Trial Outcomes & Findings for Efficacy and Safety of FIRTECH in Patients With Mild to Moderate Acute Low Back Pain (NCT NCT05137041)
NCT ID: NCT05137041
Last Updated: 2025-09-09
Results Overview
NRS is used to assess pain intensity, it is a 11-point scale (0-10) where '0' representing 'no pain' and '10' representing 'worst pain imaginable'. Responder is defined as participant with ≥30% decrease from baseline in pain NRS and who did not take rescue medication (defined as receiving paracetamol (authorized), any other analgesics and anti-inflammatory drugs as well as any non-pharmaceutical therapy (prohibited) for treating pain starting from randomization to Day 5 or starting before the study and still ongoing at randomization).
COMPLETED
PHASE3
221 participants
Day 5
2025-09-09
Participant Flow
A total of 221 participants took part in the study at 7 investigative sites in Germany and Italy from 04 November 2021 to 22 November 2022.
Participants suffering from mild to moderate acute low back pain were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either FIRTECH patch or no patch.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
ITP FIRTECH
The infrared therapy patch (ITP) FIRTECH patch was applied on the lower back region of the body on Day 1 and intended to be worn for 5 Days (Day 5).
|
No Patch Control Arm
No patch application.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
113
|
108
|
|
Overall Study
Intent-to-Treat Population
|
113
|
108
|
|
Overall Study
Safety Population
|
114
|
107
|
|
Overall Study
Modified Intent-to-Treat Population
|
91
|
89
|
|
Overall Study
Full Analysis Set
|
97
|
84
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
112
|
104
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
4
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
ITP FIRTECH
The infrared therapy patch (ITP) FIRTECH patch was applied on the lower back region of the body on Day 1 and intended to be worn for 5 Days (Day 5).
|
No Patch Control Arm
No patch application.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Reason not Specified
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
ITP FIRTECH
n=113 Participants
The ITP FIRTECH patch was applied on the lower back region of the body on Day 1 and intended to be worn for 5 Days (Day 5).
|
No Patch Control Arm
n=108 Participants
No patch application.
|
Total
n=221 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
45.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.10 • n=113 Participants
|
44.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.87 • n=108 Participants
|
45.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.97 • n=221 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
59 Participants
n=113 Participants
|
62 Participants
n=108 Participants
|
121 Participants
n=221 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
54 Participants
n=113 Participants
|
46 Participants
n=108 Participants
|
100 Participants
n=221 Participants
|
|
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 5Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat population was defined as all participants randomized that had the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) evaluation done at baseline and Day 5 with the exclusion of participants without any pain at baseline (i.e. baseline instantaneous pain NRS score equal to "0").
NRS is used to assess pain intensity, it is a 11-point scale (0-10) where '0' representing 'no pain' and '10' representing 'worst pain imaginable'. Responder is defined as participant with ≥30% decrease from baseline in pain NRS and who did not take rescue medication (defined as receiving paracetamol (authorized), any other analgesics and anti-inflammatory drugs as well as any non-pharmaceutical therapy (prohibited) for treating pain starting from randomization to Day 5 or starting before the study and still ongoing at randomization).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ITP FIRTECH
n=91 Participants
The ITP FIRTECH patch was applied on the lower back region of the body on Day 1 and intended to be worn for 5 Days (Day 5).
|
No Patch Control Arm
n=89 Participants
No patch application.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Responders at Day 5
|
72.5 percentage of participants
Interval 62.17 to 81.37
|
49.4 percentage of participants
Interval 38.67 to 60.25
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 to Day 6Population: Safety population was defined as all participants randomized into the study and, if randomized to the "patch" arm, had the device installed.
An adverse event (AE) is any symptom, sign, illness or experience that develops or worsens in severity during the course of the study. A treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) is an event that emerges during treatment, having been absent pretreatment, or worsens relative to the pretreatment state.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ITP FIRTECH
n=114 Participants
The ITP FIRTECH patch was applied on the lower back region of the body on Day 1 and intended to be worn for 5 Days (Day 5).
|
No Patch Control Arm
n=107 Participants
No patch application.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Reported With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
|
18 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 5Population: Full Analysis Set population was defined as all participants randomized that had the NRS evaluation done at baseline and that were not using any rescue medication starting from randomization to Day 5 Visit 2 or starting before the study and still ongoing at randomization with the exclusion of participants without any pain at baseline (i.e. baseline instantaneous pain NRS score equal to "0").
NRS is used to assess pain intensity, it is a 11-point scale (0-10) where '0' representing 'no pain' and '10' representing 'worst pain imaginable'. PID equals the NRS change from baseline. A negative difference indicates improvement. Time-weighted summed pain intensity difference (SPID) was calculated by multiplying the PID score at each postdose time point by the duration since the preceding time point and then summing these values. The Normalized Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID0- 5) is to be calculated as the SPID0- 5 divided by the total duration time. The score range for ITP FIRTECH arm is -5.0 to 2.1 and for no patch control arm is -5.8 to 3.1.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ITP FIRTECH
n=97 Participants
The ITP FIRTECH patch was applied on the lower back region of the body on Day 1 and intended to be worn for 5 Days (Day 5).
|
No Patch Control Arm
n=84 Participants
No patch application.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Normalized Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (PID) Over 5 Days (SPID0-5)
|
-1.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.356
|
-0.91 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.484
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Day 5Population: Full Analysis Set population was defined as all participants randomized that had the NRS evaluation done at baseline and that were not using any rescue medication starting from randomization to Day 5 Visit 2 or starting before the study and still ongoing at randomization with the exclusion of participants without any pain at baseline (i.e. baseline instantaneous pain NRS score equal to "0"). Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis.
The RMDQ is a self-administered, widely used health status measure for lower back pain (LBP). It measures pain and function, using 24 items describing limitations to everyday life that can be caused by LBP. The score of the RMDQ is the total number of items checked - that is from a minimum of 0 (no disability) to a maximum of 24 (maximum disability), where lower scores indicative of better function.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ITP FIRTECH
n=84 Participants
The ITP FIRTECH patch was applied on the lower back region of the body on Day 1 and intended to be worn for 5 Days (Day 5).
|
No Patch Control Arm
n=69 Participants
No patch application.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage Change in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Score
|
-32.2 percentage change in RMDQ score
Standard Deviation 61.81
|
-16.4 percentage change in RMDQ score
Standard Deviation 41.64
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5Population: Full Analysis Set population was defined as all participants randomized that had the NRS evaluation done at baseline and that were not using any rescue medication starting from randomization to Day 5 Visit 2 or starting before the study and still ongoing at randomization with the exclusion of participants without any pain at baseline (i.e. baseline instantaneous pain NRS score equal to "0"). Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at specific timepoint.
Change in mobility from baseline to Day 5 using Schober's test score.Schober test consists of extending a tape measure on the spinal column, between two posterior superior iliac spines and up to 10 cm above this, with the individual in a neutral position. Then, participant is asked to do anterior flexion of the trunk, then therapist will measure the distance of the marked points, in participants without changes of mobility should increase at least 5 cm. Increases smaller than 5 cm indicate that the test is positive, decreased mobility of the lumbar spine. These data were collected at baseline and at Day 5 and then the change from baseline to Day 5 was calculated for each treatment group.This change from baseline is analyzed by Analysis of covariance(ANCOVA) model with the treatment group as fixed effect and baseline instantaneous pain NRS as continuous covariate.Score range for ITP FIRTECH arm is -2.0 to 6.0 and for no patch control arm is -4.2 to 2.0.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ITP FIRTECH
n=97 Participants
The ITP FIRTECH patch was applied on the lower back region of the body on Day 1 and intended to be worn for 5 Days (Day 5).
|
No Patch Control Arm
n=84 Participants
No patch application.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mobility Evaluation Using Schober's Test
Baseline
|
7.9 cm
Standard Deviation 4.52
|
8.1 cm
Standard Deviation 4.89
|
|
Mobility Evaluation Using Schober's Test
Day 5
|
8.7 cm
Standard Deviation 5.48
|
8.1 cm
Standard Deviation 5.23
|
|
Mobility Evaluation Using Schober's Test
Change from Baseline
|
0.9 cm
Standard Deviation 1.44
|
-0.1 cm
Standard Deviation 1.27
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 5Population: Full Analysis Set population was defined as all participants randomized that had the NRS evaluation done at baseline and that were not using any rescue medication starting from randomization to Day 5 Visit 2 or starting before the study and still ongoing at randomization with the exclusion of participants without any pain at baseline (i.e. baseline instantaneous pain NRS score equal to "0"). Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at specific timepoint.
Change in mobility from baseline to Day 5 using FTF test score.Procedure for FTF test follow recommendation of American Psychological Association:participant stood erect on a platform 20-cm high with shoes removed and feet together.Participant was asked to bend forward as far as possible,while maintaining knees,arms,and fingers fully extended.Vertical distance between tip of middle finger and platform is measured with supple tape measure and is expressed in cm.Vertical distance between platform and tip of middle finger is positive when participant did not reach platform and negative when he could go further.These data were collected at baseline and at Day 5 and then change from baseline to Day 5 was calculated for each treatment group.This change from baseline is analyzed by ANCOVA model with treatment group as fixed effect and baseline instantaneous pain NRS as continuous covariate.Score range:ITP FIRTECH arm=-22.0-17.0;no patch control arm=-30.0-13.0.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ITP FIRTECH
n=97 Participants
The ITP FIRTECH patch was applied on the lower back region of the body on Day 1 and intended to be worn for 5 Days (Day 5).
|
No Patch Control Arm
n=84 Participants
No patch application.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mobility Evaluation Using Fingertip-to-Floor (FTF) Test
Baseline
|
21.0 cm
Standard Deviation 17.48
|
18.6 cm
Standard Deviation 18.27
|
|
Mobility Evaluation Using Fingertip-to-Floor (FTF) Test
Day 5
|
17.4 cm
Standard Deviation 14.88
|
17.5 cm
Standard Deviation 16.41
|
|
Mobility Evaluation Using Fingertip-to-Floor (FTF) Test
Change from Baseline
|
-3.5 cm
Standard Deviation 6.6
|
-1.7 cm
Standard Deviation 5.31
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 5Population: Full Analysis Set population was defined as all participants randomized that had the NRS evaluation done at baseline and that were not using any rescue medication starting from randomization to Day 5 Visit 2 or starting before the study and still ongoing at randomization with the exclusion of participants without any pain at baseline (i.e. baseline instantaneous pain NRS score equal to "0").
Time to reach acceptable pain is defined as the time in hours from baseline subject symptom self-assessment date and time (Day 1 Visit 1, Pain perception) to the first report of post-baseline acceptable pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ITP FIRTECH
n=97 Participants
The ITP FIRTECH patch was applied on the lower back region of the body on Day 1 and intended to be worn for 5 Days (Day 5).
|
No Patch Control Arm
n=84 Participants
No patch application.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to Reach Acceptable Pain
|
9.62 hours
Interval 8.017 to 10.317
|
8.65 hours
Interval 7.25 to 10.533
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 5Population: Full Analysis Set population was defined as all participants randomized that had the NRS evaluation done at baseline and that were not using any rescue medication starting from randomization to Day 5 Visit 2 or starting before the study and still ongoing at randomization with the exclusion of participants without any pain at baseline (i.e. baseline instantaneous pain NRS score equal to "0"). Overall number analyzed is the number of censored participants with the event.
Time to reach no pain was defined as the time (hours) from baseline subject symptom self-assessment date and time (Day 1 Visit 1, Pain Perception) to the first report of instantaneous pain NRS=0.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ITP FIRTECH
n=97 Participants
The ITP FIRTECH patch was applied on the lower back region of the body on Day 1 and intended to be worn for 5 Days (Day 5).
|
No Patch Control Arm
n=84 Participants
No patch application.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to Reach no Pain
|
NA hours
The median and 95% confidence interval (CI) was not estimable as the event did not occur
|
NA hours
The median and 95% CI was not estimable as the event did not occur
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Day 5Population: Full Analysis Set population was defined as all participants randomized that had the NRS evaluation done at baseline and that were not using any rescue medication starting from randomization to Day 5 Visit 2 or starting before the study and still ongoing at randomization with the exclusion of participants without any pain at baseline (i.e. baseline instantaneous pain NRS score equal to "0"). Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at specific timepoints.
NRS is used to assess pain intensity, it is a 11-point scale (0-10) where '0' representing 'no pain' and '10' representing 'worst pain imaginable'. PID was defined as instantaneous pain NRS change from baseline. Instantaneous pain NRS was analyzed from baseline up to Day 5. A negative difference indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ITP FIRTECH
n=97 Participants
The ITP FIRTECH patch was applied on the lower back region of the body on Day 1 and intended to be worn for 5 Days (Day 5).
|
No Patch Control Arm
n=84 Participants
No patch application.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time Course of PID
Change from Baseline at Day 1 Evening
|
-0.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.24
|
-0.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.26
|
|
Time Course of PID
Change from Baseline at Day 2 Morning
|
-1.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.55
|
-0.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.60
|
|
Time Course of PID
Change from Baseline at Day 2 Evening
|
-1.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.60
|
-0.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.76
|
|
Time Course of PID
Change from Baseline at Day 3 Morning
|
-1.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.55
|
-0.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.85
|
|
Time Course of PID
Change from Baseline at Day 3 Evening
|
-1.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.53
|
-0.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.74
|
|
Time Course of PID
Change from Baseline at Day 4 Morning
|
-1.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.44
|
-0.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.91
|
|
Time Course of PID
Change from Baseline at Day 4 Evening
|
-1.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.56
|
-1.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.99
|
|
Time Course of PID
Change from Baseline at Day 5 Morning
|
-1.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.58
|
-1.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.20
|
|
Time Course of PID
Change from Baseline at Day 5
|
-2.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.64
|
-1.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.85
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Day 5Population: Full Analysis Set population was defined as all participants randomized that had the NRS evaluation done at baseline and that were not using any rescue medication starting from randomization to Day 5 Visit 2 or starting before the study and still ongoing at randomization with the exclusion of participants without any pain at baseline (i.e. baseline instantaneous pain NRS score equal to "0"). Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available at specific timepoint.
Pain relief is assessed using a verbal rating scale (VRS), where 0 = none and 4 = complete in response to a pain relief question.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ITP FIRTECH
n=97 Participants
The ITP FIRTECH patch was applied on the lower back region of the body on Day 1 and intended to be worn for 5 Days (Day 5).
|
No Patch Control Arm
n=84 Participants
No patch application.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time Course of Pain Relief
Day 1 Evening
|
0.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.86
|
0.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.61
|
|
Time Course of Pain Relief
Day 2 Morning
|
1.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.97
|
0.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
|
|
Time Course of Pain Relief
Day 2 Evening
|
1.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
|
0.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.97
|
|
Time Course of Pain Relief
Day 3 Morning
|
1.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
|
0.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
|
|
Time Course of Pain Relief
Day 3 Evening
|
1.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.98
|
0.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.02
|
|
Time Course of Pain Relief
Day 4 Morning
|
1.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.11
|
0.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.07
|
|
Time Course of Pain Relief
Day 4 Evening
|
1.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.16
|
0.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
|
|
Time Course of Pain Relief
Day 5 Morning
|
1.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.22
|
1.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.37
|
|
Time Course of Pain Relief
Day 5
|
1.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.21
|
0.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.32
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Day 5Population: Full Analysis Set population was defined as all participants randomized that had the NRS evaluation done at baseline and that were not using any rescue medication starting from randomization to Day 5 Visit 2 or starting before the study and still ongoing at randomization with the exclusion of participants without any pain at baseline (i.e. baseline instantaneous pain NRS score equal to "0").
Total pain relief (TOTPAR) is calculated by multiplying the pain relief score at each post-dose time point by the duration (in hours) since the preceding time point. The Normalized Sum of Pain Relief (TOTPAR0- 5) is to be calculated as the Total Pain Relief divided by the total duration time. Higher scores indicate more pain relief. The score range is from 0.0 to 3.5 for both the arms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ITP FIRTECH
n=97 Participants
The ITP FIRTECH patch was applied on the lower back region of the body on Day 1 and intended to be worn for 5 Days (Day 5).
|
No Patch Control Arm
n=84 Participants
No patch application.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Normalized Sum of Pain Relief
|
1.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.834
|
0.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.842
|
Adverse Events
ITP FIRTECH
No Patch Control Arm
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
ITP FIRTECH
n=114 participants at risk
The ITP FIRTECH patch was applied on the lower back region of the body on Day 1 and intended to be worn for 5 Days (Day 5).
|
No Patch Control Arm
n=107 participants at risk
No patch application.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.00%
0/114 • Day 1 to Day 6
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events is mentioned for Safety Population. Safety population was defined as all participants randomized into the study and, if randomized to the "patch" arm, had the device installed.
|
0.93%
1/107 • Number of events 1 • Day 1 to Day 6
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events is mentioned for Safety Population. Safety population was defined as all participants randomized into the study and, if randomized to the "patch" arm, had the device installed.
|
|
General disorders
Application Site Erythema
|
1.8%
2/114 • Number of events 2 • Day 1 to Day 6
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events is mentioned for Safety Population. Safety population was defined as all participants randomized into the study and, if randomized to the "patch" arm, had the device installed.
|
0.00%
0/107 • Day 1 to Day 6
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events is mentioned for Safety Population. Safety population was defined as all participants randomized into the study and, if randomized to the "patch" arm, had the device installed.
|
|
General disorders
Application Site Irritation
|
0.88%
1/114 • Number of events 1 • Day 1 to Day 6
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events is mentioned for Safety Population. Safety population was defined as all participants randomized into the study and, if randomized to the "patch" arm, had the device installed.
|
0.00%
0/107 • Day 1 to Day 6
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events is mentioned for Safety Population. Safety population was defined as all participants randomized into the study and, if randomized to the "patch" arm, had the device installed.
|
|
General disorders
Application Site Pain
|
1.8%
2/114 • Number of events 2 • Day 1 to Day 6
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events is mentioned for Safety Population. Safety population was defined as all participants randomized into the study and, if randomized to the "patch" arm, had the device installed.
|
0.00%
0/107 • Day 1 to Day 6
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events is mentioned for Safety Population. Safety population was defined as all participants randomized into the study and, if randomized to the "patch" arm, had the device installed.
|
|
General disorders
Application Site Paraesthesia
|
0.88%
1/114 • Number of events 1 • Day 1 to Day 6
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events is mentioned for Safety Population. Safety population was defined as all participants randomized into the study and, if randomized to the "patch" arm, had the device installed.
|
0.00%
0/107 • Day 1 to Day 6
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events is mentioned for Safety Population. Safety population was defined as all participants randomized into the study and, if randomized to the "patch" arm, had the device installed.
|
|
General disorders
Application Site Pruritus
|
6.1%
7/114 • Number of events 8 • Day 1 to Day 6
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events is mentioned for Safety Population. Safety population was defined as all participants randomized into the study and, if randomized to the "patch" arm, had the device installed.
|
0.00%
0/107 • Day 1 to Day 6
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events is mentioned for Safety Population. Safety population was defined as all participants randomized into the study and, if randomized to the "patch" arm, had the device installed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastrointestinal Infection
|
0.88%
1/114 • Number of events 1 • Day 1 to Day 6
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events is mentioned for Safety Population. Safety population was defined as all participants randomized into the study and, if randomized to the "patch" arm, had the device installed.
|
0.00%
0/107 • Day 1 to Day 6
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events is mentioned for Safety Population. Safety population was defined as all participants randomized into the study and, if randomized to the "patch" arm, had the device installed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
2.6%
3/114 • Number of events 3 • Day 1 to Day 6
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events is mentioned for Safety Population. Safety population was defined as all participants randomized into the study and, if randomized to the "patch" arm, had the device installed.
|
1.9%
2/107 • Number of events 2 • Day 1 to Day 6
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events is mentioned for Safety Population. Safety population was defined as all participants randomized into the study and, if randomized to the "patch" arm, had the device installed.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
0.00%
0/114 • Day 1 to Day 6
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events is mentioned for Safety Population. Safety population was defined as all participants randomized into the study and, if randomized to the "patch" arm, had the device installed.
|
0.93%
1/107 • Number of events 1 • Day 1 to Day 6
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events is mentioned for Safety Population. Safety population was defined as all participants randomized into the study and, if randomized to the "patch" arm, had the device installed.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back Pain
|
0.88%
1/114 • Number of events 1 • Day 1 to Day 6
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events is mentioned for Safety Population. Safety population was defined as all participants randomized into the study and, if randomized to the "patch" arm, had the device installed.
|
1.9%
2/107 • Number of events 2 • Day 1 to Day 6
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events is mentioned for Safety Population. Safety population was defined as all participants randomized into the study and, if randomized to the "patch" arm, had the device installed.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle Tightness
|
0.88%
1/114 • Number of events 1 • Day 1 to Day 6
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events is mentioned for Safety Population. Safety population was defined as all participants randomized into the study and, if randomized to the "patch" arm, had the device installed.
|
0.00%
0/107 • Day 1 to Day 6
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events is mentioned for Safety Population. Safety population was defined as all participants randomized into the study and, if randomized to the "patch" arm, had the device installed.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Spinal Pain
|
0.88%
1/114 • Number of events 1 • Day 1 to Day 6
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events is mentioned for Safety Population. Safety population was defined as all participants randomized into the study and, if randomized to the "patch" arm, had the device installed.
|
0.00%
0/107 • Day 1 to Day 6
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events is mentioned for Safety Population. Safety population was defined as all participants randomized into the study and, if randomized to the "patch" arm, had the device installed.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
1.8%
2/114 • Number of events 2 • Day 1 to Day 6
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events is mentioned for Safety Population. Safety population was defined as all participants randomized into the study and, if randomized to the "patch" arm, had the device installed.
|
0.00%
0/107 • Day 1 to Day 6
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events is mentioned for Safety Population. Safety population was defined as all participants randomized into the study and, if randomized to the "patch" arm, had the device installed.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Sleep Disorder
|
0.00%
0/114 • Day 1 to Day 6
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events is mentioned for Safety Population. Safety population was defined as all participants randomized into the study and, if randomized to the "patch" arm, had the device installed.
|
0.93%
1/107 • Number of events 1 • Day 1 to Day 6
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events is mentioned for Safety Population. Safety population was defined as all participants randomized into the study and, if randomized to the "patch" arm, had the device installed.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema
|
0.88%
1/114 • Number of events 1 • Day 1 to Day 6
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events is mentioned for Safety Population. Safety population was defined as all participants randomized into the study and, if randomized to the "patch" arm, had the device installed.
|
0.00%
0/107 • Day 1 to Day 6
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events is mentioned for Safety Population. Safety population was defined as all participants randomized into the study and, if randomized to the "patch" arm, had the device installed.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
0.88%
1/114 • Number of events 1 • Day 1 to Day 6
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events is mentioned for Safety Population. Safety population was defined as all participants randomized into the study and, if randomized to the "patch" arm, had the device installed.
|
0.00%
0/107 • Day 1 to Day 6
All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events is mentioned for Safety Population. Safety population was defined as all participants randomized into the study and, if randomized to the "patch" arm, had the device installed.
|
Additional Information
Trial Transparency Team
Sanofi aventis recherche & développement
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The Sponsor supports publication of clinical trial results but may request that investigators temporarily delay or alter publications in order to protect proprietary information. The Sponsor may also require that the results of multicenter studies be published only in their entirety and not as individual site data.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER