Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Brensocatib Tablets in Adults With Cystic Fibrosis (NCT NCT05090904)
NCT ID: NCT05090904
Last Updated: 2026-03-12
Results Overview
COMPLETED
PHASE2
29 participants
Predose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24, and 168 hours postdose on Day 28
2026-03-12
Participant Flow
Participants took part in the study at investigational sites in the United States.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Brensocatib 10 mg
Participants received brensocatib at a dose of 10 mg orally once per day for 28 days.
|
Brensocatib 25 mg
Participants received brensocatib at a dose of 25 mg orally once per day for 28 days.
|
Brensocatib 40 mg
Participants received brensocatib at a dose of 40 mg orally once per day for 28 days.
|
Placebo
Participants received a placebo matching brensocatib orally once per day for 28 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
8
|
8
|
8
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
8
|
8
|
8
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
A Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Brensocatib Tablets in Adults With Cystic Fibrosis
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Brensocatib 10 mg
n=8 Participants
Participants received brensocatib at a dose of 10 mg orally once per day for 28 days.
|
Brensocatib 25 mg
n=8 Participants
Participants received brensocatib at a dose of 25 mg orally once per day for 28 days.
|
Brensocatib 40 mg
n=8 Participants
Participants received brensocatib at a dose of 40 mg orally once per day for 28 days.
|
Placebo
n=5 Participants
Participants received a placebo matching brensocatib orally once per day for 28 days.
|
Total
n=29 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
38.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.86 • n=9 Participants
|
42.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.54 • n=9 Participants
|
34.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.95 • n=18 Participants
|
34.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.79 • n=15 Participants
|
37.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.59 • n=60 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
2 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=60 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
6 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=60 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
1 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=60 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=60 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
7 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=60 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=60 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=60 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=60 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=60 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
7 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=60 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=60 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=60 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Predose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose on Day 1Population: Pharmacokinetic (PK) Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of brensocatib (actual treatment) and had sufficient data to calculate at least 1 PK parameter.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Brensocatib 10 mg
n=8 Participants
Participants received brensocatib at a dose of 10 mg orally once per day for 28 days.
|
Brensocatib 25 mg
n=8 Participants
Participants received brensocatib at a dose of 25 mg orally once per day for 28 days.
|
Brensocatib 40 mg
n=8 Participants
Participants received brensocatib at a dose of 40 mg orally once per day for 28 days.
|
Placebo
Participants received a placebo matching brensocatib orally once per day for 28 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Brensocatib on Day 1
|
62.4 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 41.3
|
136 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 25.9
|
338 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 17.7
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Predose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24, and 168 hours postdose on Day 28Population: PK Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of brensocatib (actual treatment) and had sufficient data to calculate at least 1 PK parameter. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Brensocatib 10 mg
n=8 Participants
Participants received brensocatib at a dose of 10 mg orally once per day for 28 days.
|
Brensocatib 25 mg
n=7 Participants
Participants received brensocatib at a dose of 25 mg orally once per day for 28 days.
|
Brensocatib 40 mg
n=8 Participants
Participants received brensocatib at a dose of 40 mg orally once per day for 28 days.
|
Placebo
Participants received a placebo matching brensocatib orally once per day for 28 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Cmax of Brensocatib on Day 28
|
86.2 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 33.1
|
234 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 37.5
|
469 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 34.0
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Predose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose on Day 1Population: PK Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of brensocatib (actual treatment) and had sufficient data to calculate at least 1 PK parameter.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Brensocatib 10 mg
n=8 Participants
Participants received brensocatib at a dose of 10 mg orally once per day for 28 days.
|
Brensocatib 25 mg
n=8 Participants
Participants received brensocatib at a dose of 25 mg orally once per day for 28 days.
|
Brensocatib 40 mg
n=8 Participants
Participants received brensocatib at a dose of 40 mg orally once per day for 28 days.
|
Placebo
Participants received a placebo matching brensocatib orally once per day for 28 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Brensocatib on Day 1
|
2.0 hours
Interval 1.0 to 24.8
|
1.5 hours
Interval 1.0 to 4.1
|
1.5 hours
Interval 0.6 to 24.9
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Predose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24, and 168 hours postdose on Day 28Population: PK Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of brensocatib (actual treatment) and had sufficient data to calculate at least 1 PK parameter. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Brensocatib 10 mg
n=8 Participants
Participants received brensocatib at a dose of 10 mg orally once per day for 28 days.
|
Brensocatib 25 mg
n=7 Participants
Participants received brensocatib at a dose of 25 mg orally once per day for 28 days.
|
Brensocatib 40 mg
n=8 Participants
Participants received brensocatib at a dose of 40 mg orally once per day for 28 days.
|
Placebo
Participants received a placebo matching brensocatib orally once per day for 28 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Tmax of Brensocatib on Day 28
|
1.9 hours
Interval 0.5 to 4.0
|
2.0 hours
Interval 1.0 to 4.0
|
2.0 hours
Interval 1.0 to 4.0
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Predose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose on Day 1Population: PK Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of brensocatib (actual treatment) and had sufficient data to calculate at least 1 PK parameter.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Brensocatib 10 mg
n=8 Participants
Participants received brensocatib at a dose of 10 mg orally once per day for 28 days.
|
Brensocatib 25 mg
n=8 Participants
Participants received brensocatib at a dose of 25 mg orally once per day for 28 days.
|
Brensocatib 40 mg
n=8 Participants
Participants received brensocatib at a dose of 40 mg orally once per day for 28 days.
|
Placebo
Participants received a placebo matching brensocatib orally once per day for 28 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 24 Hours Postdose (AUC0-24) of Brensocatib in Plasma on Day 1
|
792 hours*ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 49.5
|
1600 hours*ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 22.0
|
3510 hours*ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 35.0
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Predose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose on Day 28Population: PK Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of brensocatib (actual treatment) and had sufficient data to calculate at least 1 PK parameter. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Brensocatib 10 mg
n=8 Participants
Participants received brensocatib at a dose of 10 mg orally once per day for 28 days.
|
Brensocatib 25 mg
n=7 Participants
Participants received brensocatib at a dose of 25 mg orally once per day for 28 days.
|
Brensocatib 40 mg
n=7 Participants
Participants received brensocatib at a dose of 40 mg orally once per day for 28 days.
|
Placebo
Participants received a placebo matching brensocatib orally once per day for 28 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AUC0-24 of Brensocatib in Plasma on Day 28
|
1050 hours*ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 33.1
|
3640 hours*ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 32.7
|
5950 hours*ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 40.4
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Predose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24, and 168 hours postdose on Day 28Population: PK Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of brensocatib (actual treatment) and had sufficient data to calculate at least 1 PK parameter. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Brensocatib 10 mg
n=8 Participants
Participants received brensocatib at a dose of 10 mg orally once per day for 28 days.
|
Brensocatib 25 mg
n=7 Participants
Participants received brensocatib at a dose of 25 mg orally once per day for 28 days.
|
Brensocatib 40 mg
n=7 Participants
Participants received brensocatib at a dose of 40 mg orally once per day for 28 days.
|
Placebo
Participants received a placebo matching brensocatib orally once per day for 28 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Elimination Half-life (t1/2) of Brensocatib in Plasma on Day 28
|
29.6 hours
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 16.5
|
32.4 hours
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 23.0
|
36.0 hours
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 39.5
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 56Population: Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
A TEAE is defined as any adverse event (AE) that occurred after the first dose of study investigational medicinal product (IMP) and within 28 days after the last dose of study IMP.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Brensocatib 10 mg
n=8 Participants
Participants received brensocatib at a dose of 10 mg orally once per day for 28 days.
|
Brensocatib 25 mg
n=8 Participants
Participants received brensocatib at a dose of 25 mg orally once per day for 28 days.
|
Brensocatib 40 mg
n=8 Participants
Participants received brensocatib at a dose of 40 mg orally once per day for 28 days.
|
Placebo
n=5 Participants
Participants received a placebo matching brensocatib orally once per day for 28 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)
|
4 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1: Predose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose; Day 28: Predose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 168 hours postdosePopulation: PK Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of brensocatib (actual treatment) and had sufficient data to calculate at least 1 PK parameter. Number analyzed signifies the number of participants with data available for analysis at the specified time point.
Analysis of dose dependency for brensocatib Cmax was performed using a power law model. The logarithm of the Cmax was linearly related to the logarithm of the dose using a linear regression analysis. Slope of the regression and corresponding 90% CIs are presented. Slope (90% CI): log(PK parameter) = intercept + slope \* log(dose) + error term, for relationship between each of the dose levels. All 3 dose levels are included in the same model for the dose-exposure relationship.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Brensocatib 10 mg
n=24 Participants
Participants received brensocatib at a dose of 10 mg orally once per day for 28 days.
|
Brensocatib 25 mg
Participants received brensocatib at a dose of 25 mg orally once per day for 28 days.
|
Brensocatib 40 mg
Participants received brensocatib at a dose of 40 mg orally once per day for 28 days.
|
Placebo
Participants received a placebo matching brensocatib orally once per day for 28 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Dose Proportionality of Brensocatib for Dose Levels 10mg to 40mg Using Brensocatib Cmax After Administration of Brensocatib on Days 1 and 28
Day 1
|
1.168 log(ng/ml) per log(mg)
Interval 0.97 to 1.37
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Dose Proportionality of Brensocatib for Dose Levels 10mg to 40mg Using Brensocatib Cmax After Administration of Brensocatib on Days 1 and 28
Day 28
|
1.206 log(ng/ml) per log(mg)
Interval 1.0 to 1.41
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1: Predose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose; Day 28: Predose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdosePopulation: PK Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of brensocatib (actual treatment) and had sufficient data to calculate at least 1 PK parameter. Number analyzed signifies the number of participants with data available for analysis at the specified time point.
Analysis of dose dependency for brensocatib AUC0-24 was performed using a power law model. The logarithm of the AUC0-24 was linearly related to the logarithm of the dose using a linear regression analysis. Slope of the regression and corresponding 90% CIs are presented. Slope (90% CI): log(PK parameter) = intercept + slope \* log(dose) + error term, for relationship between each of the dose levels. All 3 dose levels are included in the same model for the dose-exposure relationship.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Brensocatib 10 mg
n=24 Participants
Participants received brensocatib at a dose of 10 mg orally once per day for 28 days.
|
Brensocatib 25 mg
Participants received brensocatib at a dose of 25 mg orally once per day for 28 days.
|
Brensocatib 40 mg
Participants received brensocatib at a dose of 40 mg orally once per day for 28 days.
|
Placebo
Participants received a placebo matching brensocatib orally once per day for 28 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Dose Proportionality of Brensocatib for Dose Levels 10mg to 40mg Using Brensocatib AUC0-24 After Administration of Brensocatib on Days 1 and 28
Day 1
|
1.033 log(ng*h/mL) per log(mg)
Interval 0.8 to 1.26
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Dose Proportionality of Brensocatib for Dose Levels 10mg to 40mg Using Brensocatib AUC0-24 After Administration of Brensocatib on Days 1 and 28
Day 28
|
1.267 log(ng*h/mL) per log(mg)
Interval 1.05 to 1.48
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1: Predose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose; Day 28: Predose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 168 hours postdosePopulation: PK Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of brensocatib (actual treatment) and had sufficient data to calculate at least 1 PK parameter. Number analyzed signifies the number of participants with data available for analysis at the specified time point.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Brensocatib 10 mg
n=8 Participants
Participants received brensocatib at a dose of 10 mg orally once per day for 28 days.
|
Brensocatib 25 mg
n=8 Participants
Participants received brensocatib at a dose of 25 mg orally once per day for 28 days.
|
Brensocatib 40 mg
n=8 Participants
Participants received brensocatib at a dose of 40 mg orally once per day for 28 days.
|
Placebo
Participants received a placebo matching brensocatib orally once per day for 28 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AUClast of Brensocatib in Plasma on Days 1 and 28
Day 28
|
2210 hours*ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 40.6
|
8220 hours*ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 44.1
|
13700 hours*ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 58.6
|
—
|
|
AUClast of Brensocatib in Plasma on Days 1 and 28
Day 1
|
792 hours*ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 49.5
|
1600 hours*ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 22.0
|
3510 hours*ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 35.0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1: Predose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose; Day 28: Predose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 168 hours postdosePopulation: PK Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of brensocatib (actual treatment) and had sufficient data to calculate at least 1 PK parameter. Number analyzed signifies the number of participants with data available for analysis at the specified time point.
Analysis of dose dependency for brensocatib AUClast was performed using a power law model. The logarithm of the AUClast was linearly related to the logarithm of the dose using a linear regression analysis. Slope of the regression and corresponding 90% CIs are presented. Slope (90% CI): log(PK parameter) = intercept + slope \* log(dose) + error term, for relationship between each of the dose levels. All 3 dose levels are included in the same model for the dose-exposure relationship.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Brensocatib 10 mg
n=24 Participants
Participants received brensocatib at a dose of 10 mg orally once per day for 28 days.
|
Brensocatib 25 mg
Participants received brensocatib at a dose of 25 mg orally once per day for 28 days.
|
Brensocatib 40 mg
Participants received brensocatib at a dose of 40 mg orally once per day for 28 days.
|
Placebo
Participants received a placebo matching brensocatib orally once per day for 28 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Dose Proportionality of Brensocatib for Dose Levels 10mg to 40mg Using Brensocatib AUClast, After Administration of Brensocatib on Days 1 and 28
Day 1
|
1.033 log(ng*h/mL) per log(mg)
Interval 0.8 to 1.26
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Dose Proportionality of Brensocatib for Dose Levels 10mg to 40mg Using Brensocatib AUClast, After Administration of Brensocatib on Days 1 and 28
Day 28
|
1.334 log(ng*h/mL) per log(mg)
Interval 1.05 to 1.61
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Brensocatib 10 mg
Brensocatib 25 mg
Brensocatib 40 mg
Placebo
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Brensocatib 10 mg
n=8 participants at risk
Participants received brensocatib at a dose of 10 mg orally once per day for 28 days.
|
Brensocatib 25 mg
n=8 participants at risk
Participants received brensocatib at a dose of 25 mg orally once per day for 28 days.
|
Brensocatib 40 mg
n=8 participants at risk
Participants received brensocatib at a dose of 40 mg orally once per day for 28 days.
|
Placebo
n=5 participants at risk
Participants received a placebo matching brensocatib orally once per day for 28 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Infective pulmonary exacerbation of cystic fibrosis
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Brensocatib 10 mg
n=8 participants at risk
Participants received brensocatib at a dose of 10 mg orally once per day for 28 days.
|
Brensocatib 25 mg
n=8 participants at risk
Participants received brensocatib at a dose of 25 mg orally once per day for 28 days.
|
Brensocatib 40 mg
n=8 participants at risk
Participants received brensocatib at a dose of 40 mg orally once per day for 28 days.
|
Placebo
n=5 participants at risk
Participants received a placebo matching brensocatib orally once per day for 28 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Infective pulmonary exacerbation of cystic fibrosis
|
25.0%
2/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
COVID-19
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
20.0%
1/5 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Sputum increased
|
25.0%
2/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
25.0%
2/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
20.0%
1/5 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphadenopathy
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
20.0%
1/5 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastric fistula
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Toothache
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Chills
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Drug hypersensitivity
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Eye disorders
Conjunctivitis
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastroenteritis
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
20.0%
1/5 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Eye disorders
Corneal abrasion
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza A virus test positive
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Bone pain
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Ophthalmic migraine
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Chromaturia
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal pain
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal congestion
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Tonsillar disorder
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Tonsillolith
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Alopecia
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis contact
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Hyperhidrosis
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
20.0%
1/5 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to Day 56
Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee A disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is less than or equal to 90 days from the time submitted to the sponsor for review. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER