Trial Outcomes & Findings for Influenza Challenge Study to Determine the Optimal Infection Dose and Safety of a Recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2, Clade 3C3a) Influenza Strain (NCT NCT04978454)
NCT ID: NCT04978454
Last Updated: 2025-08-28
Results Overview
Symptomatic influenza virus infection is defined as meeting both of the following criteria: 1. Viral shedding (as determined by a positive qualitative RT-PCR result or a detectable quantitative RT-PCR result) on at least two days beginning 24 hours after challenge until Study Day 8. 2. A cumulative symptom score = 6 from daily component symptoms computed across any consecutive 5-day window through Day 8 beginning on Day 2 post challenge using a Modified Jackson Score (MJS). MJS ranges from 0 to 36, with higher scores corresponding to worse outcomes.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
60 participants
Day 2 through Day 8
2025-08-28
Participant Flow
Participants were healthy adult volunteers meeting all protocol-defined eligibility criteria. Participants were recruited from the existing cohort that were pre-screened for influenza antibody titers in the screening protocol DMID 20-0004, as well as from other existing participant registries, through advertising, and by word of mouth. Enrollment occurred between 19AUG2021 and 21JUL2022.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
10^4 TCID50 Challenge Virus
Cohort 1A: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^4 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
Cohorts 1B and 1C were not enrolled; after review by the Internal Safety Review Committee (ISRC), enrollment continued into Cohort 2A.
|
10^5 TCID50 Challenge Virus
Cohort 2A: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^5 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
Cohorts 2B and 2C were not enrolled; after review by the Internal Safety Review Committee (ISRC), enrollment continued into Cohort 3A.
|
10^6 TCID50 Challenge Virus
Cohorts 3A and 3B: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^6 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
|
Sham Inoculum
From Cohorts 1A, 2A, 3A, and 3B: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of sham sucrose phosphate glutamate (SPG) inoculum on Day 1.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
12
|
10
|
36
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
12
|
10
|
36
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Influenza Challenge Study to Determine the Optimal Infection Dose and Safety of a Recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2, Clade 3C3a) Influenza Strain
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
10^4 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=12 Participants
Cohort 1A: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^4 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
Cohorts 1B and 1C were not enrolled; after review by the Internal Safety Review Committee (ISRC), enrollment continued into Cohort 2A.
|
10^5 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=10 Participants
Cohort 2A: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^5 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
Cohorts 2B and 2C were not enrolled; after review by the Internal Safety Review Committee (ISRC), enrollment continued into Cohort 3A.
|
10^6 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=36 Participants
Cohorts 3A and 3B: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^6 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
|
Sham Inoculum
n=2 Participants
From Cohorts 1A, 2A, 3A, and 3B: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of sham sucrose phosphate glutamate (SPG) inoculum on Day 1.
|
Total
n=60 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
33.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.8 • n=99 Participants
|
37.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5 • n=107 Participants
|
31.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.0 • n=206 Participants
|
30.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1 • n=7 Participants
|
32.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.4 • n=31 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
5 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
7 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
34 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
12 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
50 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
8 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
34 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
12 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
36 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
60 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
|
BMI
|
26.08 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.41 • n=99 Participants
|
30.07 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.99 • n=107 Participants
|
28.24 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.36 • n=206 Participants
|
23.80 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.85 • n=7 Participants
|
27.97 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.74 • n=31 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 2 through Day 8Population: The Safety population consists of all participants who received study influenza challenge or sham inoculum.
Symptomatic influenza virus infection is defined as meeting both of the following criteria: 1. Viral shedding (as determined by a positive qualitative RT-PCR result or a detectable quantitative RT-PCR result) on at least two days beginning 24 hours after challenge until Study Day 8. 2. A cumulative symptom score = 6 from daily component symptoms computed across any consecutive 5-day window through Day 8 beginning on Day 2 post challenge using a Modified Jackson Score (MJS). MJS ranges from 0 to 36, with higher scores corresponding to worse outcomes.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
10^6 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=36 Participants
Cohorts 3A and 3B: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^6 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
|
Sham Inoculum
n=2 Participants
From Cohorts 1A, 2A, 3A, and 3B: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of sham sucrose phosphate glutamate (SPG) inoculum on Day 1.
|
10^4 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=12 Participants
Cohort 1A: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^4 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
Cohorts 1B and 1C were not enrolled; after review by the Internal Safety Review Committee (ISRC), enrollment continued into Cohort 2A.
|
10^5 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=10 Participants
Cohort 2A: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^5 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
Cohorts 2B and 2C were not enrolled; after review by the Internal Safety Review Committee (ISRC), enrollment continued into Cohort 3A.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number and Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic Influenza Virus Infection After Challenge.
|
28 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 through discharge from the inpatient unit (Day 8 to Day 10)Population: The Safety population consists of all participants who received study influenza challenge or sham inoculum.
Viral shedding status (yes/no) is determined by at least one of: a positive qualitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) result from multiplex assay, or a detectable quantitative RT-PCR result.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
10^6 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=36 Participants
Cohorts 3A and 3B: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^6 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
|
Sham Inoculum
n=2 Participants
From Cohorts 1A, 2A, 3A, and 3B: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of sham sucrose phosphate glutamate (SPG) inoculum on Day 1.
|
10^4 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=12 Participants
Cohort 1A: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^4 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
Cohorts 1B and 1C were not enrolled; after review by the Internal Safety Review Committee (ISRC), enrollment continued into Cohort 2A.
|
10^5 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=10 Participants
Cohort 2A: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^5 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
Cohorts 2B and 2C were not enrolled; after review by the Internal Safety Review Committee (ISRC), enrollment continued into Cohort 3A.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number and Percentage of Participants With Detected Viral Shedding in Nasopharyngeal (NP) Swabs Each Day Post-challenge.
Day 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number and Percentage of Participants With Detected Viral Shedding in Nasopharyngeal (NP) Swabs Each Day Post-challenge.
Day 2
|
34 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number and Percentage of Participants With Detected Viral Shedding in Nasopharyngeal (NP) Swabs Each Day Post-challenge.
Day 3
|
32 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number and Percentage of Participants With Detected Viral Shedding in Nasopharyngeal (NP) Swabs Each Day Post-challenge.
Day 4
|
29 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Number and Percentage of Participants With Detected Viral Shedding in Nasopharyngeal (NP) Swabs Each Day Post-challenge.
Day 5
|
23 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Number and Percentage of Participants With Detected Viral Shedding in Nasopharyngeal (NP) Swabs Each Day Post-challenge.
Day 6
|
15 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number and Percentage of Participants With Detected Viral Shedding in Nasopharyngeal (NP) Swabs Each Day Post-challenge.
Day 7
|
12 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number and Percentage of Participants With Detected Viral Shedding in Nasopharyngeal (NP) Swabs Each Day Post-challenge.
Day 8+
|
7 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 2 through Day 8Population: The Safety population consists of all participants who received study influenza challenge or sham inoculum. This analysis includes all participants in the Safety population who completed the inpatient period.
The magnitude of viral shedding is measured via quantitative RT-PCR. Peak VL post-challenge is computed for each participant as the maximum log-10 viral copies/mL.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
10^6 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=35 Participants
Cohorts 3A and 3B: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^6 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
|
Sham Inoculum
n=2 Participants
From Cohorts 1A, 2A, 3A, and 3B: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of sham sucrose phosphate glutamate (SPG) inoculum on Day 1.
|
10^4 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=12 Participants
Cohort 1A: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^4 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
Cohorts 1B and 1C were not enrolled; after review by the Internal Safety Review Committee (ISRC), enrollment continued into Cohort 2A.
|
10^5 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=10 Participants
Cohort 2A: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^5 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
Cohorts 2B and 2C were not enrolled; after review by the Internal Safety Review Committee (ISRC), enrollment continued into Cohort 3A.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Peak Viral Load (VL) After Challenge
|
2.6570 log-10 viral copies/mL
Interval 2.1464 to 3.1694
|
NA log-10 viral copies/mL
All participants in the Sham Inoculum group did not exhibit any quantitative RT-PCR results at or above the lower limit of detection for the assay.
|
1.2154 log-10 viral copies/mL
Interval 0.1236 to 2.4036
|
2.6931 log-10 viral copies/mL
Interval 1.3234 to 4.038
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 2 through Day 8Population: The Safety population consists of all participants who received study influenza challenge or sham inoculum. This analysis includes all participants in the Safety population who completed the inpatient period.
Viral shedding status (yes/no) for each day during the challenge period is determined by at least one of: a positive qualitative RT-PCR result from multiplex assay, or a detectable quantitative RT-PCR result. The duration of shedding for each participant was computed as the number of days from the initial positive NP swab until the day after the final positive NP swab. Intermittent negative results were ignored for this computation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
10^6 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=35 Participants
Cohorts 3A and 3B: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^6 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
|
Sham Inoculum
n=2 Participants
From Cohorts 1A, 2A, 3A, and 3B: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of sham sucrose phosphate glutamate (SPG) inoculum on Day 1.
|
10^4 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=12 Participants
Cohort 1A: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^4 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
Cohorts 1B and 1C were not enrolled; after review by the Internal Safety Review Committee (ISRC), enrollment continued into Cohort 2A.
|
10^5 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=10 Participants
Cohort 2A: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^5 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
Cohorts 2B and 2C were not enrolled; after review by the Internal Safety Review Committee (ISRC), enrollment continued into Cohort 3A.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Duration of Viral Shedding
|
4.4 days
Interval 3.8 to 5.1
|
NA days
All participants in the Sham Inoculum group did not exhibit any quantitative RT-PCR results at or above the lower limit of detection for the assay.
|
2.3 days
Interval 0.9 to 4.0
|
3.8 days
Interval 2.1 to 5.3
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 2 through Day 8Population: The Safety population consists of all participants who received study influenza challenge or sham inoculum.
The cumulative symptom score from daily component symptoms is computed across any consecutive 5-day window through Day 8 beginning on Day 2 post challenge using the Modified Jackson Score (MJS). MJS ranges from 0 to 36, with higher scores corresponding to worse outcomes. The maximum cumulative score post-challenge was computed for each participant.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
10^6 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=36 Participants
Cohorts 3A and 3B: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^6 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
|
Sham Inoculum
n=2 Participants
From Cohorts 1A, 2A, 3A, and 3B: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of sham sucrose phosphate glutamate (SPG) inoculum on Day 1.
|
10^4 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=12 Participants
Cohort 1A: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^4 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
Cohorts 1B and 1C were not enrolled; after review by the Internal Safety Review Committee (ISRC), enrollment continued into Cohort 2A.
|
10^5 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=10 Participants
Cohort 2A: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^5 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
Cohorts 2B and 2C were not enrolled; after review by the Internal Safety Review Committee (ISRC), enrollment continued into Cohort 3A.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Maximum Cumulative Modified Jackson Score (MJS)
|
25.8 score on a scale
Interval 18.3 to 34.1
|
1.0 score on a scale
A confidence interval could not be calculated due to all participants having the same maximum score.
|
13 score on a scale
Interval 6.4 to 21.2
|
15.9 score on a scale
Interval 7.2 to 25.4
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 2 through Day 8Population: The Safety population consists of all participants who received study influenza challenge or sham inoculum.
Participants were categorized as symptomatic if they reported a cumulative symptom score = 6 from daily component symptoms computed across any consecutive 5-day window through Day 8 beginning on Day 2 post challenge using a Modified Jackson Score (MJS). MJS ranges from 0 to 36, with higher scores corresponding to worse outcomes.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
10^6 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=36 Participants
Cohorts 3A and 3B: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^6 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
|
Sham Inoculum
n=2 Participants
From Cohorts 1A, 2A, 3A, and 3B: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of sham sucrose phosphate glutamate (SPG) inoculum on Day 1.
|
10^4 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=12 Participants
Cohort 1A: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^4 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
Cohorts 1B and 1C were not enrolled; after review by the Internal Safety Review Committee (ISRC), enrollment continued into Cohort 2A.
|
10^5 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=10 Participants
Cohort 2A: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^5 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
Cohorts 2B and 2C were not enrolled; after review by the Internal Safety Review Committee (ISRC), enrollment continued into Cohort 3A.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number and Percentage of Participants Symptomatic for Influenza.
|
29 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 29Population: The Safety population consists of all participants who received study influenza challenge or sham inoculum.
Adverse events were defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of medicinal (investigational) product. Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 57. Adverse events were MedDRA coded.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
10^6 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=36 Participants
Cohorts 3A and 3B: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^6 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
|
Sham Inoculum
n=2 Participants
From Cohorts 1A, 2A, 3A, and 3B: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of sham sucrose phosphate glutamate (SPG) inoculum on Day 1.
|
10^4 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=12 Participants
Cohort 1A: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^4 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
Cohorts 1B and 1C were not enrolled; after review by the Internal Safety Review Committee (ISRC), enrollment continued into Cohort 2A.
|
10^5 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=10 Participants
Cohort 2A: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^5 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
Cohorts 2B and 2C were not enrolled; after review by the Internal Safety Review Committee (ISRC), enrollment continued into Cohort 3A.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Adverse Events (AEs) Reported From Challenge Through Day 29
|
28 events
|
3 events
|
10 events
|
16 events
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 29Population: The Safety population consists of all participants who received study influenza challenge or sham inoculum.
Adverse events were defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of medicinal (investigational) product. Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 57. Adverse events were MedDRA coded.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
10^6 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=36 Participants
Cohorts 3A and 3B: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^6 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
|
Sham Inoculum
n=2 Participants
From Cohorts 1A, 2A, 3A, and 3B: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of sham sucrose phosphate glutamate (SPG) inoculum on Day 1.
|
10^4 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=12 Participants
Cohort 1A: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^4 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
Cohorts 1B and 1C were not enrolled; after review by the Internal Safety Review Committee (ISRC), enrollment continued into Cohort 2A.
|
10^5 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=10 Participants
Cohort 2A: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^5 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
Cohorts 2B and 2C were not enrolled; after review by the Internal Safety Review Committee (ISRC), enrollment continued into Cohort 3A.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number and Percentage of Participants Reporting Any AE From Challenge Through Day 29.
|
17 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 57Population: The Safety population consists of all participants who received study influenza challenge or sham inoculum.
An adverse event or suspected adverse reaction is considered "serious" if, in the view of either the investigator or sponsor, it results in any of the following outcomes: death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, a persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Important medical events that may not result in death, be life-threatening, or require hospitalization may be considered serious when, based upon appropriate medical judgment, they may jeopardize the participant and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed in this definition.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
10^6 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=36 Participants
Cohorts 3A and 3B: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^6 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
|
Sham Inoculum
n=2 Participants
From Cohorts 1A, 2A, 3A, and 3B: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of sham sucrose phosphate glutamate (SPG) inoculum on Day 1.
|
10^4 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=12 Participants
Cohort 1A: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^4 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
Cohorts 1B and 1C were not enrolled; after review by the Internal Safety Review Committee (ISRC), enrollment continued into Cohort 2A.
|
10^5 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=10 Participants
Cohort 2A: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^5 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
Cohorts 2B and 2C were not enrolled; after review by the Internal Safety Review Committee (ISRC), enrollment continued into Cohort 3A.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Reported From Challenge Through Day 57
|
0 events
|
0 events
|
0 events
|
0 events
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 57Population: The Safety population consists of all participants who received study influenza challenge or sham inoculum.
An adverse event or suspected adverse reaction is considered "serious" if, in the view of either the investigator or sponsor, it results in any of the following outcomes: death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, a persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Important medical events that may not result in death, be life-threatening, or require hospitalization may be considered serious when, based upon appropriate medical judgment, they may jeopardize the participant and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed in this definition.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
10^6 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=36 Participants
Cohorts 3A and 3B: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^6 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
|
Sham Inoculum
n=2 Participants
From Cohorts 1A, 2A, 3A, and 3B: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of sham sucrose phosphate glutamate (SPG) inoculum on Day 1.
|
10^4 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=12 Participants
Cohort 1A: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^4 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
Cohorts 1B and 1C were not enrolled; after review by the Internal Safety Review Committee (ISRC), enrollment continued into Cohort 2A.
|
10^5 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=10 Participants
Cohort 2A: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^5 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
Cohorts 2B and 2C were not enrolled; after review by the Internal Safety Review Committee (ISRC), enrollment continued into Cohort 3A.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number and Percentage of Participants Reporting an SAE at Any Time From Challenge Through Day 57
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 8, Day 15, and Day 29Population: The Intent-to-Treat population consists of all enrolled participants.
Serological conversion (seroconversion) is defined as a minimum 4-fold rise in post-challenge antibody titers, compared to baseline. Titers for each participant are estimated as the geometric mean of technical replicate results, and the geometric mean is taken again across participants in each challenge dose group.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
10^6 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=35 Participants
Cohorts 3A and 3B: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^6 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
|
Sham Inoculum
n=2 Participants
From Cohorts 1A, 2A, 3A, and 3B: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of sham sucrose phosphate glutamate (SPG) inoculum on Day 1.
|
10^4 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=12 Participants
Cohort 1A: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^4 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
Cohorts 1B and 1C were not enrolled; after review by the Internal Safety Review Committee (ISRC), enrollment continued into Cohort 2A.
|
10^5 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=10 Participants
Cohort 2A: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^5 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
Cohorts 2B and 2C were not enrolled; after review by the Internal Safety Review Committee (ISRC), enrollment continued into Cohort 3A.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number and Percentage of Participants With Serological Conversion for Hemagglutination Inhibition (HAI) Antibody Titers Against A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), Clade 3C3a Virus, by Study Day
Day 8
|
4 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number and Percentage of Participants With Serological Conversion for Hemagglutination Inhibition (HAI) Antibody Titers Against A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), Clade 3C3a Virus, by Study Day
Day 15
|
14 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number and Percentage of Participants With Serological Conversion for Hemagglutination Inhibition (HAI) Antibody Titers Against A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), Clade 3C3a Virus, by Study Day
Day 29
|
14 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day -1 (baseline), Day 8, Day 15, and Day 29Population: The Intent-to-Treat population consists of all enrolled participants.
Titers for each participant are estimated as the geometric mean of technical replicate results, and the geometric mean is taken again across participants in each challenge dose group.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
10^6 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=36 Participants
Cohorts 3A and 3B: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^6 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
|
Sham Inoculum
n=2 Participants
From Cohorts 1A, 2A, 3A, and 3B: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of sham sucrose phosphate glutamate (SPG) inoculum on Day 1.
|
10^4 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=12 Participants
Cohort 1A: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^4 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
Cohorts 1B and 1C were not enrolled; after review by the Internal Safety Review Committee (ISRC), enrollment continued into Cohort 2A.
|
10^5 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=10 Participants
Cohort 2A: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^5 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
Cohorts 2B and 2C were not enrolled; after review by the Internal Safety Review Committee (ISRC), enrollment continued into Cohort 3A.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Geometric Mean Hemagglutination Inhibition (HAI) Antibody Titers Against A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), Clade 3C3a Virus, by Study Day
Day -1
|
10.7 titer
Interval 8.4 to 13.9
|
5.0 titer
A confidence interval could not be calculated due to all participants having the same geometric mean titer.
|
10.9 titer
Interval 7.3 to 16.8
|
7.6 titer
Interval 5.4 to 10.7
|
|
Geometric Mean Hemagglutination Inhibition (HAI) Antibody Titers Against A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), Clade 3C3a Virus, by Study Day
Day 8
|
15.9 titer
Interval 11.6 to 21.9
|
5.0 titer
A confidence interval could not be calculated due to all participants having the same geometric mean titer.
|
11.2 titer
Interval 7.9 to 16.3
|
8.7 titer
Interval 5.7 to 14.1
|
|
Geometric Mean Hemagglutination Inhibition (HAI) Antibody Titers Against A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), Clade 3C3a Virus, by Study Day
Day 15
|
37.0 titer
Interval 28.9 to 47.3
|
5.0 titer
A confidence interval could not be calculated due to all participants having the same geometric mean titer.
|
25.2 titer
Interval 17.8 to 37.8
|
36.1 titer
Interval 21.4 to 65.0
|
|
Geometric Mean Hemagglutination Inhibition (HAI) Antibody Titers Against A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), Clade 3C3a Virus, by Study Day
Day 29
|
33.8 titer
Interval 26.4 to 43.3
|
5.0 titer
A confidence interval could not be calculated due to all participants having the same geometric mean titer.
|
25.7 titer
Interval 18.8 to 37.6
|
32.5 titer
Interval 17.4 to 65.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 8, Day 15, and Day 29Population: The Intent-to-Treat population consists of all enrolled participants.
Serological conversion (seroconversion) is defined as a minimum 4-fold rise in post-challenge antibody titers, compared to baseline. Titers for each participant are estimated as the geometric mean of technical replicate results, and the geometric mean is taken again across participants in each challenge dose group.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
10^6 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=35 Participants
Cohorts 3A and 3B: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^6 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
|
Sham Inoculum
n=2 Participants
From Cohorts 1A, 2A, 3A, and 3B: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of sham sucrose phosphate glutamate (SPG) inoculum on Day 1.
|
10^4 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=12 Participants
Cohort 1A: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^4 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
Cohorts 1B and 1C were not enrolled; after review by the Internal Safety Review Committee (ISRC), enrollment continued into Cohort 2A.
|
10^5 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=10 Participants
Cohort 2A: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^5 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
Cohorts 2B and 2C were not enrolled; after review by the Internal Safety Review Committee (ISRC), enrollment continued into Cohort 3A.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number and Percentage of Participants With Serological Conversion for Microneutralization (MN) Antibody Titers Against A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), Clade 3C3a Virus, by Study Day
Day 8
|
5 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number and Percentage of Participants With Serological Conversion for Microneutralization (MN) Antibody Titers Against A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), Clade 3C3a Virus, by Study Day
Day 15
|
17 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Number and Percentage of Participants With Serological Conversion for Microneutralization (MN) Antibody Titers Against A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), Clade 3C3a Virus, by Study Day
Day 29
|
17 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day -1 (baseline), Day 8, Day 15, and Day 29Population: The Intent-to-Treat population consists of all enrolled participants
Titers for each participant are estimated as the geometric mean of technical replicate results, and the geometric mean is taken again across participants in each challenge dose group.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
10^6 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=36 Participants
Cohorts 3A and 3B: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^6 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
|
Sham Inoculum
n=2 Participants
From Cohorts 1A, 2A, 3A, and 3B: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of sham sucrose phosphate glutamate (SPG) inoculum on Day 1.
|
10^4 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=12 Participants
Cohort 1A: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^4 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
Cohorts 1B and 1C were not enrolled; after review by the Internal Safety Review Committee (ISRC), enrollment continued into Cohort 2A.
|
10^5 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=10 Participants
Cohort 2A: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^5 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
Cohorts 2B and 2C were not enrolled; after review by the Internal Safety Review Committee (ISRC), enrollment continued into Cohort 3A.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Geometric Mean Microneutralization (MN) Antibody Titers Against A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), Clade 3C3a Virus, by Study Day
Day -1
|
24.0 titer
Interval 17.8 to 32.4
|
14.1 titer
Interval 10.0 to 20.0
|
29.1 titer
Interval 17.8 to 46.2
|
16.2 titer
Interval 9.0 to 30.3
|
|
Geometric Mean Microneutralization (MN) Antibody Titers Against A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), Clade 3C3a Virus, by Study Day
Day 8
|
46.9 titer
Interval 35.9 to 61.2
|
23.8 titer
Interval 20.0 to 28.3
|
37.8 titer
Interval 25.9 to 55.0
|
28.3 titer
Interval 18.7 to 42.9
|
|
Geometric Mean Microneutralization (MN) Antibody Titers Against A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), Clade 3C3a Virus, by Study Day
Day 15
|
85.7 titer
Interval 69.6 to 106.6
|
20.0 titer
Interval 10.0 to 40.0
|
69.2 titer
Interval 51.9 to 89.8
|
102.0 titer
Interval 77.3 to 139.3
|
|
Geometric Mean Microneutralization (MN) Antibody Titers Against A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), Clade 3C3a Virus, by Study Day
Day 29
|
75.4 titer
Interval 61.8 to 91.9
|
14.1 titer
Interval 10.0 to 20.0
|
64.2 titer
Interval 46.8 to 85.2
|
82.8 titer
Interval 60.6 to 121.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 8, Day 15, and Day 29Population: The Intent-to-Treat population consists of all enrolled participants.
Serological conversion (seroconversion) is defined as a minimum 4-fold rise in post-challenge antibody titers against HA group 2 stem domains, compared to baseline. Titers for each participant are estimated as the geometric mean of technical replicate results, and the geometric mean is taken again across participants in each challenge dose group.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
10^6 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=35 Participants
Cohorts 3A and 3B: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^6 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
|
Sham Inoculum
n=2 Participants
From Cohorts 1A, 2A, 3A, and 3B: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of sham sucrose phosphate glutamate (SPG) inoculum on Day 1.
|
10^4 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=12 Participants
Cohort 1A: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^4 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
Cohorts 1B and 1C were not enrolled; after review by the Internal Safety Review Committee (ISRC), enrollment continued into Cohort 2A.
|
10^5 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=10 Participants
Cohort 2A: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^5 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
Cohorts 2B and 2C were not enrolled; after review by the Internal Safety Review Committee (ISRC), enrollment continued into Cohort 3A.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number and Percentage of Participants With Serological Conversion for HA-stalk-specific Antibody Titers Against A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), Clade 3C3a Virus, by Study Day
Day 8
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number and Percentage of Participants With Serological Conversion for HA-stalk-specific Antibody Titers Against A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), Clade 3C3a Virus, by Study Day
Day 15
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number and Percentage of Participants With Serological Conversion for HA-stalk-specific Antibody Titers Against A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), Clade 3C3a Virus, by Study Day
Day 29
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day -1 (baseline), Day 8, Day 15, and Day 29Population: The Intent-to-Treat population consists of all enrolled participants
Titers for each participant are estimated as the geometric mean of technical replicate results, and the geometric mean is taken again across participants in each challenge dose group.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
10^6 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=36 Participants
Cohorts 3A and 3B: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^6 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
|
Sham Inoculum
n=2 Participants
From Cohorts 1A, 2A, 3A, and 3B: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of sham sucrose phosphate glutamate (SPG) inoculum on Day 1.
|
10^4 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=12 Participants
Cohort 1A: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^4 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
Cohorts 1B and 1C were not enrolled; after review by the Internal Safety Review Committee (ISRC), enrollment continued into Cohort 2A.
|
10^5 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=10 Participants
Cohort 2A: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^5 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
Cohorts 2B and 2C were not enrolled; after review by the Internal Safety Review Committee (ISRC), enrollment continued into Cohort 3A.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Geometric Mean HA-stalk-specific Antibody Titers Against A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), Clade 3C3a Virus, by Study Day
Day -1
|
7938.6 titer
Interval 6028.5 to 10400.8
|
7954.3 titer
Interval 3656.0 to 17306.0
|
9407.9 titer
Interval 6396.7 to 13735.7
|
5722.8 titer
Interval 3208.0 to 9760.5
|
|
Geometric Mean HA-stalk-specific Antibody Titers Against A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), Clade 3C3a Virus, by Study Day
Day 8
|
10506.4 titer
Interval 8030.6 to 13663.3
|
7752.2 titer
Interval 3773.0 to 15928.0
|
9175.2 titer
Interval 6745.1 to 12854.5
|
8904.9 titer
Interval 6836.9 to 11598.0
|
|
Geometric Mean HA-stalk-specific Antibody Titers Against A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), Clade 3C3a Virus, by Study Day
Day 15
|
14693.3 titer
Interval 11188.6 to 19221.9
|
9238.5 titer
Interval 4573.0 to 18664.0
|
11227.9 titer
Interval 8286.4 to 15986.4
|
19814.9 titer
Interval 11567.4 to 34824.7
|
|
Geometric Mean HA-stalk-specific Antibody Titers Against A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), Clade 3C3a Virus, by Study Day
Day 29
|
13989.0 titer
Interval 10715.9 to 18491.2
|
7927.4 titer
Interval 3906.0 to 16089.0
|
10964.6 titer
Interval 8047.9 to 15552.9
|
16736.1 titer
Interval 9697.6 to 29895.4
|
Adverse Events
10^4 TCID50 Challenge Virus
10^5 TCID50 Challenge Virus
10^6 TCID50 Challenge Virus
Sham Inoculum
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
10^4 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=12 participants at risk
Cohort 1A: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^4 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
Cohorts 1B and 1C were not enrolled; after review by the Internal Safety Review Committee (ISRC), enrollment continued into Cohort 2A.
|
10^5 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=10 participants at risk
Cohort 2A: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^5 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
Cohorts 2B and 2C were not enrolled; after review by the Internal Safety Review Committee (ISRC), enrollment continued into Cohort 3A.
|
10^6 TCID50 Challenge Virus
n=36 participants at risk
Cohorts 3A and 3B: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of 10\^6 TCID50 of recombinant H3N2 (A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2), clade 3C3a) influenza virus on Day 1.
|
Sham Inoculum
n=2 participants at risk
From Cohorts 1A, 2A, 3A, and 3B: Participants were intranasally administered 1.0 mL (0.5mL per nostril) of sham sucrose phosphate glutamate (SPG) inoculum on Day 1.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
0.00%
0/12 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
0.00%
0/10 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
0.00%
0/36 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
50.0%
1/2 • Number of events 1 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Tachycardia
|
0.00%
0/12 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
40.0%
4/10 • Number of events 4 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
8.3%
3/36 • Number of events 3 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
|
General disorders
Vessel puncture site bruise
|
0.00%
0/12 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
0.00%
0/36 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
|
General disorders
Vessel puncture site haematoma
|
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
0.00%
0/10 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
0.00%
0/36 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Arthropod bite
|
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
0.00%
0/10 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
0.00%
0/36 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Skin laceration
|
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
0.00%
0/10 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
|
Investigations
Blood pressure diastolic decreased
|
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
5.6%
2/36 • Number of events 3 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
|
Investigations
Blood pressure diastolic increased
|
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
0.00%
0/10 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
5.6%
2/36 • Number of events 2 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
|
Investigations
Blood pressure systolic increased
|
0.00%
0/12 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 2 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
11.1%
4/36 • Number of events 5 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
|
Investigations
Heart rate decreased
|
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
0.00%
0/10 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
0.00%
0/36 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
|
Investigations
Heart rate increased
|
0.00%
0/12 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
0.00%
0/10 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
8.3%
3/36 • Number of events 3 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
|
Investigations
Oxygen saturation decreased
|
0.00%
0/12 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
0.00%
0/36 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
|
Investigations
Respiratory rate decreased
|
16.7%
2/12 • Number of events 2 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
20.0%
2/10 • Number of events 2 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
0.00%
0/36 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
50.0%
1/2 • Number of events 1 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
|
Investigations
Respiratory rate increased
|
0.00%
0/12 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
30.0%
3/10 • Number of events 3 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
|
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
0.00%
0/10 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis contact
|
0.00%
0/12 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
0.00%
0/36 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
0.00%
0/12 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
0.00%
0/10 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
50.0%
1/2 • Number of events 1 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious, unsolicited adverse events were collected from Day 1 through Day 29. Serious adverse events and all-cause mortality were collected from Day 1 through Day 57.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: LTE60