Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study of Baricitinib (LY3009104) in Children With COVID-19 (NCT NCT05074420)
NCT ID: NCT05074420
Last Updated: 2026-08-11
Results Overview
PK: Overall AUC of Baricitinib in pediatric participants with COVID-19. Summarized data were reported in this outcome measure.
TERMINATED
PHASE3
6 participants
Day 1: 0.25, 0.5, 2-4 hours post-dose; Day 4: Pre-dose, 1, 6-10 hours post-dose
2026-08-11
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Baricitinib QD
* Participants received baricitinib as an oral suspension (2 milligrams per milliliter \[mg/mL\]) administered once daily (QD), with age group-based dosing: 4 milligrams (mg) for participants aged 10 to \<18 years and up to 2 mg for those aged 1 to \<10 years.
* Treatment was administered for up to 14 days or until hospital discharge, whichever occurred first, with follow-up assessments through approximately Day 60.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
6
|
|
Overall Study
At Least One Dose of Study Drug
|
6
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Baricitinib QD
* Participants received baricitinib as an oral suspension (2 milligrams per milliliter \[mg/mL\]) administered once daily (QD), with age group-based dosing: 4 milligrams (mg) for participants aged 10 to \<18 years and up to 2 mg for those aged 1 to \<10 years.
* Treatment was administered for up to 14 days or until hospital discharge, whichever occurred first, with follow-up assessments through approximately Day 60.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
The follow-up visit was not completed
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study of Baricitinib (LY3009104) in Children With COVID-19
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Baricitinib QD
n=6 Participants
* Participants received baricitinib as an oral suspension 2 mg/mL administered QD, with age group-based dosing: 4 mg for participants aged 10 to \<18 years and up to 2 mg for those aged 1 to \<10 years.
* Treatment was administered for up to 14 days or until hospital discharge, whichever occurred first, with follow-up assessments through approximately Day 60.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
7.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.8 • n=54 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
2 Participants
n=54 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
4 Participants
n=54 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
3 Participants
n=54 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
3 Participants
n=54 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=54 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
1 Participants
n=54 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=54 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=54 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
1 Participants
n=54 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
4 Participants
n=54 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=54 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=54 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
1 Participants
n=54 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Brazil
|
2 Participants
n=54 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Mexico
|
1 Participants
n=54 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Spain
|
2 Participants
n=54 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1: 0.25, 0.5, 2-4 hours post-dose; Day 4: Pre-dose, 1, 6-10 hours post-dosePopulation: PK population consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had evaluable PK sample. Based on the planned analysis, outcomes were analyzed and reported per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
PK: Overall AUC of Baricitinib in pediatric participants with COVID-19. Summarized data were reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Baricitinib QD
n=5 Participants
* Participants received baricitinib as an oral suspension 2 mg/mL administered QD, with age group-based dosing: 4 mg for participants aged 10 to \<18 years and up to 2 mg for those aged 1 to \<10 years.
* Treatment was administered for up to 14 days or until hospital discharge, whichever occurred first, with follow-up assessments through approximately Day 60.
|
|---|---|
|
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) of Baricitinib
|
266 Nanogram* hours per milliliter (ng*h/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 158
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1: 0.25, 0.5, 2-4 hours post-dose; Day 4: Pre-dose, 1, 6-10 hours post-dosePopulation: PK population consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had evaluable PK sample. Based on the planned analysis, outcomes were analyzed and reported per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
PK: Overall Cmax of Baricitinib in pediatric participants with COVID-19. Summarized data were reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Baricitinib QD
n=5 Participants
* Participants received baricitinib as an oral suspension 2 mg/mL administered QD, with age group-based dosing: 4 mg for participants aged 10 to \<18 years and up to 2 mg for those aged 1 to \<10 years.
* Treatment was administered for up to 14 days or until hospital discharge, whichever occurred first, with follow-up assessments through approximately Day 60.
|
|---|---|
|
PK: Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Baricitinib
|
57.6 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 45
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 to Day 28Population: Intent-to-treat population consisted of all participants who were assigned to study drug. Based on the planned analysis, outcomes were analyzed and reported per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level. As pre-specified in the Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), missing NIAID-OS values were imputed using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) method, applied only to participants with baseline and at least 1 postbaseline assessment.
NIAID-OS is an assessment of clinical status. The scale is as follows: 1)Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities; 2)Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen; 3)Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer requires ongoing medical care; 4)Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical care (COVID-19 related or otherwise); 5)Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 6)Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen devices; 7)Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO; 8)Death. NIAID-OS (range: 1-8); minimum value: 1 (not hospitalized, no limitations on activities); maximum value: 8 (death); higher scores indicate worse clinical status. Progression to ventilation (only progressed excluding death) by Day 28 was defined as reaching NIAID-OS ≥6; for participants with baseline NIAID-OS 6, progression required NIAID-OS ≥7, and those with a baseline score of 7 were excluded.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Baricitinib QD
n=6 Participants
* Participants received baricitinib as an oral suspension 2 mg/mL administered QD, with age group-based dosing: 4 mg for participants aged 10 to \<18 years and up to 2 mg for those aged 1 to \<10 years.
* Treatment was administered for up to 14 days or until hospital discharge, whichever occurred first, with follow-up assessments through approximately Day 60.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Progressed to Non-Invasive Ventilation/High-Flow Oxygen or Invasive Mechanical Ventilation (Including Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation [ECMO]) by Day 28
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 to Day 28Population: Intent-to-treat population consisted of all participants who were assigned to study drug. Based on the planned analysis, outcomes were analyzed and reported per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level. As pre-specified in the SAP, missing NIAID-OS values were imputed using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) method, applied only to participants with baseline and at least 1 postbaseline assessment.
NIAID-OS is an assessment of clinical status. The scale is as follows: 1) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities; 2) Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen; 3) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer requires ongoing medical care; 4) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical care (COVID-19 related or otherwise); 5) Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 6) Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen devices; 7) Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO; 8) Death. NIAID-OS (range: 1-8); minimum value: 1 (not hospitalized, no limitations on activities); maximum value: 8 (death); higher scores indicate worse clinical status. Progression to ventilation (who died or progressed) by Day 28, defined as reaching a score ≥6; for baseline scores of 6 and 7, progression required scores ≥7 and Death (NIAID-OS=8).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Baricitinib QD
n=6 Participants
* Participants received baricitinib as an oral suspension 2 mg/mL administered QD, with age group-based dosing: 4 mg for participants aged 10 to \<18 years and up to 2 mg for those aged 1 to \<10 years.
* Treatment was administered for up to 14 days or until hospital discharge, whichever occurred first, with follow-up assessments through approximately Day 60.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Died or Progressed to Non-Invasive Ventilation/High-Flow Oxygen, Invasive Mechanical Ventilation, or ECMO by Day 28
|
0 Percentage of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 4, Day 7, Day 10, Day 14, and Day 28Population: Intent-to-treat population consisted of all participants who were assigned to study drug. Based on the planned analysis, outcomes were analyzed and reported per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level. As pre-specified in the SAP, missing NIAID-OS values were imputed using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) method, applied only to participants with baseline and at least 1 postbaseline assessment.
NIAID-OS is an assessment of clinical status. The scale is as follows: 1) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities; 2) Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen; 3) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer requires ongoing medical care; 4) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical care (COVID-19 related or otherwise); 5) Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 6) Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen devices; 7) Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO; 8) Death. NIAID-OS (range: 1-8); minimum value: 1 (not hospitalized, no limitations on activities); maximum value: 8 (death); higher scores indicate worse clinical status. At each visit (Day 4/7/10/14/28), percentage of participants with ≥1-point improvement on NIAID-OS or discharged alive by that visit were reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Baricitinib QD
n=6 Participants
* Participants received baricitinib as an oral suspension 2 mg/mL administered QD, with age group-based dosing: 4 mg for participants aged 10 to \<18 years and up to 2 mg for those aged 1 to \<10 years.
* Treatment was administered for up to 14 days or until hospital discharge, whichever occurred first, with follow-up assessments through approximately Day 60.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least 1-Point Improvement on National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Ordinal Scale (NIAID-OS) or Live Discharge From Hospital
Day 4
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least 1-Point Improvement on National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Ordinal Scale (NIAID-OS) or Live Discharge From Hospital
Day 7
|
66.7 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least 1-Point Improvement on National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Ordinal Scale (NIAID-OS) or Live Discharge From Hospital
Day 10
|
83.3 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least 1-Point Improvement on National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Ordinal Scale (NIAID-OS) or Live Discharge From Hospital
Day 14
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least 1-Point Improvement on National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Ordinal Scale (NIAID-OS) or Live Discharge From Hospital
Day 28
|
83.3 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 to Day 28Population: Intent-to-treat population consisted of all participants who were assigned to study drug. Based on the planned analysis, outcomes were analyzed and reported per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level. As pre-specified in the SAP, missing NIAID-OS values were imputed using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) method, applied only to participants with baseline and at least 1 postbaseline assessment.
NIAID-OS is an assessment of clinical status. The 8-point scale as follows: 1) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities; 2) Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen; 3) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer requires ongoing medical care; 4) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical care (COVID-19 related or otherwise); 5) Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 6) Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen devices; 7) Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO; 8) Death. NIAID-OS (range: 1-8); minimum value: 1 (not hospitalized, no limitations on activities); maximum value: 8 (death); higher scores indicate worse clinical status. Number of ventilator free-days were defined as total number of days participants were alive and had NIAID-OS \<7 point (free of invasive mechanical ventilation/ECMO) by Day 28.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Baricitinib QD
n=6 Participants
* Participants received baricitinib as an oral suspension 2 mg/mL administered QD, with age group-based dosing: 4 mg for participants aged 10 to \<18 years and up to 2 mg for those aged 1 to \<10 years.
* Treatment was administered for up to 14 days or until hospital discharge, whichever occurred first, with follow-up assessments through approximately Day 60.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Ventilator-Free Days (Days Free of Invasive Mechanical Ventilation)
|
28.0 Days
Interval 3.0 to 28.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 to Day 28Population: Intent-to-treat population consisted of all participants who were assigned to study drug. Based on the planned analysis, outcomes were analyzed and reported per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level. As pre-specified in the SAP, missing NIAID-OS values were imputed using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) method, applied only to participants with baseline and at least 1 postbaseline assessment.
NIAID-OS is an assessment of clinical status. The 8-point scale as follows:1) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities; 2) Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen; 3) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer requires ongoing medical care; 4) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical care (COVID-19 related or otherwise); 5) Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 6) Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen devices; 7) Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO; 8) Death. NIAID-OS (range: 1-8); minimum value: 1 (not hospitalized, no limitations on activities); maximum value: 8 (death); higher scores indicate worse clinical status. Time to recovery was time from Day 1 to the first day the participant's maximum daily NIAID-OS was 1, 2, or 3. Participants who died before recovery were censored at Day 28 (not considered recovered).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Baricitinib QD
n=6 Participants
* Participants received baricitinib as an oral suspension 2 mg/mL administered QD, with age group-based dosing: 4 mg for participants aged 10 to \<18 years and up to 2 mg for those aged 1 to \<10 years.
* Treatment was administered for up to 14 days or until hospital discharge, whichever occurred first, with follow-up assessments through approximately Day 60.
|
|---|---|
|
Time to Recovery
|
8.0 Days
Interval 5.0 to 28.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 4Population: Intent-to-treat population consisted of all participants who were assigned to study drug. Participants were analyzed according to the study drug to which they were assigned. As pre-specified in the SAP, missing NIAID-OS values were imputed using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) method, applied only to participants with baseline and at least 1 postbaseline assessment.
NIAID-OS is an assessment of clinical status. The 8-point scale is as follows: 1) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities; 2) Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen; 3) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer requires ongoing medical care; 4) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical care (COVID-19 related or otherwise); 5) Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 6) Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen devices; 7) Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO; 8) Death. NIAID-OS (range: 1-8); minimum value: 1 (not hospitalized, no limitations on activities); maximum value: 8 (death); higher scores indicate worse clinical status. Improvement was defined as the reduction from baseline in the NIAID-OS score, calculated as baseline score minus Day 4 score. A higher positive value indicates greater improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Baricitinib QD
n=6 Participants
* Participants received baricitinib as an oral suspension 2 mg/mL administered QD, with age group-based dosing: 4 mg for participants aged 10 to \<18 years and up to 2 mg for those aged 1 to \<10 years.
* Treatment was administered for up to 14 days or until hospital discharge, whichever occurred first, with follow-up assessments through approximately Day 60.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Overall Improvement in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Ordinal Scale (NIAID-OS) at Day 4
5- point Improvement
|
0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Overall Improvement in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Ordinal Scale (NIAID-OS) at Day 4
0- point Improvement
|
83.3 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Overall Improvement in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Ordinal Scale (NIAID-OS) at Day 4
1- point Improvement
|
16.7 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Overall Improvement in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Ordinal Scale (NIAID-OS) at Day 4
2- point Improvement
|
0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Overall Improvement in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Ordinal Scale (NIAID-OS) at Day 4
3- point Improvement
|
0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Overall Improvement in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Ordinal Scale (NIAID-OS) at Day 4
4- point Improvement
|
0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Overall Improvement in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Ordinal Scale (NIAID-OS) at Day 4
6- point Improvement
|
0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Overall Improvement in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Ordinal Scale (NIAID-OS) at Day 4
7- point Improvement
|
0 Percentage of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 7Population: Intent-to-treat population consisted of all participants who were assigned to study drug. Based on the planned analysis, outcomes were analyzed and reported per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level. As pre-specified in the SAP, missing NIAID-OS values were imputed using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) method, applied only to participants with baseline and at least 1 postbaseline assessment.
NIAID-OS is an assessment of clinical status. The 8-point scale is as follows: 1) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities; 2) Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen; 3) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer requires ongoing medical care; 4) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical care (COVID-19 related or otherwise); 5) Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 6) Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen devices; 7) Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO; 8) Death. NIAID-OS (range: 1-8); minimum value: 1 (not hospitalized, no limitations on activities); maximum value: 8 (death); higher scores indicate worse clinical status. Improvement was defined as the reduction from baseline in the NIAID-OS score, calculated as baseline score minus Day 7 score. A higher positive value indicates greater improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Baricitinib QD
n=6 Participants
* Participants received baricitinib as an oral suspension 2 mg/mL administered QD, with age group-based dosing: 4 mg for participants aged 10 to \<18 years and up to 2 mg for those aged 1 to \<10 years.
* Treatment was administered for up to 14 days or until hospital discharge, whichever occurred first, with follow-up assessments through approximately Day 60.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Overall Improvement in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Ordinal Scale (NIAID-OS) at Day 7
0- point Improvement
|
33.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Overall Improvement in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Ordinal Scale (NIAID-OS) at Day 7
1- point Improvement
|
16.7 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Overall Improvement in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Ordinal Scale (NIAID-OS) at Day 7
2- point Improvement
|
0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Overall Improvement in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Ordinal Scale (NIAID-OS) at Day 7
3- point Improvement
|
0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Overall Improvement in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Ordinal Scale (NIAID-OS) at Day 7
4- point Improvement
|
50.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Overall Improvement in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Ordinal Scale (NIAID-OS) at Day 7
5- point Improvement
|
0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Overall Improvement in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Ordinal Scale (NIAID-OS) at Day 7
6- point Improvement
|
0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Overall Improvement in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Ordinal Scale (NIAID-OS) at Day 7
7- point Improvement
|
0 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 10Population: Intent-to-treat population consisted of all participants who were assigned to study drug. Based on the planned analysis, outcomes were analyzed and reported per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level. As pre-specified in the SAP, missing NIAID-OS values were imputed using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) method, applied only to participants with baseline and at least 1 postbaseline assessment.
NIAID-OS is an assessment of clinical status. The 8-point scale is as follows: 1) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities; 2) Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen; 3) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen- no longer requires ongoing medical care; 4) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical care (COVID-19 related or otherwise); 5) Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 6) Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen devices; 7) Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO; 8) Death. NIAID-OS (range: 1-8); minimum value: 1 (not hospitalized, no limitations on activities); maximum value: 8 (death); higher scores indicate worse clinical status. Improvement was defined as the reduction from baseline in the NIAID-OS score, calculated as baseline score minus Day 10 score. A higher positive value indicates greater improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Baricitinib QD
n=6 Participants
* Participants received baricitinib as an oral suspension 2 mg/mL administered QD, with age group-based dosing: 4 mg for participants aged 10 to \<18 years and up to 2 mg for those aged 1 to \<10 years.
* Treatment was administered for up to 14 days or until hospital discharge, whichever occurred first, with follow-up assessments through approximately Day 60.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Overall Improvement in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Ordinal Scale (NIAID-OS) at Day 10
0- point Improvement
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Overall Improvement in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Ordinal Scale (NIAID-OS) at Day 10
1- point Improvement
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Overall Improvement in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Ordinal Scale (NIAID-OS) at Day 10
2- point Improvement
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Overall Improvement in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Ordinal Scale (NIAID-OS) at Day 10
3- point Improvement
|
33.3 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Overall Improvement in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Ordinal Scale (NIAID-OS) at Day 10
4- point Improvement
|
50.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Overall Improvement in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Ordinal Scale (NIAID-OS) at Day 10
5- point Improvement
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Overall Improvement in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Ordinal Scale (NIAID-OS) at Day 10
6- point Improvement
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Overall Improvement in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Ordinal Scale (NIAID-OS) at Day 10
7- point Improvement
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 14Population: Intent-to-treat population consisted of all participants who were assigned to study drug. Based on the planned analysis, outcomes were analyzed and reported per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level. As pre-specified in the SAP, missing NIAID-OS values were imputed using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) method, applied only to participants with baseline and at least 1 postbaseline assessment.
NIAID-OS is an assessment of clinical status. The 8-point scale is as follows: 1) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities; 2) Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen; 3) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen- no longer requires ongoing medical care; 4) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical care (COVID-19 related or otherwise); 5) Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 6) Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen devices; 7) Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO; 8) Death. NIAID-OS (range: 1-8); minimum value: 1 (not hospitalized, no limitations on activities); maximum value: 8 (death); higher scores indicate worse clinical status. Improvement was defined as the reduction from baseline in the NIAID-OS score, calculated as baseline score minus Day 14 score. A higher positive value indicates greater improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Baricitinib QD
n=6 Participants
* Participants received baricitinib as an oral suspension 2 mg/mL administered QD, with age group-based dosing: 4 mg for participants aged 10 to \<18 years and up to 2 mg for those aged 1 to \<10 years.
* Treatment was administered for up to 14 days or until hospital discharge, whichever occurred first, with follow-up assessments through approximately Day 60.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Overall Improvement in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Ordinal Scale (NIAID-OS) at Day 14
0- point Improvement
|
0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Overall Improvement in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Ordinal Scale (NIAID-OS) at Day 14
1- point Improvement
|
16.7 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Overall Improvement in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Ordinal Scale (NIAID-OS) at Day 14
2- point Improvement
|
0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Overall Improvement in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Ordinal Scale (NIAID-OS) at Day 14
3- point Improvement
|
16.7 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Overall Improvement in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Ordinal Scale (NIAID-OS) at Day 14
4- point Improvement
|
66.7 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Overall Improvement in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Ordinal Scale (NIAID-OS) at Day 14
5- point Improvement
|
0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Overall Improvement in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Ordinal Scale (NIAID-OS) at Day 14
6- point Improvement
|
0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Overall Improvement in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Ordinal Scale (NIAID-OS) at Day 14
7- point Improvement
|
0 Percentage of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 28Population: Intent-to-treat population consisted of all participants who were assigned to study drug. Based on the planned analysis, outcomes were analyzed and reported per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level. As pre-specified in the SAP, missing NIAID-OS values were imputed using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) method, applied only to participants with baseline and at least 1 postbaseline assessment.
NIAID-OS is an assessment of clinical status. The 8-point scale is as follows: 1) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities; 2) Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen; 3) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen- no longer requires ongoing medical care; 4) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical care (COVID-19 related or otherwise); 5) Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 6) Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen devices; 7) Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO; 8) Death. NIAID-OS (range: 1-8); minimum value: 1 (not hospitalized, no limitations on activities); maximum value: 8 (death); higher scores indicate worse clinical status. Improvement was defined as the reduction from baseline in the NIAID-OS score, calculated as baseline score minus Day 28 score. A higher positive value indicates greater improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Baricitinib QD
n=6 Participants
* Participants received baricitinib as an oral suspension 2 mg/mL administered QD, with age group-based dosing: 4 mg for participants aged 10 to \<18 years and up to 2 mg for those aged 1 to \<10 years.
* Treatment was administered for up to 14 days or until hospital discharge, whichever occurred first, with follow-up assessments through approximately Day 60.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Overall Improvement in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Ordinal Scale (NIAID-OS) at Day 28
0- point Improvement
|
16.7 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Overall Improvement in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Ordinal Scale (NIAID-OS) at Day 28
1- point Improvement
|
0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Overall Improvement in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Ordinal Scale (NIAID-OS) at Day 28
2- point Improvement
|
0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Overall Improvement in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Ordinal Scale (NIAID-OS) at Day 28
3- point Improvement
|
16.7 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Overall Improvement in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Ordinal Scale (NIAID-OS) at Day 28
4- point Improvement
|
66.7 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Overall Improvement in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Ordinal Scale (NIAID-OS) at Day 28
5- point Improvement
|
0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Overall Improvement in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Ordinal Scale (NIAID-OS) at Day 28
6- point Improvement
|
0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Overall Improvement in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Ordinal Scale (NIAID-OS) at Day 28
7- point Improvement
|
0 Percentage of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 to Day 28Population: Intent-to-treat population consisted of all participants who were assigned to study drug. Based on the planned analysis, outcomes were analyzed and reported per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level. As pre-specified in the SAP, missing NIAID-OS values were imputed using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) method, applied only to participants with baseline and at least 1 postbaseline assessment.
NIAID-OS is an assessment of clinical status. The 8-point scale as follows:1) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities; 2) Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen; 3) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen- no longer requires ongoing medical care; 4) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen- requiring ongoing medical care; 5)Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 6)Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen devices; 7)Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO; 8) Death. NIAID-OS (range:1-8); minimum value:1; maximum value:8; higher scores indicate worse clinical status. Duration of hospitalization through Day 28 was defined as the total number of days with NIAID-OS scores of 4, 5, 6, or 7. Participants who died on or before Day 28 were assigned 28 days. For Day 1, hospitalization status was determined using worst NIAID-OS value recorded between baseline and the remainder of Day 1.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Baricitinib QD
n=6 Participants
* Participants received baricitinib as an oral suspension 2 mg/mL administered QD, with age group-based dosing: 4 mg for participants aged 10 to \<18 years and up to 2 mg for those aged 1 to \<10 years.
* Treatment was administered for up to 14 days or until hospital discharge, whichever occurred first, with follow-up assessments through approximately Day 60.
|
|---|---|
|
Duration of Hospitalization
|
6.5 Days
Interval 4.0 to 28.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (up to Day 60)Population: Intent-to-treat population consisted of all participants who were assigned to study drug. Based on the planned analysis, outcomes were analyzed and reported per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
Number of deaths by day 60 were reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Baricitinib QD
n=6 Participants
* Participants received baricitinib as an oral suspension 2 mg/mL administered QD, with age group-based dosing: 4 mg for participants aged 10 to \<18 years and up to 2 mg for those aged 1 to \<10 years.
* Treatment was administered for up to 14 days or until hospital discharge, whichever occurred first, with follow-up assessments through approximately Day 60.
|
|---|---|
|
All-Cause Mortality
|
0 Event of death
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 to Day 28Population: Intent-to-treat population consisted of all participants who were assigned to study drug. Based on the planned analysis, outcomes were analyzed and reported per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level. As pre-specified in the SAP, participants with missing NIAID-OS score were imputed using last observation carried forward approach.
Duration of ICU stay through Day 28 was defined as the total number of days spent in the ICU through Day 28, with days following death counted up to Day 28. For participants alive at Day 28, duration was calculated as (Date of ICU discharge - Date of ICU admission) + 1. For participants who died in the ICU on or before Day 28, duration was calculated as (Date of death - Date of ICU admission + 1) + (Date of Day 28 - Date of death).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Baricitinib QD
n=6 Participants
* Participants received baricitinib as an oral suspension 2 mg/mL administered QD, with age group-based dosing: 4 mg for participants aged 10 to \<18 years and up to 2 mg for those aged 1 to \<10 years.
* Treatment was administered for up to 14 days or until hospital discharge, whichever occurred first, with follow-up assessments through approximately Day 60.
|
|---|---|
|
Duration of Stay in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) in Days
|
0.0 Days
Interval 0.0 to 28.0
|
Adverse Events
Baricitinib QD
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Baricitinib QD
n=6 participants at risk
* Participants received baricitinib as an oral suspension 2 mg/mL administered QD, with age group-based dosing: 4 mg for participants aged 10 to \<18 years and up to 2 mg for those aged 1 to \<10 years.
* Treatment was administered for up to 14 days or until hospital discharge, whichever occurred first, with follow-up assessments through approximately Day 60.
|
|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to end of follow up (Up to 60 days)
Safety population consisted of all participants who assigned and received at least 1 dose of study drug and who did not discontinue from the study for the reason "Lost to Follow-Up" at the first postbaseline visit. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Baricitinib QD
n=6 participants at risk
* Participants received baricitinib as an oral suspension 2 mg/mL administered QD, with age group-based dosing: 4 mg for participants aged 10 to \<18 years and up to 2 mg for those aged 1 to \<10 years.
* Treatment was administered for up to 14 days or until hospital discharge, whichever occurred first, with follow-up assessments through approximately Day 60.
|
|---|---|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis contact
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to end of follow up (Up to 60 days)
Safety population consisted of all participants who assigned and received at least 1 dose of study drug and who did not discontinue from the study for the reason "Lost to Follow-Up" at the first postbaseline visit. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiration abnormal
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to end of follow up (Up to 60 days)
Safety population consisted of all participants who assigned and received at least 1 dose of study drug and who did not discontinue from the study for the reason "Lost to Follow-Up" at the first postbaseline visit. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Sinus bradycardia
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to end of follow up (Up to 60 days)
Safety population consisted of all participants who assigned and received at least 1 dose of study drug and who did not discontinue from the study for the reason "Lost to Follow-Up" at the first postbaseline visit. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to end of follow up (Up to 60 days)
Safety population consisted of all participants who assigned and received at least 1 dose of study drug and who did not discontinue from the study for the reason "Lost to Follow-Up" at the first postbaseline visit. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Lip oedema
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to end of follow up (Up to 60 days)
Safety population consisted of all participants who assigned and received at least 1 dose of study drug and who did not discontinue from the study for the reason "Lost to Follow-Up" at the first postbaseline visit. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to end of follow up (Up to 60 days)
Safety population consisted of all participants who assigned and received at least 1 dose of study drug and who did not discontinue from the study for the reason "Lost to Follow-Up" at the first postbaseline visit. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pustule
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to end of follow up (Up to 60 days)
Safety population consisted of all participants who assigned and received at least 1 dose of study drug and who did not discontinue from the study for the reason "Lost to Follow-Up" at the first postbaseline visit. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to end of follow up (Up to 60 days)
Safety population consisted of all participants who assigned and received at least 1 dose of study drug and who did not discontinue from the study for the reason "Lost to Follow-Up" at the first postbaseline visit. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to end of follow up (Up to 60 days)
Safety population consisted of all participants who assigned and received at least 1 dose of study drug and who did not discontinue from the study for the reason "Lost to Follow-Up" at the first postbaseline visit. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypocalcaemia
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to end of follow up (Up to 60 days)
Safety population consisted of all participants who assigned and received at least 1 dose of study drug and who did not discontinue from the study for the reason "Lost to Follow-Up" at the first postbaseline visit. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to end of follow up (Up to 60 days)
Safety population consisted of all participants who assigned and received at least 1 dose of study drug and who did not discontinue from the study for the reason "Lost to Follow-Up" at the first postbaseline visit. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to end of follow up (Up to 60 days)
Safety population consisted of all participants who assigned and received at least 1 dose of study drug and who did not discontinue from the study for the reason "Lost to Follow-Up" at the first postbaseline visit. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 2 • Baseline up to end of follow up (Up to 60 days)
Safety population consisted of all participants who assigned and received at least 1 dose of study drug and who did not discontinue from the study for the reason "Lost to Follow-Up" at the first postbaseline visit. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to end of follow up (Up to 60 days)
Safety population consisted of all participants who assigned and received at least 1 dose of study drug and who did not discontinue from the study for the reason "Lost to Follow-Up" at the first postbaseline visit. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Asthma
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to end of follow up (Up to 60 days)
Safety population consisted of all participants who assigned and received at least 1 dose of study drug and who did not discontinue from the study for the reason "Lost to Follow-Up" at the first postbaseline visit. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis diaper
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to end of follow up (Up to 60 days)
Safety population consisted of all participants who assigned and received at least 1 dose of study drug and who did not discontinue from the study for the reason "Lost to Follow-Up" at the first postbaseline visit. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Catheterisation venous
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to end of follow up (Up to 60 days)
Safety population consisted of all participants who assigned and received at least 1 dose of study drug and who did not discontinue from the study for the reason "Lost to Follow-Up" at the first postbaseline visit. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Tracheostomy
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to end of follow up (Up to 60 days)
Safety population consisted of all participants who assigned and received at least 1 dose of study drug and who did not discontinue from the study for the reason "Lost to Follow-Up" at the first postbaseline visit. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: GT60