Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of PF-06947386 in Japanese Adult Patients With Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection (NCT NCT04927312)
NCT ID: NCT04927312
Last Updated: 2024-03-13
Results Overview
Clinical response: Clinical response of cure was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antimicrobial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary. TOC was after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion; clinical failure: Death related to intra-abdominal infection, Persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen, Postsurgical wound infections, participant who received treatment with additional antibiotics for ongoing symptoms of intra-abdominal infection; Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy for any reason. TOC was after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
60 participants
TOC: Any day from Day 28 to Day 35
2024-03-13
Participant Flow
A total of 60 Japanese hospitalized participants with complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI) were enrolled in this study.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
PF-06947386 + Metronidazole
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of PF-06947386 (2.0 gram (g) of ceftazidime and 0.5 g of avibactam) every 8 hours, immediately followed by an IV administration of metronidazole (0.5 g) for 60 minutes. Participants received a minimum of 5 full days (15 doses) of IV study intervention up to a maximum of 14 full days (42 doses) of study intervention.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
60
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
56
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
4
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
PF-06947386 + Metronidazole
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of PF-06947386 (2.0 gram (g) of ceftazidime and 0.5 g of avibactam) every 8 hours, immediately followed by an IV administration of metronidazole (0.5 g) for 60 minutes. Participants received a minimum of 5 full days (15 doses) of IV study intervention up to a maximum of 14 full days (42 doses) of study intervention.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Other
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of PF-06947386 in Japanese Adult Patients With Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
PF-06947386 + Metronidazole
n=60 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of PF-06947386 (2.0 gram (g) of ceftazidime and 0.5 g of avibactam) every 8 hours, immediately followed by an IV administration of metronidazole (0.5 g) for 60 minutes. Participants received a minimum of 5 full days (15 doses) of IV study intervention up to a maximum of 14 full days (42 doses) of study intervention.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
56.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.90 • n=99 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
26 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
34 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
60 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
60 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: TOC: Any day from Day 28 to Day 35Population: CE analysis set included participants who had an appropriate diagnosis of cIAI; either received therapy for greater than or equal to (\>=) 48 hours, with \>=80 percent (%) of the scheduled drug administered over number of days administered or received therapy less than (\<) 48 hours before discontinuing treatment due to an adverse event (AE).
Clinical response: Clinical response of cure was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antimicrobial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary. TOC was after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion; clinical failure: Death related to intra-abdominal infection, Persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen, Postsurgical wound infections, participant who received treatment with additional antibiotics for ongoing symptoms of intra-abdominal infection; Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy for any reason. TOC was after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-06947386 + Metronidazole
n=40 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of PF-06947386 (2.0 gram (g) of ceftazidime and 0.5 g of avibactam) every 8 hours, immediately followed by an IV administration of metronidazole (0.5 g) for 60 minutes. Participants received a minimum of 5 full days (15 doses) of IV study intervention up to a maximum of 14 full days (42 doses) of study intervention.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at Test of Cure (TOC) Visit: Clinically Evaluable (CE) Analysis Set
Clinical Cure
|
36 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at Test of Cure (TOC) Visit: Clinically Evaluable (CE) Analysis Set
Clinical Failure
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at Test of Cure (TOC) Visit: Clinically Evaluable (CE) Analysis Set
Indeterminate
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Population: CE analysis set evaluated. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Here, "Number Analyzed" signifies participants included in CE analysis set at EOT and LFU respectively.
Clinical response: Clinical response of cure was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antimicrobial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary. TOC was after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion; clinical failure: Death related to intra-abdominal infection, Persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen, Postsurgical wound infections, participant who received treatment with additional antibiotics for ongoing symptoms of intra-abdominal infection; Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy for any reason. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-06947386 + Metronidazole
n=42 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of PF-06947386 (2.0 gram (g) of ceftazidime and 0.5 g of avibactam) every 8 hours, immediately followed by an IV administration of metronidazole (0.5 g) for 60 minutes. Participants received a minimum of 5 full days (15 doses) of IV study intervention up to a maximum of 14 full days (42 doses) of study intervention.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at End of Treatment (EOT) and Late Follow-up (LFU) Visits: CE Analysis Set
EOT, Clinical Cure
|
90.5 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at End of Treatment (EOT) and Late Follow-up (LFU) Visits: CE Analysis Set
EOT, Clinical Failure
|
9.5 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at End of Treatment (EOT) and Late Follow-up (LFU) Visits: CE Analysis Set
EOT, Indeterminate
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at End of Treatment (EOT) and Late Follow-up (LFU) Visits: CE Analysis Set
LFU, Clinical Cure
|
90.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at End of Treatment (EOT) and Late Follow-up (LFU) Visits: CE Analysis Set
LFU, Clinical Failure
|
10.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at End of Treatment (EOT) and Late Follow-up (LFU) Visits: CE Analysis Set
LFU, Indeterminate
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Population: MITT analysis set included all enrolled participants who had clinical evidence of cIAI and received any amount of study drug.
Clinical response: Clinical response of cure was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antimicrobial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary. TOC was after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion; clinical failure: Death related to intra-abdominal infection, Persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen, Postsurgical wound infections, participant who received treatment with additional antibiotics for ongoing symptoms of intra-abdominal infection; Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy for any reason. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-06947386 + Metronidazole
n=59 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of PF-06947386 (2.0 gram (g) of ceftazidime and 0.5 g of avibactam) every 8 hours, immediately followed by an IV administration of metronidazole (0.5 g) for 60 minutes. Participants received a minimum of 5 full days (15 doses) of IV study intervention up to a maximum of 14 full days (42 doses) of study intervention.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT and LFU Visits: Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Analysis Set
EOT, Clinical Cure
|
54 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT and LFU Visits: Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Analysis Set
EOT, Clinical Failure
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT and LFU Visits: Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Analysis Set
EOT, Indeterminate
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT and LFU Visits: Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Analysis Set
LFU, Clinical Cure
|
52 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT and LFU Visits: Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Analysis Set
LFU, Clinical Failure
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT and LFU Visits: Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Analysis Set
LFU, Indeterminate
|
3 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Population: mMITT analysis set included all enrolled participant who met the disease definition of cIAI; received any amount of study drug and had at least 1 etiologic pathogen identified at study entry (regardless of isolate susceptibilities).
Clinical response: Clinical response of cure was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antimicrobial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary. TOC was after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion; clinical failure: Death related to intra-abdominal infection, Persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen, Postsurgical wound infections, participant who received treatment with additional antibiotics for ongoing symptoms of intra-abdominal infection; Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy for any reason. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-06947386 + Metronidazole
n=42 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of PF-06947386 (2.0 gram (g) of ceftazidime and 0.5 g of avibactam) every 8 hours, immediately followed by an IV administration of metronidazole (0.5 g) for 60 minutes. Participants received a minimum of 5 full days (15 doses) of IV study intervention up to a maximum of 14 full days (42 doses) of study intervention.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT and LFU Visits: Microbiological Modified Intent-to-Treat (mMITT) Analysis Set
EOT, Clinical Cure
|
38 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT and LFU Visits: Microbiological Modified Intent-to-Treat (mMITT) Analysis Set
EOT, Clinical Failure
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT and LFU Visits: Microbiological Modified Intent-to-Treat (mMITT) Analysis Set
EOT, Indeterminate
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT and LFU Visits: Microbiological Modified Intent-to-Treat (mMITT) Analysis Set
LFU, Clinical Cure
|
36 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT and LFU Visits: Microbiological Modified Intent-to-Treat (mMITT) Analysis Set
LFU, Clinical Failure
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT and LFU Visits: Microbiological Modified Intent-to-Treat (mMITT) Analysis Set
LFU, Indeterminate
|
2 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Population: ME analysis set included participants who were included in a subset of CE participants and had at least 1 Gram-negative aerobic pathogen in the initial/prestudy culture that was susceptible. Here, "Number Analyzed" signifies participants included in ME analysis set at EOT and LFU respectively.
Clinical response: Clinical response of cure was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antimicrobial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary. TOC was after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion; clinical failure: Death related to intra-abdominal infection, Persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen, Postsurgical wound infections, participant who received treatment with additional antibiotics for ongoing symptoms of intra-abdominal infection; Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy for any reason. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-06947386 + Metronidazole
n=36 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of PF-06947386 (2.0 gram (g) of ceftazidime and 0.5 g of avibactam) every 8 hours, immediately followed by an IV administration of metronidazole (0.5 g) for 60 minutes. Participants received a minimum of 5 full days (15 doses) of IV study intervention up to a maximum of 14 full days (42 doses) of study intervention.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT and LFU Visits: Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set
EOT, Clinical Cure
|
94.4 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT and LFU Visits: Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set
EOT, Clinical Failure
|
5.6 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT and LFU Visits: Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set
EOT, Indeterminate
|
0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT and LFU Visits: Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set
LFU, Clinical Cure
|
94.3 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT and LFU Visits: Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set
LFU, Clinical Failure
|
5.7 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT and LFU Visits: Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set
LFU, Indeterminate
|
0 Percentage of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Population: eME analysis set included participants who were included in a subset of CE participants and had at least 1 Gram-negative aerobic pathogen in the initial/prestudy culture that is susceptible. Here, "Number Analyzed" signifies participants included in eME analysis set at EOT and LFU respectively.
Clinical response: Clinical response of cure was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antimicrobial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary. TOC was after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion; clinical failure: Death related to intra-abdominal infection, Persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen, Postsurgical wound infections, participant who received treatment with additional antibiotics for ongoing symptoms of intra-abdominal infection; Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy for any reason. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-06947386 + Metronidazole
n=37 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of PF-06947386 (2.0 gram (g) of ceftazidime and 0.5 g of avibactam) every 8 hours, immediately followed by an IV administration of metronidazole (0.5 g) for 60 minutes. Participants received a minimum of 5 full days (15 doses) of IV study intervention up to a maximum of 14 full days (42 doses) of study intervention.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response EOT and LFU Visits: Extended Microbiologically Evaluable (eME) Analysis Set
EOT, Clinical Cure
|
94.6 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response EOT and LFU Visits: Extended Microbiologically Evaluable (eME) Analysis Set
EOT, Clinical Failure
|
5.4 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response EOT and LFU Visits: Extended Microbiologically Evaluable (eME) Analysis Set
EOT, Indeterminate
|
0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response EOT and LFU Visits: Extended Microbiologically Evaluable (eME) Analysis Set
LFU, Clinical Cure
|
94.4 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response EOT and LFU Visits: Extended Microbiologically Evaluable (eME) Analysis Set
LFU, Clinical Failure
|
5.6 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response EOT and LFU Visits: Extended Microbiologically Evaluable (eME) Analysis Set
LFU, Indeterminate
|
0 Percentage of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Population: mMITT analysis set included all enrolled participant who met the disease definition of cIAI; received any amount of study drug and had at least 1 etiologic pathogen identified at study entry (regardless of isolate susceptibilities).
Microbiological response: Favorable microbiological response assessments include "eradication", "presumed eradication" and "colonization". Unfavorable microbiological response assessments include "persistence", "persistence with increasing MIC", and "presumed persistence. Indeterminate: Study data are not available for evaluation of efficacy. "Indeterminate" were not included in the denominator. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-06947386 + Metronidazole
n=42 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of PF-06947386 (2.0 gram (g) of ceftazidime and 0.5 g of avibactam) every 8 hours, immediately followed by an IV administration of metronidazole (0.5 g) for 60 minutes. Participants received a minimum of 5 full days (15 doses) of IV study intervention up to a maximum of 14 full days (42 doses) of study intervention.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
EOT, Favorable
|
38 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
EOT, Unfavorable
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
EOT, Indeterminate
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
TOC, Favorable
|
36 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
TOC, Unfavorable
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
TOC, Indeterminate
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
LFU, Favorable
|
36 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
LFU, Unfavorable
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
LFU, Indeterminate
|
2 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Population: ME analysis set included participants who were included in a subset of CE participants and had at least 1 Gram-negative aerobic pathogen in the initial/prestudy culture that was susceptible. Here, "Number Analyzed" signifies participants included in ME analysis set at EOT, TOC and LFU respectively.
Microbiological response: Favorable microbiological response assessments include "eradication", "presumed eradication" and "colonization". Unfavorable microbiological response assessments include "persistence", "persistence with increasing MIC", and "presumed persistence. Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy. "Indeterminate" were not included in the denominator. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-06947386 + Metronidazole
n=36 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of PF-06947386 (2.0 gram (g) of ceftazidime and 0.5 g of avibactam) every 8 hours, immediately followed by an IV administration of metronidazole (0.5 g) for 60 minutes. Participants received a minimum of 5 full days (15 doses) of IV study intervention up to a maximum of 14 full days (42 doses) of study intervention.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
EOT, Favorable
|
94.4 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
EOT, Unfavorable
|
5.6 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
EOT, Indeterminate
|
0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
TOC, Favorable
|
94.3 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
TOC, Unfavorable
|
5.7 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
TOC, Indeterminate
|
0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
LFU, Favorable
|
94.3 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
LFU, Unfavorable
|
5.7 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
LFU, Indeterminate
|
0 Percentage of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Population: eME analysis set included participants who were included in a subset of CE participants and had at least 1 Gram-negative aerobic pathogen in the initial/prestudy culture that is susceptible. Here, "Number Analyzed" signifies participants included in eME analysis set at EOT, TOC and LFU respectively.
Microbiological response: Favorable microbiological response assessments include "eradication", "presumed eradication" and "colonization". Unfavorable microbiological response assessments include "persistence", "persistence with increasing MIC", and "presumed persistence. Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy. "Indeterminate" were not included in the denominator. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-06947386 + Metronidazole
n=37 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of PF-06947386 (2.0 gram (g) of ceftazidime and 0.5 g of avibactam) every 8 hours, immediately followed by an IV administration of metronidazole (0.5 g) for 60 minutes. Participants received a minimum of 5 full days (15 doses) of IV study intervention up to a maximum of 14 full days (42 doses) of study intervention.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
EOT, Favorable
|
94.6 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
EOT, Unfavorable
|
5.4 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
EOT, Indeterminate
|
0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
TOC, Favorable
|
94.4 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
TOC, Unfavorable
|
5.6 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
TOC, Indeterminate
|
0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
LFU, Favorable
|
94.4 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
LFU, Unfavorable
|
5.6 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
LFU, Indeterminate
|
0 Percentage of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Population: mMITT analysis set:all enrolled participant who met disease definition of cIAI; received any amount of study drug; had at least 1 etiologic pathogen identified at study entry."Overall Number of Participants Analyzed": participants evaluable for this outcome measure however all participants reported under 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to table but may not have evaluable data for every row. "Number Analyzed":participants included in eME analysis set at EOT, TOC \& LFU.
Microbiological response: Favorable microbiological response assessments include "eradication", "presumed eradication" and "colonization". Unfavorable microbiological response assessments include "persistence", "persistence with increasing MIC", and "presumed persistence. Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy. "Indeterminate" were not included in the denominator. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. Response of baseline pathogens cultured from intra-abdominal site or blood. A participant can have more than 1 pathogen. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-06947386 + Metronidazole
n=42 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of PF-06947386 (2.0 gram (g) of ceftazidime and 0.5 g of avibactam) every 8 hours, immediately followed by an IV administration of metronidazole (0.5 g) for 60 minutes. Participants received a minimum of 5 full days (15 doses) of IV study intervention up to a maximum of 14 full days (42 doses) of study intervention.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
EOT, Enterobacter Aerogenes
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
EOT, Escherichia Coli
|
93.5 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
EOT, Klebsiella Oxytoca
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
EOT, Klebsiella Pneumoniae
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
EOT, Proteus Mirabilis
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
EOT, Proteus Penneri
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
EOT, Proteus Vulgaris
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
EOT, Raoultella Planticola
|
50.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
EOT, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
TOC, Enterobacter Aerogenes
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
TOC, Escherichia Coli
|
93.3 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
TOC, Klebsiella Oxytoca
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
TOC, Klebsiella Pneumoniae
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
TOC, Proteus Mirabilis
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
TOC, Proteus Penneri
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
TOC, Proteus Vulgaris
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
TOC, Raoultella Planticola
|
0.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
TOC, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
LFU, Enterobacter Aerogenes
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
LFU, Escherichia Coli
|
93.3 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
LFU, Klebsiella Oxytoca
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
LFU, Klebsiella Pneumoniae
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
LFU, Proteus Mirabilis
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
LFU, Proteus Penneri
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
LFU, Proteus Vulgaris
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
LFU, Raoultella Planticola
|
0.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
LFU, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Population: ME analysis set: participants who were included in subset of CE participants \& had at least 1 Gram-negative aerobic pathogen in the initial/prestudy culture that was susceptible. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed":participants evaluable for this outcome measure however all participants reported under 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to table but may not have evaluable data for every row. "Number Analyzed":participants included in ME analysis set at EOT,TOC \& LFU
Microbiological response: Favorable microbiological response assessments include "eradication", "presumed eradication" and "colonization". Unfavorable microbiological response assessments include "persistence", "persistence with increasing MIC", and "presumed persistence. Indeterminate: Study data are not available for evaluation of efficacy. "Indeterminate" were not included in the denominator. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. Response of baseline pathogens cultured from intra-abdominal site or blood. A participant can have more than 1 pathogen. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-06947386 + Metronidazole
n=36 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of PF-06947386 (2.0 gram (g) of ceftazidime and 0.5 g of avibactam) every 8 hours, immediately followed by an IV administration of metronidazole (0.5 g) for 60 minutes. Participants received a minimum of 5 full days (15 doses) of IV study intervention up to a maximum of 14 full days (42 doses) of study intervention.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
EOT, Enterobacter Aerogenes
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
EOT, Escherichia Coli
|
93.5 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
EOT, Klebsiella Oxytoca
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
EOT, Klebsiella Pneumoniae
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
EOT, Proteus Mirabilis
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
EOT, Proteus Penneri
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
EOT, Proteus Vulgaris
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
EOT, Raoultella Planticola
|
50.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
EOT, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
TOC, Enterobacter Aerogenes
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
TOC, Escherichia Coli
|
93.3 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
TOC, Klebsiella Oxytoca
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
TOC, Klebsiella Pneumoniae
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
TOC, Proteus Mirabilis
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
TOC, Proteus Penneri
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
TOC, Proteus Vulgaris
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
TOC, Raoultella Planticola
|
0.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
TOC, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
LFU, Enterobacter Aerogenes
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
LFU, Escherichia Coli
|
93.3 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
LFU, Klebsiella Oxytoca
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
LFU, Klebsiella Pneumoniae
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
LFU, Proteus Mirabilis
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
LFU, Proteus Penneri
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
LFU, Proteus Vulgaris
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
LFU, Raoultella Planticola
|
0.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
LFU, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Population: eME analysis set: participants who were included in subset of CE participants \& had at least 1 Gram-negative aerobic pathogen in initial/prestudy culture that is susceptible. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed":participants evaluable for this outcome measure however all participants reported under 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to table but may not have evaluable data for every row. "Number Analyzed": participants included in eME analysis set at EOT, TOC \& LFU.
Microbiological response: Favorable microbiological response assessments include "eradication", "presumed eradication" and "colonization". Unfavorable microbiological response assessments include "persistence", "persistence with increasing MIC", and "presumed persistence. Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy. "Indeterminate" were not included in the denominator. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. Response of baseline pathogens cultured from intra-abdominal site or blood. A participant can have more than 1 pathogen. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-06947386 + Metronidazole
n=37 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of PF-06947386 (2.0 gram (g) of ceftazidime and 0.5 g of avibactam) every 8 hours, immediately followed by an IV administration of metronidazole (0.5 g) for 60 minutes. Participants received a minimum of 5 full days (15 doses) of IV study intervention up to a maximum of 14 full days (42 doses) of study intervention.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
EOT, Enterobacter Aerogenes
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
EOT, Escherichia Coli
|
93.5 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
EOT, Klebsiella Oxytoca
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
EOT, Klebsiella Pneumoniae
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
EOT, Proteus Mirabilis
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
EOT, Proteus Penneri
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
EOT, Proteus Vulgaris
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
EOT, Raoultella Planticola
|
50.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
EOT, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
TOC, Enterobacter Aerogenes
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
TOC, Escherichia Coli
|
93.3 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
TOC, Klebsiella Oxytoca
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
TOC, Klebsiella Pneumoniae
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
TOC, Proteus Mirabilis
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
TOC, Proteus Penneri
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
TOC, Proteus Vulgaris
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
TOC, Raoultella Planticola
|
0.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
TOC, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
LFU, Enterobacter Aerogenes
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
LFU, Escherichia Coli
|
93.3 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
LFU, Klebsiella Oxytoca
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
LFU, Klebsiella Pneumoniae
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
LFU, Proteus Mirabilis
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
LFU, Proteus Penneri
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
LFU, Proteus Vulgaris
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
LFU, Raoultella Planticola
|
0.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
LFU, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Population: mMITT analysis set:all enrolled participant who met disease definition of cIAI; received any amount of study drug; had at least 1 etiologic pathogen identified at study entry."Overall Number of Participants Analyzed": participants evaluable for this outcome measure however all participants reported under 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to table but may not have evaluable data for every row. "Number Analyzed":participants included in eME analysis set at EOT, TOC \& LFU
Microbiological response: Favorable microbiological response assessments include "eradication", "presumed eradication" and "colonization". Unfavorable microbiological response assessments include "persistence", "persistence with increasing MIC", and "presumed persistence. Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy. "Indeterminate" were not included in the denominator. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-06947386 + Metronidazole
n=42 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of PF-06947386 (2.0 gram (g) of ceftazidime and 0.5 g of avibactam) every 8 hours, immediately followed by an IV administration of metronidazole (0.5 g) for 60 minutes. Participants received a minimum of 5 full days (15 doses) of IV study intervention up to a maximum of 14 full days (42 doses) of study intervention.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
EOT, Enterobacter Aerogenes, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
EOT, Escherichia Coli, Susceptible
|
93.3 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
EOT, Klebsiella Oxytoca, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
EOT, Klebsiella Pneumoniae, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
EOT, Proteus Mirabilis, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
EOT, Proteus Penneri, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
EOT, Proteus Vulgaris, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
EOT, Raoultella Planticola, Susceptible
|
50.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
EOT, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
TOC, Enterobacter Aerogenes, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
TOC, Escherichia Coli, Susceptible
|
93.1 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
TOC, Klebsiella Oxytoca, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
TOC, Klebsiella Pneumoniae, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
TOC, Proteus Mirabilis, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
TOC, Proteus Penneri, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
TOC, Proteus Vulgaris, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
TOC, Raoultella Planticola, Susceptible
|
0.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
TOC, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
LFU, Enterobacter Aerogenes, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
LFU, Escherichia Coli, Susceptible
|
93.1 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
LFU, Klebsiella Oxytoca, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
LFU, Klebsiella Pneumoniae, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
LFU, Proteus Mirabilis, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
LFU, Proteus Penneri, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
LFU, Proteus Vulgaris, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
LFU, Raoultella Planticola, Susceptible
|
0.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set
LFU, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Population: ME analysis set: participants who were included in subset of CE participants \& had at least 1 Gram-negative aerobic pathogen in the initial/prestudy culture that was susceptible. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed":participants evaluable for this outcome measure however all participants reported under 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to table but may not have evaluable data for every row. "Number Analyzed":participants included in ME analysis set at EOT,TOC \& LFU
Microbiological response: Favorable microbiological response assessments include "eradication", "presumed eradication" and "colonization". Unfavorable microbiological response assessments include "persistence", "persistence with increasing MIC", and "presumed persistence. Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy. "Indeterminate" were not included in the denominator. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-06947386 + Metronidazole
n=36 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of PF-06947386 (2.0 gram (g) of ceftazidime and 0.5 g of avibactam) every 8 hours, immediately followed by an IV administration of metronidazole (0.5 g) for 60 minutes. Participants received a minimum of 5 full days (15 doses) of IV study intervention up to a maximum of 14 full days (42 doses) of study intervention.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
EOT, Enterobacter Aerogenes, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
EOT, Escherichia Coli, Susceptible
|
93.3 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
EOT, Klebsiella Oxytoca, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
EOT, Klebsiella Pneumoniae, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
EOT, Proteus Mirabilis, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
EOT, Proteus Penneri, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
EOT, Proteus Vulgaris, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
EOT, Raoultella Planticola, Susceptible
|
50.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
EOT, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
TOC, Enterobacter Aerogenes, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
TOC, Escherichia Coli, Susceptible
|
93.1 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
TOC, Klebsiella Oxytoca, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
TOC, Klebsiella Pneumoniae, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
TOC, Proteus Mirabilis, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
TOC, Proteus Penneri, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
TOC, Proteus Vulgaris, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
TOC, Raoultella Planticola, Susceptible
|
0.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
TOC, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
LFU, Enterobacter Aerogenes, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
LFU, Escherichia Coli, Susceptible
|
93.1 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
LFU, Klebsiella Oxytoca, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
LFU, Klebsiella Pneumoniae, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
LFU, Proteus Mirabilis, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
LFU, Proteus Penneri, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
LFU, Proteus Vulgaris, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
LFU, Raoultella Planticola, Susceptible
|
0.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set
LFU, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Population: eME analysis set: participants who were included in subset of CE participants \& had at least 1 Gram-negative aerobic pathogen in initial/prestudy culture that is susceptible. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed":participants evaluable for this outcome measure however all participants reported under 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to table but may not have evaluable data for every row. "Number Analyzed": participants included in eME analysis set at EOT, TOC \& LFU.
Microbiological response: Favorable microbiological response assessments include "eradication", "presumed eradication" and "colonization". Unfavorable microbiological response assessments include "persistence", "persistence with increasing MIC", and "presumed persistence. Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy. "Indeterminate" were not included in the denominator. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-06947386 + Metronidazole
n=37 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of PF-06947386 (2.0 gram (g) of ceftazidime and 0.5 g of avibactam) every 8 hours, immediately followed by an IV administration of metronidazole (0.5 g) for 60 minutes. Participants received a minimum of 5 full days (15 doses) of IV study intervention up to a maximum of 14 full days (42 doses) of study intervention.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
EOT, Enterobacter Aerogenes, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
EOT, Escherichia Coli, Susceptible
|
93.3 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
EOT, Klebsiella Oxytoca, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
EOT, Klebsiella Pneumoniae, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
EOT, Proteus Mirabilis, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
EOT, Proteus Penneri, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
EOT, Proteus Vulgaris, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
EOT, Raoultella Planticola, Susceptible
|
50.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
EOT, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
TOC, Enterobacter Aerogenes, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
TOC, Escherichia Coli, Susceptible
|
93.1 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
TOC, Klebsiella Oxytoca, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
TOC, Klebsiella Pneumoniae, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
TOC, Proteus Mirabilis, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
TOC, Proteus Penneri, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
TOC, Proteus Vulgaris, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
TOC, Raoultella Planticola, Susceptible
|
0.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
TOC, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
LFU, Enterobacter Aerogenes, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
LFU, Escherichia Coli, Susceptible
|
93.1 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
LFU, Klebsiella Oxytoca, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
LFU, Klebsiella Pneumoniae, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
LFU, Proteus Mirabilis, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
LFU, Proteus Penneri, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
LFU, Proteus Vulgaris, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
LFU, Raoultella Planticola, Susceptible
|
0.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set
LFU, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa, Susceptible
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 49Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received any amount of IV study intervention.
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose that resulted in death, was life-threatening, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent disability/incapacity, a congenital anomaly/birth defect as per medical or scientific judgment. AEs included both SAEs and non-SAEs. TEAE was defined as an AE that emerges or worsened during the effective duration of treatment. All events that started on or after the first dosing day were flagged as TEAEs.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-06947386 + Metronidazole
n=60 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of PF-06947386 (2.0 gram (g) of ceftazidime and 0.5 g of avibactam) every 8 hours, immediately followed by an IV administration of metronidazole (0.5 g) for 60 minutes. Participants received a minimum of 5 full days (15 doses) of IV study intervention up to a maximum of 14 full days (42 doses) of study intervention.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs (SAEs)
AEs
|
42 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs (SAEs)
SAEs
|
3 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 49Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received any amount of IV study intervention.
Number of participants with death is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-06947386 + Metronidazole
n=60 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of PF-06947386 (2.0 gram (g) of ceftazidime and 0.5 g of avibactam) every 8 hours, immediately followed by an IV administration of metronidazole (0.5 g) for 60 minutes. Participants received a minimum of 5 full days (15 doses) of IV study intervention up to a maximum of 14 full days (42 doses) of study intervention.
|
|---|---|
|
All-cause Mortality
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 49Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received any amount of IV study intervention.
Number of participants who discontinued treatment and study due to adverse events is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-06947386 + Metronidazole
n=60 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of PF-06947386 (2.0 gram (g) of ceftazidime and 0.5 g of avibactam) every 8 hours, immediately followed by an IV administration of metronidazole (0.5 g) for 60 minutes. Participants received a minimum of 5 full days (15 doses) of IV study intervention up to a maximum of 14 full days (42 doses) of study intervention.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment and Study Due to Adverse Events
Discontinued Treatment due to AE
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment and Study Due to Adverse Events
Discontinued study due to AE
|
2 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received any amount of IV study intervention. Here, "Number Analyzed" signifies participants included in safety analysis set at EOT, TOC and LFU respectively. Here, "Number Analyzed" signifies number of participants evaluable for specified rows.
A semiautomated recording device was used to measure SBP and DBP with participant in a supine position after at least 5 minutes of rest.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-06947386 + Metronidazole
n=60 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of PF-06947386 (2.0 gram (g) of ceftazidime and 0.5 g of avibactam) every 8 hours, immediately followed by an IV administration of metronidazole (0.5 g) for 60 minutes. Participants received a minimum of 5 full days (15 doses) of IV study intervention up to a maximum of 14 full days (42 doses) of study intervention.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
Baseline, SBP
|
119.0 Millimeters of Mercury
Standard Deviation 17.73
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
Day 2, SBP
|
3.8 Millimeters of Mercury
Standard Deviation 16.05
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
Day 3, SBP
|
6.1 Millimeters of Mercury
Standard Deviation 20.44
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
Day 4, SBP
|
8.0 Millimeters of Mercury
Standard Deviation 18.27
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
Day 5, SBP
|
8.2 Millimeters of Mercury
Standard Deviation 18.26
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
Day 6, SBP
|
2.2 Millimeters of Mercury
Standard Deviation 22.92
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
Day 7, SBP
|
2.8 Millimeters of Mercury
Standard Deviation 21.61
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
Day 8, SBP
|
4.9 Millimeters of Mercury
Standard Deviation 21.14
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
Day 9, SBP
|
-9.6 Millimeters of Mercury
Standard Deviation 20.61
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
Day 10, SBP
|
-8.6 Millimeters of Mercury
Standard Deviation 23.86
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
Day 11, SBP
|
-11.8 Millimeters of Mercury
Standard Deviation 16.50
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
Day 12, SBP
|
-16.3 Millimeters of Mercury
Standard Deviation 27.57
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
Day 13, SBP
|
-10.7 Millimeters of Mercury
Standard Deviation 35.50
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
Day 14, SBP
|
-20.0 Millimeters of Mercury
Standard Deviation 33.94
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
EOT, SBP
|
2.1 Millimeters of Mercury
Standard Deviation 17.56
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
TOC, SBP
|
2.1 Millimeters of Mercury
Standard Deviation 19.34
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
LFU, SBP
|
4.7 Millimeters of Mercury
Standard Deviation 18.78
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
Baseline, DBP
|
70.6 Millimeters of Mercury
Standard Deviation 12.90
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
Day 2, DBP
|
0.1 Millimeters of Mercury
Standard Deviation 11.31
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
Day 3, DBP
|
2.4 Millimeters of Mercury
Standard Deviation 12.77
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
Day 4, DBP
|
4.8 Millimeters of Mercury
Standard Deviation 15.13
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
Day 5, DBP
|
4.0 Millimeters of Mercury
Standard Deviation 13.90
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
Day 6, DBP
|
2.0 Millimeters of Mercury
Standard Deviation 16.36
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
Day 7, DBP
|
4.4 Millimeters of Mercury
Standard Deviation 17.53
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
Day 8, DBP
|
8.5 Millimeters of Mercury
Standard Deviation 14.90
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
Day 9, DBP
|
0.2 Millimeters of Mercury
Standard Deviation 21.05
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
Day 10, DBP
|
-3.4 Millimeters of Mercury
Standard Deviation 23.10
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
Day 11, DBP
|
2.3 Millimeters of Mercury
Standard Deviation 24.80
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
Day 12, DBP
|
-5.0 Millimeters of Mercury
Standard Deviation 23.30
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
Day 13, DBP
|
-7.0 Millimeters of Mercury
Standard Deviation 32.19
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
Day 14, DBP
|
-9.5 Millimeters of Mercury
Standard Deviation 43.13
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
EOT, DBP
|
0.7 Millimeters of Mercury
Standard Deviation 12.74
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
TOC, DBP
|
2.9 Millimeters of Mercury
Standard Deviation 13.26
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
LFU, DBP
|
3.4 Millimeters of Mercury
Standard Deviation 13.86
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received any amount of IV study intervention. Here, "Number Analyzed" signifies participants included in safety analysis set at EOT, TOC and LFU respectively. Here, "Number Analyzed" signifies number of participants evaluable for specified rows.
Pulse rate was measured for in a supine position preceded by at least 5 minutes of rest for the participant.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-06947386 + Metronidazole
n=60 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of PF-06947386 (2.0 gram (g) of ceftazidime and 0.5 g of avibactam) every 8 hours, immediately followed by an IV administration of metronidazole (0.5 g) for 60 minutes. Participants received a minimum of 5 full days (15 doses) of IV study intervention up to a maximum of 14 full days (42 doses) of study intervention.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Pulse Rate
Day 8
|
-9.1 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 14.69
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Pulse Rate
Baseline
|
82.6 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 13.50
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Pulse Rate
Day 2
|
-4.8 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 11.54
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Pulse Rate
Day 3
|
-7.1 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 13.04
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Pulse Rate
Day 4
|
-8.9 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 14.92
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Pulse Rate
Day 5
|
-11.3 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 15.46
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Pulse Rate
Day 6
|
-12.4 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 15.61
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Pulse Rate
Day 7
|
-11.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 18.09
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Pulse Rate
Day 9
|
-12.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 20.25
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Pulse Rate
Day 10
|
-8.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 29.50
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Pulse Rate
Day 11
|
-12.3 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 24.57
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Pulse Rate
Day 12
|
-18.7 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 35.36
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Pulse Rate
Day 13
|
-18.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 37.51
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Pulse Rate
Day 14
|
-24.5 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 53.03
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Pulse Rate
EOT
|
-8.7 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 16.56
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Pulse Rate
TOC
|
-8.8 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 16.43
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Pulse Rate
LFU
|
-9.4 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 16.07
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received any amount of IV study intervention. Here, "Number Analyzed" signifies participants included in safety analysis set at EOT, TOC and LFU respectively. Here, "Number Analyzed" signifies number of participants evaluable for specified rows.
Body weight was measured using a balance scale.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-06947386 + Metronidazole
n=60 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of PF-06947386 (2.0 gram (g) of ceftazidime and 0.5 g of avibactam) every 8 hours, immediately followed by an IV administration of metronidazole (0.5 g) for 60 minutes. Participants received a minimum of 5 full days (15 doses) of IV study intervention up to a maximum of 14 full days (42 doses) of study intervention.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Weight
Baseline
|
62.05 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 12.975
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Weight
Day 2
|
0.64 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 1.587
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Weight
Day 3
|
0.68 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 1.927
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Weight
Day 4
|
0.34 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 1.578
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Weight
Day 5
|
0.39 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 1.949
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Weight
Day 6
|
0.82 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 1.593
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Weight
Day 7
|
1.55 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 2.415
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Weight
Day 8
|
1.80 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 3.894
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Weight
Day 9
|
5.80 Kilograms
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated for a single participant.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Weight
Day 10
|
5.00 Kilograms
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated for a single participant.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Weight
Day 11
|
5.40 Kilograms
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated for a single participant.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Weight
Day 12
|
-0.05 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 5.303
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Weight
Day 13
|
1.35 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 4.455
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received any amount of IV study intervention. Here, "Number Analyzed" signifies participants included in safety analysis set at EOT, TOC and LFU respectively. Here, "Number Analyzed" signifies participants evaluable for specified rows.
Temperature was measured in a supine position, after the participant had rest for at least 5 minutes.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-06947386 + Metronidazole
n=60 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of PF-06947386 (2.0 gram (g) of ceftazidime and 0.5 g of avibactam) every 8 hours, immediately followed by an IV administration of metronidazole (0.5 g) for 60 minutes. Participants received a minimum of 5 full days (15 doses) of IV study intervention up to a maximum of 14 full days (42 doses) of study intervention.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Temperature
Baseline
|
37.01 Degree Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.643
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Temperature
Day 2
|
0.33 Degree Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.653
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Temperature
Day 3
|
0.09 Degree Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.650
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Temperature
Day 4
|
-0.05 Degree Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.679
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Temperature
Day 5
|
-0.12 Degree Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.659
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Temperature
Day 6
|
-0.29 Degree Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.782
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Temperature
Day 7
|
-0.20 Degree Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.846
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Temperature
Day 8
|
-0.19 Degree Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.607
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Temperature
Day 9
|
-0.12 Degree Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.698
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Temperature
Day 10
|
-0.26 Degree Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.811
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Temperature
Day 11
|
-0.30 Degree Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.739
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Temperature
Day 12
|
0.13 Degree Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.321
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Temperature
Day 13
|
-0.27 Degree Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.493
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Temperature
Day 14
|
-0.10 Degree Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.141
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Temperature
EOT
|
-0.38 Degree Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.711
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Temperature
TOC
|
-0.58 Degree Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.766
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Temperature
LFU
|
-0.54 Degree Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.684
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received any amount of IV study intervention. Here, "Number Analyzed" signifies participants included in safety analysis set at EOT, TOC and LFU respectively. Here, "Number Analyzed" signifies participants evaluable for specified rows.
Respiratory rate was measured in a supine position, after the participant had rest for at least 5 minutes.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-06947386 + Metronidazole
n=60 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of PF-06947386 (2.0 gram (g) of ceftazidime and 0.5 g of avibactam) every 8 hours, immediately followed by an IV administration of metronidazole (0.5 g) for 60 minutes. Participants received a minimum of 5 full days (15 doses) of IV study intervention up to a maximum of 14 full days (42 doses) of study intervention.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Respiratory Rate
Baseline
|
17.8 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 3.39
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Respiratory Rate
Day 2
|
0.4 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 5.91
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Respiratory Rate
Day 3
|
-0.4 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 4.41
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Respiratory Rate
Day 4
|
-1.1 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 3.97
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Respiratory Rate
Day 5
|
-0.5 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 4.79
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Respiratory Rate
Day 6
|
-1.3 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 3.90
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Respiratory Rate
Day 7
|
-1.6 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 3.63
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Respiratory Rate
Day 8
|
-1.1 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 2.66
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Respiratory Rate
Day 9
|
-2.8 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 3.27
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Respiratory Rate
Day 10
|
0.2 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 3.19
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Respiratory Rate
Day 11
|
-1.8 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 4.19
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Respiratory Rate
Day 12
|
-3.3 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 4.16
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Respiratory Rate
Day 13
|
-0.3 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 4.93
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Respiratory Rate
Day 14
|
0.5 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 9.19
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Respiratory Rate
EOT
|
-0.6 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 4.30
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Respiratory Rate
TOC
|
-1.2 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 4.15
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Respiratory Rate
LFU
|
-1.6 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 3.88
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 49Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received any amount of IV study intervention.
Criteria for abnormal laboratory values for chemistry parameters: Bilirubin \>1.5\*upper limit of normal (ULN), direct Bilirubin \>1.5\*ULN, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase \>3.0\*ULN, total protein and albumin \<0.8\*lower limit of normal (LLN), urea nitrogen and creatinine \>1.3\*ULN, sodium \>0.95\*LLN, potassium \>0.9\*LLN and \>1.1\*ULN, calcium \>0.9\*LLN, glucose \> 1.5\*LLN; hematology parameters: Hemoglobin, hematocrit, erythrocytes \<0.8\*LLN, platelets \<0.5\*LLN and \> 1.75\*ULN, leukocytes \<0.6\*LLN and \<0.6\*LLN, lymphocytes \<0.8\* LLN, lymphocytes/leukocytes \<0.8\* LLN and \>1.2\*ULN, neutrophils \>1.2\*ULN, neutrophils/leukocytes \<0.8\*LLN and \>1.2\* ULN, basophils/leukocytes \>1.2\*ULN, eosinophils \>1.2\*ULN, eosinophils/leukocytes \>1.2\*ULN, monocytes and monocytes/leukocytes \>1.2\*ULN; Criteria for abnormal laboratory values for urinalysis parameters: urine glucose, \>=1, urine protein \>=1, urine Hemoglobin\>=1.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-06947386 + Metronidazole
n=60 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of PF-06947386 (2.0 gram (g) of ceftazidime and 0.5 g of avibactam) every 8 hours, immediately followed by an IV administration of metronidazole (0.5 g) for 60 minutes. Participants received a minimum of 5 full days (15 doses) of IV study intervention up to a maximum of 14 full days (42 doses) of study intervention.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities
|
60 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 3, Day 4, and Combination of Day 3 and 4: 15 minutes before or after infusion, 30-90 minutes after infusion, 300-360 minutes after infusionPopulation: Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis set included all participants who have at least 1 plasma concentration data value available for either Ceftazidime or Avibactam. Overall number of participants analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for specified rows.
Plasma concentrations of avibactam was measured by nominal sampling window.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-06947386 + Metronidazole
n=58 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of PF-06947386 (2.0 gram (g) of ceftazidime and 0.5 g of avibactam) every 8 hours, immediately followed by an IV administration of metronidazole (0.5 g) for 60 minutes. Participants received a minimum of 5 full days (15 doses) of IV study intervention up to a maximum of 14 full days (42 doses) of study intervention.
|
|---|---|
|
Plasma Concentration of Avibactam
Day 3, 15 minutes before or after
|
13810 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 5911.5
|
|
Plasma Concentration of Avibactam
Day 3, 30-90 minutes after
|
8321 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 3776.9
|
|
Plasma Concentration of Avibactam
Day 3, 300-360 minutes after
|
1148 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 708.04
|
|
Plasma Concentration of Avibactam
Day 4, 15 minutes before or after
|
13940 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 4352.1
|
|
Plasma Concentration of Avibactam
Day 4, 30-90 minutes after
|
7897 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 2926.5
|
|
Plasma Concentration of Avibactam
Day 4, 300-360 minutes after
|
1651 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 2195.6
|
|
Plasma Concentration of Avibactam
Day 3 and Day 4, 15 minutes before or after
|
13870 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 5240.9
|
|
Plasma Concentration of Avibactam
Day 3 and Day 4, 30-90 minutes after
|
8098 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 3332.2
|
|
Plasma Concentration of Avibactam
Day 3 and 4, 300-360 minutes after
|
1382 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 1589.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 3, Day 4, and Combination of Day 3 and 4: 15 minutes before or after infusion, 30-90 minutes after infusion, 300-360 minutes after infusionPopulation: PK analysis set included all participants who have at least 1 plasma concentration data value available for either Ceftazidime or Avibactam. Overall number of participants analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Here, "Number Analyzed" signifies participants evaluable for specified rows.
Plasma concentrations of ceftazidime was measured by nominal sampling window.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-06947386 + Metronidazole
n=58 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of PF-06947386 (2.0 gram (g) of ceftazidime and 0.5 g of avibactam) every 8 hours, immediately followed by an IV administration of metronidazole (0.5 g) for 60 minutes. Participants received a minimum of 5 full days (15 doses) of IV study intervention up to a maximum of 14 full days (42 doses) of study intervention.
|
|---|---|
|
Plasma Concentration of Ceftazidime
Day 3, 15 minutes before or after
|
72940 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 21323
|
|
Plasma Concentration of Ceftazidime
Day 3, 30-90 minutes after
|
48800 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 16611
|
|
Plasma Concentration of Ceftazidime
Day 3, 300-360 minutes after
|
10030 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 5852.5
|
|
Plasma Concentration of Ceftazidime
Day 4, 15 minutes before or after
|
76680 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 26157
|
|
Plasma Concentration of Ceftazidime
Day 4, 30-90 minutes after
|
49190 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 13095
|
|
Plasma Concentration of Ceftazidime
Day 4, 300-360 minutes after
|
13920 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 13135
|
|
Plasma Concentration of Ceftazidime
Day 3 and Day 4, 15 minutes before or after
|
74580 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 23418
|
|
Plasma Concentration of Ceftazidime
Day 3 and Day 4, 30-90 minutes after
|
49010 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 14729
|
|
Plasma Concentration of Ceftazidime
Day 3 and Day 4, 300-360 minutes after
|
11840 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 10028
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: TOC: Any day from Day 28 to Day 35Population: MITT analysis set included all enrolled participants who had clinical evidence of cIAI.
Clinical response: Clinical response of cure was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antimicrobial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary. TOC was after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion; clinical failure: Death related to intra-abdominal infection, Persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen, Postsurgical wound infections, participant who received treatment with additional antibiotics for ongoing symptoms of intra-abdominal infection; Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy for any reason. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-06947386 + Metronidazole
n=59 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of PF-06947386 (2.0 gram (g) of ceftazidime and 0.5 g of avibactam) every 8 hours, immediately followed by an IV administration of metronidazole (0.5 g) for 60 minutes. Participants received a minimum of 5 full days (15 doses) of IV study intervention up to a maximum of 14 full days (42 doses) of study intervention.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at TOC Visit: MITT Analysis Set
TOC, Clinical Cure
|
52 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at TOC Visit: MITT Analysis Set
TOC, Clinical Failure
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at TOC Visit: MITT Analysis Set
TOC, Indeterminate
|
3 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: TOC: Any day from Day 28 to Day 35Population: mMITT analysis set included all enrolled participant who met the disease definition of cIAI; received any amount of study drug and had at least 1 etiologic pathogen identified at study entry (regardless of isolate susceptibilities).
Clinical response: Clinical response of cure was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antimicrobial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary. TOC was after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion; clinical failure: Death related to intra-abdominal infection, Persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen, Postsurgical wound infections, participant who received treatment with additional antibiotics for ongoing symptoms of intra-abdominal infection; Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy for any reason. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-06947386 + Metronidazole
n=42 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of PF-06947386 (2.0 gram (g) of ceftazidime and 0.5 g of avibactam) every 8 hours, immediately followed by an IV administration of metronidazole (0.5 g) for 60 minutes. Participants received a minimum of 5 full days (15 doses) of IV study intervention up to a maximum of 14 full days (42 doses) of study intervention.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at TOC Visit: mMITT Analysis Set
TOC, Clinical Cure
|
36 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at TOC Visit: mMITT Analysis Set
TOC, Clinical Failure
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at TOC Visit: mMITT Analysis Set
TOC, Indeterminate
|
2 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: TOC: Any day from Day 28 to Day 35Population: ME analysis set included participants who were included in a subset of CE participants and had at least 1 Gram-negative aerobic pathogen in the initial/prestudy culture that was susceptible.
Clinical response: Clinical response of cure was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antimicrobial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary. TOC was after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion; clinical failure: Death related to intra-abdominal infection, Persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen, Postsurgical wound infections, participant who received treatment with additional antibiotics for ongoing symptoms of intra-abdominal infection; Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy for any reason. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-06947386 + Metronidazole
n=35 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of PF-06947386 (2.0 gram (g) of ceftazidime and 0.5 g of avibactam) every 8 hours, immediately followed by an IV administration of metronidazole (0.5 g) for 60 minutes. Participants received a minimum of 5 full days (15 doses) of IV study intervention up to a maximum of 14 full days (42 doses) of study intervention.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at TOC: ME Analysis Set
TOC, Clinical Failure
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at TOC: ME Analysis Set
TOC, Clinical Cure
|
33 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at TOC: ME Analysis Set
TOC, Indeterminate
|
0 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: TOC: Any day from Day 28 to Day 35Population: eME analysis set included participants who were included in a subset of CE participants and had at least 1 Gram-negative aerobic pathogen in the initial/prestudy culture that is susceptible.
Clinical response: Clinical response of cure was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antimicrobial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary. TOC was after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion; clinical failure: Death related to intra-abdominal infection, Persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen, Postsurgical wound infections, participant who received treatment with additional antibiotics for ongoing symptoms of intra-abdominal infection; Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy for any reason. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-06947386 + Metronidazole
n=36 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of PF-06947386 (2.0 gram (g) of ceftazidime and 0.5 g of avibactam) every 8 hours, immediately followed by an IV administration of metronidazole (0.5 g) for 60 minutes. Participants received a minimum of 5 full days (15 doses) of IV study intervention up to a maximum of 14 full days (42 doses) of study intervention.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at TOC: eME Analysis Set
TOC, Clinical Cure
|
34 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at TOC: eME Analysis Set
TOC, Clinical Failure
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at TOC: eME Analysis Set
TOC, Indeterminate
|
0 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Population: Sepsis participants subset included participants who satisfied clinical \& microbiological criteria; total score \>=2 in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) for intensive care unit (ICU) participants, 2 items or more in quick SOFA (qSOFA) for non-ICU participants; most relevant pathogens (aerobic Gram-negative bacteria -either Enterobacterales or aerobic Gram-negative pathogens other than Enterobacterales) isolated from blood at Baseline regardless of susceptibility.
Clinical response of cure was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs \& symptoms of index infection such that no further antimicrobial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary. TOC was after 28 calendar days from day of 1st IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28¬-35 calendar days after day of 1st IV infusion; clinical failure: Death related to intra-abdominal infection, Persisting or recurrent infection within abdomen, Postsurgical wound infections, participant who received treatment with additional antibiotics for ongoing symptom of intra-abdominal infection; Indeterminate:Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy for any reason. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. LFU:after 42 calendar days from day of 1st IV infusion, allowed visit window was 42-49 calendar days from 1st IV infusion. TOC:after 28 calendar days from 1st IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28-35 calendar days after 1st IV infusion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-06947386 + Metronidazole
n=2 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of PF-06947386 (2.0 gram (g) of ceftazidime and 0.5 g of avibactam) every 8 hours, immediately followed by an IV administration of metronidazole (0.5 g) for 60 minutes. Participants received a minimum of 5 full days (15 doses) of IV study intervention up to a maximum of 14 full days (42 doses) of study intervention.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants Subset
EOT, Clinical Cure
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants Subset
EOT, Clinical Failure
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants Subset
EOT, Indeterminate
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants Subset
TOC, Clinical Cure
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants Subset
TOC, Clinical Failure
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants Subset
TOC, Indeterminate
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants Subset
LFU, Clinical Cure
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants Subset
LFU, Clinical Failure
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants Subset
LFU, Indeterminate
|
0 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Population: Sepsis evaluable participants subset: participants who satisfied both clinical and microbiological criteria; Clinical: at least one criteria at Baseline. 1) body temperature \>=38 degree Celsius or \<36 degree Celsius, 2) WBC \>12000 cells/mm3 or \<4000 cells/mm3, or immature neutrophil \>10%, 3) heart rate \>90 beats per minute (bpm), 4) SBP \<90mmHg, 5) C-reactive protein (CRP) \>=20 mg/dL. Microbiological: The most relevant pathogens isolated from blood at Baseline regardless of susceptibility.
Clinical response of cure was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs \& symptoms of index infection such that no further antimicrobial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary. TOC was after 28 calendar days from day of 1st IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28¬-35 calendar days after day of 1st IV infusion; clinical failure: Death related to intra-abdominal infection, Persisting or recurrent infection within abdomen, Postsurgical wound infections, participant who received treatment with additional antibiotics for ongoing symptom of intra-abdominal infection; Indeterminate:Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy for any reason. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. LFU:after 42 calendar days from day of 1st IV infusion, allowed visit window was 42-49 calendar days from 1st IV infusion. TOC:after 28 calendar days from 1st IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28-35 calendar days after 1st IV infusion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-06947386 + Metronidazole
n=1 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of PF-06947386 (2.0 gram (g) of ceftazidime and 0.5 g of avibactam) every 8 hours, immediately followed by an IV administration of metronidazole (0.5 g) for 60 minutes. Participants received a minimum of 5 full days (15 doses) of IV study intervention up to a maximum of 14 full days (42 doses) of study intervention.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluable Participants Subset
EOT, Clinical Cure
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluable Participants Subset
EOT, Clinical Failure
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluable Participants Subset
EOT, Indeterminate
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluable Participants Subset
TOC, Clinical Cure
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluable Participants Subset
TOC, Clinical Failure
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluable Participants Subset
TOC, Indeterminate
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluable Participants Subset
LFU, Clinical Cure
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluable Participants Subset
LFU, Clinical Failure
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluable Participants Subset
LFU, Indeterminate
|
0 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Population: Sepsis participants subset included participants who satisfied clinical \& microbiological criteria; total score \>=2 in SOFA for ICU participants, 2 items or more in qSOFA for non-ICU participants; most relevant pathogens (aerobic Gram-negative bacteria -either Enterobacterales or aerobic Gram-negative pathogens other than Enterobacterales) isolated from blood at Baseline regardless of susceptibility.
Microbiological response: Favorable microbiological response assessments include "eradication", "presumed eradication" and "colonization". Unfavorable microbiological response assessments include "persistence", "persistence with increasing MIC", and "presumed persistence. Indeterminate: Study data are not available for evaluation of efficacy. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-06947386 + Metronidazole
n=2 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of PF-06947386 (2.0 gram (g) of ceftazidime and 0.5 g of avibactam) every 8 hours, immediately followed by an IV administration of metronidazole (0.5 g) for 60 minutes. Participants received a minimum of 5 full days (15 doses) of IV study intervention up to a maximum of 14 full days (42 doses) of study intervention.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants Subset
EOT, Favorable
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants Subset
EOT, Unfavorable
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants Subset
EOT, Indeterminate
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants Subset
TOC, Favorable
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants Subset
TOC, Unfavorable
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants Subset
TOC, Indeterminate
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants Subset
LFU, Favorable
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants Subset
LFU, Unfavorable
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants Subset
LFU, Indeterminate
|
0 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Population: Sepsis evaluable participants subset: participants who satisfied both clinical and microbiological criteria. Clinical: at least 1 criteria at Baseline, 1) body temperature \>=38 or \<36 degree Celsius, 2) WBC \>12000 or \<4000 cells/mm3, or immature neutrophil \>10%, 3) heart rate \>90 bpm, 4) SBP \<90 mmHg, 5) CRP \>=20 mg/dL. Microbiological: The most relevant pathogens isolated from blood at Baseline regardless of susceptibility.
Microbiological response: Favorable microbiological response assessments include "eradication", "presumed eradication" and "colonization". Unfavorable microbiological response assessments include "persistence", "persistence with increasing MIC", and "presumed persistence. Indeterminate: Study data are not available for evaluation of efficacy. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-06947386 + Metronidazole
n=1 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of PF-06947386 (2.0 gram (g) of ceftazidime and 0.5 g of avibactam) every 8 hours, immediately followed by an IV administration of metronidazole (0.5 g) for 60 minutes. Participants received a minimum of 5 full days (15 doses) of IV study intervention up to a maximum of 14 full days (42 doses) of study intervention.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluable Participants Subset
EOT, Favorable
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluable Participants Subset
EOT, Unfavorable
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluable Participants Subset
EOT, Indeterminate
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluable Participants Subset
TOC, Favorable
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluable Participants Subset
TOC, Unfavorable
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluable Participants Subset
TOC, Indeterminate
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluable Participants Subset
LFU, Favorable
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluable Participants Subset
LFU, Unfavorable
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluable Participants Subset
LFU, Indeterminate
|
0 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Population: Sepsis participants subset: participants who satisfied clinical \& microbiological criteria; total score \>=2 in SOFA for ICU participants, 2 items or more in qSOFA for non-ICU participants; most relevant pathogens (aerobic Gram-negative bacteria -either Enterobacterales or aerobic Gram-negative pathogens other than Enterobacterales) isolated from blood at Baseline regardless of susceptibility. "Number Analyzed": participants included in Sepsis participants subset at EOT \& LFU respectively.
Microbiological response: Favorable microbiological response assessments include "eradication", "presumed eradication" and "colonization". Unfavorable microbiological response assessments include "persistence", "persistence with increasing MIC", and "presumed persistence. Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. Response of baseline pathogens cultured from intra-abdominal site or blood. A participant can have more than 1 pathogen. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-06947386 + Metronidazole
n=2 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of PF-06947386 (2.0 gram (g) of ceftazidime and 0.5 g of avibactam) every 8 hours, immediately followed by an IV administration of metronidazole (0.5 g) for 60 minutes. Participants received a minimum of 5 full days (15 doses) of IV study intervention up to a maximum of 14 full days (42 doses) of study intervention.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants Subset
EOT, Escherichia Coli
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants Subset
EOT, Klebsiella Pneumoniae
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants Subset
TOC, Escherichia Coli
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants Subset
TOC, Klebsiella Pneumoniae
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants Subset
LFU, Escherichia Coli
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants Subset
LFU, Klebsiella Pneumoniae
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Population: Sepsis evaluable participants subset: participants who satisfied both clinical and microbiological criteria. Clinical: at least 1 criteria at Baseline, 1) body temperature \>=38 or \<36 degree Celsius, 2) WBC \>12000 or \<4000 cells/mm3, or immature neutrophil \>10%, 3) heart rate \>90 bpm, 4) SBP \<90 mmHg, 5) CRP \>=20 mg/dL. Microbiological: The most relevant pathogens isolated from blood at Baseline regardless of susceptibility.
Microbiological response: Favorable microbiological response assessments include "eradication", "presumed eradication" and "colonization". Unfavorable microbiological response assessments include "persistence", "persistence with increasing MIC", and "presumed persistence. Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. Response of baseline pathogens cultured from intra-abdominal site or blood. A participant can have more than 1 pathogen. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-06947386 + Metronidazole
n=1 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of PF-06947386 (2.0 gram (g) of ceftazidime and 0.5 g of avibactam) every 8 hours, immediately followed by an IV administration of metronidazole (0.5 g) for 60 minutes. Participants received a minimum of 5 full days (15 doses) of IV study intervention up to a maximum of 14 full days (42 doses) of study intervention.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluation Participants Subset
EOT, Escherichia Coli
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluation Participants Subset
EOT, Klebsiella Pneumoniae
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluation Participants Subset
TOC, Escherichia Coli
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluation Participants Subset
TOC, Klebsiella Pneumoniae
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluation Participants Subset
LFU, Klebsiella Pneumoniae
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluation Participants Subset
LFU, Escherichia Coli
|
1 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Population: Sepsis participants subset: participants who satisfied clinical \& microbiological criteria: total score \>=2 in SOFA for ICU participants, 2 items or more in qSOFA for non-ICU participants; most relevant pathogens isolated from blood at Baseline regardless of susceptibility. Here, "Number Analyzed" signifies participants included in Sepsis participants subset at EOT and LFU respectively.
Microbiological response: Favorable microbiological response assessments include "eradication", "presumed eradication" and "colonization". Unfavorable microbiological response assessments include "persistence", "persistence with increasing MIC", and "presumed persistence. Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-06947386 + Metronidazole
n=1 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of PF-06947386 (2.0 gram (g) of ceftazidime and 0.5 g of avibactam) every 8 hours, immediately followed by an IV administration of metronidazole (0.5 g) for 60 minutes. Participants received a minimum of 5 full days (15 doses) of IV study intervention up to a maximum of 14 full days (42 doses) of study intervention.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants Subset
EOT, Escherichia Coli, Susceptible
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants Subset
EOT, Klebsiella Pneumoniae, Susceptible
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants Subset
TOC, Escherichia Coli, Susceptible
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants Subset
TOC, Klebsiella Pneumoniae, Susceptible
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants Subset
LFU, Escherichia Coli, Susceptible
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants Subset
LFU, Klebsiella Pneumoniae, Susceptible
|
1 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Population: Sepsis evaluable participants subset: participants who satisfied both clinical and microbiological criteria. Clinical: at least 1 criteria at Baseline, 1) body temperature \>=38 or \<36 degree Celsius, 2) WBC \>12000 or \<4000 cells/mm3, or immature neutrophil \>10%, 3) heart rate \>90 bpm, 4) SBP \<90 mmHg, 5) CRP \>=20 mg/dL. Microbiological: The most relevant pathogens isolated from blood at Baseline regardless of susceptibility.
Microbiological response: Favorable microbiological response assessments include "eradication", "presumed eradication" and "colonization". Unfavorable microbiological response assessments include "persistence", "persistence with increasing MIC", and "presumed persistence. Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-06947386 + Metronidazole
n=1 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of PF-06947386 (2.0 gram (g) of ceftazidime and 0.5 g of avibactam) every 8 hours, immediately followed by an IV administration of metronidazole (0.5 g) for 60 minutes. Participants received a minimum of 5 full days (15 doses) of IV study intervention up to a maximum of 14 full days (42 doses) of study intervention.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluation Participants Subset
EOT, Klebsiella Pneumoniae, Susceptible
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluation Participants Subset
TOC, Klebsiella Pneumoniae, Susceptible
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluation Participants Subset
LFU, Klebsiella Pneumoniae, Susceptible
|
1 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 49Population: Sepsis participants subset included participants who satisfied clinical \& microbiological criteria; total score \>=2 in SOFA for ICU participants, 2 items or more in qSOFA for non-ICU participants; most relevant pathogens (aerobic Gram-negative bacteria -either Enterobacterales or aerobic Gram-negative pathogens other than Enterobacterales) isolated from blood at Baseline regardless of susceptibility.
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose that resulted in death, was life-threatening, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent disability/incapacity, a congenital anomaly/birth defect as per medical or scientific judgment. AEs included both SAEs and non-SAEs. TEAE was defined as an AE that emerges or worsened during the effective duration of treatment. All events that started on or after the first dosing day were flagged as TEAEs.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-06947386 + Metronidazole
n=2 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of PF-06947386 (2.0 gram (g) of ceftazidime and 0.5 g of avibactam) every 8 hours, immediately followed by an IV administration of metronidazole (0.5 g) for 60 minutes. Participants received a minimum of 5 full days (15 doses) of IV study intervention up to a maximum of 14 full days (42 doses) of study intervention.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent AEs and SAEs: Sepsis Participants Subset
AEs
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent AEs and SAEs: Sepsis Participants Subset
SAEs
|
0 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 49Population: Sepsis evaluable participants subset: participants who satisfied both clinical and microbiological criteria. Clinical: at least 1 criteria at Baseline, 1) body temperature \>=38 or \<36 degree Celsius, 2) WBC \>12000 or \<4000 cells/mm3, or immature neutrophil \>10%, 3) heart rate \>90 bpm, 4) SBP \<90 mmHg, 5) CRP \>=20 mg/dL. Microbiological: The most relevant pathogens isolated from blood at Baseline regardless of susceptibility.
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose that resulted in death, was life-threatening, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent disability/incapacity, a congenital anomaly/birth defect as per medical or scientific judgment. AEs included both SAEs and non-SAEs. TEAE was defined as an AE that emerges or worsened during the effective duration of treatment. All events that started on or after the first dosing day were flagged as TEAEs.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-06947386 + Metronidazole
n=1 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of PF-06947386 (2.0 gram (g) of ceftazidime and 0.5 g of avibactam) every 8 hours, immediately followed by an IV administration of metronidazole (0.5 g) for 60 minutes. Participants received a minimum of 5 full days (15 doses) of IV study intervention up to a maximum of 14 full days (42 doses) of study intervention.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent AEs and SAEs: Sepsis Evaluable Participants Subset
AEs
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent AEs and SAEs: Sepsis Evaluable Participants Subset
SAEs
|
0 Participants
|
Adverse Events
PF-06947386 + Metronidazole
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
PF-06947386 + Metronidazole
n=60 participants at risk
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of PF-06947386 (2.0 gram (g) of ceftazidime and 0.5 g of avibactam) every 8 hours, immediately followed by an IV administration of metronidazole (0.5 g) for 60 minutes. Participants received a minimum of 5 full days (15 doses) of IV study intervention up to a maximum of 14 full days (42 doses) of study intervention.
|
|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ileus
|
1.7%
1/60 • Up to Day 49
Same event may appear as both an AE and SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Analysis performed on safety analysis set.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia aspiration
|
1.7%
1/60 • Up to Day 49
Same event may appear as both an AE and SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Analysis performed on safety analysis set.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pyelonephritis
|
1.7%
1/60 • Up to Day 49
Same event may appear as both an AE and SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Analysis performed on safety analysis set.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
1.7%
1/60 • Up to Day 49
Same event may appear as both an AE and SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Analysis performed on safety analysis set.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Femur fracture
|
1.7%
1/60 • Up to Day 49
Same event may appear as both an AE and SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Analysis performed on safety analysis set.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Gout
|
1.7%
1/60 • Up to Day 49
Same event may appear as both an AE and SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Analysis performed on safety analysis set.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
PF-06947386 + Metronidazole
n=60 participants at risk
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of PF-06947386 (2.0 gram (g) of ceftazidime and 0.5 g of avibactam) every 8 hours, immediately followed by an IV administration of metronidazole (0.5 g) for 60 minutes. Participants received a minimum of 5 full days (15 doses) of IV study intervention up to a maximum of 14 full days (42 doses) of study intervention.
|
|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal distension
|
3.3%
2/60 • Up to Day 49
Same event may appear as both an AE and SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Analysis performed on safety analysis set.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
5.0%
3/60 • Up to Day 49
Same event may appear as both an AE and SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Analysis performed on safety analysis set.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
11.7%
7/60 • Up to Day 49
Same event may appear as both an AE and SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Analysis performed on safety analysis set.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
11.7%
7/60 • Up to Day 49
Same event may appear as both an AE and SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Analysis performed on safety analysis set.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
6.7%
4/60 • Up to Day 49
Same event may appear as both an AE and SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Analysis performed on safety analysis set.
|
|
General disorders
Puncture site pain
|
3.3%
2/60 • Up to Day 49
Same event may appear as both an AE and SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Analysis performed on safety analysis set.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
3.3%
2/60 • Up to Day 49
Same event may appear as both an AE and SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Analysis performed on safety analysis set.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Incision site pain
|
3.3%
2/60 • Up to Day 49
Same event may appear as both an AE and SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Analysis performed on safety analysis set.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Wound complication
|
6.7%
4/60 • Up to Day 49
Same event may appear as both an AE and SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Analysis performed on safety analysis set.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
3.3%
2/60 • Up to Day 49
Same event may appear as both an AE and SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Analysis performed on safety analysis set.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
3.3%
2/60 • Up to Day 49
Same event may appear as both an AE and SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Analysis performed on safety analysis set.
|
|
Investigations
Blood magnesium abnormal
|
3.3%
2/60 • Up to Day 49
Same event may appear as both an AE and SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Analysis performed on safety analysis set.
|
|
Investigations
Blood phosphorus abnormal
|
3.3%
2/60 • Up to Day 49
Same event may appear as both an AE and SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Analysis performed on safety analysis set.
|
|
Investigations
Blood potassium abnormal
|
3.3%
2/60 • Up to Day 49
Same event may appear as both an AE and SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Analysis performed on safety analysis set.
|
|
Investigations
Liver function test increased
|
3.3%
2/60 • Up to Day 49
Same event may appear as both an AE and SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Analysis performed on safety analysis set.
|
|
Investigations
SARS-CoV-2 test positive
|
3.3%
2/60 • Up to Day 49
Same event may appear as both an AE and SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Analysis performed on safety analysis set.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
3.3%
2/60 • Up to Day 49
Same event may appear as both an AE and SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Analysis performed on safety analysis set.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
3.3%
2/60 • Up to Day 49
Same event may appear as both an AE and SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Analysis performed on safety analysis set.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Delirium
|
3.3%
2/60 • Up to Day 49
Same event may appear as both an AE and SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Analysis performed on safety analysis set.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
10.0%
6/60 • Up to Day 49
Same event may appear as both an AE and SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Analysis performed on safety analysis set.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Blister
|
3.3%
2/60 • Up to Day 49
Same event may appear as both an AE and SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Analysis performed on safety analysis set.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
5.0%
3/60 • Up to Day 49
Same event may appear as both an AE and SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Analysis performed on safety analysis set.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
5.0%
3/60 • Up to Day 49
Same event may appear as both an AE and SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Analysis performed on safety analysis set.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from the study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER