Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Video Intervention to Improve Patient Understanding of Tumor Genomic Testing in Patients With Metastatic Cancer (NCT NCT05215769)

NCT ID: NCT05215769

Last Updated: 2026-04-13

Results Overview

Measured as percentage correct out of 10 questions. Will have 90% power to detect an effect size of 0.47 in change of recall accuracy from pre- to post- video intervention, using a two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test with alpha of 0.05.

Recruitment status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

243 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

At T1 (baseline), at T2 (within 27-days of baseline, all following video viewing and on the same date as video viewing), and at T3 (Up to 288 days after baseline)

Results posted on

2026-04-13

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Cohort 1- Breast
Patients participate in a video intervention session and complete questionnaires at baseline, after participating in the video intervention, and after receiving NGS results. Health Education: Participate in a video intervention Questionnaire Administration: Complete questionnaires
Cohort 2- Lung
Patients participate in a video intervention session and complete questionnaires at baseline, after participating in the video intervention, and after receiving NGS results. Health Education: Participate in a video intervention Questionnaire Administration: Complete questionnaires
Cohort 3- Other Cancer
Patients participate in a video intervention session and complete questionnaires at baseline, after participating in the video intervention, and after receiving NGS results. Health Education: Participate in a video intervention Questionnaire Administration: Complete questionnaires
Cohort 4- Community
Patients participate in a video intervention session and complete questionnaires at baseline, after participating in the video intervention, and after receiving NGS results. Health Education: Participate in a video intervention Questionnaire Administration: Complete questionnaires
Overall Study
STARTED
55
69
62
57
Overall Study
Enrolled and initiated T1 survey participation
54
66
60
56
Overall Study
Completed T2 survey participation
54
64
59
56
Overall Study
Completed T3 survey participation
50
51
50
52
Overall Study
COMPLETED
50
51
50
0
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
5
18
12
57

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

A Video Intervention to Improve Patient Understanding of Tumor Genomic Testing in Patients With Metastatic Cancer

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Cohort 1- Breast
n=55 Participants
Patients participate in a video intervention session and complete questionnaires at baseline, after participating in the video intervention, and after receiving NGS results. Health Education: Participate in a video intervention Questionnaire Administration: Complete questionnaires
Cohort 2- Lung
n=69 Participants
Patients participate in a video intervention session and complete questionnaires at baseline, after participating in the video intervention, and after receiving NGS results. Health Education: Participate in a video intervention Questionnaire Administration: Complete questionnaires
Cohort 3- Other
n=62 Participants
Patients participate in a video intervention session and complete questionnaires at baseline, after participating in the video intervention, and after receiving NGS results. Health Education: Participate in a video intervention Questionnaire Administration: Complete questionnaires
Cohort 4- Community
n=57 Participants
Patients participate in a video intervention session and complete questionnaires at baseline, after participating in the video intervention, and after receiving NGS results. Health Education: Participate in a video intervention Questionnaire Administration: Complete questionnaires
Total
n=243 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
59 years
n=193 Participants
63 years
n=193 Participants
63 years
n=386 Participants
66 years
n=112 Participants
63 years
n=103 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
55 Participants
n=193 Participants
37 Participants
n=193 Participants
24 Participants
n=386 Participants
37 Participants
n=112 Participants
153 Participants
n=103 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants
n=193 Participants
32 Participants
n=193 Participants
38 Participants
n=386 Participants
20 Participants
n=112 Participants
90 Participants
n=103 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
50 Participants
n=193 Participants
62 Participants
n=193 Participants
55 Participants
n=386 Participants
46 Participants
n=112 Participants
213 Participants
n=103 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
3 Participants
n=193 Participants
5 Participants
n=193 Participants
6 Participants
n=386 Participants
9 Participants
n=112 Participants
23 Participants
n=103 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino or Spanish
0 Participants
n=193 Participants
0 Participants
n=193 Participants
1 Participants
n=386 Participants
2 Participants
n=112 Participants
3 Participants
n=103 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 Participants
n=193 Participants
0 Participants
n=193 Participants
0 Participants
n=386 Participants
0 Participants
n=112 Participants
1 Participants
n=103 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants
n=193 Participants
0 Participants
n=193 Participants
0 Participants
n=386 Participants
0 Participants
n=112 Participants
1 Participants
n=103 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other Race or Ethnicity
0 Participants
n=193 Participants
2 Participants
n=193 Participants
0 Participants
n=386 Participants
0 Participants
n=112 Participants
2 Participants
n=103 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Prefer not to answer
0 Participants
n=193 Participants
0 Participants
n=193 Participants
0 Participants
n=386 Participants
0 Participants
n=112 Participants
0 Participants
n=103 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
55 participants
n=193 Participants
69 participants
n=193 Participants
62 participants
n=386 Participants
57 participants
n=112 Participants
243 participants
n=103 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: At T1 (baseline), at T2 (within 27-days of baseline, all following video viewing and on the same date as video viewing), and at T3 (Up to 288 days after baseline)

Population: Number of participants analyzed includes all participants who completed all three time points of the study.

Measured as percentage correct out of 10 questions. Will have 90% power to detect an effect size of 0.47 in change of recall accuracy from pre- to post- video intervention, using a two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test with alpha of 0.05.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1- Breast
n=50 Participants
Patients participate in a video intervention session and complete questionnaires at baseline, after participating in the video intervention, and after receiving NGS results. Health Education: Participate in a video intervention Questionnaire Administration: Complete questionnaires
Cohort 2- Lung
n=51 Participants
Patients participate in a video intervention session and complete questionnaires at baseline, after participating in the video intervention, and after receiving NGS results. Health Education: Participate in a video intervention Questionnaire Administration: Complete questionnaires
Cohort 3- Other
n=50 Participants
Patients participate in a video intervention session and complete questionnaires at baseline, after participating in the video intervention, and after receiving NGS results. Health Education: Participate in a video intervention Questionnaire Administration: Complete questionnaires
Cohort 4- Community
n=52 Participants
Patients participate in a video intervention session and complete questionnaires at baseline, after participating in the video intervention, and after receiving NGS results. Health Education: Participate in a video intervention Questionnaire Administration: Complete questionnaires
Message-specific Knowledge/Recall Accuracy
T1 (Baseline)
88.8 Percent of questions answered correctly
Interval 80.0 to 100.0
85.53 Percent of questions answered correctly
Interval 80.0 to 100.0
88.0 Percent of questions answered correctly
Interval 80.0 to 100.0
85.38 Percent of questions answered correctly
Interval 80.0 to 100.0
Message-specific Knowledge/Recall Accuracy
T2 (After participating in video intervention)
96.8 Percent of questions answered correctly
Interval 100.0 to 100.0
92.67 Percent of questions answered correctly
Interval 90.0 to 100.0
95.0 Percent of questions answered correctly
Interval 90.0 to 100.0
91.73 Percent of questions answered correctly
Interval 90.0 to 100.0
Message-specific Knowledge/Recall Accuracy
T3 (After receiving NGS results)
91.4 Percent of questions answered correctly
Interval 90.0 to 100.0
89.59 Percent of questions answered correctly
Interval 90.0 to 100.0
92.0 Percent of questions answered correctly
Interval 90.0 to 100.0
91.15 Percent of questions answered correctly
Interval 90.0 to 100.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At T1 (baseline), at T2 (within 27-days of baseline, all following video viewing and on the same date as video viewing), and at T3 (Up to 288 days after baseline)

Population: Number of participants analyzed includes all participants who completed all three time points of the study.

Measured with the validated 10 true/false question survey that measure objective knowledge of genes/genetics (% correct out of 10). Will be summarized using descriptive statistics and compared pre-/post-video using Wilcoxon signed rank test.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1- Breast
n=50 Participants
Patients participate in a video intervention session and complete questionnaires at baseline, after participating in the video intervention, and after receiving NGS results. Health Education: Participate in a video intervention Questionnaire Administration: Complete questionnaires
Cohort 2- Lung
n=51 Participants
Patients participate in a video intervention session and complete questionnaires at baseline, after participating in the video intervention, and after receiving NGS results. Health Education: Participate in a video intervention Questionnaire Administration: Complete questionnaires
Cohort 3- Other
n=50 Participants
Patients participate in a video intervention session and complete questionnaires at baseline, after participating in the video intervention, and after receiving NGS results. Health Education: Participate in a video intervention Questionnaire Administration: Complete questionnaires
Cohort 4- Community
n=52 Participants
Patients participate in a video intervention session and complete questionnaires at baseline, after participating in the video intervention, and after receiving NGS results. Health Education: Participate in a video intervention Questionnaire Administration: Complete questionnaires
Patient Genomic Knowledge
T1 (Baseline)
90 Percent of questions answered correctly
Interval 80.0 to 100.0
90 Percent of questions answered correctly
Interval 80.0 to 90.0
90 Percent of questions answered correctly
Interval 80.0 to 100.0
80 Percent of questions answered correctly
Interval 70.0 to 90.0
Patient Genomic Knowledge
T2 (After participating in video intervention)
90 Percent of questions answered correctly
Interval 80.0 to 100.0
90 Percent of questions answered correctly
Interval 80.0 to 100.0
90 Percent of questions answered correctly
Interval 80.0 to 100.0
90 Percent of questions answered correctly
Interval 80.0 to 90.0
Patient Genomic Knowledge
T3 (After receiving NGS results)
90 Percent of questions answered correctly
Interval 80.0 to 90.0
90 Percent of questions answered correctly
Interval 80.0 to 90.0
90 Percent of questions answered correctly
Interval 80.0 to 97.5
90 Percent of questions answered correctly
Interval 80.0 to 90.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At T1 (baseline), at T2 (within 27-days of baseline, all following video viewing and on the same date as video viewing), and at T3 (Up to 288 days after baseline)

Population: Number of participants analyzed includes all participants who completed all three time points of the study.

Measured with the 11-item trust in physician/provider survey (TIPP). The survey uses a 5-point Likert scale with scores ranging from 11 to 55, with higher scores indicating greater trust in physician/provider. Will be summarized using descriptive statistics.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1- Breast
n=50 Participants
Patients participate in a video intervention session and complete questionnaires at baseline, after participating in the video intervention, and after receiving NGS results. Health Education: Participate in a video intervention Questionnaire Administration: Complete questionnaires
Cohort 2- Lung
n=51 Participants
Patients participate in a video intervention session and complete questionnaires at baseline, after participating in the video intervention, and after receiving NGS results. Health Education: Participate in a video intervention Questionnaire Administration: Complete questionnaires
Cohort 3- Other
n=50 Participants
Patients participate in a video intervention session and complete questionnaires at baseline, after participating in the video intervention, and after receiving NGS results. Health Education: Participate in a video intervention Questionnaire Administration: Complete questionnaires
Cohort 4- Community
n=52 Participants
Patients participate in a video intervention session and complete questionnaires at baseline, after participating in the video intervention, and after receiving NGS results. Health Education: Participate in a video intervention Questionnaire Administration: Complete questionnaires
Patient Trust of Physician/Provider
T1 (Baseline)
50.5 score on a scale
Interval 44.25 to 53.0
46.22 score on a scale
Interval 42.13 to 53.88
50 score on a scale
Interval 43.25 to 52.0
44.5 score on a scale
Interval 39.0 to 52.0
Patient Trust of Physician/Provider
T2 (After participating in video intervention)
51 score on a scale
Interval 45.0 to 54.0
48 score on a scale
Interval 40.0 to 52.88
50 score on a scale
Interval 45.0 to 53.0
45 score on a scale
Interval 41.5 to 52.5
Patient Trust of Physician/Provider
T3 (After receiving NGS results)
50 score on a scale
Interval 47.0 to 53.0
50 score on a scale
Interval 45.0 to 53.0
49.5 score on a scale
Interval 43.0 to 53.0
45 score on a scale
Interval 41.75 to 51.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At T1 (baseline), at T2 (within 27-days of baseline, all following video viewing and on the same date as video viewing), and at T3 (Up to 288 days after baseline)

Population: Only breast cancer and lung cancer cohorts were analyzed for this outcome measure

Measured with the validated 10 true/false question survey (% correct out of 10). . Will be summarized using descriptive statistics and compared pre-/post-video using Wilcoxon signed rank test. Will be compared between MBC and MLC patients using Wilcoxon rank sum test.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1- Breast
n=50 Participants
Patients participate in a video intervention session and complete questionnaires at baseline, after participating in the video intervention, and after receiving NGS results. Health Education: Participate in a video intervention Questionnaire Administration: Complete questionnaires
Cohort 2- Lung
n=51 Participants
Patients participate in a video intervention session and complete questionnaires at baseline, after participating in the video intervention, and after receiving NGS results. Health Education: Participate in a video intervention Questionnaire Administration: Complete questionnaires
Cohort 3- Other
Patients participate in a video intervention session and complete questionnaires at baseline, after participating in the video intervention, and after receiving NGS results. Health Education: Participate in a video intervention Questionnaire Administration: Complete questionnaires
Cohort 4- Community
Patients participate in a video intervention session and complete questionnaires at baseline, after participating in the video intervention, and after receiving NGS results. Health Education: Participate in a video intervention Questionnaire Administration: Complete questionnaires
Change in Patient Genomic Knowledge in Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) Versus Metastatic Lung Cancer (MLC) Patients
T1 (Baseline)
90 Percent of questions answered correctly
Interval 80.0 to 100.0
90 Percent of questions answered correctly
Interval 80.0 to 90.0
Change in Patient Genomic Knowledge in Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) Versus Metastatic Lung Cancer (MLC) Patients
T2 (After participating in video intervention)
90 Percent of questions answered correctly
Interval 80.0 to 100.0
90 Percent of questions answered correctly
Interval 80.0 to 100.0
Change in Patient Genomic Knowledge in Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) Versus Metastatic Lung Cancer (MLC) Patients
T3 (After receiving NGS results)
90 Percent of questions answered correctly
Interval 80.0 to 90.0
90 Percent of questions answered correctly
Interval 80.0 to 90.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At T1 (baseline), at T2 (within 27-days of baseline, all following video viewing and on the same date as video viewing), and at T3 (Up to 288 days after baseline)

Population: Only breast cancer and lung cancer cohorts were analyzed for this outcome measure

Measured with the 11-item trust in physician/provider survey (TIPP). The survey uses a 5-point Likert scale with scores ranging from 11 to 55, with higher scores indicating greater trust in physician/provider.. Will be summarized using descriptive statistics and compared pre-/post-video using Wilcoxon signed rank test. Will be compared between MBC and MLC patients using Wilcoxon rank sum test.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1- Breast
n=50 Participants
Patients participate in a video intervention session and complete questionnaires at baseline, after participating in the video intervention, and after receiving NGS results. Health Education: Participate in a video intervention Questionnaire Administration: Complete questionnaires
Cohort 2- Lung
n=51 Participants
Patients participate in a video intervention session and complete questionnaires at baseline, after participating in the video intervention, and after receiving NGS results. Health Education: Participate in a video intervention Questionnaire Administration: Complete questionnaires
Cohort 3- Other
Patients participate in a video intervention session and complete questionnaires at baseline, after participating in the video intervention, and after receiving NGS results. Health Education: Participate in a video intervention Questionnaire Administration: Complete questionnaires
Cohort 4- Community
Patients participate in a video intervention session and complete questionnaires at baseline, after participating in the video intervention, and after receiving NGS results. Health Education: Participate in a video intervention Questionnaire Administration: Complete questionnaires
Change in Patient Trust of Physician/Provider in MBC Versus MLC Patients
T1 (Baseline)
50.5 score on a scale
Interval 44.25 to 53.0
46.22 score on a scale
Interval 42.13 to 53.88
Change in Patient Trust of Physician/Provider in MBC Versus MLC Patients
T2 (After participating in video intervention)
51 score on a scale
Interval 45.0 to 54.0
48 score on a scale
Interval 40.0 to 52.88
Change in Patient Trust of Physician/Provider in MBC Versus MLC Patients
T3 (After receiving NGS results)
50 score on a scale
Interval 47.0 to 53.0
50 score on a scale
Interval 45.0 to 53.0

Adverse Events

Health Services Research (Video)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Dr. Daniel G. Stover

Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center

Phone: (614) 685-6700

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place