MedTrace Logo

Effectiveness of Pragmatic Shoulder Technique VS Traditional Physical Therapy

NCT04859387 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 49

Last updated 2021-06-02

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Isolated and combined effectiveness of pragmatic protocols on shoulder range of motion had been investigated and found effective in healthy participants. To our knowledge, there was insufficient literature to support the comparison between pragmatic and traditional protocols in the treatment of shoulder pathologies.

Conditions

  • Shoulder Pain
  • Shoulder Impingement
  • Shoulder Injuries
  • Frozen Shoulder
  • Shoulder Capsulitis

Interventions

OTHER

set of pragmatic shoulder technique

Group A received pragmatic intervention which includes Pectoralis major and minor stretch, AC joint mobilization, rotator cuff facilitation for subscapularis and infraspinatus, serratus anterior stretch, thoracic manipulation and posterior capsular stretch.

OTHER

traditional physical therapy

Group B received traditional interventions which includes modalities such as TENS and hot pack, soft tissue mobilization, joint mobilization, stretching and strengthening etc. other than pragmatic intervention

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Helping Hand Institute of Rehabilitation Sciences

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Keramat Ullah Keramat, Ph.D* · HHIRS Trust

Study Design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
60 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2020-04-15
Primary Completion
2020-07-30
Completion
2020-09-23

Countries

  • Pakistan

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04859387 on ClinicalTrials.gov