Periotome Versus Peizotome as an Aid of Atraumatic Extraction.

NCT04915443 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 19

Last updated 2021-06-10

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study aims to compare between periotome and piezotome in terms of efficiency and durability in procedures of simple extractions as an alternative atraumatic extraction technique.

Conditions

  • Dental Extraction
  • Dental Implant

Interventions

DEVICE

Periotome

Dental instrument used to perform atraumatic dental extraction. After the initial de attachment, the periotome was inserted between the root and the bone parallel to the long axis of the root and pushed apically to the maximum depth that the tissue allowes severing the PDL and leaving it for 10-15 seconds allowing the biomechanical creep to occur. This proses is repeated at different points of entries at all the different surfaces of the tooth.

DEVICE

Piezotome

Dental device used for many purposes one of which is performing atraumatic dental extraction. An LC2 tip was used for all the procedures and it was inserted between the tooth root and the bone parallel to the long axis of the root and moved in a sweeping motion 3-4mm toward the apex severing the PDL.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Qassim University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • DAYASHANKARA JK RAO, MDS,MFDSRCS · College of Dentistry Qassim University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
62 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2019-12-02
Primary Completion
2021-03-16
Completion
2021-03-16

Countries

  • Saudi Arabia

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04915443 on ClinicalTrials.gov