Participants received RHEZ, orally, QD for 8 weeks followed by 18 weeks of rifampin and isoniazid for a total of 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Abnormalities
Aspartate Aminotransferase (U/L): High: Grade 3
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Abnormalities
Aspartate Aminotransferase (U/L): High: Grade 4
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Abnormalities
Alanine Aminotransferase (U/L): High: Grade 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Abnormalities
Bilirubin (umol/L): High: Grade 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Abnormalities
Bilirubin (umol/L): High: Grade 4
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Abnormalities
Cholesterol (Total) (mmol/L): High: Grade 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Abnormalities
Creatinine (umol/L): High: Grade 3
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Abnormalities
eGFR (mL/min): Low: Grade 3
|
2 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Abnormalities
Glucose (Non-Fasting) (mmol/L): High: Grade 3
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Abnormalities
Glucose (Non-Fasting) (mmol/L): High: Grade 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Abnormalities
Potassium (mmol/L): High: Grade 4
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Abnormalities
Sodium (mmol/L): High: Grade 3
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Abnormalities
Triglycerides (mmol/L): High Grade 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Abnormalities
Hemoglobin (g/dL): All (Males or Females): Low: Grade 3
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Abnormalities
Hemoglobin (g/dL): All (Males or Females): Low: Grade 4
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Abnormalities
Lymphocytes (x10^9/L): Low: Grade 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Abnormalities
Prothrombin Time (sec): High: Grade 3
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Abnormalities
Urine Protein: Grade 3
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)Population: Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study treatment.
Vital signs measurements included systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate, body weight, and body temperature. Blood pressure (i.e., SBP, DBP) and heart rate were measured in the supine and sitting positions after the participant had been in each position for at least 3 minutes. The participants were categorized based on the clinically relevant vital sign values as per DAIDS criteria pre-specified in SAP. Each vital sign parameter was graded using the DAIDS criteria as follows: Grade 1 - Mild; Grade 2 - Moderate; Grade 3 - Severe; Grade 4 - Potentially Life Threatening; Grade 5 - Death. The categories with at least one participant with clinically significant value of any grade for vital signs are reported here.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 10 mg
n=20 Participants
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, QD, bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, TIW and OPC-167832, 10 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 30 mg
n=42 Participants
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, QD, bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, TIW and OPC-167832, 30 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 90 mg
n=38 Participants
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, QD, bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, TIW and OPC-167832, 90 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
RHEZ
n=21 Participants
Participants received RHEZ, orally, QD for 8 weeks followed by 18 weeks of rifampin and isoniazid for a total of 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in the Vital Signs
Hypertension- DBP: Grade 1
|
8 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in the Vital Signs
Hypertension- DBP: Grade 2
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in the Vital Signs
Hypertension- DBP: Grade 3
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in the Vital Signs
Hypertension- SBP: Grade 1
|
8 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in the Vital Signs
Hypertension- SBP: Grade 2
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in the Vital Signs
Hypertension- SBP: Grade 3
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in the Vital Signs
Body Temperature Increased: Grade 1
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in the Vital Signs
Body Temperature Increased: Grade 2
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in the Vital Signs
Body Temperature Increased: Grade 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in the Vital Signs
Body Temperature Increased: Grade 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in the Vital Signs
Body Weight Decreased: Grade 2 weight loss from baseline
|
4 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in the Vital Signs
Body Weight Decreased: Grade 3 body weight loss from baseline
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)Population: Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study treatment.
3 ECGs were performed at baseline (Day -1) spaced 5 to 10 minutes apart, and 3 ECGs at all subsequent visits during the treatment and follow-up periods. The categories with at least one participant with clinically relevant ECG abnormalities are reported here.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 10 mg
n=20 Participants
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, QD, bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, TIW and OPC-167832, 10 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 30 mg
n=42 Participants
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, QD, bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, TIW and OPC-167832, 30 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 90 mg
n=38 Participants
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, QD, bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, TIW and OPC-167832, 90 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
RHEZ
n=21 Participants
Participants received RHEZ, orally, QD for 8 weeks followed by 18 weeks of rifampin and isoniazid for a total of 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
Increase in QT: >480 msec
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
Increase in QTcB: >450 msec
|
5 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
Increase in QTcB: >480 msec
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
First Degree AV Block: > 200 msec
|
1 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
Increase in QT: >450 msec
|
4 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
Increase in QTcB: >60 Increase from baseline
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
Increase in QTcB: >=30 to <=60 Increase from baseline
|
6 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
Increase in QTcF: >450 msec
|
5 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
Increase in QTcF: >60 Increase from baseline
|
0 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
Increase in QTcF: >=30 to <=60 Increase from baseline
|
13 Participants
|
28 Participants
|
27 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
RR High: > 1200 msec
|
6 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
RR Low: < 600 msec
|
1 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
Sinus Bradycardia: Heart Rate {HR} _Mean < 41 beats per minute {bpm}
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
Sinus Bradycardia: HR_Mean < 50 bpm
|
5 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
Sinus Tachycardia: HR_Mean > 100 bpm
|
4 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug up to end of follow up period (up to approximately Week 52)Population: Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study treatment.
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant administered a treatment that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. All AEs were graded on a 5-point scale according to DAIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric AEs as follows: Grade 1 - Mild; Grade 2 - Moderate; Grade 3 - Severe; Grade 4 - Life Threatening; Grade 5 - Death.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 10 mg
n=20 Participants
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, QD, bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, TIW and OPC-167832, 10 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 30 mg
n=42 Participants
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, QD, bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, TIW and OPC-167832, 30 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 90 mg
n=38 Participants
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, QD, bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, TIW and OPC-167832, 90 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
RHEZ
n=21 Participants
Participants received RHEZ, orally, QD for 8 weeks followed by 18 weeks of rifampin and isoniazid for a total of 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With an AE Reported as DAIDS Grade 3 or Higher
|
4 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to approximately Week 52)Population: Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study treatment.
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant administered an investigational medicinal product or trial treatment and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs are AEs with an onset date on or after the start of treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 10 mg
n=20 Participants
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, QD, bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, TIW and OPC-167832, 10 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 30 mg
n=42 Participants
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, QD, bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, TIW and OPC-167832, 30 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 90 mg
n=38 Participants
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, QD, bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, TIW and OPC-167832, 90 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
RHEZ
n=21 Participants
Participants received RHEZ, orally, QD for 8 weeks followed by 18 weeks of rifampin and isoniazid for a total of 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation of Treatment
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 17Population: mITT analysis set included all randomized participants that took at least 1 dose of study medication or RHEZ, had at least 1 postbaseline culture result, demonstrated positive culture results by Week 1, and demonstrated susceptibility to rifampin and isoniazid (from the screening specimen). Percentages are rounded off to the nearest decimal point. The data for Delamanid+Bedaquiline+OPC-167832 10, 30 and 90 mg arm groups is reported in this outcome measure.
A participant was classified as having achieved SCC if the participant achieved first 2 consecutive sputum cultures negative for growth of mycobacterium tuberculosis at least 1 week apart (±4 days) after his/her last sputum culture that was positive for growth, and did not have a positive sputum culture result in between, and by the end of the treatment. Efficacy was assessed by using the MGIT liquid culture system. 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using Clopper Pearson (exact) confidence interval model.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 10 mg
n=20 Participants
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, QD, bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, TIW and OPC-167832, 10 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 30 mg
n=42 Participants
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, QD, bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, TIW and OPC-167832, 30 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 90 mg
n=38 Participants
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, QD, bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, TIW and OPC-167832, 90 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
RHEZ
Participants received RHEZ, orally, QD for 8 weeks followed by 18 weeks of rifampin and isoniazid for a total of 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Sputum Culture Conversion (SCC) in Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube® (MGIT) by End of Treatment (Week 17)
|
100.0 percentage of participants
Interval 83.2 to 100.0
|
92.9 percentage of participants
Interval 80.5 to 98.5
|
97.4 percentage of participants
Interval 86.2 to 99.9
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 26Population: mITT analysis set included all randomized participants that took at least 1 dose of study medication or RHEZ, had at least 1 postbaseline culture result, demonstrated positive culture results by Week 1, and demonstrated susceptibility to rifampin and isoniazid (from the screening specimen). Percentages are rounded off to the nearest decimal point. The data for RHEZ arm group is reported in this outcome measure.
A participant was classified as having achieved SCC if the participant achieved first 2 consecutive sputum cultures negative for growth of mycobacterium tuberculosis at least 1 week apart (±4 days) after his/her last sputum culture that was positive for growth, and did not have a positive sputum culture result in between, and by the end of the treatment. Efficacy was assessed by using the MGIT liquid culture system. 95% CI is calculated using Clopper Pearson (exact) confidence interval model.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 10 mg
n=21 Participants
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, QD, bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, TIW and OPC-167832, 10 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 30 mg
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, QD, bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, TIW and OPC-167832, 30 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 90 mg
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, QD, bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, TIW and OPC-167832, 90 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
RHEZ
Participants received RHEZ, orally, QD for 8 weeks followed by 18 weeks of rifampin and isoniazid for a total of 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved SCC in MGIT by End of Treatment (Week 26)
|
100.0 percentage of participants
Interval 83.9 to 100.0
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 8Population: mITT analysis set included all randomized participants that took at least 1 dose of study medication or RHEZ, had at least 1 postbaseline culture result, demonstrated positive culture results by Week 1, and demonstrated susceptibility to rifampin and isoniazid (from the screening specimen).
A participant was classified as having achieved SCC if he/she achieved first 2 consecutive sputum cultures negative for growth of mycobacterium tuberculosis at least 1 week apart (±4 days) after his/her last sputum culture that was positive for growth, and did not have a positive sputum culture result in between, and by the end of the 8 weeks of treatment. Efficacy was assessed by using the MGIT liquid culture system. 95% CI is calculated using Clopper Pearson (exact) confidence interval model.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 10 mg
n=20 Participants
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, QD, bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, TIW and OPC-167832, 10 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 30 mg
n=42 Participants
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, QD, bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, TIW and OPC-167832, 30 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 90 mg
n=38 Participants
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, QD, bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, TIW and OPC-167832, 90 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
RHEZ
n=21 Participants
Participants received RHEZ, orally, QD for 8 weeks followed by 18 weeks of rifampin and isoniazid for a total of 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved SCC in MGIT by the End of 8 Weeks of Treatment
|
40.0 percentage of participants
Interval 19.1 to 63.9
|
57.1 percentage of participants
Interval 41.0 to 72.3
|
50.0 percentage of participants
Interval 33.4 to 66.6
|
52.4 percentage of participants
Interval 29.8 to 74.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 52Population: mITT analysis set included all randomized participants that took at least 1 dose of study medication or RHEZ, had at least 1 postbaseline culture result, demonstrated positive culture results by Week 1, and demonstrated susceptibility to rifampin and isoniazid (from the screening specimen). 'Number analyzed' indicates the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure at the specific timepoint.
Time to detection of MGIT cultures was the time assessed, in days, when a sputum culture result was positive using the MGIT system during the routine 42-day incubation period. A longer time to detection represented a lower burden of mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) organisms present in the sputum.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 10 mg
n=20 Participants
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, QD, bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, TIW and OPC-167832, 10 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 30 mg
n=42 Participants
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, QD, bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, TIW and OPC-167832, 30 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 90 mg
n=38 Participants
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, QD, bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, TIW and OPC-167832, 90 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
RHEZ
n=21 Participants
Participants received RHEZ, orally, QD for 8 weeks followed by 18 weeks of rifampin and isoniazid for a total of 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Time to Detection of MGIT Cultures
Week 4
|
12.6 days
Interval 8.0 to 42.0
|
14.4 days
Interval 4.0 to 42.0
|
18.1 days
Interval 6.0 to 42.0
|
15.9 days
Interval 9.0 to 42.0
|
|
Time to Detection of MGIT Cultures
Baseline
|
5.7 days
Interval 4.0 to 15.0
|
5.1 days
Interval 3.0 to 42.0
|
5.3 days
Interval 2.0 to 29.0
|
5.5 days
Interval 4.0 to 12.0
|
|
Time to Detection of MGIT Cultures
Week 1
|
8.5 days
Interval 3.0 to 42.0
|
8.8 days
Interval 5.0 to 16.0
|
10.4 days
Interval 4.0 to 42.0
|
9.3 days
Interval 6.0 to 17.0
|
|
Time to Detection of MGIT Cultures
Week 2
|
9.9 days
Interval 7.0 to 42.0
|
10.5 days
Interval 5.0 to 42.0
|
11.9 days
Interval 4.0 to 42.0
|
12.0 days
Interval 6.0 to 42.0
|
|
Time to Detection of MGIT Cultures
Week 3
|
12.6 days
Interval 8.0 to 42.0
|
12.6 days
Interval 5.0 to 42.0
|
15.5 days
Interval 9.0 to 42.0
|
14.0 days
Interval 8.0 to 42.0
|
|
Time to Detection of MGIT Cultures
Week 5
|
19.3 days
Interval 9.0 to 42.0
|
18.6 days
Interval 9.0 to 42.0
|
21.9 days
Interval 6.0 to 42.0
|
21.7 days
Interval 11.0 to 42.0
|
|
Time to Detection of MGIT Cultures
Week 6
|
19.0 days
Interval 11.0 to 42.0
|
23.0 days
Interval 9.0 to 42.0
|
22.9 days
Interval 11.0 to 42.0
|
23.6 days
Interval 11.0 to 42.0
|
|
Time to Detection of MGIT Cultures
Week 7
|
20.1 days
Interval 8.0 to 42.0
|
28.6 days
Interval 11.0 to 42.0
|
32.6 days
Interval 12.0 to 42.0
|
30.6 days
Interval 13.0 to 42.0
|
|
Time to Detection of MGIT Cultures
Week 8
|
35.2 days
Interval 10.0 to 42.0
|
42.0 days
Interval 11.0 to 42.0
|
42.0 days
Interval 11.0 to 42.0
|
42.0 days
Interval 7.0 to 42.0
|
|
Time to Detection of MGIT Cultures
Week 10
|
42.0 days
Interval 13.0 to 42.0
|
42.0 days
Interval 12.0 to 42.0
|
42.0 days
Interval 4.0 to 42.0
|
42.0 days
Interval 17.0 to 42.0
|
|
Time to Detection of MGIT Cultures
Week 12
|
42.0 days
Interval 17.0 to 42.0
|
42.0 days
Interval 16.0 to 42.0
|
42.0 days
Interval 8.0 to 42.0
|
42.0 days
Interval 24.0 to 42.0
|
|
Time to Detection of MGIT Cultures
Week 13
|
42.0 days
Interval 42.0 to 42.0
|
42.0 days
Interval 14.0 to 42.0
|
42.0 days
Interval 18.0 to 42.0
|
42.0 days
Interval 30.0 to 42.0
|
|
Time to Detection of MGIT Cultures
Week 15
|
42.0 days
Interval 11.0 to 42.0
|
42.0 days
Interval 15.0 to 42.0
|
42.0 days
Interval 18.0 to 42.0
|
42.0 days
Interval 36.0 to 42.0
|
|
Time to Detection of MGIT Cultures
Week 17
|
42.0 days
Interval 42.0 to 42.0
|
42.0 days
Interval 29.0 to 42.0
|
42.0 days
Interval 17.0 to 42.0
|
42.0 days
Interval 42.0 to 42.0
|
|
Time to Detection of MGIT Cultures
Week 19
|
42.0 days
Interval 4.0 to 42.0
|
42.0 days
Interval 42.0 to 42.0
|
42.0 days
Interval 24.0 to 42.0
|
42.0 days
Interval 42.0 to 42.0
|
|
Time to Detection of MGIT Cultures
Week 21
|
42.0 days
Interval 42.0 to 42.0
|
42.0 days
Interval 42.0 to 42.0
|
42.0 days
Interval 42.0 to 42.0
|
42.0 days
Interval 42.0 to 42.0
|
|
Time to Detection of MGIT Cultures
Week 23
|
42.0 days
Interval 18.0 to 42.0
|
42.0 days
Interval 42.0 to 42.0
|
42.0 days
Interval 28.0 to 42.0
|
42.0 days
Interval 42.0 to 42.0
|
|
Time to Detection of MGIT Cultures
Week 26
|
42.0 days
Interval 9.0 to 42.0
|
42.0 days
Interval 42.0 to 42.0
|
42.0 days
Interval 6.0 to 42.0
|
42.0 days
Interval 42.0 to 42.0
|
|
Time to Detection of MGIT Cultures
Week 28
|
42.0 days
Interval 14.0 to 42.0
|
42.0 days
Interval 42.0 to 42.0
|
42.0 days
Interval 42.0 to 42.0
|
42.0 days
Interval 42.0 to 42.0
|
|
Time to Detection of MGIT Cultures
Week 30
|
42.0 days
Interval 23.0 to 42.0
|
42.0 days
Interval 42.0 to 42.0
|
42.0 days
Interval 42.0 to 42.0
|
42.0 days
Interval 42.0 to 42.0
|
|
Time to Detection of MGIT Cultures
Week 34
|
42.0 days
Interval 42.0 to 42.0
|
42.0 days
Interval 12.0 to 42.0
|
42.0 days
Interval 19.0 to 42.0
|
42.0 days
Interval 16.0 to 42.0
|
|
Time to Detection of MGIT Cultures
Week 39
|
42.0 days
Interval 42.0 to 42.0
|
42.0 days
Interval 7.0 to 42.0
|
42.0 days
Interval 14.0 to 42.0
|
42.0 days
Interval 3.0 to 42.0
|
|
Time to Detection of MGIT Cultures
Week 43
|
42.0 days
Interval 7.0 to 42.0
|
42.0 days
Interval 4.0 to 42.0
|
42.0 days
Interval 7.0 to 42.0
|
42.0 days
Interval 19.0 to 42.0
|
|
Time to Detection of MGIT Cultures
Week 47
|
42.0 days
Interval 7.0 to 42.0
|
42.0 days
Interval 4.0 to 42.0
|
42.0 days
Interval 16.0 to 42.0
|
42.0 days
Interval 10.0 to 42.0
|
|
Time to Detection of MGIT Cultures
Week 52
|
42.0 days
Interval 13.0 to 42.0
|
42.0 days
Interval 13.0 to 42.0
|
42.0 days
Interval 18.0 to 42.0
|
42.0 days
Interval 42.0 to 42.0
|
|
Time to Detection of MGIT Cultures
Early Termination
|
—
|
11.0 days
Interval 11.0 to 11.0
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 8, and End of Treatment Period - Week 17 (for OPC-167832 arms) and Week 26 (for RHEZ arm)Population: mITT analysis set included all randomized participants that took at least 1 dose of study medication or RHEZ, had at least 1 postbaseline culture result, demonstrated positive culture results by Week 1, and demonstrated susceptibility to rifampin and isoniazid (from the screening specimen).
Sputum LAM concentrations were measured on up to 3 samples collected at baseline and postbaseline at Week 8 and at end of treatment. A participant was classified as having achieved negative sputum conversion in LAM if the participant has the first of 2 visits of at least 1 week apart with sputum LAM negative (below the lower limit of quantification) and without a positive sputum LAM result in between. Numeric sputum LAM concentration data was converted to a binary variable using the rule: if the sputum LAM concentration was less than 10 picograms per milliliter (pg/mL) then it was interpreted as a negative result. If the sputum LAM concentration was greater than or equal to 10 pg/mL then it was interpreted as positive result. SCC for LAM was considered to have been achieved if there were negative results at two consecutive visits with non-missing results. 95% CI was calculated using Clopper Pearson (exact) confidence interval model.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 10 mg
n=20 Participants
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, QD, bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, TIW and OPC-167832, 10 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 30 mg
n=42 Participants
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, QD, bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, TIW and OPC-167832, 30 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 90 mg
n=38 Participants
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, QD, bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, TIW and OPC-167832, 90 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
RHEZ
n=21 Participants
Participants received RHEZ, orally, QD for 8 weeks followed by 18 weeks of rifampin and isoniazid for a total of 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Negative Sputum Lipoarabinomannan (LAM) by 8 Weeks of Treatment and by End of Treatment
At Week 8
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
|
2.4 percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 12.6
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
|
14.3 percentage of participants
Interval 3.0 to 36.3
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Negative Sputum Lipoarabinomannan (LAM) by 8 Weeks of Treatment and by End of Treatment
At End of Treatment - Week 17 and Week 26
|
15.0 percentage of participants
Interval 3.2 to 37.9
|
14.3 percentage of participants
Interval 5.4 to 28.5
|
23.7 percentage of participants
Interval 11.4 to 40.2
|
23.8 percentage of participants
Interval 8.2 to 47.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 52Population: mITT analysis set included all randomized participants that took at least 1 dose of study medication or RHEZ, had at least 1 postbaseline culture result, demonstrated positive culture results by Week 1, and demonstrated susceptibility to rifampin and isoniazid (from the screening specimen).
Acquired resistance was defined as a post-baseline resistant result at any timepoint after a baseline susceptible result. Baseline was defined as Day -1, if Day -1 was missing then Day 1 was used, if day 1 was missing then Week 1 was used. Resistance data was collected for streptomycin, isoniazid, rifampicin, ethambutol, pyrazinamide, bedaquiline and delamanid. Susceptibility testing (DST) for anti-TB medications was performed on positive M tuberculosis isolates from Day -1 or Day 1 cultures, and on the end of treatment sputum specimen. Percentage of participants who were susceptible at baseline and developed resistance to the indicated drug (class) at any post-baseline visits was summarized.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 10 mg
n=20 Participants
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, QD, bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, TIW and OPC-167832, 10 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 30 mg
n=42 Participants
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, QD, bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, TIW and OPC-167832, 30 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 90 mg
n=38 Participants
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, QD, bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, TIW and OPC-167832, 90 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
RHEZ
n=21 Participants
Participants received RHEZ, orally, QD for 8 weeks followed by 18 weeks of rifampin and isoniazid for a total of 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Acquired Drug Resistance
|
0 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the first dose of the study up to the end of the follow-up period (up to Week 52)Population: mITT analysis set included all randomized participants that took at least 1 dose of study medication or RHEZ, had at least 1 postbaseline culture result, demonstrated positive culture results by Week 1, and demonstrated susceptibility to rifampin and isoniazid (from the screening specimen).
Sputum culture conversion occurs when a participant has the first of 2 consecutive visits of at least 7 days apart with sputum cultures negative and without a positive sputum culture result in between, as well as no positive sputum culture after the negative results. If a participant had a positive MGIT culture result throughout the study period, then the participant was considered as not having achieved SCC within the period under consideration. The time to SCC in this case was censored. Time to SCC was calculated from date of first dose using MGIT cultures without the mitigation method measures.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 10 mg
n=20 Participants
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, QD, bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, TIW and OPC-167832, 10 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 30 mg
n=42 Participants
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, QD, bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, TIW and OPC-167832, 30 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 90 mg
n=38 Participants
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, QD, bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, TIW and OPC-167832, 90 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
RHEZ
n=21 Participants
Participants received RHEZ, orally, QD for 8 weeks followed by 18 weeks of rifampin and isoniazid for a total of 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Time to Sputum Culture Conversion (SCC)
|
70.0 days
Interval 51.0 to 84.5
|
56.0 days
Interval 49.0 to 84.0
|
69.5 days
Interval 49.0 to 84.0
|
56.0 days
Interval 48.0 to 71.0
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 26Positron emission tomography/computerized axial tomography (PET/CT) imaging changes over the course of treatment, using quantitative scan assessment.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months post randomizationThe decline of ribosomal ribonucleic acid synthesis ratio (RS ratio - a ratio of spacers between the mRNA) in sputum over the course of trial.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Screening to 12 months post randomizationThe change in whole blood transcriptomic signatures over the course of treatment will be evaluated using ROC curves for association with microbiological and clinical response.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months post randomizationThe proportion of subjects with favorable outcome as compared to the 6 months post end of treatment and at 12 months post randomization.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months post randomizationProportion of participants with relapse at 12 months post randomization.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 10 mg
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 30 mg
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 90 mg
RHEZ
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 10 mg
n=20 participants at risk
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, QD, bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, TIW and OPC-167832, 10 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 30 mg
n=42 participants at risk
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, QD, bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, TIW and OPC-167832, 30 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 90 mg
n=38 participants at risk
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, QD, bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, TIW and OPC-167832, 90 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
RHEZ
n=21 participants at risk
Participants received RHEZ, orally, QD for 8 weeks followed by 18 weeks of rifampin and isoniazid for a total of 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Appendicitis perforated
|
5.0%
1/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Localised infection
|
5.0%
1/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
2.4%
1/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tuberculosis
|
0.00%
0/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
2.4%
1/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperkalaemia
|
0.00%
0/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
2.4%
1/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Myelopathy
|
0.00%
0/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
2.4%
1/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Haemoptysis
|
0.00%
0/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
2.4%
1/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 10 mg
n=20 participants at risk
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, QD, bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, TIW and OPC-167832, 10 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 30 mg
n=42 participants at risk
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, QD, bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, TIW and OPC-167832, 30 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
Delamanid + Bedaquiline + OPC-167832 90 mg
n=38 participants at risk
Participants received a combination regimen of delamanid, 300 mg, oral tablets, QD, bedaquiline, 400 mg, oral tablets, QD for 2 weeks, then 200 mg, TIW and OPC-167832, 90 mg, oral tablets, QD for a total of 17 weeks.
|
RHEZ
n=21 participants at risk
Participants received RHEZ, orally, QD for 8 weeks followed by 18 weeks of rifampin and isoniazid for a total of 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Eye disorders
Conjunctival haemorrhage
|
5.0%
1/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Eye disorders
Conjunctivitis allergic
|
0.00%
0/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
2.4%
1/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
5.3%
2/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye irritation
|
5.0%
1/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Eye disorders
Visual acuity reduced
|
5.0%
1/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
2.6%
1/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
10.0%
2/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
2.4%
1/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
2.6%
1/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
4.8%
1/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal tenderness
|
5.0%
1/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
5.0%
1/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
7.1%
3/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dental caries
|
0.00%
0/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
5.3%
2/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
10.0%
2/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
11.9%
5/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
5.3%
2/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
14.3%
3/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
5.0%
1/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
7.1%
3/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
5.3%
2/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
|
0.00%
0/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
5.3%
2/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
0.00%
0/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
7.9%
3/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
14.3%
3/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Noninfective gingivitis
|
5.0%
1/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomatitis
|
5.0%
1/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.00%
0/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
9.5%
4/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
5.3%
2/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
4.8%
1/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
0.00%
0/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
9.5%
4/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
2.6%
1/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
4.8%
1/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Chills
|
5.0%
1/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Influenza like illness
|
0.00%
0/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
9.5%
4/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
5.3%
2/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
5.0%
1/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
4.8%
2/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatitis alcoholic
|
5.0%
1/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Hypersensitivity
|
5.0%
1/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
2.6%
1/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
4.8%
1/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Seasonal allergy
|
0.00%
0/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
2.4%
1/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
5.3%
2/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Abscess limb
|
5.0%
1/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
2.4%
1/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
2.6%
1/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Body tinea
|
5.0%
1/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
4.8%
2/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
5.0%
1/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
5.0%
1/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
7.1%
3/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
5.3%
2/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
HIV infection
|
5.0%
1/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Haemophilus infection
|
5.0%
1/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lower respiratory tract infection
|
10.0%
2/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
5.3%
2/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
14.3%
3/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
5.0%
1/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
2.4%
1/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
4.8%
1/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Respiratory tract infection
|
0.00%
0/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
5.3%
2/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sexually transmitted disease
|
5.0%
1/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
7.1%
3/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Subcutaneous abscess
|
5.0%
1/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
5.3%
2/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
15.0%
3/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
31.0%
13/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
31.6%
12/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
38.1%
8/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
5.0%
1/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
2.4%
1/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
5.3%
2/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
4.8%
1/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Soft tissue injury
|
0.00%
0/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
2.4%
1/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
9.5%
2/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Thermal burn
|
5.0%
1/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
2.6%
1/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
4.8%
1/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
7.1%
3/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
2.6%
1/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
4.8%
1/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
2.4%
1/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
2.6%
1/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
9.5%
2/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Blood pressure increased
|
5.0%
1/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
2.4%
1/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
5.3%
2/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
4.8%
1/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Electrocardiogram QT prolonged
|
10.0%
2/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
4.8%
2/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Haemoglobin decreased
|
5.0%
1/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Abnormal loss of weight
|
10.0%
2/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
5.0%
1/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
4.8%
2/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
15.0%
3/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
4.8%
2/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
19.0%
4/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
10.0%
2/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
11.9%
5/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
5.3%
2/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
|
5.0%
1/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
4.8%
2/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
0.00%
0/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
5.3%
2/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Temporomandibular pain and dysfunction syndrome
|
5.0%
1/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
15.0%
3/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
19.0%
8/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
18.4%
7/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
28.6%
6/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Neuropathy peripheral
|
0.00%
0/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
9.5%
2/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
5.0%
1/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
2.4%
1/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
2.6%
1/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Dysuria
|
5.0%
1/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
2.4%
1/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary hesitation
|
5.0%
1/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Erectile dysfunction
|
0.00%
0/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
7.1%
3/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Intermenstrual bleeding
|
5.0%
1/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Bronchiectasis
|
5.0%
1/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
5.0%
1/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
7.1%
3/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Haemoptysis
|
10.0%
2/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
2.4%
1/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
2.6%
1/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
4.8%
1/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleuritic pain
|
5.0%
1/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis allergic
|
10.0%
2/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis contact
|
5.0%
1/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Eczema weeping
|
5.0%
1/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Night sweats
|
5.0%
1/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
2.4%
1/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
2.6%
1/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
10.0%
2/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
2.4%
1/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
10.0%
2/20 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
4.8%
2/42 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
5.3%
2/38 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
4.8%
1/21 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took any dose of the study drug.
|
Additional Information
Clinical Transparency
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place