Accuracy Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence Assisted Liver Tumor Ablation Path Planning
NCT05161624 · Status: UNKNOWN · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 160
Last updated 2021-12-17
Summary
CT-guided microwave ablation is one of the important treatment methods for primary or metastatic liver tumors. It has the advantages of minimally invasive, safe, and economical. For liver tumors with a diameter of less than 3 cm, it can be comparable to surgical resection. However, different doctors have different levels of experience, leading to a high risk of residues after ablation and even complications. The key is to fail to plan the needle placement reasonably. The past research on path planning was mostly conducted by the engineering team, so that the actual clinical needs were not considered comprehensively, and the sample size of verified cases was small, which limited the application of existing models in the clinical application. In previous study, we used artificial intelligence to segment the upper abdominal organs and construct the constraint function to establish the ablation path planning model, and initially verified the effectiveness of the path planning model in a small number of cases. Now it is planned to expand the number of patients enrolled to evaluate the accuracy of the ablation path planning model that we have established.
Conditions
- Liver Tumor
Interventions
- DIAGNOSTIC_TEST
-
Accuracy evaluation
The design of the diagnostic trial will include 160 cases of liver tumors with indications for microwave ablation after a multidisciplinary consultation with clinicians (Multiple Disciplinary Team, MDT), including primary liver cancer and metastatic liver tumors, and the tumor diameter is less than 3 cm. The test subjects consist of three groups: a. path planning model, b. junior ablation specialists, c. senior ablation specialists. The three groups will perform microwave ablation path planning on 160 selected cases of liver tumors. The attending professor of the clinical medical group of the department is responsible for scoring, evaluating whether the design of the plan is reasonable, and then comparing the scoring results by using statistical methods to evaluate the accuracy and effectiveness of the path planning model established in this study.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Sun Yat-sen University
lead OTHER
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 70 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2021-12-15
- Primary Completion
- 2022-02-28
- Completion
- 2022-04-30
Countries
- China
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Radiofrequency Ablation Combined With Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Versus Radiofrequency Ablation Alone for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT01415063 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Radiotherapy as an Adjuvant Therapy After Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT00557024 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Effectiveness of Microwave Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma as Compared to Radiofrequency Ablation
NCT01340105 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Radiofrequency Ablation With or With Transcatheter Arterial Embolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT00554905 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Combination Therapy of Microwave Ablation and Cellular Immunotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT02851784 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Combination Chemoembolization and Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Greater Than 3 cm
NCT00479050 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1
-
TACE+RFA Versus Re-resection for Recurrent Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT01833286 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Different Regimens of Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT00493402 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Hepatectomy Versus Chemoembolization for Resectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Beyond Milan Criteria
NCT02138981 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison of Microwave and Radiofrequency Ablation for Liver
NCT02539212 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Microwave Ablation Versus Liver Resection for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
NCT06462742 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
TACE/HAIC Combined With Lenvatinib and Sintilimab in Neoadjuvant Therapy for Intermediate-stage HCC
NCT05250843 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
TACE Combined With Lenvatinib and MWA in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Large Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT05555316 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Repeat Hepatectomy for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT01570166 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Microwave Ablation for the Treatment of Malignant Liver Tumors Closed to Intrahepatic Vessels
NCT03063840 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Risk Assessment for HBV-Related Liver Cancer
NCT07160946 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
The Value of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT in the Efficacy Evaluation of Advanced Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Undergoing Systemic Antitumor Therapy
NCT06746194 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Clinical Feasibility of Microwave Ablation Using Two Channel Microwave Generator and Two Antennas for Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT06086002 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Study of Adjuvant Radiotherapy After Curative Resection of HCC With Narrow Margin (RAISE)
NCT03732105 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
TACE as an Adjuvant Therapy After Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT00556803 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Non-inferiority Study of Unresectable Hepatocelluar Carcinoma Receiving Stereotactic Radiotherapy Combined With Hepatic Arterial Chemoembolization Compared With Conversion Hepatectomy
NCT05057104 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
RFA Versus SBRT for Recurrent Small HCC
NCT04047173 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Ablation of Pulmonary Oligometastasis Combined With System for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT06644430 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Cytokine Change in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated by Thermal Ablation
NCT04555265 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Radiofrequency-assisted Liver Resection in Intractable Liver Cancer
NCT04413526 ·Status: COMPLETED