Scoring System in Predicting Perforated Duodenal Ulcer Morbidity and Mortality in Bpkihs

NCT04994184 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 74

Last updated 2021-08-09

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Different scoring systems were developed for risk prediction and adjustment of morbidity from perforated duodenal ulcer. However, these scoring systems are not routinely used in perforated duodenal ulcer patient in everyday clinical practice. Identification of patient with a high risk of adverse outcomes following surgery is important for clinical decision-making which can assist in risk stratification and triage e.g. timing and extent of pre-operative respiratory and circulatory stabilization, postoperative admission to a high dependency unit (HDU), the level and extent of monitoring, and inclusion in specific perioperative care protocols.

Few studies assessed and compared the accuracy indices of PULP with BOEY and ASA in predicting post PPU repair 30-day morbidity Further, the efficacy must be verified in individual settings like ours. So we wish to assess its efficacy in BPKIHS-a tertiary referral center of eastern Nepal.

Conditions

  • Perforated Duodenal Ulcer

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences

    lead OTHER

Eligibility

Min Age
16 Years
Max Age
80 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-03-25
Primary Completion
2021-06-30
Completion
2021-07-01

Countries

  • Nepal

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04994184 on ClinicalTrials.gov