Trial Outcomes & Findings for Microcurrent Device (TIVIC Health) (NCT NCT05198518)
NCT ID: NCT05198518
Last Updated: 2025-06-12
Results Overview
Change in postoperative pain score in first use of device post-op at different timepoints after intervention. Participants will record their pain score before and after use of the device. The pain will be recorded using a visual analog scale. Full scale from 0-10, with higher score indicating more pain. Participants instructed to use device for total of 14 days and recommended to use at least 3x a day. They are asked to record their pain levels at baseline, 10 min, 2 hours, and 4 hours after the first time they use the device.
COMPLETED
NA
60 participants
baseline, 10 min, 2 hour, 4 hour at first use within 14 days after procedure
2025-06-12
Participant Flow
60 patients met the inclusion criteria and enrolled into the study.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
All Participants Screened
Participants consented and had screening visit to determine eligibility
|
Microcurrent TENS Device
A handheld micro-current TENS emitter device, which applies a small current of electricity to the forehead and maxillary region
Microcurrent TENS device: The study device is a handheld micro-current TENS emitter intended to be used for the relief of postoperative pain after FESS. The design of the study device was optimized to provide transcutaneous nerve stimulation to the regional areas associated with the sinuses.
|
Sham Device
The sham device appears identical to the active device while emitting no therapeutic microcurrent.
Sham Device: The sham device appears and operates identically to the active device, including indicator lights and haptic vibration, however it emits a weak direct current that is non-therapeutic.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Screening Visit
STARTED
|
118
|
0
|
0
|
|
Screening Visit
COMPLETED
|
60
|
0
|
0
|
|
Screening Visit
NOT COMPLETED
|
58
|
0
|
0
|
|
Enrolled Participants
STARTED
|
0
|
27
|
33
|
|
Enrolled Participants
COMPLETED
|
0
|
27
|
33
|
|
Enrolled Participants
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
All Participants Screened
Participants consented and had screening visit to determine eligibility
|
Microcurrent TENS Device
A handheld micro-current TENS emitter device, which applies a small current of electricity to the forehead and maxillary region
Microcurrent TENS device: The study device is a handheld micro-current TENS emitter intended to be used for the relief of postoperative pain after FESS. The design of the study device was optimized to provide transcutaneous nerve stimulation to the regional areas associated with the sinuses.
|
Sham Device
The sham device appears identical to the active device while emitting no therapeutic microcurrent.
Sham Device: The sham device appears and operates identically to the active device, including indicator lights and haptic vibration, however it emits a weak direct current that is non-therapeutic.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Screening Visit
Deemed unable to participate
|
58
|
0
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Microcurrent Device (TIVIC Health)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Microcurrent TENS Device
n=27 Participants
A handheld micro-current TENS emitter device, which applies a small current of electricity to the forehead and maxillary region
Microcurrent TENS device: The study device is a handheld micro-current TENS emitter intended to be used for the relief of postoperative pain after FESS. The design of the study device was optimized to provide transcutaneous nerve stimulation to the regional areas associated with the sinuses.
|
Sham Device
n=33 Participants
The sham device appears identical to the active device while emitting no therapeutic microcurrent.
Sham Device: The sham device appears and operates identically to the active device, including indicator lights and haptic vibration, however it emits a weak direct current that is non-therapeutic.
|
Total
n=60 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
41.38 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.63 • n=99 Participants
|
39.55 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.31 • n=107 Participants
|
40.35 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.35 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
10 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
17 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
40 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White (Caucasian)
|
19 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
36 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
|
4 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
|
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Prior Sinus Surgery
|
25 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Pre-Operative Diagnosis
Chronic Rhinosinusitis without Polyposis
|
16 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
35 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Pre-Operative Diagnosis
Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Polyposis
|
8 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Pre-Operative Diagnosis
Other
|
3 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Septoplasty
|
18 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
40 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 10 min, 2 hour, 4 hour at first use within 14 days after procedureChange in postoperative pain score in first use of device post-op at different timepoints after intervention. Participants will record their pain score before and after use of the device. The pain will be recorded using a visual analog scale. Full scale from 0-10, with higher score indicating more pain. Participants instructed to use device for total of 14 days and recommended to use at least 3x a day. They are asked to record their pain levels at baseline, 10 min, 2 hours, and 4 hours after the first time they use the device.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Microcurrent TENS Device
n=27 Participants
A handheld micro-current TENS emitter device, which applies a small current of electricity to the forehead and maxillary region
Microcurrent TENS device: The study device is a handheld micro-current TENS emitter intended to be used for the relief of postoperative pain after FESS. The design of the study device was optimized to provide transcutaneous nerve stimulation to the regional areas associated with the sinuses.
|
Sham Device
n=33 Participants
The sham device appears identical to the active device while emitting no therapeutic microcurrent.
Sham Device: The sham device appears and operates identically to the active device, including indicator lights and haptic vibration, however it emits a weak direct current that is non-therapeutic.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Pain Visual Analog Score After First Use of Device
Baseline
|
4.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.06
|
5.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.68
|
|
Change in Pain Visual Analog Score After First Use of Device
10 min
|
4.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.96
|
4.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.31
|
|
Change in Pain Visual Analog Score After First Use of Device
2 hour
|
4.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.26
|
4.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.33
|
|
Change in Pain Visual Analog Score After First Use of Device
4 hour
|
3.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.47
|
3.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.46
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 10 min, 2 hour, 4 hour at second use within 14 days after procedureChange in postoperative pain score after second use of device post-op at different timepoints after intervention. Participants will record their pain score before and after use of the device. The pain will be recorded using a visual analog scale. Full scale from 0-10, with higher score indicating more pain. Participants instructed to use device for total of 14 days and recommended to use at least 3x a day. They are asked to record their pain levels at baseline, 10 min, 2 hours, and 4 hours after the second time they use the device.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Microcurrent TENS Device
n=27 Participants
A handheld micro-current TENS emitter device, which applies a small current of electricity to the forehead and maxillary region
Microcurrent TENS device: The study device is a handheld micro-current TENS emitter intended to be used for the relief of postoperative pain after FESS. The design of the study device was optimized to provide transcutaneous nerve stimulation to the regional areas associated with the sinuses.
|
Sham Device
n=33 Participants
The sham device appears identical to the active device while emitting no therapeutic microcurrent.
Sham Device: The sham device appears and operates identically to the active device, including indicator lights and haptic vibration, however it emits a weak direct current that is non-therapeutic.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Pain Visual Analog Score After Second Use of Device
Baseline
|
4.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.91
|
5.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.99
|
|
Change in Pain Visual Analog Score After Second Use of Device
10 min
|
3.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.60
|
5.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.62
|
|
Change in Pain Visual Analog Score After Second Use of Device
2 hour
|
3.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.66
|
4.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.56
|
|
Change in Pain Visual Analog Score After Second Use of Device
4 hour
|
3.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.66
|
4.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.11
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 10 min, 2 hour, 4 hour at 3rd use within 14 days after procedureChange in postoperative pain score after third use of device post-op at different timepoints after intervention. Participants will record their pain score before and after use of the device. The pain will be recorded using a visual analog scale. Full scale from 0-10, with higher score indicating more pain. Participants instructed to use device for total of 14 days and recommended to use at least 3x a day. They are asked to record their pain levels at baseline, 10 min, 2 hours, and 4 hours after the third time they use the device.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Microcurrent TENS Device
n=27 Participants
A handheld micro-current TENS emitter device, which applies a small current of electricity to the forehead and maxillary region
Microcurrent TENS device: The study device is a handheld micro-current TENS emitter intended to be used for the relief of postoperative pain after FESS. The design of the study device was optimized to provide transcutaneous nerve stimulation to the regional areas associated with the sinuses.
|
Sham Device
n=33 Participants
The sham device appears identical to the active device while emitting no therapeutic microcurrent.
Sham Device: The sham device appears and operates identically to the active device, including indicator lights and haptic vibration, however it emits a weak direct current that is non-therapeutic.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Pain Visual Analog Score After Third Use of Device
Baseline
|
4.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.20
|
4.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.05
|
|
Change in Pain Visual Analog Score After Third Use of Device
10 min
|
4.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.20
|
4.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.47
|
|
Change in Pain Visual Analog Score After Third Use of Device
2 hour
|
3.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.02
|
4.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.84
|
|
Change in Pain Visual Analog Score After Third Use of Device
4 hour
|
3.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.09
|
3.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.07
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 10 min, 2 hour, 4 hour at fourth use within 14 days after procedureChange in postoperative pain score after fourth use of device post-op at different timepoints after intervention. Participants will record their pain score before and after use of the device. The pain will be recorded using a visual analog scale. Full scale from 0-10, with higher score indicating more pain. Participants instructed to use device for total of 14 days and recommended to use at least 3x a day. They are asked to record their pain levels at baseline, 10 min, 2 hours, and 4 hours after the fourth time they use the device.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Microcurrent TENS Device
n=27 Participants
A handheld micro-current TENS emitter device, which applies a small current of electricity to the forehead and maxillary region
Microcurrent TENS device: The study device is a handheld micro-current TENS emitter intended to be used for the relief of postoperative pain after FESS. The design of the study device was optimized to provide transcutaneous nerve stimulation to the regional areas associated with the sinuses.
|
Sham Device
n=33 Participants
The sham device appears identical to the active device while emitting no therapeutic microcurrent.
Sham Device: The sham device appears and operates identically to the active device, including indicator lights and haptic vibration, however it emits a weak direct current that is non-therapeutic.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Pain Visual Analog Score After Fourth Use of Device
Baseline
|
4.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.06
|
4.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.48
|
|
Change in Pain Visual Analog Score After Fourth Use of Device
10 min
|
3.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.96
|
4.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.35
|
|
Change in Pain Visual Analog Score After Fourth Use of Device
2 hour
|
3.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.84
|
3.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.15
|
|
Change in Pain Visual Analog Score After Fourth Use of Device
4 hour
|
3.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.85
|
3.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.22
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 10 min, 2 hour, 4 hour at fifth use within 14 days after procedureChange in postoperative pain score after fifth use of device post-op at different timepoints after intervention. Participants will record their pain score before and after use of the device. The pain will be recorded using a visual analog scale. Full scale from 0-10, with higher score indicating more pain. Participants instructed to use device for total of 14 days and recommended to use at least 3x a day. They are asked to record their pain levels at baseline, 10 min, 2 hours, and 4 hours after the fifth time they use the device.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Microcurrent TENS Device
n=27 Participants
A handheld micro-current TENS emitter device, which applies a small current of electricity to the forehead and maxillary region
Microcurrent TENS device: The study device is a handheld micro-current TENS emitter intended to be used for the relief of postoperative pain after FESS. The design of the study device was optimized to provide transcutaneous nerve stimulation to the regional areas associated with the sinuses.
|
Sham Device
n=33 Participants
The sham device appears identical to the active device while emitting no therapeutic microcurrent.
Sham Device: The sham device appears and operates identically to the active device, including indicator lights and haptic vibration, however it emits a weak direct current that is non-therapeutic.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Pain Visual Analog Score After Fifth Use of Device
Baseline
|
3.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.71
|
4.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.70
|
|
Change in Pain Visual Analog Score After Fifth Use of Device
10 min
|
3.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.50
|
3.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.48
|
|
Change in Pain Visual Analog Score After Fifth Use of Device
2 hour
|
3.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.51
|
2.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.02
|
|
Change in Pain Visual Analog Score After Fifth Use of Device
4 hour
|
2.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.31
|
2.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.28
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks Post-OpThe possible range of Total SNOT scores is between 0 to 110. Higher scores indicate greater rhinosinusitis-related health burden.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Microcurrent TENS Device
n=27 Participants
A handheld micro-current TENS emitter device, which applies a small current of electricity to the forehead and maxillary region
Microcurrent TENS device: The study device is a handheld micro-current TENS emitter intended to be used for the relief of postoperative pain after FESS. The design of the study device was optimized to provide transcutaneous nerve stimulation to the regional areas associated with the sinuses.
|
Sham Device
n=33 Participants
The sham device appears identical to the active device while emitting no therapeutic microcurrent.
Sham Device: The sham device appears and operates identically to the active device, including indicator lights and haptic vibration, however it emits a weak direct current that is non-therapeutic.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT 22)
Baseline
|
46.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.4
|
37.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.8
|
|
Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT 22)
2 weeks post-op
|
27.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.5
|
19.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.9
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks Post-OpFull scale from 0-100. Higher score indicates more severe symptoms
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Microcurrent TENS Device
n=27 Participants
A handheld micro-current TENS emitter device, which applies a small current of electricity to the forehead and maxillary region
Microcurrent TENS device: The study device is a handheld micro-current TENS emitter intended to be used for the relief of postoperative pain after FESS. The design of the study device was optimized to provide transcutaneous nerve stimulation to the regional areas associated with the sinuses.
|
Sham Device
n=33 Participants
The sham device appears identical to the active device while emitting no therapeutic microcurrent.
Sham Device: The sham device appears and operates identically to the active device, including indicator lights and haptic vibration, however it emits a weak direct current that is non-therapeutic.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Difference in Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Score
|
3.8 mean difference in score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.8
|
3.8 mean difference in score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 10 min, 2 hour, 4 hour on POD14Participants will record their pain before using the device at their postoperative debridement visits on post operative day 14 (POD14). Their pain levels will be recorded at baseline, 10 min, 2 hours, and 4 hours using a visual analog scale. Full scale from 0-10, with higher score indicating more pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Microcurrent TENS Device
n=27 Participants
A handheld micro-current TENS emitter device, which applies a small current of electricity to the forehead and maxillary region
Microcurrent TENS device: The study device is a handheld micro-current TENS emitter intended to be used for the relief of postoperative pain after FESS. The design of the study device was optimized to provide transcutaneous nerve stimulation to the regional areas associated with the sinuses.
|
Sham Device
n=33 Participants
The sham device appears identical to the active device while emitting no therapeutic microcurrent.
Sham Device: The sham device appears and operates identically to the active device, including indicator lights and haptic vibration, however it emits a weak direct current that is non-therapeutic.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Debridement Associated Pain Visual Analog Score Before Use of Device
Baseline
|
4.88 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.06
|
5.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.68
|
|
Debridement Associated Pain Visual Analog Score Before Use of Device
10 min
|
4.71 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.96
|
4.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.31
|
|
Debridement Associated Pain Visual Analog Score Before Use of Device
2 hour
|
4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.26
|
4.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.33
|
|
Debridement Associated Pain Visual Analog Score Before Use of Device
4 hour
|
3.71 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.47
|
3.85 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.46
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 10 min, 2 hour, 4 hour on POD14Participants will record their pain before using the device at their postoperative debridement visits on post operative day 14 (POD14). Their pain levels will be recorded at baseline, 10 min, 2 hours, and 4 hours after the first use of device using a visual analog scale. Full scale from 0-10, with higher score indicating more pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Microcurrent TENS Device
n=27 Participants
A handheld micro-current TENS emitter device, which applies a small current of electricity to the forehead and maxillary region
Microcurrent TENS device: The study device is a handheld micro-current TENS emitter intended to be used for the relief of postoperative pain after FESS. The design of the study device was optimized to provide transcutaneous nerve stimulation to the regional areas associated with the sinuses.
|
Sham Device
n=33 Participants
The sham device appears identical to the active device while emitting no therapeutic microcurrent.
Sham Device: The sham device appears and operates identically to the active device, including indicator lights and haptic vibration, however it emits a weak direct current that is non-therapeutic.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Debridement Associated Pain Visual Analog Score After First Use of Device
Baseline
|
4.47 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.91
|
5.67 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.99
|
|
Debridement Associated Pain Visual Analog Score After First Use of Device
10 min
|
3.76 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.6
|
5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.62
|
|
Debridement Associated Pain Visual Analog Score After First Use of Device
2 hour
|
3.59 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.66
|
4.53 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.56
|
|
Debridement Associated Pain Visual Analog Score After First Use of Device
4 hour
|
3.59 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.66
|
4.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.11
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 10 min, 2 hour, 4 hour on POD14Participants will record their pain before using the device at their postoperative debridement visits on post operative day 14 (POD14). Their pain levels will be recorded at baseline, 10 min, 2 hours, and 4 hours after the second use of device using a visual analog scale. Full scale from 0-10, with higher score indicating more pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Microcurrent TENS Device
n=27 Participants
A handheld micro-current TENS emitter device, which applies a small current of electricity to the forehead and maxillary region
Microcurrent TENS device: The study device is a handheld micro-current TENS emitter intended to be used for the relief of postoperative pain after FESS. The design of the study device was optimized to provide transcutaneous nerve stimulation to the regional areas associated with the sinuses.
|
Sham Device
n=33 Participants
The sham device appears identical to the active device while emitting no therapeutic microcurrent.
Sham Device: The sham device appears and operates identically to the active device, including indicator lights and haptic vibration, however it emits a weak direct current that is non-therapeutic.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Debridement Associated Pain Visual Analog Score After Second Use of Device
Baseline
|
4.71 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.2
|
4.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.05
|
|
Debridement Associated Pain Visual Analog Score After Second Use of Device
10 min
|
4.29 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.2
|
4.25 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.47
|
|
Debridement Associated Pain Visual Analog Score After Second Use of Device
2 hour
|
1.82 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.64
|
2.02 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4
|
|
Debridement Associated Pain Visual Analog Score After Second Use of Device
4 hour
|
3.71 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.09
|
3.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.07
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 10 min, 2 hour, 4 hour on POD14Participants will record their pain before using the device at their postoperative debridement visits on post operative day 14 (POD14). Their pain levels will be recorded at baseline, 10 min, 2 hours, and 4 hours after the third use of device using a visual analog scale. Full scale from 0-10, with higher score indicating more pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Microcurrent TENS Device
n=27 Participants
A handheld micro-current TENS emitter device, which applies a small current of electricity to the forehead and maxillary region
Microcurrent TENS device: The study device is a handheld micro-current TENS emitter intended to be used for the relief of postoperative pain after FESS. The design of the study device was optimized to provide transcutaneous nerve stimulation to the regional areas associated with the sinuses.
|
Sham Device
n=33 Participants
The sham device appears identical to the active device while emitting no therapeutic microcurrent.
Sham Device: The sham device appears and operates identically to the active device, including indicator lights and haptic vibration, however it emits a weak direct current that is non-therapeutic.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Debridement Associated Pain Visual Analog Score After Third Use of Device
Baseline
|
4.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.06
|
4.06 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.48
|
|
Debridement Associated Pain Visual Analog Score After Third Use of Device
10 min
|
3.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.96
|
4.11 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.35
|
|
Debridement Associated Pain Visual Analog Score After Third Use of Device
2 hour
|
3.33 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.84
|
3.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.15
|
|
Debridement Associated Pain Visual Analog Score After Third Use of Device
4 hour
|
3.13 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.85
|
3.33 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.22
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 10 min, 2 hour, 4 hour on POD14Participants will record their pain before using the device at their postoperative debridement visits on post operative day 14 (POD14). Their pain levels will be recorded at baseline, 10 min, 2 hours, and 4 hours after the fourth use of device using a visual analog scale. Full scale from 0-10, with higher score indicating more pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Microcurrent TENS Device
n=27 Participants
A handheld micro-current TENS emitter device, which applies a small current of electricity to the forehead and maxillary region
Microcurrent TENS device: The study device is a handheld micro-current TENS emitter intended to be used for the relief of postoperative pain after FESS. The design of the study device was optimized to provide transcutaneous nerve stimulation to the regional areas associated with the sinuses.
|
Sham Device
n=33 Participants
The sham device appears identical to the active device while emitting no therapeutic microcurrent.
Sham Device: The sham device appears and operates identically to the active device, including indicator lights and haptic vibration, however it emits a weak direct current that is non-therapeutic.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Debridement Associated Pain Visual Analog Score After Fourth Use of Device
Baseline
|
3.75 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.71
|
4.13 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.7
|
|
Debridement Associated Pain Visual Analog Score After Fourth Use of Device
10 min
|
3.33 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.5
|
3.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.48
|
|
Debridement Associated Pain Visual Analog Score After Fourth Use of Device
2 hour
|
3.41 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.51
|
2.93 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.02
|
|
Debridement Associated Pain Visual Analog Score After Fourth Use of Device
4 hour
|
2.91 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.31
|
2.73 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.28
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Daily until 2nd postoperative visit (day 14)Participants will record their postoperative pain medication daily usage (opioids and acetaminophen). Number of Acetaminophen 325mg or Number of Oxycodone 5 mg taken across 2 weeks post-op
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Microcurrent TENS Device
n=27 Participants
A handheld micro-current TENS emitter device, which applies a small current of electricity to the forehead and maxillary region
Microcurrent TENS device: The study device is a handheld micro-current TENS emitter intended to be used for the relief of postoperative pain after FESS. The design of the study device was optimized to provide transcutaneous nerve stimulation to the regional areas associated with the sinuses.
|
Sham Device
n=33 Participants
The sham device appears identical to the active device while emitting no therapeutic microcurrent.
Sham Device: The sham device appears and operates identically to the active device, including indicator lights and haptic vibration, however it emits a weak direct current that is non-therapeutic.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Postoperative Pain Medication Usage
Tylenol
|
24.3 number of pills
Standard Deviation 30.83
|
16.4 number of pills
Standard Deviation 14.87
|
|
Postoperative Pain Medication Usage
Oxy
|
2.5 number of pills
Standard Deviation 2.84
|
1.5 number of pills
Standard Deviation 2.29
|
Adverse Events
Microcurrent TENS Device
Sham Device
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Alfred Marc C Iloreta Jr, MD
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place