Trial Outcomes & Findings for Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Efficacy of Nemolizumab in Participants With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis (NCT NCT04921345)
NCT ID: NCT04921345
Last Updated: 2026-05-26
Results Overview
COMPLETED
PHASE2
109 participants
Pre-dose at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
2026-05-26
Participant Flow
The study was conducted at 23 sites in the United States, Denmark, Hungary, Poland and Spain from 24 June 2021 to 28 April 2025.
A total of 109 participants were enrolled in this study.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Aged 7-11 Year
Participants aged 7-11 years received subcutaneous (SC) injection of 10, 20 or 30 milligrams (mg) nemolizumab, every 4 weeks (Q4W) for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 20, 40 or 60 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 1.1: Participants Aged 7-11 Years
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Aged 2-6 Years
Participants aged 2-6 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
36
|
37
|
36
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
31
|
35
|
32
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
5
|
2
|
4
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Aged 7-11 Year
Participants aged 7-11 years received subcutaneous (SC) injection of 10, 20 or 30 milligrams (mg) nemolizumab, every 4 weeks (Q4W) for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 20, 40 or 60 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 1.1: Participants Aged 7-11 Years
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Aged 2-6 Years
Participants aged 2-6 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Subject/Caregiver Request
|
4
|
0
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Physician/Principal Investigator Decision
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Efficacy of Nemolizumab in Participants With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Aged 7-11 Year
n=36 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 10, 20 or 30 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 20, 40 or 60 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 1.1: Participants Aged 7-11 Years
n=37 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Aged 2-6 Years
n=36 Participants
Participants aged 2-6 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Total
n=109 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
8.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.51 • n=20 Participants
|
8.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.40 • n=32 Participants
|
3.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.19 • n=64 Participants
|
7.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.70 • n=50 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
17 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=32 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=64 Participants
|
52 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
19 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=32 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=64 Participants
|
57 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
3 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=32 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=64 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
33 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
37 Participants
n=32 Participants
|
35 Participants
n=64 Participants
|
105 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=32 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=64 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=32 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=64 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=32 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=64 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=32 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=64 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=32 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=64 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
36 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
37 Participants
n=32 Participants
|
35 Participants
n=64 Participants
|
108 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=32 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=64 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=32 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=64 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 32 and 52Population: Analysis was performed on Pharmacokinetic (PK) Set. The PK Set consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and have at least one measurable post-baseline concentration. Here, 'number analyzed' = participants with available data at each specified timepoint.
Serum concentrations of Nemolizumab were analyzed using validated enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Aged 7-11 Year
n=36 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 10, 20 or 30 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 20, 40 or 60 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 1.1: Participants Aged 7-11 Years
n=37 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Aged 2-6 Years
n=36 Participants
Participants aged 2-6 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Nemolizumab Serum Concentrations
Week 4
|
5950 nanograms per milliliters (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 2240
|
2900 nanograms per milliliters (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 893
|
3080 nanograms per milliliters (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 1220
|
|
Nemolizumab Serum Concentrations
Week 8
|
5150 nanograms per milliliters (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 2150
|
2800 nanograms per milliliters (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 986
|
2560 nanograms per milliliters (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 1310
|
|
Nemolizumab Serum Concentrations
Week 12
|
4730 nanograms per milliliters (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 1670
|
2550 nanograms per milliliters (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 1180
|
2490 nanograms per milliliters (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 1430
|
|
Nemolizumab Serum Concentrations
Week 16
|
4630 nanograms per milliliters (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 1660
|
2110 nanograms per milliliters (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 1000
|
2430 nanograms per milliliters (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 1510
|
|
Nemolizumab Serum Concentrations
Week 32
|
4370 nanograms per milliliters (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 2100
|
2760 nanograms per milliliters (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 1150
|
2600 nanograms per milliliters (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 1490
|
|
Nemolizumab Serum Concentrations
Week 52
|
4410 nanograms per milliliters (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 2490
|
2250 nanograms per milliliters (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 939
|
2680 nanograms per milliliters (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 1490
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 32 and 52Population: Analysis was performed on the PK Set. The PK Set consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least one measurable post-baseline concentration.
CL/F is apparent clearance of the drug from the serum, calculated as the drug dose divided area under the curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinite time \[AUC (0-inf)\]. Individual nemolizumab.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Aged 7-11 Year
n=36 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 10, 20 or 30 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 20, 40 or 60 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 1.1: Participants Aged 7-11 Years
n=37 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Aged 2-6 Years
n=36 Participants
Participants aged 2-6 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Apparent Total Body Clearance (Cl/F) of Nemolizumab
|
0.139 liter per day (L/day)
Standard Deviation 0.0824
|
0.134 liter per day (L/day)
Standard Deviation 0.0407
|
0.0761 liter per day (L/day)
Standard Deviation 0.0245
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 32 and 52Population: Analysis was performed on the PK Set. The PK Set consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least one measurable post-baseline concentration.
Vd/F was calculated as dose divided by lambda\_z \*AUC(0-inf).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Aged 7-11 Year
n=36 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 10, 20 or 30 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 20, 40 or 60 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 1.1: Participants Aged 7-11 Years
n=37 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Aged 2-6 Years
n=36 Participants
Participants aged 2-6 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vd/F) of Nemolizumab
|
3.39 liter
Standard Deviation 1.36
|
3.37 liter
Standard Deviation 1.02
|
1.75 liter
Standard Deviation 0.495
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 32 and 52Population: Analysis was performed on the PK Set. The PK Set consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least one measurable post-baseline concentration.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Aged 7-11 Year
n=36 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 10, 20 or 30 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 20, 40 or 60 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 1.1: Participants Aged 7-11 Years
n=37 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Aged 2-6 Years
n=36 Participants
Participants aged 2-6 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Absorption Rate Constant (Ka) of Nemolizumab
|
0.502 per day
Standard Deviation 0.0402
|
0.503 per day
Standard Deviation 0.0280
|
0.494 per day
Standard Deviation 0.0383
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Population: Analysis was performed on the PK Set. The PK Set consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least one measurable post-baseline concentration.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Aged 7-11 Year
n=36 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 10, 20 or 30 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 20, 40 or 60 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 1.1: Participants Aged 7-11 Years
n=37 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Aged 2-6 Years
n=36 Participants
Participants aged 2-6 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Serum Concentration Observed Immediately Before Next Dosing (Ctrough) of Nemolizumab
Week 4
|
6.71 micrograms per milliliter (ug/mL)
Standard Deviation 2.76
|
3.25 micrograms per milliliter (ug/mL)
Standard Deviation 1.21
|
3.13 micrograms per milliliter (ug/mL)
Standard Deviation 1.29
|
|
Serum Concentration Observed Immediately Before Next Dosing (Ctrough) of Nemolizumab
Week 12
|
5.35 micrograms per milliliter (ug/mL)
Standard Deviation 2.46
|
2.85 micrograms per milliliter (ug/mL)
Standard Deviation 1.43
|
2.84 micrograms per milliliter (ug/mL)
Standard Deviation 1.38
|
|
Serum Concentration Observed Immediately Before Next Dosing (Ctrough) of Nemolizumab
Week 16
|
5.52 micrograms per milliliter (ug/mL)
Standard Deviation 2.54
|
2.69 micrograms per milliliter (ug/mL)
Standard Deviation 1.48
|
3.10 micrograms per milliliter (ug/mL)
Standard Deviation 1.63
|
|
Serum Concentration Observed Immediately Before Next Dosing (Ctrough) of Nemolizumab
Week 8
|
6.38 micrograms per milliliter (ug/mL)
Standard Deviation 3.39
|
3.15 micrograms per milliliter (ug/mL)
Standard Deviation 1.51
|
3.20 micrograms per milliliter (ug/mL)
Standard Deviation 1.80
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 32 and 52Population: Analysis was performed on the PK Set. The PK Set consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least one measurable post-baseline concentration.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Aged 7-11 Year
n=36 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 10, 20 or 30 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 20, 40 or 60 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 1.1: Participants Aged 7-11 Years
n=37 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Aged 2-6 Years
n=36 Participants
Participants aged 2-6 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUCinf) of Nemolizumab
|
204 days*nanograms per milliliters
Standard Deviation 61.6
|
101 days*nanograms per milliliters
Standard Deviation 26.7
|
93.2 days*nanograms per milliliters
Standard Deviation 38.2
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 32 and 52Population: Analysis was performed on the PK Set. The PK Set consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least one measurable post-baseline concentration.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Aged 7-11 Year
n=36 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 10, 20 or 30 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 20, 40 or 60 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 1.1: Participants Aged 7-11 Years
n=37 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Aged 2-6 Years
n=36 Participants
Participants aged 2-6 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Apparent Terminal Half-life (t1/2) of Nemolizumab
|
17.7 day
Standard Deviation 3.89
|
17.8 day
Standard Deviation 3.86
|
16.9 day
Standard Deviation 5.06
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline through Week 52Population: Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
AE defined as any untoward medical occurrence in clinical study participant administered a medicinal product which does not necessarily have causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs defined as AEs occurring after first administration of study drug during the study. SAE was any untoward medical occurrence, in view of either Investigator or Sponsor, that resulted in death, was life-threatening, resulted in inpatient hospitalisation or prolongation of existing hospitalisation, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was congenital anomaly/birth defect or was important medical event. AESI was noteworthy TEAE for study drug that was to be monitored closely and reported promptly. Relatedness to study drug was based on Investigator's discretion. AEs Leading to study treatment withdrawal and AEs Leading to study withdrawal will also be reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Aged 7-11 Year
n=36 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 10, 20 or 30 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 20, 40 or 60 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 1.1: Participants Aged 7-11 Years
n=37 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Aged 2-6 Years
n=36 Participants
Participants aged 2-6 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs), Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
AESIs
|
4 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs), Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
AE leading to discontinuation
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs), Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
SAEs
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs), Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
TEAEs
|
30 Participants
|
32 Participants
|
32 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52Population: Analysis was performed on the intent-to-treat (ITT) set. The ITT set consisted of all enrolled participants. Here, 'number analyzed' = participants with available data at each specified timepoint.
EASI assesses severity and extent of AD signs through a composite score of erythema, induration/population, excoriation, and lichenification. The severity was assessed on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) for each of the 4 body areas: head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs, with half points allowed. The EASI score ranged from 0 to 72 with higher scores representing greater severity of atopic dermatitis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Aged 7-11 Year
n=36 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 10, 20 or 30 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 20, 40 or 60 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 1.1: Participants Aged 7-11 Years
n=37 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Aged 2-6 Years
n=36 Participants
Participants aged 2-6 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Each Visit up to Week 52
Week 40
|
-87.48 percent change
Standard Deviation 13.801
|
-88.63 percent change
Standard Deviation 15.316
|
-87.16 percent change
Standard Deviation 20.753
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Each Visit up to Week 52
Week 12
|
-66.89 percent change
Standard Deviation 33.873
|
-80.49 percent change
Standard Deviation 19.318
|
-85.00 percent change
Standard Deviation 19.401
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Each Visit up to Week 52
Week 4
|
-48.91 percent change
Standard Deviation 32.283
|
-66.10 percent change
Standard Deviation 32.089
|
-68.88 percent change
Standard Deviation 30.549
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Each Visit up to Week 52
Week 8
|
-61.40 percent change
Standard Deviation 36.260
|
-74.65 percent change
Standard Deviation 28.423
|
-75.41 percent change
Standard Deviation 35.869
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Each Visit up to Week 52
Week 16
|
-76.34 percent change
Standard Deviation 25.119
|
-85.86 percent change
Standard Deviation 14.305
|
-82.17 percent change
Standard Deviation 24.537
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Each Visit up to Week 52
Week 20
|
-78.31 percent change
Standard Deviation 23.574
|
-87.26 percent change
Standard Deviation 15.473
|
-88.80 percent change
Standard Deviation 22.292
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Each Visit up to Week 52
Week 24
|
-78.39 percent change
Standard Deviation 25.594
|
-92.62 percent change
Standard Deviation 9.826
|
-87.38 percent change
Standard Deviation 21.716
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Each Visit up to Week 52
Week 28
|
-82.38 percent change
Standard Deviation 19.766
|
-88.32 percent change
Standard Deviation 15.212
|
-93.28 percent change
Standard Deviation 14.285
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Each Visit up to Week 52
Week 32
|
-79.09 percent change
Standard Deviation 29.339
|
-91.72 percent change
Standard Deviation 9.358
|
-88.77 percent change
Standard Deviation 18.080
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Each Visit up to Week 52
Week 36
|
-84.49 percent change
Standard Deviation 18.584
|
-88.90 percent change
Standard Deviation 15.773
|
-90.40 percent change
Standard Deviation 15.204
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Each Visit up to Week 52
Week 44
|
-91.51 percent change
Standard Deviation 10.145
|
-87.08 percent change
Standard Deviation 21.731
|
-89.06 percent change
Standard Deviation 18.792
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Each Visit up to Week 52
Week 48
|
-91.07 percent change
Standard Deviation 11.622
|
-85.49 percent change
Standard Deviation 21.664
|
-90.71 percent change
Standard Deviation 16.472
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Each Visit up to Week 52
Week 52
|
-90.86 percent change
Standard Deviation 10.609
|
-85.66 percent change
Standard Deviation 21.397
|
-90.53 percent change
Standard Deviation 20.487
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52Population: Analysis was performed on the ITT set. The ITT set consisted of all enrolled participants. Here, 'number analyzed' = participants with available data at each specified timepoint.
EASI assesses severity and extent of AD signs through a composite score of erythema, induration/population, excoriation, and lichenification. The severity was assessed on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) for each of the 4 body areas: head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs, with half points allowed. The EASI score ranged from 0 to 72 with higher scores representing greater severity of atopic dermatitis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Aged 7-11 Year
n=36 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 10, 20 or 30 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 20, 40 or 60 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 1.1: Participants Aged 7-11 Years
n=37 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Aged 2-6 Years
n=36 Participants
Participants aged 2-6 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in EASI Score
Week 32
|
-21.04 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.940
|
-25.98 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.246
|
-23.48 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.586
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in EASI Score
Week 52
|
-24.09 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.791
|
-24.24 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.001
|
-23.85 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.138
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in EASI Score
Week 4
|
-12.86 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.154
|
-18.90 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.316
|
-17.72 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.449
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in EASI Score
Week 8
|
-16.56 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.141
|
-20.87 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.960
|
-19.51 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.210
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in EASI Score
Week 12
|
-18.00 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.880
|
-23.25 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.566
|
-21.95 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.247
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in EASI Score
Week 16
|
-20.46 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.189
|
-24.27 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.840
|
-21.60 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.357
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in EASI Score
Week 20
|
-21.12 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.359
|
-24.88 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.290
|
-23.34 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.401
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in EASI Score
Week 24
|
-21.19 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.950
|
-26.63 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.783
|
-22.89 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.483
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in EASI Score
Week 28
|
-22.06 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.332
|
-25.10 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.529
|
-24.39 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.567
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in EASI Score
Week 36
|
-22.67 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.470
|
-25.30 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.270
|
-23.78 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.532
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in EASI Score
Week 40
|
-23.26 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.041
|
-25.44 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.533
|
-23.03 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.323
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in EASI Score
Week 44
|
-24.40 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.259
|
-25.18 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.720
|
-23.44 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.263
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in EASI Score
Week 48
|
-24.45 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.029
|
-24.33 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.500
|
-23.91 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.981
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52Population: Analysis was performed on the ITT set. The ITT set consisted of all enrolled participants. Here, 'number analyzed' = participants with available data at each specified timepoint.
EASI assesses severity and extent of AD signs through a composite score of erythema, induration/population, excoriation, and lichenification. The severity was assessed on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) for each of the 4 body areas: head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs, with half points allowed. The EASI score ranged from 0 to 72 with higher scores representing greater severity of atopic dermatitis. EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90 responders will be the participants who achieved greater than or equal to (\>=) 50%, \>=75% and \>=90% overall improvement in EASI score respectively from baseline to Week 52.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Aged 7-11 Year
n=36 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 10, 20 or 30 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 20, 40 or 60 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 1.1: Participants Aged 7-11 Years
n=37 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Aged 2-6 Years
n=36 Participants
Participants aged 2-6 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Achieving 50 Percent (%), 75% or 90% Response From Baseline in EASI (EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90)
Week 16: EASI - 50
|
31 Participants
|
34 Participants
|
32 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving 50 Percent (%), 75% or 90% Response From Baseline in EASI (EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90)
Week 32: EASI - 75
|
27 Participants
|
33 Participants
|
27 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving 50 Percent (%), 75% or 90% Response From Baseline in EASI (EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90)
Week 36: EASI - 50
|
32 Participants
|
34 Participants
|
30 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving 50 Percent (%), 75% or 90% Response From Baseline in EASI (EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90)
Week 4: EASI - 50
|
19 Participants
|
25 Participants
|
29 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving 50 Percent (%), 75% or 90% Response From Baseline in EASI (EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90)
Week 4: EASI - 75
|
10 Participants
|
18 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving 50 Percent (%), 75% or 90% Response From Baseline in EASI (EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90)
Week 4: EASI - 90
|
3 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving 50 Percent (%), 75% or 90% Response From Baseline in EASI (EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90)
Week 8: EASI - 50
|
23 Participants
|
31 Participants
|
30 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving 50 Percent (%), 75% or 90% Response From Baseline in EASI (EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90)
Week 8: EASI - 75
|
15 Participants
|
24 Participants
|
25 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving 50 Percent (%), 75% or 90% Response From Baseline in EASI (EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90)
Week 8: EASI - 90
|
8 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
18 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving 50 Percent (%), 75% or 90% Response From Baseline in EASI (EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90)
Week 12: EASI - 50
|
30 Participants
|
31 Participants
|
32 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving 50 Percent (%), 75% or 90% Response From Baseline in EASI (EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90)
Week 12: EASI - 75
|
17 Participants
|
25 Participants
|
28 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving 50 Percent (%), 75% or 90% Response From Baseline in EASI (EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90)
Week 12: EASI - 90
|
9 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving 50 Percent (%), 75% or 90% Response From Baseline in EASI (EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90)
Week 16: EASI - 75
|
24 Participants
|
27 Participants
|
25 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving 50 Percent (%), 75% or 90% Response From Baseline in EASI (EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90)
Week 16: EASI - 90
|
12 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving 50 Percent (%), 75% or 90% Response From Baseline in EASI (EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90)
Week 20: EASI - 50
|
32 Participants
|
34 Participants
|
30 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving 50 Percent (%), 75% or 90% Response From Baseline in EASI (EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90)
Week 20: EASI - 75
|
25 Participants
|
30 Participants
|
29 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving 50 Percent (%), 75% or 90% Response From Baseline in EASI (EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90)
Week 20: EASI - 90
|
13 Participants
|
18 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving 50 Percent (%), 75% or 90% Response From Baseline in EASI (EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90)
Week 24: EASI - 50
|
31 Participants
|
34 Participants
|
31 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving 50 Percent (%), 75% or 90% Response From Baseline in EASI (EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90)
Week 24: EASI - 75
|
26 Participants
|
31 Participants
|
29 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving 50 Percent (%), 75% or 90% Response From Baseline in EASI (EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90)
Week 24: EASI - 90
|
16 Participants
|
25 Participants
|
25 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving 50 Percent (%), 75% or 90% Response From Baseline in EASI (EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90)
Week 28: EASI - 50
|
32 Participants
|
33 Participants
|
32 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving 50 Percent (%), 75% or 90% Response From Baseline in EASI (EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90)
Week 28: EASI - 75
|
30 Participants
|
31 Participants
|
31 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving 50 Percent (%), 75% or 90% Response From Baseline in EASI (EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90)
Week 28: EASI - 90
|
19 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
29 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving 50 Percent (%), 75% or 90% Response From Baseline in EASI (EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90)
Week 32: EASI - 50
|
33 Participants
|
35 Participants
|
30 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving 50 Percent (%), 75% or 90% Response From Baseline in EASI (EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90)
Week 32: EASI - 90
|
15 Participants
|
25 Participants
|
26 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving 50 Percent (%), 75% or 90% Response From Baseline in EASI (EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90)
Week 36: EASI - 75
|
25 Participants
|
31 Participants
|
29 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving 50 Percent (%), 75% or 90% Response From Baseline in EASI (EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90)
Week 36: EASI - 90
|
18 Participants
|
24 Participants
|
24 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving 50 Percent (%), 75% or 90% Response From Baseline in EASI (EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90)
Week 40: EASI - 50
|
32 Participants
|
34 Participants
|
32 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving 50 Percent (%), 75% or 90% Response From Baseline in EASI (EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90)
Week 40: EASI - 75
|
27 Participants
|
29 Participants
|
25 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving 50 Percent (%), 75% or 90% Response From Baseline in EASI (EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90)
Week 40: EASI - 90
|
18 Participants
|
23 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving 50 Percent (%), 75% or 90% Response From Baseline in EASI (EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90)
Week 44: EASI - 50
|
31 Participants
|
32 Participants
|
30 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving 50 Percent (%), 75% or 90% Response From Baseline in EASI (EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90)
Week 44: EASI - 75
|
29 Participants
|
29 Participants
|
28 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving 50 Percent (%), 75% or 90% Response From Baseline in EASI (EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90)
Week 44: EASI - 90
|
22 Participants
|
24 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving 50 Percent (%), 75% or 90% Response From Baseline in EASI (EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90)
Week 48: EASI - 50
|
30 Participants
|
32 Participants
|
32 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving 50 Percent (%), 75% or 90% Response From Baseline in EASI (EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90)
Week 48: EASI - 75
|
28 Participants
|
28 Participants
|
30 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving 50 Percent (%), 75% or 90% Response From Baseline in EASI (EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90)
Week 48: EASI - 90
|
21 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
24 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving 50 Percent (%), 75% or 90% Response From Baseline in EASI (EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90)
Week 52: EASI - 50
|
32 Participants
|
33 Participants
|
32 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving 50 Percent (%), 75% or 90% Response From Baseline in EASI (EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90)
Week 52: EASI - 75
|
30 Participants
|
29 Participants
|
29 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving 50 Percent (%), 75% or 90% Response From Baseline in EASI (EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90)
Week 52: EASI - 90
|
22 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
25 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52Population: Analysis was performed on the ITT set. The ITT set consisted of all enrolled participants. Here, 'number analyzed' = participants with available data at each specified timepoint.
IGA is a 5-point scale used by the investigator or trained designee to evaluate the global severity of AD. The Investigator reviewed the participant's skin and give a score of 0 (Clear), 1 (Almost clear), 2 (Mild), 3 (Moderate), or 4 (Severe). Here, higher score indicates severe outcome. Success was defined as an IGA of 0 \[Clear\] or 1 \[Almost clear\] and a \>=2-points improvement from baseline. Number of participants with IGA success rate was reported for this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Aged 7-11 Year
n=36 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 10, 20 or 30 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 20, 40 or 60 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 1.1: Participants Aged 7-11 Years
n=37 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Aged 2-6 Years
n=36 Participants
Participants aged 2-6 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Success Rate
Week 32
|
15 Participants
|
23 Participants
|
24 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Success Rate
Week 4
|
5 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Success Rate
Week 8
|
9 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Success Rate
Week 12
|
13 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
18 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Success Rate
Week 16
|
17 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Success Rate
Week 20
|
13 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Success Rate
Week 24
|
13 Participants
|
25 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Success Rate
Week 28
|
14 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
23 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Success Rate
Week 36
|
17 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Success Rate
Week 40
|
14 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Success Rate
Week 44
|
19 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Success Rate
Week 48
|
17 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
24 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Success Rate
Week 52
|
15 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
24 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52Population: Analysis was performed on the ITT set. The ITT set consisted of all enrolled participants. Here, 'number analyzed' = participants with available data at each specified timepoint.
BSA affected by AD was assessed for each section of the body (the possible highest score for each region was: head and neck \[9%\], anterior trunk \[18%\], back \[18%\], upper limbs \[18%\], lower limbs \[36%\], and genitals \[1%\]) and reported as a percentage of all major body sections combined. The reported percentage of BSA was combined percentage of all major body sections.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Aged 7-11 Year
n=36 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 10, 20 or 30 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 20, 40 or 60 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 1.1: Participants Aged 7-11 Years
n=37 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Aged 2-6 Years
n=36 Participants
Participants aged 2-6 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) Involvement by Atopic Dermatitis (AD)
Week 4
|
-12.76 percentage of BSA involvement
Standard Deviation 18.358
|
-22.22 percentage of BSA involvement
Standard Deviation 19.519
|
-17.66 percentage of BSA involvement
Standard Deviation 13.779
|
|
Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) Involvement by Atopic Dermatitis (AD)
Week 8
|
-17.75 percentage of BSA involvement
Standard Deviation 21.082
|
-28.34 percentage of BSA involvement
Standard Deviation 18.666
|
-23.09 percentage of BSA involvement
Standard Deviation 17.492
|
|
Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) Involvement by Atopic Dermatitis (AD)
Week 12
|
-21.15 percentage of BSA involvement
Standard Deviation 20.593
|
-32.84 percentage of BSA involvement
Standard Deviation 17.714
|
-28.15 percentage of BSA involvement
Standard Deviation 15.323
|
|
Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) Involvement by Atopic Dermatitis (AD)
Week 20
|
-26.09 percentage of BSA involvement
Standard Deviation 20.817
|
-36.46 percentage of BSA involvement
Standard Deviation 16.910
|
-29.48 percentage of BSA involvement
Standard Deviation 14.698
|
|
Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) Involvement by Atopic Dermatitis (AD)
Week 28
|
-29.99 percentage of BSA involvement
Standard Deviation 17.461
|
-35.90 percentage of BSA involvement
Standard Deviation 16.301
|
-31.82 percentage of BSA involvement
Standard Deviation 12.338
|
|
Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) Involvement by Atopic Dermatitis (AD)
Week 32
|
-28.72 percentage of BSA involvement
Standard Deviation 17.295
|
-38.15 percentage of BSA involvement
Standard Deviation 16.188
|
-30.02 percentage of BSA involvement
Standard Deviation 14.152
|
|
Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) Involvement by Atopic Dermatitis (AD)
Week 40
|
-33.15 percentage of BSA involvement
Standard Deviation 15.673
|
-37.57 percentage of BSA involvement
Standard Deviation 17.080
|
-28.65 percentage of BSA involvement
Standard Deviation 16.538
|
|
Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) Involvement by Atopic Dermatitis (AD)
Week 44
|
-34.98 percentage of BSA involvement
Standard Deviation 17.161
|
-35.42 percentage of BSA involvement
Standard Deviation 19.669
|
-28.96 percentage of BSA involvement
Standard Deviation 17.460
|
|
Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) Involvement by Atopic Dermatitis (AD)
Week 48
|
-35.49 percentage of BSA involvement
Standard Deviation 16.827
|
-36.10 percentage of BSA involvement
Standard Deviation 18.255
|
-31.70 percentage of BSA involvement
Standard Deviation 14.324
|
|
Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) Involvement by Atopic Dermatitis (AD)
Week 16
|
-25.50 percentage of BSA involvement
Standard Deviation 17.463
|
-34.17 percentage of BSA involvement
Standard Deviation 15.452
|
-25.34 percentage of BSA involvement
Standard Deviation 16.319
|
|
Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) Involvement by Atopic Dermatitis (AD)
Week 24
|
-28.66 percentage of BSA involvement
Standard Deviation 18.126
|
-37.67 percentage of BSA involvement
Standard Deviation 16.934
|
-28.74 percentage of BSA involvement
Standard Deviation 15.153
|
|
Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) Involvement by Atopic Dermatitis (AD)
Week 36
|
-31.82 percentage of BSA involvement
Standard Deviation 15.182
|
-37.51 percentage of BSA involvement
Standard Deviation 16.869
|
-29.18 percentage of BSA involvement
Standard Deviation 13.313
|
|
Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) Involvement by Atopic Dermatitis (AD)
Week 52
|
-34.71 percentage of BSA involvement
Standard Deviation 16.319
|
-35.27 percentage of BSA involvement
Standard Deviation 17.668
|
-31.15 percentage of BSA involvement
Standard Deviation 15.041
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52Population: Analysis was performed on the ITT set. The ITT set consisted of all enrolled participants. Here, 'number analyzed' = participants with available data at each specified timepoint.
Pruritus NRS is a scale that will be used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. For maximum itch intensity: the scores were provided on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being 'worst itch imaginable'. Higher scores indicated worse outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Aged 7-11 Year
n=36 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 10, 20 or 30 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 20, 40 or 60 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 1.1: Participants Aged 7-11 Years
n=37 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Aged 2-6 Years
n=36 Participants
Participants aged 2-6 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (PP NRS) Score
Week 24
|
-4.46 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.264
|
-5.16 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.257
|
-5.85 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.424
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (PP NRS) Score
Week 4
|
-2.78 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.066
|
-3.03 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.470
|
-4.36 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.902
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (PP NRS) Score
Week 8
|
-3.91 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.266
|
-4.29 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.292
|
-4.84 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.516
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (PP NRS) Score
Week 12
|
-4.13 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.167
|
-4.47 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.487
|
-5.03 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.573
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (PP NRS) Score
Week 16
|
-4.60 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.055
|
-4.90 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.491
|
-5.48 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.454
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (PP NRS) Score
Week 20
|
-4.22 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.221
|
-4.87 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.259
|
-5.54 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.534
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (PP NRS) Score
Week 28
|
-4.58 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.089
|
-5.40 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.984
|
-5.78 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.439
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (PP NRS) Score
Week 32
|
-4.71 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.187
|
-5.39 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.069
|
-5.72 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.363
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (PP NRS) Score
Week 36
|
-4.88 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.995
|
-5.50 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.125
|
-5.94 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.348
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (PP NRS) Score
Week 40
|
-4.88 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.957
|
-5.41 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.087
|
-6.16 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.256
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (PP NRS) Score
Week 44
|
-4.65 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.008
|
-5.56 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.186
|
-6.26 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.991
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (PP NRS) Score
Week 48
|
-4.56 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.120
|
-5.81 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.156
|
-6.46 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.978
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (PP NRS) Score
Week 52
|
-4.66 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.090
|
-5.62 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.944
|
-6.32 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.129
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52Population: Analysis was performed on the ITT set. The ITT set consisted of all enrolled participants. Here, 'number analyzed' = participants with available data at each specified timepoint.
Pruritus NRS is a scale that was used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. For maximum itch intensity: the scores were provided on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being 'worst itch imaginable'. Higher scores indicated worse outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Aged 7-11 Year
n=36 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 10, 20 or 30 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 20, 40 or 60 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 1.1: Participants Aged 7-11 Years
n=37 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Aged 2-6 Years
n=36 Participants
Participants aged 2-6 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of PP NRS Score
Week 12
|
-57.56 percent change
Standard Deviation 29.073
|
-60.29 percent change
Standard Deviation 30.314
|
-68.08 percent change
Standard Deviation 33.578
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of PP NRS Score
Week 24
|
-62.19 percent change
Standard Deviation 31.021
|
-70.43 percent change
Standard Deviation 26.843
|
-79.15 percent change
Standard Deviation 28.563
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of PP NRS Score
Week 28
|
-64.67 percent change
Standard Deviation 28.794
|
-73.91 percent change
Standard Deviation 24.040
|
-78.51 percent change
Standard Deviation 29.041
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of PP NRS Score
Week 32
|
-64.67 percent change
Standard Deviation 27.737
|
-73.55 percent change
Standard Deviation 26.034
|
-77.65 percent change
Standard Deviation 28.477
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of PP NRS Score
Week 36
|
-68.77 percent change
Standard Deviation 27.082
|
-75.57 percent change
Standard Deviation 26.533
|
-80.28 percent change
Standard Deviation 27.557
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of PP NRS Score
Week 40
|
-68.79 percent change
Standard Deviation 26.011
|
-73.64 percent change
Standard Deviation 25.659
|
-82.39 percent change
Standard Deviation 26.173
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of PP NRS Score
Week 52
|
-65.73 percent change
Standard Deviation 27.817
|
-75.85 percent change
Standard Deviation 23.800
|
-84.82 percent change
Standard Deviation 24.430
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of PP NRS Score
Week 8
|
-53.41 percent change
Standard Deviation 29.280
|
-58.95 percent change
Standard Deviation 29.795
|
-65.90 percent change
Standard Deviation 33.824
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of PP NRS Score
Week 4
|
-38.15 percent change
Standard Deviation 27.090
|
-41.48 percent change
Standard Deviation 32.040
|
-57.89 percent change
Standard Deviation 39.240
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of PP NRS Score
Week 16
|
-63.84 percent change
Standard Deviation 27.986
|
-66.58 percent change
Standard Deviation 29.990
|
-74.15 percent change
Standard Deviation 31.042
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of PP NRS Score
Week 20
|
-59.75 percent change
Standard Deviation 30.193
|
-67.09 percent change
Standard Deviation 28.155
|
-75.40 percent change
Standard Deviation 32.320
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of PP NRS Score
Week 44
|
-65.80 percent change
Standard Deviation 26.928
|
-75.99 percent change
Standard Deviation 26.893
|
-84.51 percent change
Standard Deviation 22.644
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of PP NRS Score
Week 48
|
-64.86 percent change
Standard Deviation 28.322
|
-78.89 percent change
Standard Deviation 25.842
|
-86.72 percent change
Standard Deviation 20.254
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52Population: Analysis was performed on the ITT set. The ITT set consisted of all enrolled participants. Here, 'number analyzed' = participants with available data at each specified timepoint.
Pruritus NRS is a scale that was used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. For maximum itch intensity: the scores were provided on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being 'worst itch imaginable'. Higher scores indicated worse outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Aged 7-11 Year
n=36 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 10, 20 or 30 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 20, 40 or 60 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 1.1: Participants Aged 7-11 Years
n=37 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Aged 2-6 Years
n=36 Participants
Participants aged 2-6 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With an Improvement of >= 4 From Baseline in Weekly Average of PP NRS
Week 4
|
23.5 percentage of participants
|
31.4 percentage of participants
|
69.4 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With an Improvement of >= 4 From Baseline in Weekly Average of PP NRS
Week 8
|
44.4 percentage of participants
|
64.7 percentage of participants
|
66.7 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With an Improvement of >= 4 From Baseline in Weekly Average of PP NRS
Week 12
|
50.0 percentage of participants
|
64.7 percentage of participants
|
69.4 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With an Improvement of >= 4 From Baseline in Weekly Average of PP NRS
Week 40
|
69.0 percentage of participants
|
82.4 percentage of participants
|
86.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With an Improvement of >= 4 From Baseline in Weekly Average of PP NRS
Week 44
|
61.3 percentage of participants
|
78.8 percentage of participants
|
90.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With an Improvement of >= 4 From Baseline in Weekly Average of PP NRS
Week 48
|
65.5 percentage of participants
|
81.3 percentage of participants
|
92.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With an Improvement of >= 4 From Baseline in Weekly Average of PP NRS
Week 52
|
65.4 percentage of participants
|
80.0 percentage of participants
|
88.5 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With an Improvement of >= 4 From Baseline in Weekly Average of PP NRS
Week 16
|
58.8 percentage of participants
|
66.7 percentage of participants
|
76.5 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With an Improvement of >= 4 From Baseline in Weekly Average of PP NRS
Week 20
|
54.5 percentage of participants
|
75.0 percentage of participants
|
78.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With an Improvement of >= 4 From Baseline in Weekly Average of PP NRS
Week 24
|
59.4 percentage of participants
|
67.7 percentage of participants
|
80.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With an Improvement of >= 4 From Baseline in Weekly Average of PP NRS
Week 28
|
60.6 percentage of participants
|
77.4 percentage of participants
|
81.8 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With an Improvement of >= 4 From Baseline in Weekly Average of PP NRS
Week 32
|
58.6 percentage of participants
|
81.3 percentage of participants
|
78.8 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With an Improvement of >= 4 From Baseline in Weekly Average of PP NRS
Week 36
|
66.7 percentage of participants
|
80.6 percentage of participants
|
84.4 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52Population: Analysis was performed on the ITT set. The ITT set consisted of all enrolled participants. Here, 'number analyzed' = participants with available data at each specified timepoint.
Pruritus NRS is a scale that was used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. For maximum itch intensity: the scores were provided on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being 'worst itch imaginable'. Higher scores indicated worse outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Aged 7-11 Year
n=36 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 10, 20 or 30 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 20, 40 or 60 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 1.1: Participants Aged 7-11 Years
n=37 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Aged 2-6 Years
n=36 Participants
Participants aged 2-6 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Pruritus NRS Score
Week 28
|
-4.32 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.818
|
-5.04 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.977
|
-5.55 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.403
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Pruritus NRS Score
Week 36
|
-4.65 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.733
|
-4.96 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.204
|
-5.68 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.301
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Pruritus NRS Score
Week 44
|
-4.55 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.738
|
-5.08 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.318
|
-5.96 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.942
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Pruritus NRS Score
Week 48
|
-4.42 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.843
|
-5.30 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.261
|
-6.06 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.992
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Pruritus NRS Score
Week 4
|
-2.46 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.878
|
-2.84 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.286
|
-4.26 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.884
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Pruritus NRS Score
Week 8
|
-3.61 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.030
|
-4.14 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.111
|
-4.64 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.477
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Pruritus NRS Score
Week 12
|
-3.83 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.889
|
-4.28 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.303
|
-4.89 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.569
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Pruritus NRS Score
Week 16
|
-4.27 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.884
|
-4.61 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.363
|
-5.29 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.512
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Pruritus NRS Score
Week 20
|
-4.04 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.831
|
-4.61 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.260
|
-5.29 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.539
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Pruritus NRS Score
Week 24
|
-4.38 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.939
|
-5.01 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.145
|
-5.60 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.411
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Pruritus NRS Score
Week 32
|
-4.40 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.909
|
-5.00 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.049
|
-5.48 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.309
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Pruritus NRS Score
Week 40
|
-4.59 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.757
|
-5.03 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.108
|
-5.89 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.214
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Pruritus NRS Score
Week 52
|
-4.53 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.729
|
-5.19 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.054
|
-5.89 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.050
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52Population: Analysis was performed on the ITT set. The ITT set consisted of all enrolled participants. Here, 'number analyzed' = participants with available data at each specified timepoint.
Pruritus NRS is a scale that was used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. For maximum itch intensity: the scores were provided on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being 'worst itch imaginable'. Higher scores indicated worse outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Aged 7-11 Year
n=36 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 10, 20 or 30 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 20, 40 or 60 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 1.1: Participants Aged 7-11 Years
n=37 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Aged 2-6 Years
n=36 Participants
Participants aged 2-6 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Pruritus NRS Score
Week 4
|
-38.07 percent change
Standard Deviation 28.816
|
-42.77 percent change
Standard Deviation 32.130
|
-60.43 percent change
Standard Deviation 40.923
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Pruritus NRS Score
Week 8
|
-55.69 percent change
Standard Deviation 30.791
|
-62.42 percent change
Standard Deviation 29.260
|
-66.94 percent change
Standard Deviation 34.327
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Pruritus NRS Score
Week 12
|
-59.59 percent change
Standard Deviation 29.263
|
-63.40 percent change
Standard Deviation 29.376
|
-69.71 percent change
Standard Deviation 34.020
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Pruritus NRS Score
Week 16
|
-65.85 percent change
Standard Deviation 28.875
|
-68.84 percent change
Standard Deviation 29.502
|
-75.35 percent change
Standard Deviation 31.973
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Pruritus NRS Score
Week 20
|
-63.23 percent change
Standard Deviation 28.263
|
-69.59 percent change
Standard Deviation 29.258
|
-76.24 percent change
Standard Deviation 32.756
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Pruritus NRS Score
Week 24
|
-66.58 percent change
Standard Deviation 29.303
|
-75.37 percent change
Standard Deviation 25.933
|
-79.72 percent change
Standard Deviation 28.575
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Pruritus NRS Score
Week 28
|
-67.41 percent change
Standard Deviation 27.925
|
-76.56 percent change
Standard Deviation 25.092
|
-80.01 percent change
Standard Deviation 28.807
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Pruritus NRS Score
Week 32
|
-67.17 percent change
Standard Deviation 27.445
|
-76.66 percent change
Standard Deviation 27.287
|
-78.86 percent change
Standard Deviation 27.818
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Pruritus NRS Score
Week 36
|
-72.15 percent change
Standard Deviation 26.282
|
-76.63 percent change
Standard Deviation 28.952
|
-81.52 percent change
Standard Deviation 26.943
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Pruritus NRS Score
Week 40
|
-71.45 percent change
Standard Deviation 25.950
|
-76.29 percent change
Standard Deviation 26.727
|
-83.27 percent change
Standard Deviation 25.987
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Pruritus NRS Score
Week 44
|
-71.06 percent change
Standard Deviation 26.279
|
-77.24 percent change
Standard Deviation 30.172
|
-85.78 percent change
Standard Deviation 21.530
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Pruritus NRS Score
Week 48
|
-69.56 percent change
Standard Deviation 28.108
|
-80.56 percent change
Standard Deviation 28.317
|
-87.22 percent change
Standard Deviation 20.586
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Pruritus NRS Score
Week 52
|
-71.11 percent change
Standard Deviation 26.493
|
-78.63 percent change
Standard Deviation 27.303
|
-85.40 percent change
Standard Deviation 24.213
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52Population: Analysis was performed on the ITT set. The ITT set consisted of all enrolled participants. Here, 'number analyzed' = participants with available data at each specified timepoint.
The sleep disturbance NRS is a scale used by the participants to report the degree of their sleep loss related to AD. Participants were asked the following questions in their local language: how would you rate your sleep last night? On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no sleep loss related to signs/symptoms of AD' and 10 being 'I cannot sleep at all due to the signs/symptoms of AD'. Higher scores indicated worse outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Aged 7-11 Year
n=36 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 10, 20 or 30 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 20, 40 or 60 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 1.1: Participants Aged 7-11 Years
n=37 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Aged 2-6 Years
n=36 Participants
Participants aged 2-6 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Sleep Disturbance NRS Score
Week 16
|
-4.02 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.770
|
-4.43 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.608
|
-5.50 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.590
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Sleep Disturbance NRS Score
Week 20
|
-3.90 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.968
|
-4.40 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.459
|
-5.43 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.646
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Sleep Disturbance NRS Score
Week 44
|
-4.22 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.032
|
-5.06 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.454
|
-5.93 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.218
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Sleep Disturbance NRS Score
Week 48
|
-4.28 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.013
|
-5.19 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.486
|
-5.98 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.235
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Sleep Disturbance NRS Score
Week 4
|
-2.22 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.731
|
-2.87 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.348
|
-4.49 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.038
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Sleep Disturbance NRS Score
Week 8
|
-3.22 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.957
|
-4.04 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.022
|
-4.91 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.637
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Sleep Disturbance NRS Score
Week 12
|
-3.58 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.875
|
-4.09 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.439
|
-5.26 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.758
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Sleep Disturbance NRS Score
Week 24
|
-4.05 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.947
|
-4.76 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.452
|
-5.79 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.358
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Sleep Disturbance NRS Score
Week 28
|
-4.10 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.903
|
-4.87 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.436
|
-5.70 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.382
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Sleep Disturbance NRS Score
Week 32
|
-4.24 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.014
|
-4.93 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.435
|
-5.69 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.449
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Sleep Disturbance NRS Score
Week 36
|
-4.27 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.948
|
-4.92 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.448
|
-5.75 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.408
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Sleep Disturbance NRS Score
Week 40
|
-4.29 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.977
|
-4.97 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.332
|
-5.99 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.338
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Sleep Disturbance NRS Score
Week 52
|
-4.25 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.830
|
-5.02 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.235
|
-5.87 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.262
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52Population: Analysis was performed on the ITT set. The ITT set consisted of all enrolled participants. Here, 'number analyzed' = participants with available data at each specified timepoint.
The sleep disturbance NRS is a scale used by the participants to report the degree of their sleep loss related to AD. Participants were asked the following questions in their local language: how would you rate your sleep last night? On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no sleep loss related to signs/symptoms of AD' and 10 being 'I cannot sleep at all due to the signs/symptoms of AD'. Higher scores indicated worse outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Aged 7-11 Year
n=36 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 10, 20 or 30 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 20, 40 or 60 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 1.1: Participants Aged 7-11 Years
n=37 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Aged 2-6 Years
n=36 Participants
Participants aged 2-6 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Sleep Disturbance NRS Score
Week 36
|
-73.75 percent change
Standard Deviation 26.730
|
-75.55 percent change
Standard Deviation 34.652
|
-81.62 percent change
Standard Deviation 27.706
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Sleep Disturbance NRS Score
Week 44
|
-73.08 percent change
Standard Deviation 28.123
|
-77.93 percent change
Standard Deviation 34.758
|
-84.54 percent change
Standard Deviation 24.702
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Sleep Disturbance NRS Score
Week 48
|
-72.93 percent change
Standard Deviation 28.940
|
-79.38 percent change
Standard Deviation 34.445
|
-86.16 percent change
Standard Deviation 24.318
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Sleep Disturbance NRS Score
Week 52
|
-75.37 percent change
Standard Deviation 25.904
|
-77.67 percent change
Standard Deviation 33.804
|
-84.52 percent change
Standard Deviation 25.893
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Sleep Disturbance NRS Score
Week 4
|
-39.21 percent change
Standard Deviation 29.647
|
-42.47 percent change
Standard Deviation 38.448
|
-62.43 percent change
Standard Deviation 39.978
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Sleep Disturbance NRS Score
Week 8
|
-56.84 percent change
Standard Deviation 31.138
|
-62.31 percent change
Standard Deviation 29.147
|
-70.03 percent change
Standard Deviation 34.843
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Sleep Disturbance NRS Score
Week 12
|
-61.78 percent change
Standard Deviation 28.132
|
-61.71 percent change
Standard Deviation 34.954
|
-73.73 percent change
Standard Deviation 34.420
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Sleep Disturbance NRS Score
Week 16
|
-69.67 percent change
Standard Deviation 23.842
|
-66.11 percent change
Standard Deviation 36.736
|
-77.79 percent change
Standard Deviation 31.422
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Sleep Disturbance NRS Score
Week 20
|
-68.61 percent change
Standard Deviation 27.927
|
-67.56 percent change
Standard Deviation 35.387
|
-77.67 percent change
Standard Deviation 32.456
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Sleep Disturbance NRS Score
Week 24
|
-68.90 percent change
Standard Deviation 28.233
|
-72.08 percent change
Standard Deviation 34.295
|
-82.82 percent change
Standard Deviation 27.889
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Sleep Disturbance NRS Score
Week 28
|
-71.86 percent change
Standard Deviation 26.979
|
-73.97 percent change
Standard Deviation 34.922
|
-81.60 percent change
Standard Deviation 28.432
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Sleep Disturbance NRS Score
Week 32
|
-71.80 percent change
Standard Deviation 27.867
|
-74.49 percent change
Standard Deviation 34.085
|
-81.22 percent change
Standard Deviation 28.812
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Sleep Disturbance NRS Score
Week 40
|
-72.04 percent change
Standard Deviation 27.324
|
-76.49 percent change
Standard Deviation 32.641
|
-84.88 percent change
Standard Deviation 27.123
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline up to Week 52Population: Analysis was performed on the ITT set. The ITT set consisted of all enrolled participants.
Percentage of participants receiving any rescue therapy by rescue treatment was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Aged 7-11 Year
n=36 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 10, 20 or 30 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 20, 40 or 60 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 1.1: Participants Aged 7-11 Years
n=37 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Aged 2-6 Years
n=36 Participants
Participants aged 2-6 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Receiving Any Rescue Therapy by Rescue Treatment
|
13.9 percentage of participants
|
2.7 percentage of participants
|
5.6 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52Population: Analysis was performed on the ITT set. The ITT set consisted of all enrolled participants. Here, 'number analyzed' = participants with available data at each specified timepoint.
SCORAD is a clinical tool for assessing the severity and the extent of AD signs and symptoms. Extent and intensity of eczema as well as subjective signs (insomnia, etc.) are assessed and scored. Total score ranged from 0 (absent disease) to 103 (severe disease), a higher score indicated severe disease.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Aged 7-11 Year
n=36 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 10, 20 or 30 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 20, 40 or 60 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 1.1: Participants Aged 7-11 Years
n=37 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Aged 2-6 Years
n=36 Participants
Participants aged 2-6 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score
Week 4
|
-35.91 percent change
Standard Deviation 21.912
|
-49.08 percent change
Standard Deviation 24.712
|
-55.04 percent change
Standard Deviation 21.867
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score
Week 8
|
-50.33 percent change
Standard Deviation 20.729
|
-59.01 percent change
Standard Deviation 20.163
|
-61.09 percent change
Standard Deviation 26.870
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score
Week 12
|
-58.29 percent change
Standard Deviation 22.692
|
-63.16 percent change
Standard Deviation 20.228
|
-70.53 percent change
Standard Deviation 20.369
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score
Week 16
|
-58.98 percent change
Standard Deviation 22.159
|
-67.97 percent change
Standard Deviation 18.005
|
-68.07 percent change
Standard Deviation 24.199
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score
Week 20
|
-58.82 percent change
Standard Deviation 22.867
|
-72.33 percent change
Standard Deviation 17.542
|
-75.46 percent change
Standard Deviation 22.982
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score
Week 24
|
-58.83 percent change
Standard Deviation 24.493
|
-76.31 percent change
Standard Deviation 13.598
|
-76.18 percent change
Standard Deviation 21.189
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score
Week 28
|
-65.51 percent change
Standard Deviation 20.193
|
-73.53 percent change
Standard Deviation 15.894
|
-80.23 percent change
Standard Deviation 21.501
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score
Week 32
|
-59.52 percent change
Standard Deviation 27.109
|
-76.59 percent change
Standard Deviation 15.176
|
-75.58 percent change
Standard Deviation 18.677
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score
Week 36
|
-66.96 percent change
Standard Deviation 22.759
|
-72.88 percent change
Standard Deviation 15.971
|
-75.29 percent change
Standard Deviation 19.712
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score
Week 40
|
-68.57 percent change
Standard Deviation 20.930
|
-71.55 percent change
Standard Deviation 17.978
|
-74.90 percent change
Standard Deviation 22.125
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score
Week 44
|
-73.70 percent change
Standard Deviation 17.943
|
-71.51 percent change
Standard Deviation 18.440
|
-77.16 percent change
Standard Deviation 19.573
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score
Week 48
|
-73.29 percent change
Standard Deviation 19.494
|
-72.97 percent change
Standard Deviation 24.220
|
-76.82 percent change
Standard Deviation 18.174
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score
Week 52
|
-72.03 percent change
Standard Deviation 17.223
|
-74.60 percent change
Standard Deviation 20.382
|
-79.09 percent change
Standard Deviation 19.268
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16 and Week 52Population: Analysis was performed on the ITT set. The ITT set consisted of all enrolled participants. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this outcome measure and 'number analyzed' = participants with available data at each specified timepoint.
The DLQI is a validated 10-item questionnaire covering domains including symptoms/feelings, daily activities, leisure, work/school, personal relationships, and treatment. The participant rated each question ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much) and score ranged from 0 to 30. A higher total score indicated a poorer quality of life (QoL).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Aged 7-11 Year
n=32 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 10, 20 or 30 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 20, 40 or 60 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 1.1: Participants Aged 7-11 Years
n=35 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Aged 2-6 Years
n=21 Participants
Participants aged 2-6 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (cDLQI) For Participants >=4 Years of Age
Week 16
|
-9.78 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.966
|
-10.80 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.411
|
-10.52 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.662
|
|
Change From Baseline in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (cDLQI) For Participants >=4 Years of Age
Week 52
|
-10.72 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.519
|
-11.97 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.037
|
-12.00 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.231
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16 and Week 52Population: Analysis was performed on the ITT set. The ITT set consisted of all enrolled participants. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this outcome measure and 'number analyzed' = participants with available data at each specified timepoint. Data is reported for arm Cohort 2: Participants Aged 2-6 Years.
The DLQI is a validated 10-item questionnaire covering domains including symptoms/feelings, daily activities, leisure, work/school, personal relationships, and treatment. The participant rated each question ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much) and score ranged from 0 to 30. A higher total score indicated a poorer QoL.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Aged 7-11 Year
n=12 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 10, 20 or 30 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 20, 40 or 60 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 1.1: Participants Aged 7-11 Years
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Aged 2-6 Years
Participants aged 2-6 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Infants' Dermatology Life Quality Index (iDLQI) Score For Participants Less Than (<) 4 Years of Age
Week 16
|
-13.00 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.492
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Infants' Dermatology Life Quality Index (iDLQI) Score For Participants Less Than (<) 4 Years of Age
Week 52
|
-13.27 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.915
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16 and Week 52Population: Analysis was performed on the ITT set. The ITT set consisted of all enrolled participants. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this outcome measure and 'number analyzed' = participants with available data at each specified timepoint.
The POEM is a 7-item questionnaire that assessed disease symptoms (dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding and weeping) with a scoring system of 0 (absent disease) to 28 (severe disease). A high score indicated poor QOL.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Aged 7-11 Year
n=32 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 10, 20 or 30 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 20, 40 or 60 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 1.1: Participants Aged 7-11 Years
n=35 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Aged 2-6 Years
n=33 Participants
Participants aged 2-6 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM)
Week 52
|
-13.31 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.398
|
-14.77 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.026
|
-15.53 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.375
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM)
Week 16
|
-12.31 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.851
|
-13.71 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.939
|
-12.09 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.013
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 52Population: Analysis was performed on PK Set. The PK Set consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and have at least one measurable post-baseline concentration.
The relationship between nemolizumab serum concentrations and changes in PP-NRS score was established using population point estimate of IC50, where IC50 is the concentration leading to half of the maximum drug-induced reduction (Imax) in PP NRS.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Aged 7-11 Year
n=109 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 10, 20 or 30 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 20, 40 or 60 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 1.1: Participants Aged 7-11 Years
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Aged 2-6 Years
Participants aged 2-6 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Pharmacokinetic (PK)/Pharmacodynamic (PD) Relationship Between Nemolizumab Serum Concentration and Changes in PP NRS
|
0.719 ug/mL
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 52Population: Analysis was performed on PK Set. The PK Set consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and have at least one measurable post-baseline concentration.
The relationship between nemolizumab serum concentrations and changes in EASI score was established using population point estimate of IC50. Where, IC50 is the concentration leading to half of the maximum drug-induced reduction (Imax) in EASI score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Aged 7-11 Year
n=109 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 10, 20 or 30 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 20, 40 or 60 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 1.1: Participants Aged 7-11 Years
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Aged 2-6 Years
Participants aged 2-6 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
PK/PD Relationship Between Nemolizumab Serum Concentration and Changes in EASI Score
|
4.58 ug/mL
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 52Population: Analysis was performed on PK Set. The PK Set consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and have at least one measurable post-baseline concentration.
The relationship between nemolizumab serum concentrations and changes in IGA score was established using the population point estimate of the slope parameter.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Aged 7-11 Year
n=109 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 10, 20 or 30 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 20, 40 or 60 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 1.1: Participants Aged 7-11 Years
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Aged 2-6 Years
Participants aged 2-6 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
PK/PD Relationship Between Nemolizumab Serum Concentration and Changes in IGA Score
|
0.09160 liter per micrograms (L/ug)
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16 and Week 52Population: Analysis was performed on the ITT set. The ITT set consisted of all enrolled participants.
ADA positive was defined as a sample that was evaluated as positive in both the ADA screening and confirmatory assays. ADA positive participants was defined as participants who had at least 1 positive ADA result.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Aged 7-11 Year
n=36 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 10, 20 or 30 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 20, 40 or 60 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 1.1: Participants Aged 7-11 Years
n=37 Participants
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Aged 2-6 Years
n=36 Participants
Participants aged 2-6 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) for Nemolizumab
Week 52
|
3 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) for Nemolizumab
Week 16
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Cohort 1: Participants Aged 7-11 Year
Cohort 1.1: Participants Aged 7-11 Years
Cohort 2: Participants Aged 2-6 Years
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Aged 7-11 Year
n=36 participants at risk
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 10, 20 or 30 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 20, 40 or 60 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 1.1: Participants Aged 7-11 Years
n=37 participants at risk
Participants aged 7-11 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Aged 2-6 Years
n=36 participants at risk
Participants aged 2-6 years received SC injection of 5, 10 or 15 mg nemolizumab, Q4W for 52 weeks with a loading dose of 10, 20 or 30 mg at Day 1 based on the body weight.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Asymptomatic COVID-19
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
5.6%
2/36 • Number of events 3 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
8.1%
3/37 • Number of events 4 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
16.7%
6/36 • Number of events 7 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bullous impetigo
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Conjunctivitis
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
8.3%
3/36 • Number of events 3 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Conjunctivitis bacterial
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Covid-19
|
5.6%
2/36 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cystitis
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Eczema herpeticum
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Folliculitis
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
5.6%
2/36 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
8.3%
3/36 • Number of events 3 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis viral
|
5.6%
2/36 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastrointestinal viral infection
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 3 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Hand-foot-and-mouth disease
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes simplex
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes virus infection
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Impetigo
|
11.1%
4/36 • Number of events 5 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
8.3%
3/36 • Number of events 3 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
16.7%
6/36 • Number of events 6 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Labyrinthitis
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Laryngitis
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lower respiratory tract infection
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Molluscum contagiosum
|
5.6%
2/36 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
5.6%
2/36 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
18.9%
7/37 • Number of events 15 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
16.7%
6/36 • Number of events 8 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Oral herpes
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Otitis media
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
8.3%
3/36 • Number of events 3 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis
|
8.3%
3/36 • Number of events 3 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis bacterial
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis streptococcal
|
5.6%
2/36 • Number of events 5 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Respiratory tract infection
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
5.6%
2/36 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Staphylococcal skin infection
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tonsillitis
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tonsillitis streptococcal
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
30.6%
11/36 • Number of events 18 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
29.7%
11/37 • Number of events 24 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
44.4%
16/36 • Number of events 29 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
8.3%
3/36 • Number of events 3 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Varicella
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
13.9%
5/36 • Number of events 5 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral infection
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral rash
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral upper respiratory tract infection
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Arthropod bite
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Head injury
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Humerus fracture
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ligament sprain
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Skin injury
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Wrist fracture
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Asthma
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 3 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Grunting
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinitis allergic
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinorrhoea
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Tonsillar hypertrophy
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
8.3%
3/36 • Number of events 3 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Wheezing
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis atopic
|
8.3%
3/36 • Number of events 3 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
8.1%
3/37 • Number of events 3 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
5.6%
2/36 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis contact
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pityriasis
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pityriasis rosea
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Urticaria
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Lip swelling
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Toothache
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Blood alkaline phosphatase increased
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatine phosphokinase increased
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Electrocardiogram QT prolonged
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Eosinophil count increased
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Peak expiratory flow rate decreased
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Urine analysis abnormal
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Eosinophilia
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphadenitis
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Microcytic anaemia
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Haematuria
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Proteinuria
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site erythema
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
5.6%
2/36 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Congenital, familial and genetic disorders
Phimosis
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Ear inflammation
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Ear pain
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Allergy to animal
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Breast hyperplasia
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Tachycardia
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Eye disorders
Astigmatism
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Eye disorders
Hypermetropia
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Eye disorders
Myopia
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Overweight
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Vitamin d deficiency
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myokymia
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Skin papilloma
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
0.00%
0/36 • From Baseline up to Week 60
Analysis was performed on the safety set. The safety set consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER