Lung Ultrasound-Guided Fluid Deresuscitation in ICU Patients

NCT05188092 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 1000

Last updated 2025-12-05

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Timely recognition and treatment of fluid overload can expedite liberation from invasive mechanical ventilation in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Lung ultrasound (LUS) is an easy to learn, safe, cheap and noninvasive bedside imaging tool with high accuracy for pulmonary edema and pleural effusions in ICU patients. The aim of this study is to assess the effect of LUS-guided deresuscitation on duration of invasive ventilation in ICU patients. The investigators hypothesize that LUS-guided fluid deresuscitation is superior to routine fluid deresuscitation (not using LUS) with regard to duration of invasive ventilation.

This study is an international multicenter randomized clinical trial (RCT) in invasively ventilated ICU patients.This study will include 1,000 consecutively admitted invasively ventilated adult ICU patients, who are expected not to be extubated within the next 24 hours after randomization. Patients are randomly assigned to the intervention group, in which fluid deresuscitation is guided by repeated LUS, or the control group, in which fluid deresuscitation is at the discretion of the treating physician (not using LUS).

Conditions

  • Mechanical Ventilation
  • Fluid Overload
  • Deresuscitation
  • Ventilator-free Days

Interventions

OTHER

Lung ultrasound guided deresuscitation

With every new LUS examination, the following scenarios, with distinct recommendations, are possible: 1. LUS observations suggest massive pulmonary fluid overload, with the recommendation to minimize fluid infusion and start fluid withdrawal, targeting a negative fluid balance of at least -1500 ml in the next 24 hours; 2. LUS suggests some pulmonary edema and/or significant pleural effusion. These LUS observations suggest little pulmonary fluid overload, with the suggestion to minimize fluid infusion and start fluid withdrawal, targeting a negative fluid balance at least -500 ml in the next 24 hours; 3. LUS suggests absence of pulmonary edema and no pleural effusion. These LUS observations suggest no fluid overload, with the suggestion to target a neutral fluid balance in the next 24 hours.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development

    collaborator OTHER
  • Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Marcus J Schultz, Prof · Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

  • Pieter Roel Tuinman, Dr · Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc

  • Frederique Paulus, Dr · Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

  • Leo MA Heunks · Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-12-22
Primary Completion
2026-04-01
Completion
2026-06-01

Countries

  • Netherlands

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05188092 on ClinicalTrials.gov