Evaluation of the Levels of Pain and Discomfort Associated With Two Techniques of Corticotomy
NCT05040945 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 34
Last updated 2021-09-10
Summary
This study aims to estimate the levels of pain and discomfort associated with the en-masse retraction of the six upper anterior teeth and assisted by either conventional or flapless corticotomy.
Thirty-four adult patients exhibiting class П division 1 malocclusion will be randomly allocated to either the conventional corticotomy group or the flapless corticotomy group, and they will be treated by extraction of maxillary first premolars with applying mini-screws between maxillary second premolar and first molar as temporary skeletal anchorage devices (TSADs). The levels of pain and discomfort will be rated after 24 hours of corticotomy (T1), four days (T2), seven days (T3), 14 days (T4) and after 28 days of corticotomy, by asking the patients to fill in a questionnaire for assessing levels of pain and discomfort.
Conditions
- Class II Division 1 Malocclusion
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Traditional corticotomy
Adult patients will be treated by extraction of maxillary first premolars with applying mini-screws between maxillary second premolar and first molar as temporary skeletal anchorage devices (TSADs). Then en-masse retraction associated with traditional corticotomy will be applied.
- PROCEDURE
-
Flapless corticotomy
Adult patients will be treated by extraction of maxillary first premolars with applying mini-screws between maxillary second premolar and first molar as temporary skeletal anchorage devices (TSADs). Then en-masse retraction associated with flapless corticotomy will be applied.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Damascus University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Hanin Nizar Khlef, DDS,MSc · Specialist and Clinical Lecturer, Department of Orthodontics, University of Damascus
-
Mohammad Y Hajeer, DDS,MSc,PhD · Professor of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Dental School, Damascus, Syria
-
Omar Heshmeh, DDS,MSc,PhD · Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Damascus Dental School, Damascus, Syria
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 30 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2018-02-15
- Primary Completion
- 2018-07-31
- Completion
- 2019-05-15
Countries
- Syria
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Enhancing Anaesthetic Success in Mandibular Molars With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Comparative Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06330519 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Assess Intraoperative Pain for Restorative Treatment of Maxillary 1st Permanent Molars Using Artinibsa Versus Artpharma in Children During Infiltration Technique
NCT04303234 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Modified Kinesio Taping Technique on Morbidity After Impacted Third Molar
NCT04740450 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Intravenous Dexamethasone on Postoperative Pain and Complications in Jaw Surgery
NCT06787196 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Jaw Muscle Pain Post Wisdom Molar Surgery
NCT07094542 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Diagnosis, Evaluation and Treatment of Patients in Need of Third Molar Removal
NCT00316485 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of The Surgical Drain Placement With Use of Kinesiologic Tape
NCT04108559 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Distolingual Infiltration Verses Conventional Nerve Block in Mandibular Third Molar Extraction
NCT07296926 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Anesthetic Efficacy Of 4% ArtpharmaDent Versus 2% Mepecaine-L in Extraction of Lower First Primary Molars
NCT03942991 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Anesthetic Efficacy in Extraction on Mandibular Molars
NCT03106168 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Postoperative Pain and Swelling After Flap vsFlapless Technique For Mandibular Third Molar Surgery
NCT07247929 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Pretreatment Dexamethazone on Pain and Success of Nerve Block
NCT03199482 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
A Comparison Between Conventional Surgery and Piezosurgery
NCT02495207 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Physics Forceps vs Conventional Forceps in Extraction of Mandibular Molars
NCT04875650 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Intraosseous Anesthesia Versus Mandibular Nerve Block in Children
NCT05193487 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Trapezoidal Flap vs. Envelope Flap in Mandibular Third Molar Extraction.
NCT02120131 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Articaine Versus Lidocaine Buccal Infiltration
NCT05223075 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Intracanal Dexamethasone Extrusion and Postoperative Endodontic Pain
NCT06894069 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Comparison of Conventional Buccal Nerve Block Versus Buccal Nerve Trunk Block During Extraction of Posterior Mandibular Teeth
NCT07330518 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Oral Specimen and Data Acquisition Study of Subjects Requiring Third Molar Removal
NCT01805869 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Efficiency of Single Buccal Infiltration Versus Buccal and Intrapapillary Infiltration
NCT04458142 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Use of Corticosteroids in Third Molar Surgery
NCT05752305 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Comparison of Intraligamentary Anesthesia With the Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block for the Extraction of Mandibular Molars.
NCT06611865 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pre-emptive Analgesic Administration in Primary Tooth Extraction
NCT03786029 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Comparison of the Effects of Intraoral Postoperative Dexamethasone Applications After Mandibular Third Molar Surgery
NCT06604286 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4