MedTrace Logo

Effects of a Classic High-frequency rTMS Treatment Versus a Deep rTMS Treatment

NCT04956016 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 152

Last updated 2026-01-13

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The main objective is to demonstrate that dTMS is more efficient than high frequency rTMS with a conventional coil.

The patient will receive treatment arm A or B :

Arm A : classic rTMS treatment (use of the 8-shaped coil) and standard therapy Arm B: treatment with deep rTMS (use of the H-shaped coil (helmet)) and standard therapies.

20 rTMS sessions are planned (5 sessions per week) and 3 follow-up visits : at Day 30, Day 60 and Day 90.

Conditions

  • Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant

Interventions

DEVICE

classic rTMS using the 8-shaped coil

20 rTMS sessions are planned (5 sessions per week)

DEVICE

deep rTMS using the H1-shaped coil

20 rTMS sessions are planned (5 sessions per week)

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Centre Hospitalier Henri Laborit

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Ghina HARIKA-GERMANEAU, Dr · Centre Hospitalier Henri Laborit

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-08-23
Primary Completion
2028-08-31
Completion
2028-08-31

Countries

  • France

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04956016 on ClinicalTrials.gov