Diagnostic Accuracy of Self-sampling Versus Healthcare Sampling for Coronavirus-Disease-2019 Detection.
NCT05209178 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 3070
Last updated 2022-05-11
Summary
The current Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic continues to be a worldwide health emergency. To contain the spread of disease, high demands on testing availability and capacity are observed. Although polymerase chain reaction (PRC) is the golden standard method in detecting infection with COVID-19, the procedure is time consuming and requires healthcare personnel and laboratories. Rapid antigen tests, however, have several potential benefits including greater scalability and results are provided much quicker. So far, sampling for rapid antigen tests is predominantly performed by health care personnel. Though, the testing and analyzing procedure of an antigen test seems manageable by laymen but the validity of a self-performed rapid antigen test is sparsely examined. Thus, the investigators wish to conduct a study evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of self-performed rapid antigen test for detecting COVID-19 infection by comparing self-performed and healthcare-performed rapid antigen tests on the same individual while using a PCR tests as a control.
Conditions
- COVID-19 Pandemic
Interventions
- DIAGNOSTIC_TEST
-
Collection of nasal and oropharyngeal specimen for COVID19 antigen test
Regarding two independent sampling procedures from the anterior part of the nose and the oropharynx, participants are randomized to either perform the sampling by themselves with written instructions or having the procedure performed by trained personnel. The specimen is meant for a rapid antigen test for COVID-19 infection.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Emergency Medical Services, Capital Region, Denmark
collaborator OTHER_GOV -
Technical University of Denmark
collaborator OTHER -
Copenhagen Medical A/S
collaborator UNKNOWN -
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Kathrine K Jakobsen, MD · Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 16 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2022-02-04
- Primary Completion
- 2022-03-25
- Completion
- 2022-05-06
Countries
- Denmark
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Self-sampling for the Study of COVID-19
NCT04447495 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Optimal Length for Nasal Mid-turbinate and Nasopharyngeal Swabs
NCT04840082 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Swab Site and Sample Collector on Testing Sensitivity for COVID-19 Virus in Symptomatic Individuals
NCT04321369 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Assessment of Self-Collected Sample Compared to Clinician Collected Sample in COVID-19 and Influenza Program
NCT04681950 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
A Comparison of Sample Collection Methods for SARS-COV-2 Antibody Testing
NCT04537572 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
SARS-CoV-2 OTC At Home Test
NCT05553964 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Self-Collected Saliva Samples Without Viral Transport Media for COVID-19 Testing Via RT-PCR
NCT04604145 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Detection of SARS-CoV2 (COVID-19) Between Nasopharyngeal Swab Specimens and Those Obtained by Salivary Sputum
NCT05024461 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Performance of 3 Sampling Methods for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) With Real-time Reverse Transcriptase PCR
NCT04361448 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Diagnostic Performance Evaluation of a Novel SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Antigen Detection Test
NCT04609969 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Longitudinal Study of COVID-19 Positive Patients Testing Nasal Swabs and Collecting Blood Samples for Research
NCT04327804 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Dry Versus Wet Nasopharyngeal Rapid Test for the Detection of COVID-19.
NCT04839094 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
COVID-19 Testing Sample Acquisition Throughput and Efficiency
NCT04532411 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Novel Point-of-Care Diagnostic Test for SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19)
NCT04513990 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Saliva as Source of Detection for SARS-CoV-2
NCT04424446 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Evaluation of the Diagnostic Performance of the TestNPass DM-DIV for SARS-CoV-2 Using a Nasopharyngeal Sample
NCT06917261 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of the SONA Saliva C-19 Rapid Self-Test for the Detection of COVID-19
NCT05256589 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance Evaluation of KnowNow SARS-CoV-2 Test for the Detection of COVID-19 Antigen
NCT04733170 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
The Use of Peripheral Blood Specimens From Patients Suspected of Having SARS-CoV-2 Infections in Research Studies Intended to Support the Development of COVID-19 Detection Methods, Treatments, and/or Vaccines
NCT04391400 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
COVID-19 Tests With Saliva Specimens
NCT04567953 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Self- Versus Conventional-swabbing for COVID-19 Screening (COVISWAB)
NCT04831853 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test Kit
NCT04889365 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Spartan COVID-19 System: Evaluation of Clinical Sample Collection
NCT04473248 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
COVID-19 Rapid Testing for Self-Administration Among an Asymptomatic Sample
NCT04896710 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Nasopharyngeal Swab v. Nasopharyngeal Saline Wash or Saliva Collection in Testing for Respiratory Viruses
NCT05864118 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA