MedTrace Logo

Comparison of Piezoelectric Split-crest Technique Versus Expansion Using Hand Driven Ridge Expanders in Treatment of Maxillary Narrow Ridges

NCT05141331 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 28

Last updated 2021-12-03

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Comparison of Piezoelectric split-crest technique versus expansion using Hand Driven Ridge Expanders in treatment of Maxillary Narrow Ridges

Conditions

  • Edentulous Alveolar Ridge

Interventions

DEVICE

piezoelectric

Comparing Piezoelectric split-crest technique versus expansion using Hand Driven Ridge Expanders in treatment of Maxillary Narrow Ridges

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • ahmed ashraf abdelreheem

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
70 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-05-20
Primary Completion
2022-05-31
Completion
2022-07-31

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05141331 on ClinicalTrials.gov