Peribulbar Block Versus Subtenon's Injection in Redo Vitreoretinal Surgery

NCT04978415 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2022-09-13

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

To compare the efficacy and efficiency of peribulbar block versus sub-Tenon's capsule injection of local anesthetic in redo vitreoretinal surgery

Conditions

  • Analgesia

Interventions

PROCEDURE

peribulbar block versus subtenon's block

Sixty patients undergoing vitreoretinal surgery were randomized to receive either peribulbar or sub-Tenon's capsule injection of 8 ml of a 20:80 mixture of 2% lidocaine and 0.75% bupivacaine with 60 IU hyalouronic acid. two groups 30 patient each (group p and group s) after connecting the patient to the monitor, we give him sedation 50 mg propofol, apply a nasal cannula group P: receives 2 injection peribulbar block group S: receives single injection subtenon Patients rate their pain sensation in both groups using an 11-point (0-10) numerical visual analogue scale immediately after surgery.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Research Institute of Ophthalmology, Egypt

    collaborator OTHER
  • Abeer Samir Salem

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Abeer Samir, MD · research institute of ophthalmology

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE
Model
SEQUENTIAL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
80 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-10-01
Primary Completion
2022-11-30
Completion
2022-11-30

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04978415 on ClinicalTrials.gov