Safety and Immunogenicity of 2 Doses Versus 1 Dose of Acellular Pertussis Vaccines Containing Genetically-detoxified Pertussis Toxin in Young Adults Previously Primed With Acellular Pertussis Vaccines
NCT05193734 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 100
Last updated 2022-01-18
Summary
A significant increase of pertussis incidence is reported in a growing number of countries. This resurgence is considered as resulting from the limited durability of aP-vaccine-induced immunity and is associated with increased mortality in young infants and morbidity at all age groups. As the pertussis immunity acquired through immunization or infection is short-lived, its maintenance or reactivation requires repeat boosting at regular time points. Thus, novel strategies capable of reactivating pertussis immunity are needed.
The efficacy of current acellular pertussis vaccines (which contain chemically-detoxified pertussis toxoid (PT)) rapidly wanes, in part because priming and repeat immunization with acellular vaccines induce antibodies specific for the chemically-detoxified PT but unable to efficiently recognize the native PT expressed by B. pertussis.
Clinical studies have shown the superior immunogenicity profile of acellular pertussis vaccines including genetically-detoxified PT (rPT) in adults and adolescents previously primed with aP. In particular, the investigators showed in a past Geneva study in teenagers previously primed with aP that rPT/FHA induced a stronger recall response than the current aP-vaccine at one month post-vaccination. However, the difference was less clear one year after vaccination, suggesting that 2 doses may be needed for more sustained immunity.
In the present study, the investigators would like to assess whether giving two doses of rPT/FHA at 6 months interval induces stronger immune responses than a single dose.
Conditions
- Pertussis
- Vaccine-Preventable Diseases
Interventions
- DRUG
-
Pertagen®
Schedule: Group Pertagen will receive two doses of Pertagen®. (one vaccination on Day 0 and 6 months later for each volunteer.) Mode of Administration: Intramuscular injection into the deltoid region of the upper extremity, using a syringe with a 1 to 1.5 inch #25-gauge sterile needle.
- DRUG
-
Revaxis®
Schedule: Group Control will receive one dose of Revaxis® on Day 0 followed by 1 dose of Pertagen® 6 months later for each volunteer. Mode of Administration: Intramuscular injection into the deltoid region of the upper extremity, using a syringe with a 1 to 1.5 inch #25-gauge sterile needle.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University Hospital, Geneva
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
BLANCHARD ROHNER Geraldine, MD · University of Geneva
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 30 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2022-02-07
- Primary Completion
- 2022-08-01
- Completion
- 2023-03-30
Countries
- Switzerland
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
A Trial Comparing Two Pertussis-containing Vaccines in Pregnancy and Vaccine Responses in UK Mothers and Their Infants
NCT02145624 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Study to Analyze the Risk Factors Associated With Pertussis/Whooping Cough Infection Among Infants
NCT01890850 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Study of a Birth Dose of GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals' 251154 Vaccine
NCT01110044 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Rates of Pertussis Disease Among Persons Receiving Pentacel® or Other Pertussis Vaccines
NCT01129362 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Assess Feasibility of an Acellular Pertussis Vaccine (Pa) Given Soon After Birth, Followed by 3-dose Primary Vaccination With the DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib Vaccine
NCT00289796 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Comparison of GSK Biologicals' Reduced Antigen Diphtheria and Tetanus Toxoids and Acellular Pertussis- Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine, to BoostrixTM and Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine Administered Separately and With Revaxis®
NCT01277705 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Pediatric Pertussis in Ambulatory Settings
NCT04807712 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Immunogenicity and Safety of GSK Biologicals' Boostrix Polio Vaccine in 3 and 4-year-old Children
NCT01245049 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Study of a New Formulation of DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib Vaccine Administered as a Booster Dose to 18-23 Months Old Children
NCT00611559 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Optimising the Timing of Whooping Cough Immunisation in MUMs
NCT03908164 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Vaccine Responses in Infants After Acellular Pertussis Vaccination During Pregnancy in Thailand
NCT02408926 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Study to Asses DTPw-HBV/Hib at 15-18 Months (m) and Mencevax™ ACW at 24 to 30 m in Primed Subjects
NCT00317109 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Impact of Boostrix™ Maternal Vaccination on Morbidity and Mortality of Pertussis Disease in Infants ≤6 Weeks of Age, in Bogota, Colombia.
NCT02569879 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of GSK Biologicals' DTaP-IPV Candidate Vaccine to DTaP and IPV Separately Administered Vaccines in Terms of Immune Response and Safety
NCT00263692 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Safety Study of Tritanrix-HepB/Hib-MenAC, Tritanrix-HepB/Hiberix, and Mencevax ACWY Vaccines in Children
NCT00228917 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
A Study to Evaluate Immunogenicity and Safety of GlaxoSmithKline (GSK)'s Infanrix Hexa Vaccine (DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib) Versus MCM Vaccine BV's Vaxelis Vaccine (DTaP5-HBV-IPV-Hib) in Healthy Infants and Toddlers
NCT04535037 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Immune Response & Safety of GSK Biologicals' Mencevax™ ACWY in Subjects Primed in the DTPW-HBV=HIB-MENAC-TT-011 Study
NCT00291343 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Comparison of Safety and Immunogenicity of Pediacel™ and Infanrix™ IPV+Hib (Penta) Given in a 3 Dose Schedule in Infants
NCT00287092 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Safety and Immunogenicity Study of a Candidate Tuberculosis Vaccine in Healthy Infants
NCT01098474 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Immune Response and Safety Comparison of 3 Lots of GSK Biologicals' DTaP-IPV Candidate Vaccine to DTaP + IPV Vaccines
NCT00148941 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
A Study to Evaluate Safety and Immunogenicity of APV006 in Healthy Adults
NCT05952596 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Safety of DTaP-IPV-Hep B-PRP~T Combined Vaccine Compared to Tritanrix-HepB/Hib™ and OPV Given at Age 2, 4, and 6 Months.
NCT00313911 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Assess Immunogenicity, Reactogenicity, Safety of a Booster of GSK Biologicals DTPw-HBV/Hib Kft Compared to DTPw-HBV/Hib
NCT00332566 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Immunogenicity and Reactogenicity of GSK Bio DTPa-HBV-IPV and Hib Vaccines When Coadministered to Healthy Infants
NCT00879827 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Study to Compare Pediacel® to Infanrix®-IPV+Hib When Both Are Co-Administered With Prevenar® in Infants and Toddlers
NCT00343421 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3