Trial Outcomes & Findings for Evaluation of Multifocal Contact Lens Designs With and Without an HEV Blocker on Visual Function (NCT NCT04995055)

NCT ID: NCT04995055

Last Updated: 2023-06-06

Results Overview

The starburst diameter (mm) was measured each subject binocularly. Starburst diameter was quantified by the horizontal spread of the spokes emerging from the center of a small, point-like stimulus. A calibrated custom-made micrometer (two sides with reverse threading) was used to spread two posts out from a central mid-point. The posts attach to a custom-designed ruler that indicates the lateral spread of the starburst. Measurements for this metric are positive. Smaller diameter indicates better lens performance. The average diameter (mm) for each lens type was reported by period.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

37 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

30-minutes post lens insertion

Results posted on

2023-06-06

Participant Flow

A total of 37 subjects were enrolled into this study. Of those enrolled, 35 were fit into at least 1 study lens, while 2 subjects failed to meet all eligibility criteria. Of those dispensed, 25 subjects completed the study, while 10 subjects were discontinued.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Senofilcon A\Senofilcon A (C3)
Subjects randomized to this sequence received the senofilcon A lens during the first period and then received the senofilcon A (C3) lens during the second period
Senofilcon A (C3)\ Senofilcon A
Subjects randomized to this sequence received the senofilcon A (C3) lens during the first period and then received the senofilcon A lens during the second period
Period 1
STARTED
17
18
Period 1
COMPLETED
12
13
Period 1
NOT COMPLETED
5
5
Period 2
STARTED
12
13
Period 2
COMPLETED
12
13
Period 2
NOT COMPLETED
0
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Senofilcon A\Senofilcon A (C3)
Subjects randomized to this sequence received the senofilcon A lens during the first period and then received the senofilcon A (C3) lens during the second period
Senofilcon A (C3)\ Senofilcon A
Subjects randomized to this sequence received the senofilcon A (C3) lens during the first period and then received the senofilcon A lens during the second period
Period 1
COVID-19 Related
1
0
Period 1
Withdrawal by Subject
0
1
Period 1
Subject discontinued due to timing
4
4

Baseline Characteristics

Evaluation of Multifocal Contact Lens Designs With and Without an HEV Blocker on Visual Function

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Fitted Subjects
n=35 Participants
All subjects fitted at least one study lens.
Age, Continuous
51.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.95 • n=99 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
30 Participants
n=99 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants
n=99 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
6 Participants
n=99 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
29 Participants
n=99 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
35 Participants
n=99 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 30-minutes post lens insertion

Population: All subjects fitted at least one study lens.

The starburst diameter (mm) was measured each subject binocularly. Starburst diameter was quantified by the horizontal spread of the spokes emerging from the center of a small, point-like stimulus. A calibrated custom-made micrometer (two sides with reverse threading) was used to spread two posts out from a central mid-point. The posts attach to a custom-designed ruler that indicates the lateral spread of the starburst. Measurements for this metric are positive. Smaller diameter indicates better lens performance. The average diameter (mm) for each lens type was reported by period.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Senofilcon A
n=30 Participants
Subjects that wore senofilcon A lens in either the first or second period of the study.
Senofilcon A (C3)
n=30 Participants
Subjects that wore senofilcon A (C3) lens in either the first or second period of the study.
Starburst Diameter (mm)
Period 1
77.06 mm
Standard Deviation 25.900
64.13 mm
Standard Deviation 27.703
Starburst Diameter (mm)
Period 2
67.26 mm
Standard Deviation 30.991
54.24 mm
Standard Deviation 22.706

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 30-minutes post lens insertion

Population: All subjects fitted at least one study lens.

Halo diameter (mm) was quantified and measured using the same micrometer as for starbursts diameter (mm). The Halo diameter (mm) was measured each subject binocularly. Measurements for halo diameter are positive, where smaller values indicate better performance. The average diameter (mm) for each lens type.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Senofilcon A
n=30 Participants
Subjects that wore senofilcon A lens in either the first or second period of the study.
Senofilcon A (C3)
n=30 Participants
Subjects that wore senofilcon A (C3) lens in either the first or second period of the study.
Halos Diameter (mm)
69.24 mm
Standard Deviation 19.033
52.93 mm
Standard Deviation 17.725

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 30-minutes post lens insertion

Population: All subjects fitted at least one study lens.

Glare disability threshold was collected binocularly for each subject. Subjects were exposed to a target stimulus for 2 seconds; before the measurement was taken the annulus was set to a level below that which would cause the target stimulus to be veiled. The experimenter would then adjust the intensity of the annulus until subjects could no longer see the target stimulus. Subjects would indicate this by pressing a buzzer. Glare disability thresholds take on positive values, where higher values indicate better lens performance. The average glare disability level (change in log relative energy) for each lens type was reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Senofilcon A
n=30 Participants
Subjects that wore senofilcon A lens in either the first or second period of the study.
Senofilcon A (C3)
n=29 Participants
Subjects that wore senofilcon A (C3) lens in either the first or second period of the study.
Glare Disability Threshold
2.62 log (change in log relative energy)
Standard Deviation 0.235
2.86 log (change in log relative energy)
Standard Deviation 0.179

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 30-minutes post lens insertion

Population: All subjects fitted at least one study lens.

The Glare discomfort was evaluated by calculating the change in height of the palpebral fissure measured while the participant views the mid-wave central grating target, compared to the maximal squint during a 5-second Photostress exposure induced by a solid, 10-degree broadband field, which completely obscures the target (\~10-deg diameter). Both eyes were recorded and averaged, to produce an average palpebral fissure height before and during the Photostress exposure. Glare discomfort can take on negative and positive values, where smaller values indicate better lens performance. The average glare discomfort (change in palpebral fissure height) for each lens type was reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Senofilcon A
n=30 Participants
Subjects that wore senofilcon A lens in either the first or second period of the study.
Senofilcon A (C3)
n=30 Participants
Subjects that wore senofilcon A (C3) lens in either the first or second period of the study.
Glare Discomfort (mm)
9.88 mm
Standard Deviation 4.164
6.61 mm
Standard Deviation 3.151

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 30-minutes post lens insertion

Population: All subjects fitted at least one study lens.

Using the same optical bench set-up described Glare Disability Threshold, to measure HCT, participants viewed the mid-wave (580 nm) grating target presented on presented on a short wave (460 nm) "sky-light background." The intensity of the background was adjusted, until the participant was no longer able to resolve the grating target. The log relative energy of the background needed to obscure the central target was recorded as HCT. Heterochromatic contrast thresholds are positive values, where higher values indicate better lens performance. The average threshold each lens type was reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Senofilcon A
n=30 Participants
Subjects that wore senofilcon A lens in either the first or second period of the study.
Senofilcon A (C3)
n=29 Participants
Subjects that wore senofilcon A (C3) lens in either the first or second period of the study.
Heterochromatic Contrast Threshold (HCT)
1.85 log (change in log relative energy)
Standard Deviation 0.221
2.14 log (change in log relative energy)
Standard Deviation 0.295

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 30-minutes post lens insertion

Population: All subjects fitted at least one study lens.

To create the two-point threshold stimulus, a single point- source like stimulus was spread into two distinct points of light, using a custom-built, collapsible light baffle. The two-point threshold was quantified as the minimum distance (mm) at which a participant could detect two distinct points of light, separated by a small black space. Measurements for this metric are positive. Smaller distances indicate better lens performance. The average distance for each lens type and period.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Senofilcon A
n=30 Participants
Subjects that wore senofilcon A lens in either the first or second period of the study.
Senofilcon A (C3)
n=30 Participants
Subjects that wore senofilcon A (C3) lens in either the first or second period of the study.
Two-Point Threshold (mm) With 403nm Filter
Period 1
16.49 mm
Standard Deviation 5.600
7.51 mm
Standard Deviation 2.889
Two-Point Threshold (mm) With 403nm Filter
Period 2
13.21 mm
Standard Deviation 5.021
9.50 mm
Standard Deviation 6.321

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 30-minutes post lens insertion

Population: All subjects fitted at least one study lens.

To create the two-point threshold stimulus, a single point- source like stimulus was spread into two distinct points of light, using a custom-built, collapsible light baffle. The two-point threshold was quantified as the minimum distance (mm) at which a participant could detect two distinct points of light, separated by a small black space. Measurements for this metric are positive. Smaller distances indicate better lens performance. The average distance for each lens type.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Senofilcon A
n=30 Participants
Subjects that wore senofilcon A lens in either the first or second period of the study.
Senofilcon A (C3)
n=30 Participants
Subjects that wore senofilcon A (C3) lens in either the first or second period of the study.
Two-Point Threshold (mm) Without 403nm Filter
8.63 mm
Standard Deviation 3.391
5.47 mm
Standard Deviation 1.953

Adverse Events

Senofilcon A (C3)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Senofilcon A

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Thomas R. Karkkainen, OD, MS, FAAO

Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. (JJVC)

Phone: 1-800-843-2020

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: GT60