Trial Outcomes & Findings for Acute Intermittent Hypoxia in Traumatic Brain Injury (NCT NCT04890639)

NCT ID: NCT04890639

Last Updated: 2026-02-18

Results Overview

Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events as assessed by concerning change in blood pressure, SpO2, and heart rate from baseline, as reviewed and determined by the medical monitor.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

12 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Visit 2 (AIH session #1, 21% O2, sham), conducted 1-6 days after baseline assessment in Visit 1

Results posted on

2026-02-18

Participant Flow

Participants were recruited through physician referrals, outreach via research registries, flyers and online ads distributed within the Shirley Ryan AbilityLab and other Northwestern-affiliated hospitals. Twelve participants were enrolled into the study between March 2022 and January 2024.

All participants underwent the same treatment protocol.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
AIH Group
All participants completed six research visits to the Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, including four AIH treatment sessions (Visits 2-5), as well as the pre- and post-treatment assessments of motor, cognitive and affective function (Visits 1 and 6 respectively). During each of the four AIH interventions administered in Visits 2 through 5, the participants received brief bouts of reduced oxygen (O2), that they inhaled through a non-rebreathing face mask. The gas mixture was delivered using a customized Hyp-123 device (Hypoxico, Gardiner, NY), and O2 concentrations were monitored using a Maxtec Handi+ oxygen analyzer (Maxtec, Salt Lake City, UT). Participants' peripheral oxygen saturation levels (SpO2) and heart rate (HR) were monitored in real time with a Nonin 7500 pulse oximeter (Nonin Medical Inc., Plymouth, MN). To assess the potential changes in corticospinal excitability associated with the AIH intervention, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied to the left primary motor cortex 45 min after completing the AIH intervention in Visit 2 and Visit 5, and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the first dorsal interosseous muscle of the right hand. In addition to an extensive behavioral testing battery administered in Visit 1 and Visit 6, a brief assessment of motor, cognitive and affective function was administered 60 min after the completion of each AIH intervention in Visits 2 through 5.
Overall Study
STARTED
12
Overall Study
COMPLETED
12
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Acute Intermittent Hypoxia in Traumatic Brain Injury

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
AIH Group
n=12 Participants
All participants completed six research visits to the Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, including four AIH treatment sessions (Visits 2-5), as well as the pre- and post-treatment assessments of motor, cognitive and affective function (Visits 1 and 6 respectively). During each of the four AIH interventions administered in Visits 2 through 5, the participants received brief bouts of reduced oxygen (O2), that they inhaled through a non-rebreathing face mask. The gas mixture was delivered using a customized Hyp-123 device (Hypoxico, Gardiner, NY), and O2 concentrations were monitored using a Maxtec Handi+ oxygen analyzer (Maxtec, Salt Lake City, UT). Participants' peripheral oxygen saturation levels (SpO2) and heart rate (HR) were monitored in real time with a Nonin 7500 pulse oximeter (Nonin Medical Inc., Plymouth, MN). To assess the potential changes in corticospinal excitability associated with the AIH intervention, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied to the left primary motor cortex 45 min after completing the AIH intervention in Visit 2 and Visit 5, and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the first dorsal interosseous muscle of the right hand. In addition to an extensive behavioral testing battery administered in Visit 1 and Visit 6, a brief assessment of motor, cognitive and affective function was administered 60 min after the completion of each AIH intervention in Visits 2 through 5.
Age, Continuous
44.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3 • n=4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants
n=4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
8 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
11 Participants
n=4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
12 Participants
n=4 Participants
Months since injury
41.4 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27.4 • n=4 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Visit 2 (AIH session #1, 21% O2, sham), conducted 1-6 days after baseline assessment in Visit 1

Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events as assessed by concerning change in blood pressure, SpO2, and heart rate from baseline, as reviewed and determined by the medical monitor.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
AIH Group
n=12 Participants
All participants completed six research visits to the Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, including four AIH treatment sessions (Visits 2-5), as well as the pre- and post-treatment assessments of motor, cognitive and affective function (Visits 1 and 6 respectively). During each of the four AIH interventions administered in Visits 2 through 5, the participants received brief bouts of reduced oxygen (O2), that they inhaled through a non-rebreathing face mask. The gas mixture was delivered using a customized Hyp-123 device (Hypoxico, Gardiner, NY), and O2 concentrations were monitored using a Maxtec Handi+ oxygen analyzer (Maxtec, Salt Lake City, UT). Participants' peripheral oxygen saturation levels (SpO2) and heart rate (HR) were monitored in real time with a Nonin 7500 pulse oximeter (Nonin Medical Inc., Plymouth, MN). To assess the potential changes in corticospinal excitability associated with the AIH intervention, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied to the left primary motor cortex 45 min after completing the AIH intervention in Visit 2 and Visit 5, and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the first dorsal interosseous muscle of the right hand. In addition to an extensive behavioral testing battery administered in Visit 1 and Visit 6, a brief assessment of motor, cognitive and affective function was administered 60 min after the completion of each AIH intervention in Visits 2 through 5.
Change in Vitals at Visit 2
0 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Visit 3 (AIH session #2, 17% O2), conducted 1-5 days after Visit 2 (i.e., 2-7 days after baseline)

Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events as assessed by concerning change in blood pressure, SpO2, and heart rate from baseline, as reviewed and determined by the medical monitor.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
AIH Group
n=12 Participants
All participants completed six research visits to the Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, including four AIH treatment sessions (Visits 2-5), as well as the pre- and post-treatment assessments of motor, cognitive and affective function (Visits 1 and 6 respectively). During each of the four AIH interventions administered in Visits 2 through 5, the participants received brief bouts of reduced oxygen (O2), that they inhaled through a non-rebreathing face mask. The gas mixture was delivered using a customized Hyp-123 device (Hypoxico, Gardiner, NY), and O2 concentrations were monitored using a Maxtec Handi+ oxygen analyzer (Maxtec, Salt Lake City, UT). Participants' peripheral oxygen saturation levels (SpO2) and heart rate (HR) were monitored in real time with a Nonin 7500 pulse oximeter (Nonin Medical Inc., Plymouth, MN). To assess the potential changes in corticospinal excitability associated with the AIH intervention, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied to the left primary motor cortex 45 min after completing the AIH intervention in Visit 2 and Visit 5, and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the first dorsal interosseous muscle of the right hand. In addition to an extensive behavioral testing battery administered in Visit 1 and Visit 6, a brief assessment of motor, cognitive and affective function was administered 60 min after the completion of each AIH intervention in Visits 2 through 5.
Change in Vitals at Visit 3
0 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Visit 4 (AIH session #3, 13% O2), conducted 1-5 days after Visit 3 (i.e., 6-12 days after baseline)

Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events as assessed by concerning change in blood pressure, SpO2, and heart rate from baseline, as reviewed and determined by the medical monitor.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
AIH Group
n=12 Participants
All participants completed six research visits to the Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, including four AIH treatment sessions (Visits 2-5), as well as the pre- and post-treatment assessments of motor, cognitive and affective function (Visits 1 and 6 respectively). During each of the four AIH interventions administered in Visits 2 through 5, the participants received brief bouts of reduced oxygen (O2), that they inhaled through a non-rebreathing face mask. The gas mixture was delivered using a customized Hyp-123 device (Hypoxico, Gardiner, NY), and O2 concentrations were monitored using a Maxtec Handi+ oxygen analyzer (Maxtec, Salt Lake City, UT). Participants' peripheral oxygen saturation levels (SpO2) and heart rate (HR) were monitored in real time with a Nonin 7500 pulse oximeter (Nonin Medical Inc., Plymouth, MN). To assess the potential changes in corticospinal excitability associated with the AIH intervention, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied to the left primary motor cortex 45 min after completing the AIH intervention in Visit 2 and Visit 5, and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the first dorsal interosseous muscle of the right hand. In addition to an extensive behavioral testing battery administered in Visit 1 and Visit 6, a brief assessment of motor, cognitive and affective function was administered 60 min after the completion of each AIH intervention in Visits 2 through 5.
Change in Vitals at Visit 4
0 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Visit 5 (AIH session #4, 9% O2), conducted 2-6 days after Visit 4 (i.e., 8-14 days after baseline)

Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events as assessed by concerning change in blood pressure, SpO2, and heart rate from baseline, as reviewed and determined by the medical monitor.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
AIH Group
n=12 Participants
All participants completed six research visits to the Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, including four AIH treatment sessions (Visits 2-5), as well as the pre- and post-treatment assessments of motor, cognitive and affective function (Visits 1 and 6 respectively). During each of the four AIH interventions administered in Visits 2 through 5, the participants received brief bouts of reduced oxygen (O2), that they inhaled through a non-rebreathing face mask. The gas mixture was delivered using a customized Hyp-123 device (Hypoxico, Gardiner, NY), and O2 concentrations were monitored using a Maxtec Handi+ oxygen analyzer (Maxtec, Salt Lake City, UT). Participants' peripheral oxygen saturation levels (SpO2) and heart rate (HR) were monitored in real time with a Nonin 7500 pulse oximeter (Nonin Medical Inc., Plymouth, MN). To assess the potential changes in corticospinal excitability associated with the AIH intervention, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied to the left primary motor cortex 45 min after completing the AIH intervention in Visit 2 and Visit 5, and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the first dorsal interosseous muscle of the right hand. In addition to an extensive behavioral testing battery administered in Visit 1 and Visit 6, a brief assessment of motor, cognitive and affective function was administered 60 min after the completion of each AIH intervention in Visits 2 through 5.
Change in Vitals at Visit 5
0 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Visit 2 (AIH session #1, 21% O2, sham), conducted 1-6 days after baseline assessment in Visit 1

Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events as assessed by the presence of "Yes" responses on a verbally-administered 9-item "Yes/No" subjective symptom checklist, as reviewed and determined by the medical monitor. The nine symptoms on this checklist are as follows: 1) chest pain, 2) shortness of breath, 3) lightheadedness, 4) neck pain, 5) dizziness, 6) arm pain (left side for cardiac symptoms), 7) sweatiness/feeling warm, 8) sensory changes (new signs of numbness), 9) increased weakness. Participants will be asked if they are experiencing any of the above symptoms at the 2-minute, 6-minute, 14-minute, 24-minute, and 30-minute timepoints throughout an AIH session.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
AIH Group
n=12 Participants
All participants completed six research visits to the Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, including four AIH treatment sessions (Visits 2-5), as well as the pre- and post-treatment assessments of motor, cognitive and affective function (Visits 1 and 6 respectively). During each of the four AIH interventions administered in Visits 2 through 5, the participants received brief bouts of reduced oxygen (O2), that they inhaled through a non-rebreathing face mask. The gas mixture was delivered using a customized Hyp-123 device (Hypoxico, Gardiner, NY), and O2 concentrations were monitored using a Maxtec Handi+ oxygen analyzer (Maxtec, Salt Lake City, UT). Participants' peripheral oxygen saturation levels (SpO2) and heart rate (HR) were monitored in real time with a Nonin 7500 pulse oximeter (Nonin Medical Inc., Plymouth, MN). To assess the potential changes in corticospinal excitability associated with the AIH intervention, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied to the left primary motor cortex 45 min after completing the AIH intervention in Visit 2 and Visit 5, and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the first dorsal interosseous muscle of the right hand. In addition to an extensive behavioral testing battery administered in Visit 1 and Visit 6, a brief assessment of motor, cognitive and affective function was administered 60 min after the completion of each AIH intervention in Visits 2 through 5.
Change in Symptoms at Visit 2
Chest pain
0 Participants
Change in Symptoms at Visit 2
Shortness of breath
0 Participants
Change in Symptoms at Visit 2
Lightheadedness
0 Participants
Change in Symptoms at Visit 2
Neck pain
0 Participants
Change in Symptoms at Visit 2
Dizziness
0 Participants
Change in Symptoms at Visit 2
Arm pain
0 Participants
Change in Symptoms at Visit 2
Sweatiness/feeling warm
0 Participants
Change in Symptoms at Visit 2
New numbness
0 Participants
Change in Symptoms at Visit 2
Increased weakness
0 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Visit 3 (AIH session #2, 17% O2), conducted 1-5 days after Visit 2 (i.e., 2-7 days after baseline)

Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events as assessed by the presence of "Yes" responses on a verbally-administered 9-item "Yes/No" subjective symptom checklist, as reviewed and determined by the medical monitor. The nine symptoms on this checklist are as follows: 1) chest pain, 2) shortness of breath, 3) lightheadedness, 4) neck pain, 5) dizziness, 6) arm pain (left side for cardiac symptoms), 7) sweatiness/feeling warm, 8) sensory changes (new signs of numbness), 9) increased weakness. Participants will be asked if they are experiencing any of the above symptoms at the 2-minute, 6-minute, 14-minute, 24-minute, and 30-minute timepoints throughout an AIH session.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
AIH Group
n=12 Participants
All participants completed six research visits to the Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, including four AIH treatment sessions (Visits 2-5), as well as the pre- and post-treatment assessments of motor, cognitive and affective function (Visits 1 and 6 respectively). During each of the four AIH interventions administered in Visits 2 through 5, the participants received brief bouts of reduced oxygen (O2), that they inhaled through a non-rebreathing face mask. The gas mixture was delivered using a customized Hyp-123 device (Hypoxico, Gardiner, NY), and O2 concentrations were monitored using a Maxtec Handi+ oxygen analyzer (Maxtec, Salt Lake City, UT). Participants' peripheral oxygen saturation levels (SpO2) and heart rate (HR) were monitored in real time with a Nonin 7500 pulse oximeter (Nonin Medical Inc., Plymouth, MN). To assess the potential changes in corticospinal excitability associated with the AIH intervention, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied to the left primary motor cortex 45 min after completing the AIH intervention in Visit 2 and Visit 5, and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the first dorsal interosseous muscle of the right hand. In addition to an extensive behavioral testing battery administered in Visit 1 and Visit 6, a brief assessment of motor, cognitive and affective function was administered 60 min after the completion of each AIH intervention in Visits 2 through 5.
Change in Symptoms at Visit 3
Chest pain
0 Participants
Change in Symptoms at Visit 3
Shortness of breath
0 Participants
Change in Symptoms at Visit 3
Lightheadedness
0 Participants
Change in Symptoms at Visit 3
Neck pain
0 Participants
Change in Symptoms at Visit 3
Dizziness
0 Participants
Change in Symptoms at Visit 3
Arm pain
0 Participants
Change in Symptoms at Visit 3
Sweatiness/feeling warm
0 Participants
Change in Symptoms at Visit 3
New numbness
0 Participants
Change in Symptoms at Visit 3
Increased weakness
0 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Visit 4 (AIH session #3, 13% O2), conducted 1-5 days after Visit 3 (i.e., 6-12 days after baseline)

Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events as assessed by the presence of "Yes" responses on a verbally-administered 9-item "Yes/No" subjective symptom checklist, as reviewed and determined by the medical monitor. The nine symptoms on this checklist are as follows: 1) chest pain, 2) shortness of breath, 3) lightheadedness, 4) neck pain, 5) dizziness, 6) arm pain (left side for cardiac symptoms), 7) sweatiness/feeling warm, 8) sensory changes (new signs of numbness), 9) increased weakness. Participants will be asked if they are experiencing any of the above symptoms at the 2-minute, 6-minute, 14-minute, 24-minute, and 30-minute timepoints throughout an AIH session.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
AIH Group
n=12 Participants
All participants completed six research visits to the Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, including four AIH treatment sessions (Visits 2-5), as well as the pre- and post-treatment assessments of motor, cognitive and affective function (Visits 1 and 6 respectively). During each of the four AIH interventions administered in Visits 2 through 5, the participants received brief bouts of reduced oxygen (O2), that they inhaled through a non-rebreathing face mask. The gas mixture was delivered using a customized Hyp-123 device (Hypoxico, Gardiner, NY), and O2 concentrations were monitored using a Maxtec Handi+ oxygen analyzer (Maxtec, Salt Lake City, UT). Participants' peripheral oxygen saturation levels (SpO2) and heart rate (HR) were monitored in real time with a Nonin 7500 pulse oximeter (Nonin Medical Inc., Plymouth, MN). To assess the potential changes in corticospinal excitability associated with the AIH intervention, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied to the left primary motor cortex 45 min after completing the AIH intervention in Visit 2 and Visit 5, and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the first dorsal interosseous muscle of the right hand. In addition to an extensive behavioral testing battery administered in Visit 1 and Visit 6, a brief assessment of motor, cognitive and affective function was administered 60 min after the completion of each AIH intervention in Visits 2 through 5.
Change in Symptoms at Visit 4
Chest pain
0 Participants
Change in Symptoms at Visit 4
Shortness of breath
0 Participants
Change in Symptoms at Visit 4
Lightheadedness
2 Participants
Change in Symptoms at Visit 4
Neck pain
0 Participants
Change in Symptoms at Visit 4
Dizziness
0 Participants
Change in Symptoms at Visit 4
Arm pain
0 Participants
Change in Symptoms at Visit 4
Sweatiness/feeling warm
0 Participants
Change in Symptoms at Visit 4
New numbness
0 Participants
Change in Symptoms at Visit 4
Increased weakness
0 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Visit 5 (AIH session #4, 9% O2), conducted 2-6 days after Visit 4 (i.e., 8-14 days after baseline)

Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events as assessed by the presence of "Yes" responses on a verbally-administered 9-item "Yes/No" subjective symptom checklist, as reviewed and determined by the medical monitor. The nine symptoms on this checklist are as follows: 1) chest pain, 2) shortness of breath, 3) lightheadedness, 4) neck pain, 5) dizziness, 6) arm pain (left side for cardiac symptoms), 7) sweatiness/feeling warm, 8) sensory changes (new signs of numbness), 9) increased weakness. Participants will be asked if they are experiencing any of the above symptoms at the 2-minute, 6-minute, 14-minute, 24-minute, and 30-minute timepoints throughout an AIH session.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
AIH Group
n=12 Participants
All participants completed six research visits to the Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, including four AIH treatment sessions (Visits 2-5), as well as the pre- and post-treatment assessments of motor, cognitive and affective function (Visits 1 and 6 respectively). During each of the four AIH interventions administered in Visits 2 through 5, the participants received brief bouts of reduced oxygen (O2), that they inhaled through a non-rebreathing face mask. The gas mixture was delivered using a customized Hyp-123 device (Hypoxico, Gardiner, NY), and O2 concentrations were monitored using a Maxtec Handi+ oxygen analyzer (Maxtec, Salt Lake City, UT). Participants' peripheral oxygen saturation levels (SpO2) and heart rate (HR) were monitored in real time with a Nonin 7500 pulse oximeter (Nonin Medical Inc., Plymouth, MN). To assess the potential changes in corticospinal excitability associated with the AIH intervention, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied to the left primary motor cortex 45 min after completing the AIH intervention in Visit 2 and Visit 5, and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the first dorsal interosseous muscle of the right hand. In addition to an extensive behavioral testing battery administered in Visit 1 and Visit 6, a brief assessment of motor, cognitive and affective function was administered 60 min after the completion of each AIH intervention in Visits 2 through 5.
Change in Symptoms at Visit 5
Chest pain
0 Participants
Change in Symptoms at Visit 5
Shortness of breath
0 Participants
Change in Symptoms at Visit 5
Lightheadedness
1 Participants
Change in Symptoms at Visit 5
Neck pain
0 Participants
Change in Symptoms at Visit 5
Dizziness
0 Participants
Change in Symptoms at Visit 5
Arm pain
0 Participants
Change in Symptoms at Visit 5
Sweatiness/feeling warm
0 Participants
Change in Symptoms at Visit 5
New numbness
0 Participants
Change in Symptoms at Visit 5
Increased weakness
0 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Visit 1 (baseline) and Visit 6 (i.e., 9-17 days after baseline)

Population: One participant was excluded from the Coding Task that requires writing digits on a piece of paper in Visit 6 due to a right (dominant) arm fracture sustained three days prior. Since the Coding Task score is accounted for in the Attention Cognitive Domain score, it was computed only for the eleven remaining subjects.

The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Update consists of twelve subtests that are used to compute Index scores on five cognitive domains, including Immediate Memory, Delayed Memory, Visuospatial/Constructional Abilities, Language, and Attention. Index scores on each domain range between 40 and 160. Lower scores correspond to greater cognitive deficits.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
AIH Group
n=12 Participants
All participants completed six research visits to the Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, including four AIH treatment sessions (Visits 2-5), as well as the pre- and post-treatment assessments of motor, cognitive and affective function (Visits 1 and 6 respectively). During each of the four AIH interventions administered in Visits 2 through 5, the participants received brief bouts of reduced oxygen (O2), that they inhaled through a non-rebreathing face mask. The gas mixture was delivered using a customized Hyp-123 device (Hypoxico, Gardiner, NY), and O2 concentrations were monitored using a Maxtec Handi+ oxygen analyzer (Maxtec, Salt Lake City, UT). Participants' peripheral oxygen saturation levels (SpO2) and heart rate (HR) were monitored in real time with a Nonin 7500 pulse oximeter (Nonin Medical Inc., Plymouth, MN). To assess the potential changes in corticospinal excitability associated with the AIH intervention, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied to the left primary motor cortex 45 min after completing the AIH intervention in Visit 2 and Visit 5, and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the first dorsal interosseous muscle of the right hand. In addition to an extensive behavioral testing battery administered in Visit 1 and Visit 6, a brief assessment of motor, cognitive and affective function was administered 60 min after the completion of each AIH intervention in Visits 2 through 5.
Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Scores
Immediate Memory, Visit 1
98.83 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.56
Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Scores
Immediate Memory, Visit 6
102.33 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.43
Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Scores
Visuospatial/Constructional Abilities, Visit 1
97.17 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.83
Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Scores
Visuospatial/Constructional Abilities, Visit 6
93.50 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.09
Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Scores
Language, Visit 1
106.17 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.66
Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Scores
Language, Visit 6
101.25 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.02
Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Scores
Attention, Visit 1
104.82 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.45
Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Scores
Attention, Visit 6
105.64 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.33
Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Scores
Delayed Memory, Visit 1
94.75 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.05
Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Scores
Delayed Memory, Visit 6
90.58 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.70

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Visit 1 (baseline) and Visit 6 (i.e., 9-17 days after baseline)

The California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT-II) is a multi-trial word learning test that evaluates verbal memory performance. The test measures Immediate Free Recall (possible score range: 0-80), Short-Delay Free Recall (0-16), Short-Delay Cued Recall (0-16), Long-Delay Free Recall (0-16), Long-Delay Cued Recall (0-16), and Long-Delay Recognition (0-16). The score on each subscale represents the number of correct responses. Higher scores indicate better memory.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
AIH Group
n=12 Participants
All participants completed six research visits to the Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, including four AIH treatment sessions (Visits 2-5), as well as the pre- and post-treatment assessments of motor, cognitive and affective function (Visits 1 and 6 respectively). During each of the four AIH interventions administered in Visits 2 through 5, the participants received brief bouts of reduced oxygen (O2), that they inhaled through a non-rebreathing face mask. The gas mixture was delivered using a customized Hyp-123 device (Hypoxico, Gardiner, NY), and O2 concentrations were monitored using a Maxtec Handi+ oxygen analyzer (Maxtec, Salt Lake City, UT). Participants' peripheral oxygen saturation levels (SpO2) and heart rate (HR) were monitored in real time with a Nonin 7500 pulse oximeter (Nonin Medical Inc., Plymouth, MN). To assess the potential changes in corticospinal excitability associated with the AIH intervention, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied to the left primary motor cortex 45 min after completing the AIH intervention in Visit 2 and Visit 5, and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the first dorsal interosseous muscle of the right hand. In addition to an extensive behavioral testing battery administered in Visit 1 and Visit 6, a brief assessment of motor, cognitive and affective function was administered 60 min after the completion of each AIH intervention in Visits 2 through 5.
California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT-II) Scores
Immediate Free Recall, Visit 1
48.25 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.64
California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT-II) Scores
Immediate Free Recall, Visit 6
50.33 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.43
California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT-II) Scores
Short-Delay Free Recall, Visit 1
10.75 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.03
California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT-II) Scores
Short-Delay Free Recall, Visit 6
11.50 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.43
California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT-II) Scores
Short-Delay Cued Recall, Visit 1
12.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.95
California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT-II) Scores
Short-Delay Cued Recall, Visit 6
12.17 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.54
California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT-II) Scores
Long-Delay Free Recall, Visit 1
11.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.77
California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT-II) Scores
Long-Delay Free Recall, Visit 6
11.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.16
California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT-II) Scores
Long-Delay Cued Recall, Visit 1
11.75 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.31
California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT-II) Scores
Long-Delay Cued Recall, Visit 6
11.83 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.90
California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT-II) Scores
Long-Delay Recognition, Visit 1
14.25 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.71
California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT-II) Scores
Long-Delay Recognition, Visit 6
13.83 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.89

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Visit 1 (baseline) and Visit 6 (i.e., 9-17 days after baseline)

The D-KEFS (Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System) Verbal Fluency Test measures one's ability to retrieve words from memory. The task is to produce as many words as possible that (1) begin with a specific letter (e.g., F,A,S), (2) belong to a certain semantic category (e.g., animal names), or (3) belong to two alternating categories (e.g., fruits and furniture). The scores (range: 0-unlimited) represent the number of correct responses produced in each condition. Higher scores mean better performance on the test.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
AIH Group
n=12 Participants
All participants completed six research visits to the Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, including four AIH treatment sessions (Visits 2-5), as well as the pre- and post-treatment assessments of motor, cognitive and affective function (Visits 1 and 6 respectively). During each of the four AIH interventions administered in Visits 2 through 5, the participants received brief bouts of reduced oxygen (O2), that they inhaled through a non-rebreathing face mask. The gas mixture was delivered using a customized Hyp-123 device (Hypoxico, Gardiner, NY), and O2 concentrations were monitored using a Maxtec Handi+ oxygen analyzer (Maxtec, Salt Lake City, UT). Participants' peripheral oxygen saturation levels (SpO2) and heart rate (HR) were monitored in real time with a Nonin 7500 pulse oximeter (Nonin Medical Inc., Plymouth, MN). To assess the potential changes in corticospinal excitability associated with the AIH intervention, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied to the left primary motor cortex 45 min after completing the AIH intervention in Visit 2 and Visit 5, and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the first dorsal interosseous muscle of the right hand. In addition to an extensive behavioral testing battery administered in Visit 1 and Visit 6, a brief assessment of motor, cognitive and affective function was administered 60 min after the completion of each AIH intervention in Visits 2 through 5.
D-KEFS (Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System) Verbal Fluency Test Scores
Letter Fluency, Visit 1
51.58 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.74
D-KEFS (Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System) Verbal Fluency Test Scores
Letter Fluency, Visit 6
46.67 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.70
D-KEFS (Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System) Verbal Fluency Test Scores
Category Fluency, Visit 1
46.50 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.69
D-KEFS (Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System) Verbal Fluency Test Scores
Category Fluency, Visit 6
46.50 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.76
D-KEFS (Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System) Verbal Fluency Test Scores
Category Switching, Visit 1
13.83 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.84
D-KEFS (Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System) Verbal Fluency Test Scores
Category Switching, Visit 6
13.17 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.13

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Visit 1 (baseline) and Visit 6 (i.e., 9-17 days after baseline)

Population: Visit 1 data from two subjects were not recorded due to a technical error. One participant could not complete the task in Visit 6 due to a right (dominant) arm fracture sustained three days prior. The data from nine remaining participants were submitted to the analysis.

The Serial Reaction Time Task (SRTT) measures implicit motor learning. Participants press four keyboard keys in sequence in response to cues on the screen. At first, the same ten-key pattern is repeated without participants' awareness. Next, key presses follow a random sequence. The outcome measure is the difference in average reaction time between the random and learned sequences. An increase in reaction time during the random sequence reflects the cognitive effort required to inhibit the previously learned pattern. Therefore, larger differences indicate stronger implicit motor learning.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
AIH Group
n=9 Participants
All participants completed six research visits to the Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, including four AIH treatment sessions (Visits 2-5), as well as the pre- and post-treatment assessments of motor, cognitive and affective function (Visits 1 and 6 respectively). During each of the four AIH interventions administered in Visits 2 through 5, the participants received brief bouts of reduced oxygen (O2), that they inhaled through a non-rebreathing face mask. The gas mixture was delivered using a customized Hyp-123 device (Hypoxico, Gardiner, NY), and O2 concentrations were monitored using a Maxtec Handi+ oxygen analyzer (Maxtec, Salt Lake City, UT). Participants' peripheral oxygen saturation levels (SpO2) and heart rate (HR) were monitored in real time with a Nonin 7500 pulse oximeter (Nonin Medical Inc., Plymouth, MN). To assess the potential changes in corticospinal excitability associated with the AIH intervention, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied to the left primary motor cortex 45 min after completing the AIH intervention in Visit 2 and Visit 5, and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the first dorsal interosseous muscle of the right hand. In addition to an extensive behavioral testing battery administered in Visit 1 and Visit 6, a brief assessment of motor, cognitive and affective function was administered 60 min after the completion of each AIH intervention in Visits 2 through 5.
Serial Reaction Time Task (SRTT) Scores
SRTT, Visit 1
0.11 seconds
Standard Deviation 0.09
Serial Reaction Time Task (SRTT) Scores
SRTT, Visit 6
0.04 seconds
Standard Deviation 0.08

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Visit 1 (baseline) and Visit 6 (i.e., 9-17 days after baseline)

Population: One participant was excluded from the TMT in Visit 6 due to a right (dominant) arm fracture sustained three days prior. The data from eleven remaining participants were submitted to the analysis.

The Trail Making Test (TMT) is a measure of motor and executive function. This test has two parts, Part A and Part B. Part A requires participants to draw a line between circles containing numbers in ascending order (e.g., 1-2-3…etc.). Part B requires participants to draw a line, alternating between ascending numbers and letters (e.g., 1-A-2-B…etc.). The outcome measures are the reaction times in seconds required to complete Part A and Part B. Faster reaction times indicate better test performance.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
AIH Group
n=11 Participants
All participants completed six research visits to the Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, including four AIH treatment sessions (Visits 2-5), as well as the pre- and post-treatment assessments of motor, cognitive and affective function (Visits 1 and 6 respectively). During each of the four AIH interventions administered in Visits 2 through 5, the participants received brief bouts of reduced oxygen (O2), that they inhaled through a non-rebreathing face mask. The gas mixture was delivered using a customized Hyp-123 device (Hypoxico, Gardiner, NY), and O2 concentrations were monitored using a Maxtec Handi+ oxygen analyzer (Maxtec, Salt Lake City, UT). Participants' peripheral oxygen saturation levels (SpO2) and heart rate (HR) were monitored in real time with a Nonin 7500 pulse oximeter (Nonin Medical Inc., Plymouth, MN). To assess the potential changes in corticospinal excitability associated with the AIH intervention, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied to the left primary motor cortex 45 min after completing the AIH intervention in Visit 2 and Visit 5, and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the first dorsal interosseous muscle of the right hand. In addition to an extensive behavioral testing battery administered in Visit 1 and Visit 6, a brief assessment of motor, cognitive and affective function was administered 60 min after the completion of each AIH intervention in Visits 2 through 5.
Trail Making Test (TMT) Scores
TMT Part A, Visit 1
22.36 seconds
Standard Deviation 6.71
Trail Making Test (TMT) Scores
TMT Part A, Visit 6
22.82 seconds
Standard Deviation 13.22
Trail Making Test (TMT) Scores
TMT Part B, Visit 1
56.55 seconds
Standard Deviation 11.27
Trail Making Test (TMT) Scores
TMT Part B, Visit 6
47.09 seconds
Standard Deviation 16.23

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: baseline (Visit 1) and follow-up (Visit 6, 9-17 days after baseline), as well as one hour after AIH in Visit 2 (1-6 days after baseline), Visit 3 (2-7 days after baseline), Visit 4 (6-12 days after baseline) and Visit 5 (8-14 days after baseline)

Population: One participant was excluded from the Finger Tapping Test in Visit 6 due to a right (dominant) arm fracture sustained three days prior. The data from eleven remaining participants were submitted to the analysis.

The Finger Tapping Test measures the rate of finger presses in order to assess simple motor coordination. In this task, participants are asked to tap the lever on a wooden board with their index finger as fast as possible for ten seconds. Five trials with each hand are administered. The first two trials are discarded as practice. The average number of taps on the subsequent three trials are recorded as the test score. Higher scores reflect better motor function.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
AIH Group
n=11 Participants
All participants completed six research visits to the Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, including four AIH treatment sessions (Visits 2-5), as well as the pre- and post-treatment assessments of motor, cognitive and affective function (Visits 1 and 6 respectively). During each of the four AIH interventions administered in Visits 2 through 5, the participants received brief bouts of reduced oxygen (O2), that they inhaled through a non-rebreathing face mask. The gas mixture was delivered using a customized Hyp-123 device (Hypoxico, Gardiner, NY), and O2 concentrations were monitored using a Maxtec Handi+ oxygen analyzer (Maxtec, Salt Lake City, UT). Participants' peripheral oxygen saturation levels (SpO2) and heart rate (HR) were monitored in real time with a Nonin 7500 pulse oximeter (Nonin Medical Inc., Plymouth, MN). To assess the potential changes in corticospinal excitability associated with the AIH intervention, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied to the left primary motor cortex 45 min after completing the AIH intervention in Visit 2 and Visit 5, and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the first dorsal interosseous muscle of the right hand. In addition to an extensive behavioral testing battery administered in Visit 1 and Visit 6, a brief assessment of motor, cognitive and affective function was administered 60 min after the completion of each AIH intervention in Visits 2 through 5.
Finger Tapping Test Scores
Right hand, Visit 1
48.55 average number of taps
Standard Deviation 6.64
Finger Tapping Test Scores
Right hand, Visit 2
52.31 average number of taps
Standard Deviation 8.54
Finger Tapping Test Scores
Right hand, Visit 3
53.69 average number of taps
Standard Deviation 10.15
Finger Tapping Test Scores
Right hand, Visit 4
55.89 average number of taps
Standard Deviation 6.87
Finger Tapping Test Scores
Right hand, Visit 5
56.95 average number of taps
Standard Deviation 7.87
Finger Tapping Test Scores
Right hand, Visit 6
58.12 average number of taps
Standard Deviation 8.26
Finger Tapping Test Scores
Left hand, Visit 1
46.73 average number of taps
Standard Deviation 4.34
Finger Tapping Test Scores
Left hand, Visit 2
48.19 average number of taps
Standard Deviation 8.39
Finger Tapping Test Scores
Left hand, Visit 3
49.30 average number of taps
Standard Deviation 7.47
Finger Tapping Test Scores
Left hand, Visit 4
49.75 average number of taps
Standard Deviation 9.35
Finger Tapping Test Scores
Left hand, Visit 5
52.30 average number of taps
Standard Deviation 7.63
Finger Tapping Test Scores
Left hand, Visit 6
52.60 average number of taps
Standard Deviation 6.81

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: baseline (Visit 1) and follow-up (Visit 6, 9-17 days after baseline), as well as one hour after AIH in Visit 2 (1-6 days after baseline), Visit 3 (2-7 days after baseline), Visit 4 (6-12 days after baseline) and Visit 5 (8-14 days after baseline)

Population: One participant was excluded from the Grooved Pegboard Test in Visit 6 due to a right (dominant) arm fracture sustained three days prior. Another participant was excluded from the Grooved Pegboard Test in Visit 6 due to a bruised left thumb. The data from ten remaining participants were submitted to the analysis.

The Grooved Pegboard Test measures manual dexterity and eye-hand coordination. It consists in inserting grooved pegs into a 5×5 board as quickly as possible, without skipping any slots, starting from the top row. One hand is tested at a time, starting with the dominant one. When using the right hand, participants are asked to fill the board from left to right. When using the left hand, they complete the board from right to left. The outcome measure is the amount of time in seconds required to complete the board. Faster reaction times reflect better motor function.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
AIH Group
n=10 Participants
All participants completed six research visits to the Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, including four AIH treatment sessions (Visits 2-5), as well as the pre- and post-treatment assessments of motor, cognitive and affective function (Visits 1 and 6 respectively). During each of the four AIH interventions administered in Visits 2 through 5, the participants received brief bouts of reduced oxygen (O2), that they inhaled through a non-rebreathing face mask. The gas mixture was delivered using a customized Hyp-123 device (Hypoxico, Gardiner, NY), and O2 concentrations were monitored using a Maxtec Handi+ oxygen analyzer (Maxtec, Salt Lake City, UT). Participants' peripheral oxygen saturation levels (SpO2) and heart rate (HR) were monitored in real time with a Nonin 7500 pulse oximeter (Nonin Medical Inc., Plymouth, MN). To assess the potential changes in corticospinal excitability associated with the AIH intervention, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied to the left primary motor cortex 45 min after completing the AIH intervention in Visit 2 and Visit 5, and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the first dorsal interosseous muscle of the right hand. In addition to an extensive behavioral testing battery administered in Visit 1 and Visit 6, a brief assessment of motor, cognitive and affective function was administered 60 min after the completion of each AIH intervention in Visits 2 through 5.
Grooved Pegboard Test Scores
Right hand, Visit 1
68.90 seconds
Standard Deviation 11.94
Grooved Pegboard Test Scores
Right hand, Visit 2
60.80 seconds
Standard Deviation 5.92
Grooved Pegboard Test Scores
Right hand, Visit 3
60.80 seconds
Standard Deviation 8.64
Grooved Pegboard Test Scores
Right hand, Visit 4
61.40 seconds
Standard Deviation 8.81
Grooved Pegboard Test Scores
Right hand, Visit 5
57.80 seconds
Standard Deviation 5.73
Grooved Pegboard Test Scores
Right hand, Visit 6
58.80 seconds
Standard Deviation 8.30
Grooved Pegboard Test Scores
Left hand, Visit 1
76.30 seconds
Standard Deviation 14.08
Grooved Pegboard Test Scores
Left hand, Visit 2
68.60 seconds
Standard Deviation 8.81
Grooved Pegboard Test Scores
Left hand, Visit 3
68.80 seconds
Standard Deviation 9.37
Grooved Pegboard Test Scores
Left hand, Visit 4
65.50 seconds
Standard Deviation 8.09
Grooved Pegboard Test Scores
Left hand, Visit 5
66.00 seconds
Standard Deviation 10.73
Grooved Pegboard Test Scores
Left hand, Visit 6
66.50 seconds
Standard Deviation 9.61

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: approximately one hour after AIH in Visit 2 (1-6 days after baseline), Visit 3 (2-7 days after baseline), Visit 4 (6-12 days after baseline) and Visit 5 (8-14 days after baseline)

The Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) is a standardized assessment of verbal learning and memory that measures Immediate Free Recall (score range: 0-75), Short-Delay Free Recall (0-15), Long-Delay Free Recall (0-15), and Long-Delay Forced-Choice Recognition (0-15). The scores on each subscale represent the total number of correct responses. Higher scores mean better test performance.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
AIH Group
n=12 Participants
All participants completed six research visits to the Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, including four AIH treatment sessions (Visits 2-5), as well as the pre- and post-treatment assessments of motor, cognitive and affective function (Visits 1 and 6 respectively). During each of the four AIH interventions administered in Visits 2 through 5, the participants received brief bouts of reduced oxygen (O2), that they inhaled through a non-rebreathing face mask. The gas mixture was delivered using a customized Hyp-123 device (Hypoxico, Gardiner, NY), and O2 concentrations were monitored using a Maxtec Handi+ oxygen analyzer (Maxtec, Salt Lake City, UT). Participants' peripheral oxygen saturation levels (SpO2) and heart rate (HR) were monitored in real time with a Nonin 7500 pulse oximeter (Nonin Medical Inc., Plymouth, MN). To assess the potential changes in corticospinal excitability associated with the AIH intervention, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied to the left primary motor cortex 45 min after completing the AIH intervention in Visit 2 and Visit 5, and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the first dorsal interosseous muscle of the right hand. In addition to an extensive behavioral testing battery administered in Visit 1 and Visit 6, a brief assessment of motor, cognitive and affective function was administered 60 min after the completion of each AIH intervention in Visits 2 through 5.
Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) Scores
Immediate Free Recall, Visit 3
61.83 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.04
Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) Scores
Immediate Free Recall, Visit 2
51.92 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.97
Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) Scores
Immediate Recall, Visit 4
66.92 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.53
Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) Scores
Immediate Recall, Visit 5
69.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.69
Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) Scores
Short-Delay Free Recall, Visit 2
9.83 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.86
Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) Scores
Short-Delay Free Recall, Visit 3
12.33 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.09
Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) Scores
Short-Delay Free Recall, Visit 4
13.42 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.83
Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) Scores
Short-Delay Free Recall, Visit 5
13.75 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.66
Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) Scores
Long-Delay Free Recall, Visit 2
10.75 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.14
Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) Scores
Long-Delay Free Recall, Visit 3
12.58 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.68
Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) Scores
Long-Delay Free Recall, Visit 4
13.42 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.88
Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) Scores
Long-Delay Free Recall, Visit 5
13.50 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.07
Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) Scores
Long-Delay Forced-Choice Recognition, Visit 2
12.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.94
Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) Scores
Long-Delay Forced-Choice Recognition, Visit 3
13.42 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.31
Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) Scores
Long-Delay Forced-Choice Recognition, Visit 4
14.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.13
Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) Scores
Long-Delay Forced-Choice Recognition, Visit 5
14.42 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.79

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Visit 1 (baseline) and Visit 6 (i.e., 9-17 days after baseline)

The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) is a 21-item self-report questionnaire assessing the severity of depressive symptoms. Each question has four response options, scored from 0 to 3. The outcome measure is the total score (range: 0-63). Higher scores reflect greater severity of depression symptoms.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
AIH Group
n=12 Participants
All participants completed six research visits to the Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, including four AIH treatment sessions (Visits 2-5), as well as the pre- and post-treatment assessments of motor, cognitive and affective function (Visits 1 and 6 respectively). During each of the four AIH interventions administered in Visits 2 through 5, the participants received brief bouts of reduced oxygen (O2), that they inhaled through a non-rebreathing face mask. The gas mixture was delivered using a customized Hyp-123 device (Hypoxico, Gardiner, NY), and O2 concentrations were monitored using a Maxtec Handi+ oxygen analyzer (Maxtec, Salt Lake City, UT). Participants' peripheral oxygen saturation levels (SpO2) and heart rate (HR) were monitored in real time with a Nonin 7500 pulse oximeter (Nonin Medical Inc., Plymouth, MN). To assess the potential changes in corticospinal excitability associated with the AIH intervention, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied to the left primary motor cortex 45 min after completing the AIH intervention in Visit 2 and Visit 5, and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the first dorsal interosseous muscle of the right hand. In addition to an extensive behavioral testing battery administered in Visit 1 and Visit 6, a brief assessment of motor, cognitive and affective function was administered 60 min after the completion of each AIH intervention in Visits 2 through 5.
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) Scores
BDI-II, Visit 1
7.42 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.27
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) Scores
BDI-II, Visit 6
5.42 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.83

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: approximately one hour after AIH in Visit 2 (1-6 days after baseline), Visit 3 (2-7 days after baseline), Visit 4 (6-12 days after baseline) and Visit 5 (8-14 days after baseline)

The Visual Analogue Mood Scale (VAM-S) consists of a single 100-mm horizontal line representing a scale ranging from "very bad mood" (score: 0) to "very good mood" (score:100). Participants are asked to place a mark on the line corresponding to their current mood. The outcome measure is the length of the segment between the leftmost part of the scale and the mark made by the participant in mm. Higher scores mean better mood.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
AIH Group
n=12 Participants
All participants completed six research visits to the Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, including four AIH treatment sessions (Visits 2-5), as well as the pre- and post-treatment assessments of motor, cognitive and affective function (Visits 1 and 6 respectively). During each of the four AIH interventions administered in Visits 2 through 5, the participants received brief bouts of reduced oxygen (O2), that they inhaled through a non-rebreathing face mask. The gas mixture was delivered using a customized Hyp-123 device (Hypoxico, Gardiner, NY), and O2 concentrations were monitored using a Maxtec Handi+ oxygen analyzer (Maxtec, Salt Lake City, UT). Participants' peripheral oxygen saturation levels (SpO2) and heart rate (HR) were monitored in real time with a Nonin 7500 pulse oximeter (Nonin Medical Inc., Plymouth, MN). To assess the potential changes in corticospinal excitability associated with the AIH intervention, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied to the left primary motor cortex 45 min after completing the AIH intervention in Visit 2 and Visit 5, and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the first dorsal interosseous muscle of the right hand. In addition to an extensive behavioral testing battery administered in Visit 1 and Visit 6, a brief assessment of motor, cognitive and affective function was administered 60 min after the completion of each AIH intervention in Visits 2 through 5.
Visual Analogue Mood Scale (VAM-S) Scores
VAM-S, Visit 2
72.3 millimeters
Standard Deviation 9.9
Visual Analogue Mood Scale (VAM-S) Scores
VAM-S, Visit 3
69.8 millimeters
Standard Deviation 19.7
Visual Analogue Mood Scale (VAM-S) Scores
VAM-S, Visit 4
77.2 millimeters
Standard Deviation 12.4
Visual Analogue Mood Scale (VAM-S) Scores
VAM-S, Visit 5
71.4 millimeters
Standard Deviation 15.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: approximately 45 min after AIH in Visit 2 (1-6 days after baseline) and Visit 5 (8-14 days after baseline)

Population: Three participants were excluded from TMS: one could not complete the required brain MRI scan due to claustrophobia, and two were unable to undergo TMS due to scheduling issues. The data from nine remaining participants were submitted to the analysis.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is delivered to the scalp in order to elicit MEPs in the first dorsal interroseous muscle of the dominant hand. The optimal stimulation site is determined by moving the coil over the scalp in small steps along the hand representation of the primary motor cortex to find the region where the largest MEPs can be evoked in the target muscle with the minimum intensity. Change in MEP amplitudes is used to assess improvement in motor function.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
AIH Group
n=9 Participants
All participants completed six research visits to the Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, including four AIH treatment sessions (Visits 2-5), as well as the pre- and post-treatment assessments of motor, cognitive and affective function (Visits 1 and 6 respectively). During each of the four AIH interventions administered in Visits 2 through 5, the participants received brief bouts of reduced oxygen (O2), that they inhaled through a non-rebreathing face mask. The gas mixture was delivered using a customized Hyp-123 device (Hypoxico, Gardiner, NY), and O2 concentrations were monitored using a Maxtec Handi+ oxygen analyzer (Maxtec, Salt Lake City, UT). Participants' peripheral oxygen saturation levels (SpO2) and heart rate (HR) were monitored in real time with a Nonin 7500 pulse oximeter (Nonin Medical Inc., Plymouth, MN). To assess the potential changes in corticospinal excitability associated with the AIH intervention, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied to the left primary motor cortex 45 min after completing the AIH intervention in Visit 2 and Visit 5, and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the first dorsal interosseous muscle of the right hand. In addition to an extensive behavioral testing battery administered in Visit 1 and Visit 6, a brief assessment of motor, cognitive and affective function was administered 60 min after the completion of each AIH intervention in Visits 2 through 5.
Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs)
MEP, Visit 2
1625.13 μV (microvolt)
Standard Deviation 1185.61
Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs)
MEP, Visit 5
1179.86 μV (microvolt)
Standard Deviation 825.37

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Visit 1 (baseline) and Visit 6 (i.e., 9-17 days after baseline)

Population: One participant was excluded from MRI due to claustrophobia. The Visit 1 dataset from another participant was lost due to a failed export from the scanner. The MRI data for the remaining ten subjects were reviewed for the presence of observable changes in structural and functional brain images.

MRI was used to determine whether there are changes in brain structure or function from baseline, as assessed by a physician and a neuroimaging data analyst. The outcome measure is the number of participants with observable changes in structural or functional images of the brain following the AIH intervention.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
AIH Group
n=10 Participants
All participants completed six research visits to the Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, including four AIH treatment sessions (Visits 2-5), as well as the pre- and post-treatment assessments of motor, cognitive and affective function (Visits 1 and 6 respectively). During each of the four AIH interventions administered in Visits 2 through 5, the participants received brief bouts of reduced oxygen (O2), that they inhaled through a non-rebreathing face mask. The gas mixture was delivered using a customized Hyp-123 device (Hypoxico, Gardiner, NY), and O2 concentrations were monitored using a Maxtec Handi+ oxygen analyzer (Maxtec, Salt Lake City, UT). Participants' peripheral oxygen saturation levels (SpO2) and heart rate (HR) were monitored in real time with a Nonin 7500 pulse oximeter (Nonin Medical Inc., Plymouth, MN). To assess the potential changes in corticospinal excitability associated with the AIH intervention, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied to the left primary motor cortex 45 min after completing the AIH intervention in Visit 2 and Visit 5, and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the first dorsal interosseous muscle of the right hand. In addition to an extensive behavioral testing battery administered in Visit 1 and Visit 6, a brief assessment of motor, cognitive and affective function was administered 60 min after the completion of each AIH intervention in Visits 2 through 5.
MRI
0 Participants

Adverse Events

AIH Group

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 5 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
AIH Group
n=12 participants at risk
All participants completed six research visits to the Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, including four AIH treatment sessions (Visits 2-5), as well as the pre- and post-treatment assessments of motor, cognitive and affective function (Visits 1 and 6 respectively). During each of the four AIH interventions administered in Visits 2 through 5, the participants received brief bouts of reduced oxygen (O2), that they inhaled through a non-rebreathing face mask. The gas mixture was delivered using a customized Hyp-123 device (Hypoxico, Gardiner, NY), and O2 concentrations were monitored using a Maxtec Handi+ oxygen analyzer (Maxtec, Salt Lake City, UT). Participants' peripheral oxygen saturation levels (SpO2) and heart rate (HR) were monitored in real time with a Nonin 7500 pulse oximeter (Nonin Medical Inc., Plymouth, MN). To assess the potential changes in corticospinal excitability associated with the AIH intervention, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied to the left primary motor cortex 45 min after completing the AIH intervention in Visit 2 and Visit 5, and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the first dorsal interosseous muscle of the right hand. In addition to an extensive behavioral testing battery administered in Visit 1 and Visit 6, a brief assessment of motor, cognitive and affective function was administered 60 min after the completion of each AIH intervention in Visits 2 through 5.
Nervous system disorders
Lightheadedness
25.0%
3/12 • Number of events 3 • from the first AIH session (Visit 2) until the end of follow-up (Visit 6), up to three weeks
Task-related Adverse Events (AEs) were assessed during each of the four AIH sessions using a 9-item symptom checklist (Systematic Assessment) and have been reported in detail as Primary Outcome Measures. Additionally, all new symptoms self-reported by participants throughout the course of the study were logged (Non-Systematic Assessment). All such self-reported symptoms were determined to be unrelated to the intervention by the physician monitor.
Psychiatric disorders
Claustrophobia
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • from the first AIH session (Visit 2) until the end of follow-up (Visit 6), up to three weeks
Task-related Adverse Events (AEs) were assessed during each of the four AIH sessions using a 9-item symptom checklist (Systematic Assessment) and have been reported in detail as Primary Outcome Measures. Additionally, all new symptoms self-reported by participants throughout the course of the study were logged (Non-Systematic Assessment). All such self-reported symptoms were determined to be unrelated to the intervention by the physician monitor.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • from the first AIH session (Visit 2) until the end of follow-up (Visit 6), up to three weeks
Task-related Adverse Events (AEs) were assessed during each of the four AIH sessions using a 9-item symptom checklist (Systematic Assessment) and have been reported in detail as Primary Outcome Measures. Additionally, all new symptoms self-reported by participants throughout the course of the study were logged (Non-Systematic Assessment). All such self-reported symptoms were determined to be unrelated to the intervention by the physician monitor.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fracture
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • from the first AIH session (Visit 2) until the end of follow-up (Visit 6), up to three weeks
Task-related Adverse Events (AEs) were assessed during each of the four AIH sessions using a 9-item symptom checklist (Systematic Assessment) and have been reported in detail as Primary Outcome Measures. Additionally, all new symptoms self-reported by participants throughout the course of the study were logged (Non-Systematic Assessment). All such self-reported symptoms were determined to be unrelated to the intervention by the physician monitor.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • from the first AIH session (Visit 2) until the end of follow-up (Visit 6), up to three weeks
Task-related Adverse Events (AEs) were assessed during each of the four AIH sessions using a 9-item symptom checklist (Systematic Assessment) and have been reported in detail as Primary Outcome Measures. Additionally, all new symptoms self-reported by participants throughout the course of the study were logged (Non-Systematic Assessment). All such self-reported symptoms were determined to be unrelated to the intervention by the physician monitor.

Additional Information

Ekaterina Delikishkina, Ph.D.

Shirley Ryan AbilityLab

Phone: 312-238-4579

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place