Trial Outcomes & Findings for CEDARS Intervention: A Coping, Emotional Development, & Stress Reduction Intervention (NCT NCT04958694)
NCT ID: NCT04958694
Last Updated: 2026-08-17
Results Overview
This measurement reflects the number of participants recruited compared to the recruitment target goal.
COMPLETED
NA
36 participants
Baseline
2026-08-17
Participant Flow
Youth ages 14-19 years were recruited through social media advertisements.
Participants completed baseline screening assessments, including the Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) questionnaire. Participants were stratified by ACE score and then assigned to either the intervention group or the waitlist control group.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
CEDARS- Active Intervention
Participants received a self-paced, online, video-based positive affect skill-building intervention delivered over approximately 8 weeks. The intervention consisted of 8 modules including live-action and animated video content teaching emotional awareness, positive reappraisal, gratitude, mindfulness, strengths identification, acts of kindness, and SMART goal setting.
|
CEDARS- Waitlisted Control
Participants assigned to the waitlist control group did not receive the intervention during the active study period but completed the same study assessments on the same schedule as the intervention group to determine the feasibility and acceptability of CEDARS implementation and to investigate adolescent stress reduction.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
22
|
14
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
16
|
12
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
6
|
2
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Participants were allowed to pick multiple gender identities and as a result the numbers may differ from the overall recruitment number.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
CEDARS- Active Intervention
n=22 Participants
Participants received a self-paced, online, video-based positive affect skill-building intervention delivered over approximately 8 weeks. The intervention consisted of 8 modules including live-action and animated video content teaching emotional awareness, positive reappraisal, gratitude, mindfulness, strengths identification, acts of kindness, and SMART goal setting.
|
CEDARS- Waitlisted Control
n=14 Participants
Participants assigned to the waitlist control group did not receive the intervention during the active study period but completed the same study assessments on the same schedule as the intervention group to determine the feasibility and acceptability of CEDARS implementation and to investigate adolescent stress reduction.
|
Total
n=36 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
18 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.33 • n=51 Participants
|
17.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.99 • n=51 Participants
|
17.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.36 • n=102 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Genderqueer or genderfluid
|
1 Participants
n=51 Participants • Participants were allowed to pick multiple gender identities and as a result the numbers may differ from the overall recruitment number.
|
0 Participants
n=51 Participants • Participants were allowed to pick multiple gender identities and as a result the numbers may differ from the overall recruitment number.
|
1 Participants
n=102 Participants • Participants were allowed to pick multiple gender identities and as a result the numbers may differ from the overall recruitment number.
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Man
|
8 Participants
n=51 Participants • Participants were allowed to pick multiple gender identities and as a result the numbers may differ from the overall recruitment number.
|
7 Participants
n=51 Participants • Participants were allowed to pick multiple gender identities and as a result the numbers may differ from the overall recruitment number.
|
15 Participants
n=102 Participants • Participants were allowed to pick multiple gender identities and as a result the numbers may differ from the overall recruitment number.
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Questioning or unsure
|
4 Participants
n=51 Participants • Participants were allowed to pick multiple gender identities and as a result the numbers may differ from the overall recruitment number.
|
1 Participants
n=51 Participants • Participants were allowed to pick multiple gender identities and as a result the numbers may differ from the overall recruitment number.
|
5 Participants
n=102 Participants • Participants were allowed to pick multiple gender identities and as a result the numbers may differ from the overall recruitment number.
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Woman
|
10 Participants
n=51 Participants • Participants were allowed to pick multiple gender identities and as a result the numbers may differ from the overall recruitment number.
|
6 Participants
n=51 Participants • Participants were allowed to pick multiple gender identities and as a result the numbers may differ from the overall recruitment number.
|
16 Participants
n=102 Participants • Participants were allowed to pick multiple gender identities and as a result the numbers may differ from the overall recruitment number.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
4 Participants
n=51 Participants • Participants were allowed to pick multiple ethnic identities and as a result the numbers may differ from the overall recruitment number.
|
1 Participants
n=51 Participants • Participants were allowed to pick multiple ethnic identities and as a result the numbers may differ from the overall recruitment number.
|
5 Participants
n=102 Participants • Participants were allowed to pick multiple ethnic identities and as a result the numbers may differ from the overall recruitment number.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
18 Participants
n=51 Participants • Participants were allowed to pick multiple ethnic identities and as a result the numbers may differ from the overall recruitment number.
|
13 Participants
n=51 Participants • Participants were allowed to pick multiple ethnic identities and as a result the numbers may differ from the overall recruitment number.
|
31 Participants
n=102 Participants • Participants were allowed to pick multiple ethnic identities and as a result the numbers may differ from the overall recruitment number.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=51 Participants • Participants were allowed to pick multiple ethnic identities and as a result the numbers may differ from the overall recruitment number.
|
0 Participants
n=51 Participants • Participants were allowed to pick multiple ethnic identities and as a result the numbers may differ from the overall recruitment number.
|
0 Participants
n=102 Participants • Participants were allowed to pick multiple ethnic identities and as a result the numbers may differ from the overall recruitment number.
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian or Asian American
|
3 Participants
n=51 Participants • Participants were allowed to pick multiple racial identities and as a result the numbers may differ from the overall recruitment number.
|
2 Participants
n=51 Participants • Participants were allowed to pick multiple racial identities and as a result the numbers may differ from the overall recruitment number.
|
5 Participants
n=102 Participants • Participants were allowed to pick multiple racial identities and as a result the numbers may differ from the overall recruitment number.
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
|
11 Participants
n=51 Participants • Participants were allowed to pick multiple racial identities and as a result the numbers may differ from the overall recruitment number.
|
7 Participants
n=51 Participants • Participants were allowed to pick multiple racial identities and as a result the numbers may differ from the overall recruitment number.
|
18 Participants
n=102 Participants • Participants were allowed to pick multiple racial identities and as a result the numbers may differ from the overall recruitment number.
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Latino/a/x/e
|
3 Participants
n=51 Participants • Participants were allowed to pick multiple racial identities and as a result the numbers may differ from the overall recruitment number.
|
1 Participants
n=51 Participants • Participants were allowed to pick multiple racial identities and as a result the numbers may differ from the overall recruitment number.
|
4 Participants
n=102 Participants • Participants were allowed to pick multiple racial identities and as a result the numbers may differ from the overall recruitment number.
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Middle Eastern and/or North African
|
1 Participants
n=51 Participants • Participants were allowed to pick multiple racial identities and as a result the numbers may differ from the overall recruitment number.
|
0 Participants
n=51 Participants • Participants were allowed to pick multiple racial identities and as a result the numbers may differ from the overall recruitment number.
|
1 Participants
n=102 Participants • Participants were allowed to pick multiple racial identities and as a result the numbers may differ from the overall recruitment number.
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
8 Participants
n=51 Participants • Participants were allowed to pick multiple racial identities and as a result the numbers may differ from the overall recruitment number.
|
4 Participants
n=51 Participants • Participants were allowed to pick multiple racial identities and as a result the numbers may differ from the overall recruitment number.
|
12 Participants
n=102 Participants • Participants were allowed to pick multiple racial identities and as a result the numbers may differ from the overall recruitment number.
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Bi- or Multiracial
|
2 Participants
n=51 Participants • Participants were allowed to pick multiple racial identities and as a result the numbers may differ from the overall recruitment number.
|
0 Participants
n=51 Participants • Participants were allowed to pick multiple racial identities and as a result the numbers may differ from the overall recruitment number.
|
2 Participants
n=102 Participants • Participants were allowed to pick multiple racial identities and as a result the numbers may differ from the overall recruitment number.
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=51 Participants • Participants were allowed to pick multiple racial identities and as a result the numbers may differ from the overall recruitment number.
|
0 Participants
n=51 Participants • Participants were allowed to pick multiple racial identities and as a result the numbers may differ from the overall recruitment number.
|
0 Participants
n=102 Participants • Participants were allowed to pick multiple racial identities and as a result the numbers may differ from the overall recruitment number.
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=51 Participants • Participants were allowed to pick multiple racial identities and as a result the numbers may differ from the overall recruitment number.
|
0 Participants
n=51 Participants • Participants were allowed to pick multiple racial identities and as a result the numbers may differ from the overall recruitment number.
|
0 Participants
n=102 Participants • Participants were allowed to pick multiple racial identities and as a result the numbers may differ from the overall recruitment number.
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: The recruitment goal of each arm was 20 participants. This goal was exceeded by 2 in the intervention arm and short of this goal by 6 in the waitlist control arm. Placing the intervention arm at 110% of its recruitment goal and the waitlist control arm at 70%, respectively.
This measurement reflects the number of participants recruited compared to the recruitment target goal.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CEDARS- Active Intervention
n=22 Participants
Using an adapted stress-reduction intervention called the CEDARS, the investigators will pilot the intervention in adolescents (N=20) to determine the feasibility and acceptability of CEDARS implementation and to investigate adolescent stress reduction.
|
CEDARS- Waitlisted Control
n=20 Participants
The investigators will use a wait-listed control for the pilot intervention in adolescents (N=20) to determine the feasibility and acceptability of CEDARS implementation and to investigate adolescent stress reduction.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Feasibility: Percentage of Recruitment Target Enrollment Met
|
22 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Endpoint (8 Weeks after intervention start)Population: This study utilized a waitlist group as a control group and thus, the control participants did not receive intervention modules or surveys related to the intervention modules.
Feasibility was defined as the proportion of participants who completed at least 4 of the 7 core intervention modules during the study period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CEDARS- Active Intervention
n=22 Participants
Using an adapted stress-reduction intervention called the CEDARS, the investigators will pilot the intervention in adolescents (N=20) to determine the feasibility and acceptability of CEDARS implementation and to investigate adolescent stress reduction.
|
CEDARS- Waitlisted Control
The investigators will use a wait-listed control for the pilot intervention in adolescents (N=20) to determine the feasibility and acceptability of CEDARS implementation and to investigate adolescent stress reduction.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Feasibility:4 of 7 Intervention Modules Completed
|
17 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Endpoint (8 Weeks after intervention start)Population: This study utilized a waitlist group as a control group and thus, the control participants did not receive intervention modules or surveys related to the intervention modules.
Intervention module completion was defined as the mean number of modules the intervention participants completed during the study period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CEDARS- Active Intervention
n=22 Participants
Using an adapted stress-reduction intervention called the CEDARS, the investigators will pilot the intervention in adolescents (N=20) to determine the feasibility and acceptability of CEDARS implementation and to investigate adolescent stress reduction.
|
CEDARS- Waitlisted Control
The investigators will use a wait-listed control for the pilot intervention in adolescents (N=20) to determine the feasibility and acceptability of CEDARS implementation and to investigate adolescent stress reduction.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Feasibility: Mean Intervention Module Completion
|
4.6 Modules
Standard Deviation 2.11
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Endpoint (8 Weeks after intervention start)Population: The control group was a waitlisted control, so they were not assigned to the intervention and thus did not receive any surveys about satisfaction of the intervention modules.
Acceptability was defined as participant satisfaction with the intervention, measured using a 1-10 satisfaction scale, with scores ≥8 indicating intervention acceptability.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CEDARS- Active Intervention
n=22 Participants
Using an adapted stress-reduction intervention called the CEDARS, the investigators will pilot the intervention in adolescents (N=20) to determine the feasibility and acceptability of CEDARS implementation and to investigate adolescent stress reduction.
|
CEDARS- Waitlisted Control
The investigators will use a wait-listed control for the pilot intervention in adolescents (N=20) to determine the feasibility and acceptability of CEDARS implementation and to investigate adolescent stress reduction.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Acceptability: Participant Satisfaction Score ≥8 of 10
|
14 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Endpoint (8 Weeks after intervention start)Population: The control group was a waitlisted control, so they were not assigned to the intervention and thus did not receive any surveys about satisfaction of the intervention modules.
Acceptability was defined as participant satisfaction with the intervention measured using a 1-10 satisfaction scale, with scores ≥8 indicating positive acceptability.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CEDARS- Active Intervention
n=22 Participants
Using an adapted stress-reduction intervention called the CEDARS, the investigators will pilot the intervention in adolescents (N=20) to determine the feasibility and acceptability of CEDARS implementation and to investigate adolescent stress reduction.
|
CEDARS- Waitlisted Control
The investigators will use a wait-listed control for the pilot intervention in adolescents (N=20) to determine the feasibility and acceptability of CEDARS implementation and to investigate adolescent stress reduction.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Acceptability: Mean Participant Satisfaction
|
8.5 Score on a 10 point scale
Standard Deviation 1.8
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Midpoint (Week 4), Endpoint (Week 8), and 1-month follow-upPopulation: The number of participants in the outcome measure table reflects the number of participants who completed the associated mental health measure at the specified time point. Participants in both the intervention group and waitlist control group were lost to follow up and these numbers are reflected in the participant flow.
The PHQ-9 is a self-administered depression module of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ). It contains 9 questions that help identify patients with clinically meaningful symptoms of depression. Patient responses are scored 0-3 with 0 representing "not at all" and 3 indicating "nearly every day;" thus, the PHQ-9 contains a total score range of 0-27. Higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms. No specific administration time could be found, but a reasonable administration time is approximately 5-10 minutes for cognitively intact patients. PHQ-9 questions are straightforward and pertain to depressive symptoms experienced over the past 2 weeks that include anhedonia, dysphoria, sleep disturbances, fatigue, changes in eating, low self-esteem, concentration difficulties, hypo-or-hyper-active behaviors, and thoughts of suicide or homicide.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CEDARS- Active Intervention
n=22 Participants
Using an adapted stress-reduction intervention called the CEDARS, the investigators will pilot the intervention in adolescents (N=20) to determine the feasibility and acceptability of CEDARS implementation and to investigate adolescent stress reduction.
|
CEDARS- Waitlisted Control
n=14 Participants
The investigators will use a wait-listed control for the pilot intervention in adolescents (N=20) to determine the feasibility and acceptability of CEDARS implementation and to investigate adolescent stress reduction.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Depressive Symptoms
PHQ-9 Baseline
|
10.3 PHQ-9 Score
Standard Deviation 5.4 • Interval 7.9 to 12.6
|
8.3 PHQ-9 Score
Standard Deviation 5.4 • Interval 5.2 to 11.4
|
|
Depressive Symptoms
PHQ-9 Midpoint (Week 4)
|
8.4 PHQ-9 Score
Standard Deviation 6.9
|
6.8 PHQ-9 Score
Standard Deviation 4.5
|
|
Depressive Symptoms
PHQ-9 Endpoint (Week 8)
|
6 PHQ-9 Score
Standard Deviation 5.6
|
7.5 PHQ-9 Score
Standard Deviation 5.1
|
|
Depressive Symptoms
PHQ-9 1 month follow-up
|
5.1 PHQ-9 Score
Standard Deviation 4.4
|
7.5 PHQ-9 Score
Standard Deviation 4.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Midpoint (4 weeks), Endpoint (8 weeks), 1 month post interventionPopulation: The number of participants in the outcome measure table reflects the number of participants who completed the associated mental health measure at the specified time point. Participants in both the intervention group and waitlist control group were lost to follow up and these numbers are reflected in the participant flow.
The GAD-7 is a 7-item self-report questionnaire used to measure the severity of generalized anxiety disorder, with total scores ranging from 0 to 21 based on a 4-point scale (0-3). Scores of 5, 10, and 15 represent cut-points for mild, moderate, and severe anxiety, respectively. A score of 10 or higher is the recommended threshold for identifying probable cases of GAD.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CEDARS- Active Intervention
n=22 Participants
Using an adapted stress-reduction intervention called the CEDARS, the investigators will pilot the intervention in adolescents (N=20) to determine the feasibility and acceptability of CEDARS implementation and to investigate adolescent stress reduction.
|
CEDARS- Waitlisted Control
n=14 Participants
The investigators will use a wait-listed control for the pilot intervention in adolescents (N=20) to determine the feasibility and acceptability of CEDARS implementation and to investigate adolescent stress reduction.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Anxiety Symptoms
GAD 7 Endpoint (8 Weeks)
|
4.4 GAD-7 Score
Standard Deviation 4.3
|
7.1 GAD-7 Score
Standard Deviation 4.1
|
|
Anxiety Symptoms
GAD-7 Score Baseline
|
9.6 GAD-7 Score
Standard Deviation 5.7
|
7.1 GAD-7 Score
Standard Deviation 6.0
|
|
Anxiety Symptoms
GAD 7 Score Midpoint (4 Weeks)
|
7.1 GAD-7 Score
Standard Deviation 5.8
|
6.5 GAD-7 Score
Standard Deviation 4.1
|
|
Anxiety Symptoms
GAD 7 (1 month Follow-Up)
|
5.3 GAD-7 Score
Standard Deviation 5.1
|
7.4 GAD-7 Score
Standard Deviation 5.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Midpoint (4 weeks), Endpoint (8 weeks), 1 month post interventionPopulation: The number of participants in the outcome measure table reflects the number of participants who completed the associated mental health measure at the specified time point. Participants in both the intervention group and waitlist control group were lost to follow up and these numbers are reflected in the participant flow.
PANAS-C SF Scale: In this 10-item scale, the 5 positive affect (PA) items are summed to obtain a PA score, and the 5 negative affect (NA) items are summed to obtain an NA score. Each question is scored 1- "not much or not at all" to 5- "a lot. Higher scores on each scale indicate higher levels of engagement within that particular affect, although there is no cutoff threshold.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CEDARS- Active Intervention
n=22 Participants
Using an adapted stress-reduction intervention called the CEDARS, the investigators will pilot the intervention in adolescents (N=20) to determine the feasibility and acceptability of CEDARS implementation and to investigate adolescent stress reduction.
|
CEDARS- Waitlisted Control
n=14 Participants
The investigators will use a wait-listed control for the pilot intervention in adolescents (N=20) to determine the feasibility and acceptability of CEDARS implementation and to investigate adolescent stress reduction.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Positive Affect
Positive Affect Endpoint (8 weeks)
|
15.6 positive affect score
Standard Deviation 5.5
|
15.5 positive affect score
Standard Deviation 4.0
|
|
Positive Affect
Positive Affect Baseline
|
13.6 positive affect score
Standard Deviation 4.3
|
15.5 positive affect score
Standard Deviation 3.8
|
|
Positive Affect
Positive Affect Midpoint (4 weeks)
|
16.7 positive affect score
Standard Deviation 4.9
|
14.8 positive affect score
Standard Deviation 5.1
|
|
Positive Affect
Positive Affect (1 Month Post Intervention)
|
16.3 positive affect score
Standard Deviation 4.1
|
13.9 positive affect score
Standard Deviation 4.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Midpoint (4 weeks), Endpoint (8 weeks), 1 month post interventionPopulation: The number of participants in the outcome measure table reflects the number of participants who completed the associated mental health measure at the specified time point. Participants in both the intervention group and waitlist control group were lost to follow up and these numbers are reflected in the participant flow.
The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) is a widely used, self-report psychological instrument designed to measure the degree to which individuals appraise situations in their lives as uncontrollable, unpredictable, and overwhelming. The general scoring guidelines are 0-13: Low stress, 14-26: Moderate stress, 27-40: High perceived stress.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CEDARS- Active Intervention
n=22 Participants
Using an adapted stress-reduction intervention called the CEDARS, the investigators will pilot the intervention in adolescents (N=20) to determine the feasibility and acceptability of CEDARS implementation and to investigate adolescent stress reduction.
|
CEDARS- Waitlisted Control
n=14 Participants
The investigators will use a wait-listed control for the pilot intervention in adolescents (N=20) to determine the feasibility and acceptability of CEDARS implementation and to investigate adolescent stress reduction.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Perceived Stress
PSS Score Baseline
|
8.6 PSS score
Standard Deviation 2.4
|
7.7 PSS score
Standard Deviation 2.4
|
|
Perceived Stress
PSS Score Midpoint (4 weeks)
|
7.9 PSS score
Standard Deviation 3.0
|
7.4 PSS score
Standard Deviation 2.8
|
|
Perceived Stress
PSS Score Endpoint (8 weeks)
|
6.5 PSS score
Standard Deviation 2.7
|
7.2 PSS score
Standard Deviation 2.4
|
|
Perceived Stress
PSS Score (1 month Post Intervention)
|
7.3 PSS score
Standard Deviation 4.0
|
7.3 PSS score
Standard Deviation 2.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Midpoint (4 weeks), Endpoint (8 weeks), 1 month post interventionPopulation: The number of participants in the outcome measure table reflects the number of participants who completed the associated mental health measure at the specified time point. Participants in both the intervention group and waitlist control group were lost to follow up and these numbers are reflected in the participant flow.
The Flourishing Scale (FS; Diener et al., 2010) is a brief 8-item summary measure of the respondent's self-perceived success in important areas such as relationships, self-esteem, purpose, and optimism. It was designed to measure social-psychological prosperity and to complement existing measures of subjective well-being. The FS provides a single psychological well-being score. All items are rated on a 7-point Likert-type scale where 1 = strongly disagree and 7 = strongly agree. All items are phrased in a positive direction. Scores can range from 8 (Strong Disagreement with all items) to 56 (Strong Agreement with all items). Higher scores indicate greater flourshing.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CEDARS- Active Intervention
n=22 Participants
Using an adapted stress-reduction intervention called the CEDARS, the investigators will pilot the intervention in adolescents (N=20) to determine the feasibility and acceptability of CEDARS implementation and to investigate adolescent stress reduction.
|
CEDARS- Waitlisted Control
n=14 Participants
The investigators will use a wait-listed control for the pilot intervention in adolescents (N=20) to determine the feasibility and acceptability of CEDARS implementation and to investigate adolescent stress reduction.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Flourishing
Flourishing Scale Baseline
|
38.1 Flourishing Scale Score
Standard Deviation 9.4
|
41.1 Flourishing Scale Score
Standard Deviation 6.3
|
|
Flourishing
Flourishing Scale Midpoint (4 weeks)
|
43 Flourishing Scale Score
Standard Deviation 10.7
|
39.4 Flourishing Scale Score
Standard Deviation 7.3
|
|
Flourishing
Flourishing Scale Endpoint (8 weeks)
|
45.8 Flourishing Scale Score
Standard Deviation 7.8
|
42.2 Flourishing Scale Score
Standard Deviation 7.4
|
|
Flourishing
Flourishing Scale (1 month post intervention)
|
45.3 Flourishing Scale Score
Standard Deviation 7.2
|
42.7 Flourishing Scale Score
Standard Deviation 8.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Midpoint (4 weeks), Endpoint (8 weeks), 1 month post interventionPopulation: The number of participants in the outcome measure table reflects the number of participants who completed the associated mental health measure at the specified time point. Participants in both the intervention group and waitlist control group were lost to follow up and these numbers are reflected in the participant flow.
PANAS-C SF Scale: In this 10-item scale, the 5 positive affect (PA) items are summed to obtain a PA score, and the 5 negative affect (NA) items are summed to obtain an NA score. Each question is scored 1- "not much or not at all" to 5- "a lot. Higher scores on each scale indicate higher levels of engagement within that particular affect, although there is no cutoff threshold.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CEDARS- Active Intervention
n=22 Participants
Using an adapted stress-reduction intervention called the CEDARS, the investigators will pilot the intervention in adolescents (N=20) to determine the feasibility and acceptability of CEDARS implementation and to investigate adolescent stress reduction.
|
CEDARS- Waitlisted Control
n=14 Participants
The investigators will use a wait-listed control for the pilot intervention in adolescents (N=20) to determine the feasibility and acceptability of CEDARS implementation and to investigate adolescent stress reduction.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Negative Affect
Negative Affect (1 Month Post Intervention)
|
10.8 negative affect score on scale
Standard Deviation 6.0
|
11.8 negative affect score on scale
Standard Deviation 3.9
|
|
Negative Affect
Negative Affect baseline
|
14.5 negative affect score on scale
Standard Deviation 3.9
|
13.4 negative affect score on scale
Standard Deviation 3.8
|
|
Negative Affect
Negative Affect Midpoint (4 weeks)
|
11.9 negative affect score on scale
Standard Deviation 5.5
|
13.2 negative affect score on scale
Standard Deviation 3.6
|
|
Negative Affect
Negative Affect Endpoint (8 weeks)
|
9.9 negative affect score on scale
Standard Deviation 5.5
|
12.7 negative affect score on scale
Standard Deviation 3.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Midpoint, Endpoint. 1 Month Post-InterventionPopulation: The number of participants in the outcome measure table reflects the number of participants who completed the associated mental health measure at the specified time point. Participants in both the intervention group and waitlist control group were lost to follow up and these numbers are reflected in the participant flow.
The Brief Resilient Coping Scale captures tendencies to cope with stress adaptively. The scale focuses on the tendency to effectively use coping strategies in flexible, committed ways to actively solve problems despite stressful circumstances. Total score: Total sum scores range from 4 to 20. Scores of 4-13 indicate low resilient coping, 14-16 indicate medium resilient coping and 17-20 indicate high resilient coping.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CEDARS- Active Intervention
n=22 Participants
Using an adapted stress-reduction intervention called the CEDARS, the investigators will pilot the intervention in adolescents (N=20) to determine the feasibility and acceptability of CEDARS implementation and to investigate adolescent stress reduction.
|
CEDARS- Waitlisted Control
n=14 Participants
The investigators will use a wait-listed control for the pilot intervention in adolescents (N=20) to determine the feasibility and acceptability of CEDARS implementation and to investigate adolescent stress reduction.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Resilient Coping
Resilient Coping Baseline
|
14.5 Score on Resilient Coping Scale
Standard Deviation 2.7
|
14.8 Score on Resilient Coping Scale
Standard Deviation 2.7
|
|
Resilient Coping
Resilient Coping Midpoint
|
15.3 Score on Resilient Coping Scale
Standard Deviation 2.9
|
15.8 Score on Resilient Coping Scale
Standard Deviation 1.8
|
|
Resilient Coping
Resilient Coping Endpoint
|
15.1 Score on Resilient Coping Scale
Standard Deviation 2.7
|
15.5 Score on Resilient Coping Scale
Standard Deviation 2.3
|
|
Resilient Coping
Resilient Coping 1 Month Post-Intervention
|
15 Score on Resilient Coping Scale
Standard Deviation 2.5
|
15.5 Score on Resilient Coping Scale
Standard Deviation 2.9
|
Adverse Events
CEDARS- Active Intervention
CEDARS- Waitlisted Control
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Nia Heard-Garris
Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place