Trial Outcomes & Findings for Robotically Augmented Mental Practice (NCT NCT04962698)

NCT ID: NCT04962698

Last Updated: 2023-10-19

Results Overview

Peak-to-peak amplitude of motor evoked potential (MEP) of the hand muscle

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

25 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

1 day

Results posted on

2023-10-19

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Healthy Participants
(Cross-over design but presented as a single group because of many sequences) All participants will receive seven types of interventions in random order. The types of interventions are the same across subjects. Visual motor imagery: Subjects will relax their muscles and perform conventional visual mental imagery (MI). With the guidance of audio instruction, the subjects will imagine the grasp and release motions with the right arm for 2 s in each motion in their mind. There will be no proximal muscle contraction. Kinesthetic MI: The same MI procedure as Visual MI will be performed, except that the subjects will focus on the kinesthetic sensation that they would feel with the imagined motions. Robotic-hand interaction with MI: Subjects will perform robotically augmented mental practice for grasp and release motions with the activation control of the proximal muscles. During this task, subjects will also imagine the kinesthetic sensation that they would feel with the corresponding motions with the right arm. Robotic-hand interaction without MI: Subjects will perform the robotically augmented practice without MI. Virtual-hand interaction: Subjects will perform the augmented practice with visual feedback of virtual robot actions on a monitor. Robotic action observation: Subjects will relax their muscles and focus on observing the computer-controlled grasp and release actions of the robotic hand. Rest: Subjects will rest without a task.
Post-Stroke Participants
All participants will receive three types of interventions in random order. The types of interventions are the same across subjects. Visual motor imagery: Subjects will relax their muscles and perform conventional visual mental imagery (MI). With the guidance of audio instruction, the subjects will imagine the grasp and release motions with the right arm for 2 s in each motion in their mind. There will be no proximal muscle contraction. Robotic-hand interaction with MI: Subjects will perform robotically augmented mental practice for grasp and release motions with the activation control of the proximal muscles. During this task, subjects will also imagine the kinesthetic sensation that they would feel with the corresponding motions with the right arm. Rest: Subjects will rest without a task.
Motor Imagery
STARTED
19
6
Motor Imagery
COMPLETED
18
4
Motor Imagery
NOT COMPLETED
1
2
Kinesthetic MI
STARTED
19
0
Kinesthetic MI
COMPLETED
18
0
Kinesthetic MI
NOT COMPLETED
1
0
Robotic-hand Interaction With MI
STARTED
19
6
Robotic-hand Interaction With MI
COMPLETED
18
4
Robotic-hand Interaction With MI
NOT COMPLETED
1
2
Robotic-hand Interaction Without MI
STARTED
19
0
Robotic-hand Interaction Without MI
COMPLETED
18
0
Robotic-hand Interaction Without MI
NOT COMPLETED
1
0
Virtual-hand Interaction
STARTED
19
0
Virtual-hand Interaction
COMPLETED
18
0
Virtual-hand Interaction
NOT COMPLETED
1
0
Robotic Action Observation
STARTED
19
0
Robotic Action Observation
COMPLETED
18
0
Robotic Action Observation
NOT COMPLETED
1
0
Rest
STARTED
19
6
Rest
COMPLETED
18
4
Rest
NOT COMPLETED
1
2

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Healthy Participants
(Cross-over design but presented as a single group because of many sequences) All participants will receive seven types of interventions in random order. The types of interventions are the same across subjects. Visual motor imagery: Subjects will relax their muscles and perform conventional visual mental imagery (MI). With the guidance of audio instruction, the subjects will imagine the grasp and release motions with the right arm for 2 s in each motion in their mind. There will be no proximal muscle contraction. Kinesthetic MI: The same MI procedure as Visual MI will be performed, except that the subjects will focus on the kinesthetic sensation that they would feel with the imagined motions. Robotic-hand interaction with MI: Subjects will perform robotically augmented mental practice for grasp and release motions with the activation control of the proximal muscles. During this task, subjects will also imagine the kinesthetic sensation that they would feel with the corresponding motions with the right arm. Robotic-hand interaction without MI: Subjects will perform the robotically augmented practice without MI. Virtual-hand interaction: Subjects will perform the augmented practice with visual feedback of virtual robot actions on a monitor. Robotic action observation: Subjects will relax their muscles and focus on observing the computer-controlled grasp and release actions of the robotic hand. Rest: Subjects will rest without a task.
Post-Stroke Participants
All participants will receive three types of interventions in random order. The types of interventions are the same across subjects. Visual motor imagery: Subjects will relax their muscles and perform conventional visual mental imagery (MI). With the guidance of audio instruction, the subjects will imagine the grasp and release motions with the right arm for 2 s in each motion in their mind. There will be no proximal muscle contraction. Robotic-hand interaction with MI: Subjects will perform robotically augmented mental practice for grasp and release motions with the activation control of the proximal muscles. During this task, subjects will also imagine the kinesthetic sensation that they would feel with the corresponding motions with the right arm. Rest: Subjects will rest without a task.
Motor Imagery
Technical difficulty
1
0
Motor Imagery
Exclusion criteria met after enrollment
0
2
Kinesthetic MI
Technical difficulty
1
0
Robotic-hand Interaction With MI
Technical difficulty
1
0
Robotic-hand Interaction With MI
Exclusion criteria met after enrollment
0
2
Robotic-hand Interaction Without MI
Technical difficulty
1
0
Virtual-hand Interaction
Technical difficulty
1
0
Robotic Action Observation
Technical difficulty
1
0
Rest
Technical difficulty
1
0
Rest
Exclusion criteria met after enrollment
0
2

Baseline Characteristics

Robotically Augmented Mental Practice

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=19 Participants
All participants will receive various types of interventions in random order. The types of interventions are the same across subjects. Visual motor imagery (MI): Subjects will relax their muscles and perform conventional visual mental imagery (MI). With the guidance of audio instruction, the subjects will imagine the grasp and release motions with the right arm for 2 s in each motion in their mind. There will be no proximal muscle contraction. Kinesthetic MI: The same MI procedure as Visual MI will be performed, except that the subjects will focus on the kinesthetic sensation that they would feel with the imagined motions. Robotic-hand interaction with MI: Subjects will perform robotically augmented mental practice for grasp and release motions with the activation control of the proximal muscles. During this task, subjects will also imagine the kinesthetic sensation that they would feel with the corresponding motions with the right arm. Robotic-hand interaction without MI: Subjects will perform the robotically augmented practice without MI. Virtual-hand interaction: Subjects will perform the augmented practice with visual feedback of virtual robot actions on a monitor. Robotic action observation: Subjects will relax their muscles and focus on observing the computer-controlled grasp and release actions of the robotic hand. Rest: Subjects will rest without a task.
Post-Stroke Participants
n=6 Participants
All participants will receive three types of interventions in random order. The types of interventions are the same across subjects. Visual motor imagery: Subjects will relax their muscles and perform conventional visual mental imagery (MI). With the guidance of audio instruction, the subjects will imagine the grasp and release motions with the right arm for 2 s in each motion in their mind. There will be no proximal muscle contraction. Robotic-hand interaction with MI: Subjects will perform robotically augmented mental practice for grasp and release motions with the activation control of the proximal muscles. During this task, subjects will also imagine the kinesthetic sensation that they would feel with the corresponding motions with the right arm. Rest: Subjects will rest without a task.
Total
n=25 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
19 Participants
n=99 Participants
6 Participants
n=107 Participants
25 Participants
n=206 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants
n=99 Participants
2 Participants
n=107 Participants
13 Participants
n=206 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants
n=99 Participants
4 Participants
n=107 Participants
12 Participants
n=206 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
2 Participants
n=206 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
17 Participants
n=99 Participants
6 Participants
n=107 Participants
23 Participants
n=206 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
7 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
7 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
1 Participants
n=107 Participants
3 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
7 Participants
n=99 Participants
5 Participants
n=107 Participants
12 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
3 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
3 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
19 participants
n=99 Participants
6 participants
n=107 Participants
25 participants
n=206 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 day

Population: Post-stroke data were not included in the overall statistical tests because they have distinct neuromotor characteristics and cannot be mixed with healthy samples. Post-stroke data were not statistically tested independently either because the number of subjects is too small to achieve appropriate statistical power. This strategy was as originally planned.

Peak-to-peak amplitude of motor evoked potential (MEP) of the hand muscle

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=18 Participants
All participants will receive seven types of interventions in random order. The types of interventions are the same across subjects. Visual motor imagery (MI): Subjects will relax their muscles and perform conventional visual mental imagery (MI). With the guidance of audio instruction, the subjects will imagine the grasp and release motions with the right arm for 2 s in each motion in their mind. There will be no proximal muscle contraction. Kinesthetic MI: The same MI procedure as Visual MI will be performed, except that the subjects will focus on the kinesthetic sensation that they would feel with the imagined motions. Robotic-Hand Interaction with MI: Subjects will perform robotically augmented mental practice for grasp and release motions with the activation control of the proximal muscles. During this task, subjects will also imagine the kinesthetic sensation that they would feel with the corresponding motions with the right arm. Robotic-Hand Interaction without MI: Subjects will perform the Robot-Hand Interaction without MI. Virtual-Hand Interaction: Subjects will interact with visual feedback of virtual robot actions on a monitor. Robotic action observation: Subjects will relax their muscles and focus on observing the computer-controlled grasp and release actions of the robotic hand. Rest: Subjects will rest without a task.
Post-Stroke Participants
n=4 Participants
All participants will receive three types of interventions in random order. The types of interventions are the same across subjects. Visual motor imagery (MI): Subjects will relax their muscles and perform conventional visual mental imagery (MI). With the guidance of audio instruction, the subjects will imagine the grasp and release motions with the right arm for 2 s in each motion in their mind. There will be no proximal muscle contraction. Robotic-Hand Interaction with MI: Subjects will perform robotically augmented mental practice for grasp and release motions with the activation control of the proximal muscles. During this task, subjects will also imagine the kinesthetic sensation that they would feel with the corresponding motions with the right arm. Rest: Subjects will rest without a task.
MEP Amplitude
Motor Imagery
0.813 mV
Standard Deviation 0.800
0.475 mV
Standard Deviation 0.300
MEP Amplitude
Kinesthetic Motor Imagery
0.916 mV
Standard Deviation 0.695
MEP Amplitude
Robotic-Hand Interaction with MI
1.237 mV
Standard Deviation 1.010
0.451 mV
Standard Deviation 0.307
MEP Amplitude
Robotic-Hand Interaction without MI
1.019 mV
Standard Deviation 0.823
MEP Amplitude
Virtual-Hand Interaction
1.197 mV
Standard Deviation 1.010
MEP Amplitude
Robotic Action Observation
0.899 mV
Standard Deviation 0.652
MEP Amplitude
Rest
1.106 mV
Standard Deviation 0.715
0.810 mV
Standard Deviation 0.567

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 day

Population: Post-stroke data were not included in the overall statistical tests because they have distinct neuromotor characteristics and cannot be mixed with healthy samples. Post-stroke data were not statistically tested independently either because the number of subjects is too small to achieve appropriate statistical power. This strategy was as originally planned.

Reaction time of the index finger in response to an auditory cue (reaction time test)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=18 Participants
All participants will receive seven types of interventions in random order. The types of interventions are the same across subjects. Visual motor imagery (MI): Subjects will relax their muscles and perform conventional visual mental imagery (MI). With the guidance of audio instruction, the subjects will imagine the grasp and release motions with the right arm for 2 s in each motion in their mind. There will be no proximal muscle contraction. Kinesthetic MI: The same MI procedure as Visual MI will be performed, except that the subjects will focus on the kinesthetic sensation that they would feel with the imagined motions. Robotic-Hand Interaction with MI: Subjects will perform robotically augmented mental practice for grasp and release motions with the activation control of the proximal muscles. During this task, subjects will also imagine the kinesthetic sensation that they would feel with the corresponding motions with the right arm. Robotic-Hand Interaction without MI: Subjects will perform the Robot-Hand Interaction without MI. Virtual-Hand Interaction: Subjects will interact with visual feedback of virtual robot actions on a monitor. Robotic action observation: Subjects will relax their muscles and focus on observing the computer-controlled grasp and release actions of the robotic hand. Rest: Subjects will rest without a task.
Post-Stroke Participants
n=4 Participants
All participants will receive three types of interventions in random order. The types of interventions are the same across subjects. Visual motor imagery (MI): Subjects will relax their muscles and perform conventional visual mental imagery (MI). With the guidance of audio instruction, the subjects will imagine the grasp and release motions with the right arm for 2 s in each motion in their mind. There will be no proximal muscle contraction. Robotic-Hand Interaction with MI: Subjects will perform robotically augmented mental practice for grasp and release motions with the activation control of the proximal muscles. During this task, subjects will also imagine the kinesthetic sensation that they would feel with the corresponding motions with the right arm. Rest: Subjects will rest without a task.
Reaction Time
Motor Imagery
293.6 ms
Standard Deviation 43.0
522.0 ms
Standard Deviation 205.4
Reaction Time
Kinesthetic Motor Imagery
286.4 ms
Standard Deviation 57.5
Reaction Time
Robotic-Hand Interaction with MI
275.7 ms
Standard Deviation 51.5
378.6 ms
Standard Deviation 107.0
Reaction Time
Robotic-Hand Interaction without MI
271.7 ms
Standard Deviation 38.3
Reaction Time
Virtual-Hand Interaction
273.4 ms
Standard Deviation 44.2
Reaction Time
Robotic Action Observation
259.9 ms
Standard Deviation 38.2
Reaction Time
Rest
234.2 ms
Standard Deviation 38.7
362.8 ms
Standard Deviation 94.4

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 day

Population: Post-stroke data were not included in the overall statistical tests because they have distinct neuromotor characteristics and cannot be mixed with healthy samples. Post-stroke data were not statistically tested independently either because the number of subjects is too small to achieve appropriate statistical power. This strategy was as originally planned.

Peak EMG amplitude of the hand muscle during the reaction time test was determined in each intervention. After identifying the maximal peak EMG value among the interventions, peak EMG value in each task was normalized to that maximal peak EMG, expressed as the ratio.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=18 Participants
All participants will receive seven types of interventions in random order. The types of interventions are the same across subjects. Visual motor imagery (MI): Subjects will relax their muscles and perform conventional visual mental imagery (MI). With the guidance of audio instruction, the subjects will imagine the grasp and release motions with the right arm for 2 s in each motion in their mind. There will be no proximal muscle contraction. Kinesthetic MI: The same MI procedure as Visual MI will be performed, except that the subjects will focus on the kinesthetic sensation that they would feel with the imagined motions. Robotic-Hand Interaction with MI: Subjects will perform robotically augmented mental practice for grasp and release motions with the activation control of the proximal muscles. During this task, subjects will also imagine the kinesthetic sensation that they would feel with the corresponding motions with the right arm. Robotic-Hand Interaction without MI: Subjects will perform the Robot-Hand Interaction without MI. Virtual-Hand Interaction: Subjects will interact with visual feedback of virtual robot actions on a monitor. Robotic action observation: Subjects will relax their muscles and focus on observing the computer-controlled grasp and release actions of the robotic hand. Rest: Subjects will rest without a task.
Post-Stroke Participants
n=4 Participants
All participants will receive three types of interventions in random order. The types of interventions are the same across subjects. Visual motor imagery (MI): Subjects will relax their muscles and perform conventional visual mental imagery (MI). With the guidance of audio instruction, the subjects will imagine the grasp and release motions with the right arm for 2 s in each motion in their mind. There will be no proximal muscle contraction. Robotic-Hand Interaction with MI: Subjects will perform robotically augmented mental practice for grasp and release motions with the activation control of the proximal muscles. During this task, subjects will also imagine the kinesthetic sensation that they would feel with the corresponding motions with the right arm. Rest: Subjects will rest without a task.
Peak EMG
Motor Imagery
0.602 Ratio
Standard Deviation 0.292
0.517 Ratio
Standard Deviation 0.320
Peak EMG
Kinesthetic Motor Imagery
0.602 Ratio
Standard Deviation 0.277
Peak EMG
Robotic-Hand Interaction with MI
0.721 Ratio
Standard Deviation 0.290
0.954 Ratio
Standard Deviation 0.093
Peak EMG
Robotic-Hand Interaction without MI
0.699 Ratio
Standard Deviation 0.311
Peak EMG
Virtual-Hand Interaction
0.683 Ratio
Standard Deviation 0.302
Peak EMG
Robotic Action Observation
0.488 Ratio
Standard Deviation 0.288
Peak EMG
Rest
0.530 Ratio
Standard Deviation 0.256
0.599 Ratio
Standard Deviation 0.313

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 day

Population: Post-stroke data were not included in the overall statistical tests because they have distinct neuromotor characteristics and cannot be mixed with healthy samples. Post-stroke data were not statistically tested independently either because the number of subjects is too small to achieve appropriate statistical power. This strategy was as originally planned.

Maximal rate of force development during a reaction time test

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=18 Participants
All participants will receive seven types of interventions in random order. The types of interventions are the same across subjects. Visual motor imagery (MI): Subjects will relax their muscles and perform conventional visual mental imagery (MI). With the guidance of audio instruction, the subjects will imagine the grasp and release motions with the right arm for 2 s in each motion in their mind. There will be no proximal muscle contraction. Kinesthetic MI: The same MI procedure as Visual MI will be performed, except that the subjects will focus on the kinesthetic sensation that they would feel with the imagined motions. Robotic-Hand Interaction with MI: Subjects will perform robotically augmented mental practice for grasp and release motions with the activation control of the proximal muscles. During this task, subjects will also imagine the kinesthetic sensation that they would feel with the corresponding motions with the right arm. Robotic-Hand Interaction without MI: Subjects will perform the Robot-Hand Interaction without MI. Virtual-Hand Interaction: Subjects will interact with visual feedback of virtual robot actions on a monitor. Robotic action observation: Subjects will relax their muscles and focus on observing the computer-controlled grasp and release actions of the robotic hand. Rest: Subjects will rest without a task.
Post-Stroke Participants
n=4 Participants
All participants will receive three types of interventions in random order. The types of interventions are the same across subjects. Visual motor imagery (MI): Subjects will relax their muscles and perform conventional visual mental imagery (MI). With the guidance of audio instruction, the subjects will imagine the grasp and release motions with the right arm for 2 s in each motion in their mind. There will be no proximal muscle contraction. Robotic-Hand Interaction with MI: Subjects will perform robotically augmented mental practice for grasp and release motions with the activation control of the proximal muscles. During this task, subjects will also imagine the kinesthetic sensation that they would feel with the corresponding motions with the right arm. Rest: Subjects will rest without a task.
Maximal Rate of Force Development
Motor Imagery
44.0 N/s
Standard Deviation 39.8
12.6 N/s
Standard Deviation 6.7
Maximal Rate of Force Development
Kinesthetic Motor Imagery
42.9 N/s
Standard Deviation 33.0
Maximal Rate of Force Development
Robotic-Hand Interaction with MI
56.7 N/s
Standard Deviation 53.9
23.0 N/s
Standard Deviation 15.9
Maximal Rate of Force Development
Robotic-Hand Interaction without MI
61.6 N/s
Standard Deviation 61.5
Maximal Rate of Force Development
Virtual-Hand Interaction
57.0 N/s
Standard Deviation 57.3
Maximal Rate of Force Development
Robotic Action Observation
39.1 N/s
Standard Deviation 33.2
Maximal Rate of Force Development
Rest
40.8 N/s
Standard Deviation 48.1
20.0 N/s
Standard Deviation 15.4

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 day

Population: Post-stroke data were not included in the overall statistical tests because they have distinct neuromotor characteristics and cannot be mixed with healthy samples. Post-stroke data were not statistically tested independently either because the number of subjects is too small to achieve appropriate statistical power. This strategy was as originally planned.

Peak force of the index finger during a reaction time test

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=18 Participants
All participants will receive seven types of interventions in random order. The types of interventions are the same across subjects. Visual motor imagery (MI): Subjects will relax their muscles and perform conventional visual mental imagery (MI). With the guidance of audio instruction, the subjects will imagine the grasp and release motions with the right arm for 2 s in each motion in their mind. There will be no proximal muscle contraction. Kinesthetic MI: The same MI procedure as Visual MI will be performed, except that the subjects will focus on the kinesthetic sensation that they would feel with the imagined motions. Robotic-Hand Interaction with MI: Subjects will perform robotically augmented mental practice for grasp and release motions with the activation control of the proximal muscles. During this task, subjects will also imagine the kinesthetic sensation that they would feel with the corresponding motions with the right arm. Robotic-Hand Interaction without MI: Subjects will perform the Robot-Hand Interaction without MI. Virtual-Hand Interaction: Subjects will interact with visual feedback of virtual robot actions on a monitor. Robotic action observation: Subjects will relax their muscles and focus on observing the computer-controlled grasp and release actions of the robotic hand. Rest: Subjects will rest without a task.
Post-Stroke Participants
n=4 Participants
All participants will receive three types of interventions in random order. The types of interventions are the same across subjects. Visual motor imagery (MI): Subjects will relax their muscles and perform conventional visual mental imagery (MI). With the guidance of audio instruction, the subjects will imagine the grasp and release motions with the right arm for 2 s in each motion in their mind. There will be no proximal muscle contraction. Robotic-Hand Interaction with MI: Subjects will perform robotically augmented mental practice for grasp and release motions with the activation control of the proximal muscles. During this task, subjects will also imagine the kinesthetic sensation that they would feel with the corresponding motions with the right arm. Rest: Subjects will rest without a task.
Peak Force
Motor Imagery
4.369 N
Standard Deviation 4.018
1.968 N
Standard Deviation 1.869
Peak Force
Kinesthetic Motor Imagery
4.370 N
Standard Deviation 4.010
Peak Force
Robotic-Hand Interaction with MI
5.342 N
Standard Deviation 5.557
3.708 N
Standard Deviation 3.378
Peak Force
Robotic-Hand Interaction without MI
5.666 N
Standard Deviation 5.553
Peak Force
Virtual-Hand Interaction
5.105 N
Standard Deviation 5.464
Peak Force
Robotic Action Observation
3.741 N
Standard Deviation 3.385
Peak Force
Rest
3.537 N
Standard Deviation 3.878
3.312 N
Standard Deviation 4.107

Adverse Events

Healthy Participants

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Post-Stroke Participants

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Prof. Minoru Shinohara

Georgia Institute of Technology

Phone: 404-894-1030

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place