Trial Outcomes & Findings for Positive Activities for Asian American Cancer Patients and Caregivers (NCT NCT05203614)

NCT ID: NCT05203614

Last Updated: 2026-08-13

Results Overview

HRQOL was measured using the 10-item Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global-10 (PROMIS-10) (Cella et al., 2010), with physical and mental health subscales. The scale ranges from 5 to 20 with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

60 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

End-of-study (4 weeks)

Results posted on

2026-08-13

Participant Flow

Data were collected from August 2022 to October 2023, Participants were recruited in person in outpatient clinics or over the phone.

8 participants were excluded from the study before assignment to groups. 3 were excluded due to caregivers not signing informated consent; 5 were excluded due to not completing baseline measures.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Household Contribution
Participants completed one tangible, useful, or practical activity at home that might contribute to their caregiver's well-being
Outside Contribution
Participants completed one tangible, useful, or practical activity each week that would meaningfully contribute to the world outside their home.
Control
Participants were asked to report at least 5 of their daily activities from the past 24 hours into a log once a week
Overall Study
STARTED
15
19
14
Overall Study
Patients
10
12
10
Overall Study
Caregivers
5
7
4
Overall Study
COMPLETED
14
13
14
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
1
6
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Household Contribution
Participants completed one tangible, useful, or practical activity at home that might contribute to their caregiver's well-being
Outside Contribution
Participants completed one tangible, useful, or practical activity each week that would meaningfully contribute to the world outside their home.
Control
Participants were asked to report at least 5 of their daily activities from the past 24 hours into a log once a week
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
1
4
0
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
0
2
0

Baseline Characteristics

Separated by participants and caregivers

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Household Contribution
n=15 Participants
Participants completed one tangible, useful, or practical activity at home that might contribute to their caregiver's well-being
Outside Contribution
n=19 Participants
Participants completed one tangible, useful, or practical activity each week that would meaningfully contribute to the world outside their home.
Control
n=14 Participants
Participants were asked to report at least 5 of their daily activities from the past 24 hours into a log once a week
Total
n=48 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
Patients
53.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.87 • n=10 Participants • Separated by participants and caregivers
55.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.76 • n=12 Participants • Separated by participants and caregivers
55.10 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.26 • n=10 Participants • Separated by participants and caregivers
53.65 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.35 • n=32 Participants • Separated by participants and caregivers
Age, Continuous
Caregivers
57.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.49 • n=5 Participants • Separated by participants and caregivers
48.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.47 • n=7 Participants • Separated by participants and caregivers
51.00 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.93 • n=4 Participants • Separated by participants and caregivers
53.65 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.35 • n=16 Participants • Separated by participants and caregivers
Sex: Female, Male
Patients · Female
4 Participants
n=10 Participants • Separated by participants and caregivers
9 Participants
n=12 Participants • Separated by participants and caregivers
7 Participants
n=10 Participants • Separated by participants and caregivers
20 Participants
n=32 Participants • Separated by participants and caregivers
Sex: Female, Male
Patients · Male
6 Participants
n=10 Participants • Separated by participants and caregivers
3 Participants
n=12 Participants • Separated by participants and caregivers
3 Participants
n=10 Participants • Separated by participants and caregivers
12 Participants
n=32 Participants • Separated by participants and caregivers
Sex: Female, Male
Caregivers · Female
4 Participants
n=5 Participants • Separated by participants and caregivers
5 Participants
n=7 Participants • Separated by participants and caregivers
2 Participants
n=4 Participants • Separated by participants and caregivers
11 Participants
n=16 Participants • Separated by participants and caregivers
Sex: Female, Male
Caregivers · Male
1 Participants
n=5 Participants • Separated by participants and caregivers
2 Participants
n=7 Participants • Separated by participants and caregivers
2 Participants
n=4 Participants • Separated by participants and caregivers
5 Participants
n=16 Participants • Separated by participants and caregivers
Race (NIH/OMB)
Patients · American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=10 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
0 Participants
n=12 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
0 Participants
n=10 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
0 Participants
n=32 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
Race (NIH/OMB)
Patients · Asian
10 Participants
n=10 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
11 Participants
n=12 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
10 Participants
n=10 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
31 Participants
n=32 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
Race (NIH/OMB)
Patients · Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=10 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
1 Participants
n=12 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
0 Participants
n=10 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
1 Participants
n=32 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
Race (NIH/OMB)
Patients · Black or African American
0 Participants
n=10 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
0 Participants
n=12 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
0 Participants
n=10 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
0 Participants
n=32 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
Race (NIH/OMB)
Patients · White
0 Participants
n=10 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
0 Participants
n=12 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
0 Participants
n=10 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
0 Participants
n=32 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
Race (NIH/OMB)
Patients · More than one race
0 Participants
n=10 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
0 Participants
n=12 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
0 Participants
n=10 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
0 Participants
n=32 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
Race (NIH/OMB)
Patients · Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=10 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
0 Participants
n=12 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
0 Participants
n=10 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
0 Participants
n=32 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers · American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
0 Participants
n=7 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
0 Participants
n=4 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
0 Participants
n=16 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers · Asian
5 Participants
n=5 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
7 Participants
n=7 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
4 Participants
n=4 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
16 Participants
n=16 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers · Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
0 Participants
n=7 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
0 Participants
n=4 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
0 Participants
n=16 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers · Black or African American
0 Participants
n=5 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
0 Participants
n=7 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
0 Participants
n=4 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
0 Participants
n=16 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers · White
0 Participants
n=5 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
0 Participants
n=7 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
0 Participants
n=4 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
0 Participants
n=16 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers · More than one race
0 Participants
n=5 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
0 Participants
n=7 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
0 Participants
n=4 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
0 Participants
n=16 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers · Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
0 Participants
n=7 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
0 Participants
n=4 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
0 Participants
n=16 Participants • Separated by participant and caregiver
Region of Enrollment
United States
15 participants
n=15 Participants
19 participants
n=19 Participants
14 participants
n=14 Participants
48 participants
n=48 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: End-of-study (4 weeks)

Population: Only complete cases were analyzed (those who completed end-of-study).

Positive and negative affect were measured using a modified 12-item Affect-Adjective Scale (AAS) (Diener \& Emmons, 1984) that included low-arousal emotion items (e.g., peaceful/serene, dull/bored). Participants rated the extent to which they experienced positive and negative emotions over the past week on a scale from 0 ("not at all") to 6 ("extremely").

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Household Contribution
n=14 Participants
Participants completed one tangible, useful, or practical activity at home that might contribute to their caregiver's well-being
Outside Contribution
n=13 Participants
Participants completed one tangible, useful, or practical activity each week that would meaningfully contribute to the world outside their home.
Control
n=14 Participants
Participants were asked to report at least 5 of their daily activities from the past 24 hours into a log once a week
Affect-Adjective Scale
Positive Affect Patients
3.44 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.14
3.57 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
3.83 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.23
Affect-Adjective Scale
Positive Affect Caregivers
3.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
3.21 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
4.25 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.02
Affect-Adjective Scale
Negative Affect Patients
0.96 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.14
0.87 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
0.77 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7
Affect-Adjective Scale
Negative Affect Caregivers
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
1.46 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.63
0.96 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.57

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: End-of-study (4 weeks)

Population: Only complete cases were analyzed (those who completed end-of-study). Only patients analyzed.

HRQOL was measured using the 10-item Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global-10 (PROMIS-10) (Cella et al., 2010), with physical and mental health subscales. The scale ranges from 5 to 20 with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Household Contribution
n=9 Participants
Participants completed one tangible, useful, or practical activity at home that might contribute to their caregiver's well-being
Outside Contribution
n=9 Participants
Participants completed one tangible, useful, or practical activity each week that would meaningfully contribute to the world outside their home.
Control
n=10 Participants
Participants were asked to report at least 5 of their daily activities from the past 24 hours into a log once a week
Health-Related Quality of Life
Physical QOL - Patients
13.67 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2
14.67 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.87
14.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.57
Health-Related Quality of Life
Mental QOL - Patients
12.56 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.17
13.22 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.33
13.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.07

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: End-of-study (4 weeks)

Population: Only complete cases were analyzed (those who completed end-of-study).

Perceived stress was measured using the 4-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) (Cohen \& Willliamson, 1988), which assessed the frequency of stressful experiences over the past month. The scale ranges from 0 to 16 with higher scores indicating greater perceived stress.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Household Contribution
n=14 Participants
Participants completed one tangible, useful, or practical activity at home that might contribute to their caregiver's well-being
Outside Contribution
n=13 Participants
Participants completed one tangible, useful, or practical activity each week that would meaningfully contribute to the world outside their home.
Control
n=14 Participants
Participants were asked to report at least 5 of their daily activities from the past 24 hours into a log once a week
Perceived Stress
Patients
5.11 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.21
5.56 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.56
5.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.73
Perceived Stress
Caregivers
6.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.92
7.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.08
5.25 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.86

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: End-of-study (4 weeks)

Population: Only complete cases were analyzed (those who completed end-of-study).

Psychological needs were measured with a 9-item version of the Balanced Measure of Psychological Needs (BMPN) (Sheldon \& Hilpert, 2012), which includes subscales for autonomy, competence, and connectedness. The subscales range from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction of the respective need.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Household Contribution
n=14 Participants
Participants completed one tangible, useful, or practical activity at home that might contribute to their caregiver's well-being
Outside Contribution
n=13 Participants
Participants completed one tangible, useful, or practical activity each week that would meaningfully contribute to the world outside their home.
Control
n=14 Participants
Participants were asked to report at least 5 of their daily activities from the past 24 hours into a log once a week
Psychological Needs
Competence - Patients
3.82 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.78
3.81 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.13
4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.85
Psychological Needs
Autonomy - Patients
4.07 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7
4.11 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.78
4.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.74
Psychological Needs
Autonomy - Caregivers
3.73 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.6
3.92 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.1
4.33 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.47
Psychological Needs
Competence - Caregivers
3.73 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.55
3.67 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.41
4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.72
Psychological Needs
Connectedness - Patients
3.93 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.6
3.96 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.86
4.27 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.63
Psychological Needs
Connectedness - Caregivers
3.87 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.3
3.58 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.45
4.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.43

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: End-of-study (4 weeks)

Population: Only patients analyzed.

Self-perceived burden was measured using the 10-item Self-Perceived Burden Scale (SPBS) (Cousineau et al., 2003), which assessed the extent to which patients felt that they were a burden on caregivers. The scale ranges from 10 to 50 with higher scores indicating greater self=perceived burden.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Household Contribution
n=9 Participants
Participants completed one tangible, useful, or practical activity at home that might contribute to their caregiver's well-being
Outside Contribution
n=9 Participants
Participants completed one tangible, useful, or practical activity each week that would meaningfully contribute to the world outside their home.
Control
n=10 Participants
Participants were asked to report at least 5 of their daily activities from the past 24 hours into a log once a week
Self-Perceived Burden
20.44 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.89
17.33 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.58
19.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.74

Adverse Events

Household Contribution

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Outside Contribution

Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Control

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Household Contribution
n=15 participants at risk
Participants completed one tangible, useful, or practical activity at home that might contribute to their caregiver's well-being
Outside Contribution
n=19 participants at risk
Participants completed one tangible, useful, or practical activity each week that would meaningfully contribute to the world outside their home.
Control
n=14 participants at risk
Participants were asked to report at least 5 of their daily activities from the past 24 hours into a log once a week
General disorders
Patient did not feel well enough to do study activities
0.00%
0/15 • baseline to study completion, an average of 5 weeks
5.3%
1/19 • baseline to study completion, an average of 5 weeks
0.00%
0/14 • baseline to study completion, an average of 5 weeks

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

LI Qian

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Phone: 713) 745-8324

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place