Analgesic and Respiratory Outcomes in Patients Receiving Continuous Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block Compared to Continuous Preperitoneal Catheter Wound Infusion After Upper Abdominal Surgery

NCT05121987 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2021-11-16

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

We aim to compare the postoperative analgesic and respiratory outcomes in patients receiving continuous bupivacaine infusion via bilateral erector spinae catheters versus preperitoneal catheters in upper abdominal surgeries.

Conditions

  • Abdominal Cancer Surgery

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Erector Spinae Plane block

An ultrasound linear probe is going to be placed in a longitudinal orientation 3 cm lateral to the T6 spinous process corresponding to the T5 transverse process. . Local infiltration with 2% of lignocaine at the site of needle insertion is going to be administered. Using in plane approach an 18 G Tuohy needle will be inserted in caudal-cephalad direction, until the tip is deep to erector spinae muscle, as evidenced by visible hydro-dissection below the muscle plane, and on injection of 5 ml of normal saline.

PROCEDURE

Continuous Wound Infusion

Towards the end of surgery, a multiholed 15-cm Anesthesia catheter will be placed in the preperitoneal space (the subfascial space between the peritoneum and posterior fascia) under direct vision and to be tunneled via the rectus sheath to the skin, rolled out and exiting laterally and stabilized with an adhesive tape on skin.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • South Egypt Cancer Institute

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
65 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-12-01
Primary Completion
2022-12-01
Completion
2023-04-01

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05121987 on ClinicalTrials.gov