Trial Outcomes & Findings for Non-invasive Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Functional Movement Disorders (NCT NCT05155059)
NCT ID: NCT05155059
Last Updated: 2026-08-12
Results Overview
The Simplified Functional Movement Disorders Rating Scale (S-FMDRS) measures abnormal movements in 7 body regions as well as gait and speech. Symptom severity in each body region is rated from 0 to 3 (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe) and duration from 0 to 3 (0=none; 1=occasionally, 2=frequent, 3= constant). All severity and duration scores are added to yield a total score. The total score ranges from minimum 0 to maximum 68, high score representing worse outcome.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
25 participants
1 month after iTBS
2026-08-12
Participant Flow
Study participants were recruited between May 2022 and March 2025 at National Institutes of Health Clinical Center located in Bethesda Maryland.
Twenty-five participants consented to participate; one failed screening, and one was withdrawn prior to randomization due to newly identified exclusionary finding.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Treatment
Active TMS stimulation using an active TMS coil
MagStim: Bursts of three at 50Hz with an inter burst interval of 200 ms will be given for 190 seconds and this session will be repeated 3 times with 20 minutes between each session in one day. The set of 3 sessions will be repeated 5 times in 5 consecutive days.
|
Control
Sham TMS stimulation using a sham coil
Sham Comparator: Sham TMS stimulation using a sham coil
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
11
|
12
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
11
|
12
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Non-invasive Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Functional Movement Disorders
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Treatment
n=11 Participants
Active TMS stimulation using an active TMS coil
MagStim: Bursts of three at 50Hz with an inter burst interval of 200 ms will be given for 190 seconds and this session will be repeated 3 times with 20 minutes between each session in one day. The set of 3 sessions will be repeated 5 times in 5 consecutive days.
|
Control
n=12 Participants
Sham TMS stimulation using a sham coil
Sham Comparator: Sham TMS stimulation using a sham coil
|
Total
n=23 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
10 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
1 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
9 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
2 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
1 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
3 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
7 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
9 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
2 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
|
S-FMDRS
|
18.82 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.03 • n=1 Participants
|
13.25 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.92 • n=1 Participants
|
15.91 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.75 • n=1 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 month after iTBSThe Simplified Functional Movement Disorders Rating Scale (S-FMDRS) measures abnormal movements in 7 body regions as well as gait and speech. Symptom severity in each body region is rated from 0 to 3 (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe) and duration from 0 to 3 (0=none; 1=occasionally, 2=frequent, 3= constant). All severity and duration scores are added to yield a total score. The total score ranges from minimum 0 to maximum 68, high score representing worse outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Treatment
n=11 Participants
Active TMS stimulation using an active TMS coil
MagStim: Bursts of three at 50Hz with an inter burst interval of 200 ms will be given for 190 seconds and this session will be repeated 3 times with 20 minutes between each session in one day. The set of 3 sessions will be repeated 5 times in 5 consecutive days.
|
Control
n=12 Participants
Sham TMS stimulation using a sham coil
Sham Comparator: Sham TMS stimulation using a sham coil
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in S-FMDRS at 1 Month After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS
|
-48.08 % change of scores on a scale
Standard Error 13.30
|
-39.47 % change of scores on a scale
Standard Error 11.40
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 and 6 months after iTBSPopulation: The number of participants analyzed for 2 months and 6 months is different from the numbers in the participant flow due to missing data.
The Simplified Functional Movement Disorders Rating Scale (S-FMDRS) measures abnormal movements in 7 body regions as well as gait and speech. Symptom severity in each body region is rated from 0 to 3 (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe) and duration from 0 to 3 (0=none; 1=occasionally, 2=frequent, 3= constant). All severity and duration scores are added to yield a total score. The total score ranges from minimum 0 to maximum 68, high score representing worse outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Treatment
n=11 Participants
Active TMS stimulation using an active TMS coil
MagStim: Bursts of three at 50Hz with an inter burst interval of 200 ms will be given for 190 seconds and this session will be repeated 3 times with 20 minutes between each session in one day. The set of 3 sessions will be repeated 5 times in 5 consecutive days.
|
Control
n=12 Participants
Sham TMS stimulation using a sham coil
Sham Comparator: Sham TMS stimulation using a sham coil
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in S-FMDRS at 2 and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS
Change in S-FMDRS at 2 months
|
-48.04 % change of scores on a scale
Standard Error 13.30
|
-43.43 % change of scores on a scale
Standard Error 11.62
|
|
Change in S-FMDRS at 2 and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS
Change in S-FMDRS at 6 months
|
-45.33 % change of scores on a scale
Standard Error 13.30
|
-40.76 % change of scores on a scale
Standard Error 11.62
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At baseline and 1, 2 and 6 months after iTBSPopulation: The number of participants analyzed for 2 months and 6 months is different from the numbers in the participant flow due to missing data.
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a continuous numeric scale in depression and anxiety (depression 0-21 and anxiety 0-21, higher score representing worse outcome) and the questions ask about the feeling in the past week. This was repeatedly measured at baseline, then at 1 month, 2 months and 6 months after iTBS vs sham and was compared between iTBS vs sham group.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Treatment
n=11 Participants
Active TMS stimulation using an active TMS coil
MagStim: Bursts of three at 50Hz with an inter burst interval of 200 ms will be given for 190 seconds and this session will be repeated 3 times with 20 minutes between each session in one day. The set of 3 sessions will be repeated 5 times in 5 consecutive days.
|
Control
n=12 Participants
Sham TMS stimulation using a sham coil
Sham Comparator: Sham TMS stimulation using a sham coil
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at 1, 2 and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS
Anxiety_1 month
|
7.73 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.62
|
6.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.61
|
|
Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at 1, 2 and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS
Anxiety_baseline
|
8.82 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.4
|
7.67 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.37
|
|
Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at 1, 2 and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS
Anxiety_2 months
|
9.18 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.87
|
5.45 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.98
|
|
Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at 1, 2 and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS
Anxiety_6months
|
9.18 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.38
|
7.27 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.76
|
|
Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at 1, 2 and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS
Depression_baseline
|
7.55 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.95
|
3.83 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.72
|
|
Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at 1, 2 and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS
Depression_1 month
|
6.91 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.76
|
2.92 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.93
|
|
Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at 1, 2 and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS
Depression_2 months
|
8.27 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.48
|
3.45 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.05
|
|
Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at 1, 2 and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS
Depression_6 months
|
8.18 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.98
|
4.64 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.98
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1, 2 and 6 months after iTBSPopulation: The number of participants analyzed for 2 months and 6 months is different from the numbers in the participant flow due to missing data.
The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) can assess patient's view of the patient's global functioning prior to and after initiating a study medication. The CGI scale of 1-7 is a measure of clinical improvement from the intervention, higher score presenting worse outcome. (1 = Very much improved, 2 = Much improved, 3 = Minimally improved, 4 = No change, 5 = Minimally worse, 6 = Much worse, 7 = Very much worse)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Treatment
n=11 Participants
Active TMS stimulation using an active TMS coil
MagStim: Bursts of three at 50Hz with an inter burst interval of 200 ms will be given for 190 seconds and this session will be repeated 3 times with 20 minutes between each session in one day. The set of 3 sessions will be repeated 5 times in 5 consecutive days.
|
Control
n=12 Participants
Sham TMS stimulation using a sham coil
Sham Comparator: Sham TMS stimulation using a sham coil
|
|---|---|---|
|
CGI at 1, 2, and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS
6 months
|
3.44 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.57
|
3.06 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.52
|
|
CGI at 1, 2, and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS
1 month
|
3.62 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.57
|
2.99 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.51
|
|
CGI at 1, 2, and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS
2 months
|
3.80 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.57
|
3.16 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.51
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and at 1, 2 and 6 months after iTBSPopulation: Number of participants analyzed are different from the numbers in the participant flow due to missing data
The short form (36) health survey is an indicator of health-related quality of life using 36 questions. It has eight domains; the scores are weighted sums of the questions in each domain. Scores range from 0 - 100 in each domain (lower scores = more disability, higher scores = less disability). 1. Physical Functioning (PF) - ability to perform physical activities (e.g., walking, climbing stairs) 2. Role Physical (RP) - limitations in work or daily activities due to physical health 3. Bodily Pain (BP) - intensity of pain and its impact on normal work 4. General Health (GH) - overall perception of personal health 5. Vitality (VT) - energy level and fatigue 6. Social Functioning (SF) - impact of physical or emotional health on social activities 7. Role Emotional (RE) - limitations in work or daily activities due to emotional problems 8. Mental Health (MH) - psychological distress and well-being (e.g., anxiety, depression)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Treatment
n=11 Participants
Active TMS stimulation using an active TMS coil
MagStim: Bursts of three at 50Hz with an inter burst interval of 200 ms will be given for 190 seconds and this session will be repeated 3 times with 20 minutes between each session in one day. The set of 3 sessions will be repeated 5 times in 5 consecutive days.
|
Control
n=12 Participants
Sham TMS stimulation using a sham coil
Sham Comparator: Sham TMS stimulation using a sham coil
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in SF-36 at 1, 2, and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS
PF_Baseline
|
57.5 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.64
|
57.86 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.52
|
|
Change in SF-36 at 1, 2, and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS
PF_1 month
|
53.89 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 29.24
|
56.42 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 30.82
|
|
Change in SF-36 at 1, 2, and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS
PF_2 months
|
52.78 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.4
|
62.86 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 39.14
|
|
Change in SF-36 at 1, 2, and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS
PF_6 months
|
55.56 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.78
|
65.71 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 34.21
|
|
Change in SF-36 at 1, 2, and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS
RP_Baseline
|
47.92 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.14
|
39.29 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 30.77
|
|
Change in SF-36 at 1, 2, and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS
RP_1 month
|
45.14 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 31.06
|
52.78 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 32.64
|
|
Change in SF-36 at 1, 2, and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS
RP_2 months
|
34.72 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 30.8
|
61.61 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 43.22
|
|
Change in SF-36 at 1, 2, and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS
RP_6 months
|
42.36 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 34.2
|
60.71 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 37.97
|
|
Change in SF-36 at 1, 2, and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS
BP_Baseline
|
36.25 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.35
|
59.64 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.76
|
|
Change in SF-36 at 1, 2, and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS
BP_1 month
|
41.39 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.08
|
65.83 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.83
|
|
Change in SF-36 at 1, 2, and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS
BP_2 months
|
37.5 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.52
|
61.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 37.99
|
|
Change in SF-36 at 1, 2, and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS
BP_6 months
|
35 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.87
|
70.36 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.28
|
|
Change in SF-36 at 1, 2, and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS
GH_Baseline
|
50.83 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.28
|
52.86 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.53
|
|
Change in SF-36 at 1, 2, and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS
GH_1 month
|
62.78 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.93
|
59.44 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.07
|
|
Change in SF-36 at 1, 2, and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS
GH_2 months
|
57.22 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.93
|
67.14 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.21
|
|
Change in SF-36 at 1, 2, and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS
GH_6 months
|
53.33 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.95
|
62.86 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.12
|
|
Change in SF-36 at 1, 2, and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS
VT_Baseline
|
42.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.24
|
39.29 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.35
|
|
Change in SF-36 at 1, 2, and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS
VT_1 month
|
36.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.23
|
50.32 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.19
|
|
Change in SF-36 at 1, 2, and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS
VT_2 months
|
31.94 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.43
|
51.61 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.38
|
|
Change in SF-36 at 1, 2, and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS
VT_6 months
|
33.19 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.56
|
48.57 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.28
|
|
Change in SF-36 at 1, 2, and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS
SF_Baseline
|
43.75 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 30.36
|
60.71 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 32.62
|
|
Change in SF-36 at 1, 2, and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS
SF_1 month
|
51.39 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 35.6
|
75 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.75
|
|
Change in SF-36 at 1, 2, and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS
SF_2 months
|
43.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.85
|
75 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 31.46
|
|
Change in SF-36 at 1, 2, and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS
SF_6 months
|
41.67 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 29.32
|
80.36 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.9
|
|
Change in SF-36 at 1, 2, and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS
RE_Baseline
|
69.44 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.22
|
72.62 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.67
|
|
Change in SF-36 at 1, 2, and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS
RE_1 month
|
61.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 29.17
|
83.33 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.54
|
|
Change in SF-36 at 1, 2, and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS
RE_2 months
|
54.63 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 30.93
|
76.19 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 33.13
|
|
Change in SF-36 at 1, 2, and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS
RE_6 months
|
56.48 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 33.28
|
80.95 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.52
|
|
Change in SF-36 at 1, 2, and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS
MH_Baseline
|
63.33 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.28
|
60.14 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.07
|
|
Change in SF-36 at 1, 2, and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS
MH_1 month
|
66.56 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.74
|
75.33 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.75
|
|
Change in SF-36 at 1, 2, and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS
MH_2 months
|
57.22 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.54
|
76.57 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.36
|
|
Change in SF-36 at 1, 2, and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS
MH_6 months
|
58.56 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.57
|
74.71 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.61
|
Adverse Events
Treatment
Control
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Treatment
n=11 participants at risk
Active TMS stimulation using an active TMS coil
MagStim: Bursts of three at 50Hz with an inter burst interval of 200 ms will be given for 190 seconds and this session will be repeated 3 times with 20 minutes between each session in one day. The set of 3 sessions will be repeated 5 times in 5 consecutive days.
|
Control
n=12 participants at risk
Sham TMS stimulation using a sham coil
Sham Comparator: Sham TMS stimulation using a sham coil
|
|---|---|---|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
27.3%
3/11 • Adverse events were collected from enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 6 months.
Adverse events were solicited over the period of 6 months or for the duration of the study for the individual participant.
|
0.00%
0/12 • Adverse events were collected from enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 6 months.
Adverse events were solicited over the period of 6 months or for the duration of the study for the individual participant.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Pain
|
9.1%
1/11 • Adverse events were collected from enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 6 months.
Adverse events were solicited over the period of 6 months or for the duration of the study for the individual participant.
|
16.7%
2/12 • Adverse events were collected from enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 6 months.
Adverse events were solicited over the period of 6 months or for the duration of the study for the individual participant.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
9.1%
1/11 • Adverse events were collected from enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 6 months.
Adverse events were solicited over the period of 6 months or for the duration of the study for the individual participant.
|
0.00%
0/12 • Adverse events were collected from enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 6 months.
Adverse events were solicited over the period of 6 months or for the duration of the study for the individual participant.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Involuntary movements
|
9.1%
1/11 • Adverse events were collected from enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 6 months.
Adverse events were solicited over the period of 6 months or for the duration of the study for the individual participant.
|
8.3%
1/12 • Adverse events were collected from enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 6 months.
Adverse events were solicited over the period of 6 months or for the duration of the study for the individual participant.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo
|
18.2%
2/11 • Adverse events were collected from enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 6 months.
Adverse events were solicited over the period of 6 months or for the duration of the study for the individual participant.
|
0.00%
0/12 • Adverse events were collected from enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 6 months.
Adverse events were solicited over the period of 6 months or for the duration of the study for the individual participant.
|
Additional Information
Director, Movement Disorders Clinic
NINDS Parkinson's and Movement Disorders Clinic
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place