MedTrace Logo

Driving Pressure Guided Ventilation Versus Conventional Lung Protective Strategy in Morbid Obese Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery

NCT04861168 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2025-07-02

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study will be conducted to evaluate the effect of driving pressure guided ventilation compared with conventional protective lung ventilation during laparoscopic bariatric surgeries in morbid obese patients.

* the primary outcome: Intraoperative oxygenation measured by the arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2).
* the secondary outcome: incidence of early postoperative pulmonary complications e.g., postoperative hypoxia, the need for supplementary oxygen, atelectasis, barotrauma, and respiratory failure.

Conditions

  • Driving Pressure

Interventions

PROCEDURE

driving pressure guided ventilation

driving pressure guided ventilation

PROCEDURE

Conventional protective lung strategy

Conventional protective lung strategy

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Tanta University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
60 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2023-09-15
Primary Completion
2024-09-15
Completion
2025-04-15

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04861168 on ClinicalTrials.gov