Trial Outcomes & Findings for Transspinal Stimulation Plus Locomotor Training for SCI (NCT NCT04807764)
NCT ID: NCT04807764
Last Updated: 2026-08-18
Results Overview
Soleus H-reflexes following posterior tibial nerve stimulation with a 1-ms monophasic pulse were recorded with subjects seated and stimuli delivered every 1 s (1.0 Hz), 3 s (0.33 Hz), 5 s (0.2 Hz), 8 s (0.125 Hz), and 10s (0.1 Hz). Results for each interval vs 0.1 Hz shown.
COMPLETED
NA
14 participants
4-6 months
2026-08-18
Participant Flow
Participants with SCI were recruited from various sources: Each site's existing databases of past research participants; people with SCI seen clinically at the James J. Peters VA Medical Center and Mount Sinai Medical Center; via flyers and webpage notices; and through various tabling events at local expositions and gyms that cater to people with SCI.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Real Transspinal Stimulation Delivered During Standing Followed by Locomotor Training
Transspinal tonic stimulation of the thoracolumbar region will be delivered at a frequency of 30 Hz during standing with as needed body weight support (BWS) in a standing frame or in the Lokomat to ensure safety.
|
Real Transspinal Stimulation Delivered While Lying Supine Followed by Locomotor Training
Transspinal tonic stimulation will be delivered at a frequency of 30 Hz while lying supine.
|
Sham Transspinal Stimulation Delivered During Standing Followed by Locomotor Training
One sham group will be receiving transspinal stimulation during standing at an intensity where sensation is absent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
4
|
5
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
4
|
5
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Transspinal Stimulation Plus Locomotor Training for SCI
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Real Transspinal Stimulation Delivered During Standing Followed by Locomotor Training
n=4 Participants
Transspinal tonic stimulation of the thoracolumbar region will be delivered at a frequency of 30 Hz during standing with as needed body weight support (BWS) in a standing frame or in the Lokomat to ensure safety.
|
Real Transspinal Stimulation Delivered While Lying Supine Followed by Locomotor Training
n=5 Participants
Transspinal tonic stimulation will be delivered at a frequency of 30 Hz while lying supine.
|
Sham Transspinal Stimulation Delivered During Standing Followed by Locomotor Training
n=5 Participants
One sham group will be receiving transspinal stimulation during standing at an intensity where sensation is absent.
|
Total
n=14 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
44.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.2 • n=298 Participants
|
38.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4 • n=102 Participants
|
45.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.9 • n=400 Participants
|
42.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.3 • n=30 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
2 Participants
n=298 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=102 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=400 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
2 Participants
n=298 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=102 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=400 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=298 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=102 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=400 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=298 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=102 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=400 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=298 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=102 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=400 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
1 Participants
n=298 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=102 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=400 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
3 Participants
n=298 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=102 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=400 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=298 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=102 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=400 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=298 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=102 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=400 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=298 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=102 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=400 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
4 Participants
n=298 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=102 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=400 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=298 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=102 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=400 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 4-6 monthsSoleus H-reflexes following posterior tibial nerve stimulation with a 1-ms monophasic pulse were recorded with subjects seated and stimuli delivered every 1 s (1.0 Hz), 3 s (0.33 Hz), 5 s (0.2 Hz), 8 s (0.125 Hz), and 10s (0.1 Hz). Results for each interval vs 0.1 Hz shown.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Real Transspinal Stimulation Delivered During Standing Followed by Locomotor Training
n=4 Participants
Transspinal tonic stimulation of the thoracolumbar region will be delivered at a frequency of 30 Hz during standing with as needed body weight support (BWS) in a standing frame or in the Lokomat to ensure safety.
|
Real Transspinal Stimulation Delivered While Lying Supine Followed by Locomotor Training
n=5 Participants
Transspinal tonic stimulation will be delivered at a frequency of 30 Hz while lying supine.
|
Sham Transspinal Stimulation Delivered During Standing Followed by Locomotor Training
n=5 Participants
One sham group will be receiving transspinal stimulation during standing at an intensity where sensation is absent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Plasticity of Spinal Neuronal Networks - Homosynaptic Depression
0.33 Hz vs 0.1 Hz, pre-training (baseline)
|
93.3 Percent H-reflex amplitude
Standard Deviation 28.0
|
84.3 Percent H-reflex amplitude
Standard Deviation 16.4
|
71.3 Percent H-reflex amplitude
Standard Deviation 15.2
|
|
Plasticity of Spinal Neuronal Networks - Homosynaptic Depression
0.33 Hz vs 0.1 Hz, post-training (4-6 months)
|
82.0 Percent H-reflex amplitude
Standard Deviation 19.9
|
75.7 Percent H-reflex amplitude
Standard Deviation 9.8
|
77.3 Percent H-reflex amplitude
Standard Deviation 11.9
|
|
Plasticity of Spinal Neuronal Networks - Homosynaptic Depression
0.2 Hz vs 0.1 Hz, pre-training (baseline)
|
97.9 Percent H-reflex amplitude
Standard Deviation 26.0
|
94.2 Percent H-reflex amplitude
Standard Deviation 15.0
|
101.6 Percent H-reflex amplitude
Standard Deviation 35.8
|
|
Plasticity of Spinal Neuronal Networks - Homosynaptic Depression
0.2 Hz vs 0.1 Hz, post-training (4-6 months)
|
90.8 Percent H-reflex amplitude
Standard Deviation 15.4
|
85.6 Percent H-reflex amplitude
Standard Deviation 13.7
|
98.1 Percent H-reflex amplitude
Standard Deviation 10.6
|
|
Plasticity of Spinal Neuronal Networks - Homosynaptic Depression
0.125 Hz vs 0.1 Hz, pre-training (baseline)
|
102.8 Percent H-reflex amplitude
Standard Deviation 20.1
|
102.7 Percent H-reflex amplitude
Standard Deviation 21.3
|
110.5 Percent H-reflex amplitude
Standard Deviation 32.4
|
|
Plasticity of Spinal Neuronal Networks - Homosynaptic Depression
0.125 Hz vs 0.1 Hz, post-training (4-6 months)
|
99.6 Percent H-reflex amplitude
Standard Deviation 17.8
|
94.4 Percent H-reflex amplitude
Standard Deviation 12.8
|
94.5 Percent H-reflex amplitude
Standard Deviation 10.0
|
|
Plasticity of Spinal Neuronal Networks - Homosynaptic Depression
1.0 vs 0.1 Hz, pre-training (baseline)
|
53.0 Percent H-reflex amplitude
Standard Deviation 16.1
|
63.9 Percent H-reflex amplitude
Standard Deviation 31.7
|
56.0 Percent H-reflex amplitude
Standard Deviation 14.2
|
|
Plasticity of Spinal Neuronal Networks - Homosynaptic Depression
1.0 vs 0.1 Hz, post-training (4-6 months)
|
36.5 Percent H-reflex amplitude
Standard Deviation 15.9
|
54.1 Percent H-reflex amplitude
Standard Deviation 18.1
|
53.3 Percent H-reflex amplitude
Standard Deviation 18.6
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 4-6 monthsPresynaptic inhibition was assessed with a conditioning pulse train of 4 pulses with 9 ms duration, delivered to the CPN at the C-T intervals of 20, 60, or 100 ms. These C-T intervals were selected because the reflex inhibition produced at the intermediate C-T intervals is predominantly presynaptic. The stimulus to the CPN was delivered at 1.27 ± 0.12 (21.8 ± 10.1 mA) and 1.4 ± 0.28 (21.8 ± 10.1 mA) TA motor threshold before and after treatment, respectively. Control and conditioned soleus H-reflexes were randomly recorded across the C-T intervals tested, and 15 H-reflexes were recorded at each C-T interval. For each participant at each timepoint, amplitudes across the 15 H-reflexes per C-T interval were averaged. Results are listed for each C-T interval, pre- and post-intervention.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Real Transspinal Stimulation Delivered During Standing Followed by Locomotor Training
n=4 Participants
Transspinal tonic stimulation of the thoracolumbar region will be delivered at a frequency of 30 Hz during standing with as needed body weight support (BWS) in a standing frame or in the Lokomat to ensure safety.
|
Real Transspinal Stimulation Delivered While Lying Supine Followed by Locomotor Training
n=5 Participants
Transspinal tonic stimulation will be delivered at a frequency of 30 Hz while lying supine.
|
Sham Transspinal Stimulation Delivered During Standing Followed by Locomotor Training
n=5 Participants
One sham group will be receiving transspinal stimulation during standing at an intensity where sensation is absent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Plasticity of Spinal Neuronal Networks - Presynaptic Inhibition
Post-intervention, 60ms (4-6 months)
|
62.8 Conditioned vs unconditioned H-reflex %
Standard Deviation 30.4
|
77.1 Conditioned vs unconditioned H-reflex %
Standard Deviation 46.3
|
57.4 Conditioned vs unconditioned H-reflex %
Standard Deviation 25.9
|
|
Plasticity of Spinal Neuronal Networks - Presynaptic Inhibition
Post-intervention, 20 ms (4-6 months)
|
90.3 Conditioned vs unconditioned H-reflex %
Standard Deviation 18.9
|
95.4 Conditioned vs unconditioned H-reflex %
Standard Deviation 22.2
|
147.3 Conditioned vs unconditioned H-reflex %
Standard Deviation 74.3
|
|
Plasticity of Spinal Neuronal Networks - Presynaptic Inhibition
Pre-intervention, 60ms (baseline)
|
112.8 Conditioned vs unconditioned H-reflex %
Standard Deviation 14.6
|
100.5 Conditioned vs unconditioned H-reflex %
Standard Deviation 15.2
|
94.4 Conditioned vs unconditioned H-reflex %
Standard Deviation 28.9
|
|
Plasticity of Spinal Neuronal Networks - Presynaptic Inhibition
Pre-intervention, 20 ms (baseline)
|
94.1 Conditioned vs unconditioned H-reflex %
Standard Deviation 15.8
|
95.0 Conditioned vs unconditioned H-reflex %
Standard Deviation 30.3
|
109.4 Conditioned vs unconditioned H-reflex %
Standard Deviation 41.3
|
|
Plasticity of Spinal Neuronal Networks - Presynaptic Inhibition
Pre-intervention, 100 ms (baseline)
|
79.9 Conditioned vs unconditioned H-reflex %
Standard Deviation 37.3
|
80.7 Conditioned vs unconditioned H-reflex %
Standard Deviation 42.6
|
104.3 Conditioned vs unconditioned H-reflex %
Standard Deviation 37.1
|
|
Plasticity of Spinal Neuronal Networks - Presynaptic Inhibition
Post-intervention, 100 ms (4-6 months)
|
57.7 Conditioned vs unconditioned H-reflex %
Standard Deviation 61.2
|
47.2 Conditioned vs unconditioned H-reflex %
Standard Deviation 45.1
|
45.9 Conditioned vs unconditioned H-reflex %
Standard Deviation 21.5
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 4-6 monthsTo assess restoration of reciprocal Ia inhibition, soleus H-reflexes were recorded following common peroneal nerve (CPN) stimulation at short conditioning-test (C-T) intervals of 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 ms. The stimulus to the CPN was delivered at 1.27 ± 0.12 (21.8 ± 10.1 mA) and 1.4 ± 0.28 (21.8 ± 10.1 mA) TA motor threshold before and after treatment, respectively. Control and conditioned soleus H-reflexes were randomly recorded across the C-T intervals tested, and 15 H-reflexes were recorded at each C-T interval. For each participant at each timepoint, amplitudes across the 15 H-reflexes per C-T interval were averaged. Results are listed for each C-T interval, pre- and post-intervention.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Real Transspinal Stimulation Delivered During Standing Followed by Locomotor Training
n=4 Participants
Transspinal tonic stimulation of the thoracolumbar region will be delivered at a frequency of 30 Hz during standing with as needed body weight support (BWS) in a standing frame or in the Lokomat to ensure safety.
|
Real Transspinal Stimulation Delivered While Lying Supine Followed by Locomotor Training
n=5 Participants
Transspinal tonic stimulation will be delivered at a frequency of 30 Hz while lying supine.
|
Sham Transspinal Stimulation Delivered During Standing Followed by Locomotor Training
n=5 Participants
One sham group will be receiving transspinal stimulation during standing at an intensity where sensation is absent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Plasticity of Spinal Neuronal Networks - Reciprocal Inhigition
Pre-intervention, 1ms (baseline)
|
102.7 Conditioned vs unconditioned H-reflex %
Standard Deviation 5.4
|
103.3 Conditioned vs unconditioned H-reflex %
Standard Deviation 17.3
|
103.4 Conditioned vs unconditioned H-reflex %
Standard Deviation 20.3
|
|
Plasticity of Spinal Neuronal Networks - Reciprocal Inhigition
Post-intervention, 1ms (4-6 months)
|
101.3 Conditioned vs unconditioned H-reflex %
Standard Deviation 11.2
|
85.8 Conditioned vs unconditioned H-reflex %
Standard Deviation 18.6
|
89.2 Conditioned vs unconditioned H-reflex %
Standard Deviation 12.3
|
|
Plasticity of Spinal Neuronal Networks - Reciprocal Inhigition
Pre-intervention, 3ms (baseline)
|
92.1 Conditioned vs unconditioned H-reflex %
Standard Deviation 12.9
|
92.3 Conditioned vs unconditioned H-reflex %
Standard Deviation 11.3
|
104.2 Conditioned vs unconditioned H-reflex %
Standard Deviation 22.7
|
|
Plasticity of Spinal Neuronal Networks - Reciprocal Inhigition
Pre-intervention, 4ms (baseline)
|
99.7 Conditioned vs unconditioned H-reflex %
Standard Deviation 12.5
|
89.8 Conditioned vs unconditioned H-reflex %
Standard Deviation 13.5
|
99.4 Conditioned vs unconditioned H-reflex %
Standard Deviation 26.4
|
|
Plasticity of Spinal Neuronal Networks - Reciprocal Inhigition
Post-intervention, 4ms (4-6 months)
|
96.0 Conditioned vs unconditioned H-reflex %
Standard Deviation 7.8
|
78.9 Conditioned vs unconditioned H-reflex %
Standard Deviation 4.5
|
93.5 Conditioned vs unconditioned H-reflex %
Standard Deviation 16.5
|
|
Plasticity of Spinal Neuronal Networks - Reciprocal Inhigition
Pre-intervention, 2ms (baseline)
|
101.9 Conditioned vs unconditioned H-reflex %
Standard Deviation 14.5
|
84.7 Conditioned vs unconditioned H-reflex %
Standard Deviation 13.2
|
104.6 Conditioned vs unconditioned H-reflex %
Standard Deviation 25.5
|
|
Plasticity of Spinal Neuronal Networks - Reciprocal Inhigition
Post-intervention, 2ms (4-6 months)
|
99.5 Conditioned vs unconditioned H-reflex %
Standard Deviation 14.0
|
78.8 Conditioned vs unconditioned H-reflex %
Standard Deviation 7.4
|
83.0 Conditioned vs unconditioned H-reflex %
Standard Deviation 165
|
|
Plasticity of Spinal Neuronal Networks - Reciprocal Inhigition
Post-intervention, 3ms (4-6 months)
|
101.9 Conditioned vs unconditioned H-reflex %
Standard Deviation 13.1
|
77.8 Conditioned vs unconditioned H-reflex %
Standard Deviation 23.9
|
84.7 Conditioned vs unconditioned H-reflex %
Standard Deviation 14.4
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 4-6 monthsPopulation: Note, groups 1 and 3 only had 2 participants with obtainable evoked potentials; group 2 had 3 participants with obtainable evoked potentials.
Neurophysiological measurements assessing changes in corticospinal excitability from the interventions by recording responses to single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) at rest and during robotic-assisted stepping. The tibialis anterior resting motor threshold (RMT) was established and corresponded to the lowest TMS maximal stimulator output that induced reproducible evoked potentials of at least \~50 µV in 4 out of 5 consecutive single TMS pulses. RMTs (percentage of maximal stimulator output) are shown pre- and post-intervention.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Real Transspinal Stimulation Delivered During Standing Followed by Locomotor Training
n=2 Participants
Transspinal tonic stimulation of the thoracolumbar region will be delivered at a frequency of 30 Hz during standing with as needed body weight support (BWS) in a standing frame or in the Lokomat to ensure safety.
|
Real Transspinal Stimulation Delivered While Lying Supine Followed by Locomotor Training
n=3 Participants
Transspinal tonic stimulation will be delivered at a frequency of 30 Hz while lying supine.
|
Sham Transspinal Stimulation Delivered During Standing Followed by Locomotor Training
n=2 Participants
One sham group will be receiving transspinal stimulation during standing at an intensity where sensation is absent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Plasticity of Corticospinal Networks
Post-intervention (4-6 months)
|
33.8 % TMS maximal stimulator output
Standard Deviation 8.0
|
30.5 % TMS maximal stimulator output
Standard Deviation 17.5
|
41.2 % TMS maximal stimulator output
Standard Deviation 6.9
|
|
Plasticity of Corticospinal Networks
Pre-intervention (baseline)
|
44.6 % TMS maximal stimulator output
Standard Deviation 17.6
|
49.5 % TMS maximal stimulator output
Standard Deviation 14.7
|
46.1 % TMS maximal stimulator output
Standard Deviation 10.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 4-6 monthsChange in 10-meter timed test (seconds required to complete 10-meter walk) between baseline and post-intervention. Fewer seconds means faster (better) gait.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Real Transspinal Stimulation Delivered During Standing Followed by Locomotor Training
n=3 Participants
Transspinal tonic stimulation of the thoracolumbar region will be delivered at a frequency of 30 Hz during standing with as needed body weight support (BWS) in a standing frame or in the Lokomat to ensure safety.
|
Real Transspinal Stimulation Delivered While Lying Supine Followed by Locomotor Training
n=3 Participants
Transspinal tonic stimulation will be delivered at a frequency of 30 Hz while lying supine.
|
Sham Transspinal Stimulation Delivered During Standing Followed by Locomotor Training
n=3 Participants
One sham group will be receiving transspinal stimulation during standing at an intensity where sensation is absent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Ambulatory Function
|
-2.0 seconds
Interval -2.7 to -1.2
|
2.6 seconds
Interval -0.8 to 9.0
|
-.2 seconds
Interval -12.7 to 14.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 4-6 monthsPopulation: This outcome measure was prespecified but not systematically collected. Therefore, only 2 participants in group 1, and 3 participants in groups 2 and 3 have results.
Changes in Berg Balance Scale score between baseline and post-intervention. Scale scores between 0 and 56. Higher scores mean better balance.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Real Transspinal Stimulation Delivered During Standing Followed by Locomotor Training
n=2 Participants
Transspinal tonic stimulation of the thoracolumbar region will be delivered at a frequency of 30 Hz during standing with as needed body weight support (BWS) in a standing frame or in the Lokomat to ensure safety.
|
Real Transspinal Stimulation Delivered While Lying Supine Followed by Locomotor Training
n=3 Participants
Transspinal tonic stimulation will be delivered at a frequency of 30 Hz while lying supine.
|
Sham Transspinal Stimulation Delivered During Standing Followed by Locomotor Training
n=3 Participants
One sham group will be receiving transspinal stimulation during standing at an intensity where sensation is absent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Balance
|
2 units on a scale
Interval -2.0 to 6.0
|
-0.33 units on a scale
Interval -1.0 to 0.0
|
5.67 units on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 16.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 4-6 monthsPopulation: This outcome measure was prespecified but not systematically collected. Therefore, only 2 participants in each group have results.
SCIM III Bladder and Bowel management subscores Bladder subscore rated 0-15 (higher means better bladder function). Bowel subscore rated 0-10 (higher means better bowel function).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Real Transspinal Stimulation Delivered During Standing Followed by Locomotor Training
n=2 Participants
Transspinal tonic stimulation of the thoracolumbar region will be delivered at a frequency of 30 Hz during standing with as needed body weight support (BWS) in a standing frame or in the Lokomat to ensure safety.
|
Real Transspinal Stimulation Delivered While Lying Supine Followed by Locomotor Training
n=2 Participants
Transspinal tonic stimulation will be delivered at a frequency of 30 Hz while lying supine.
|
Sham Transspinal Stimulation Delivered During Standing Followed by Locomotor Training
n=2 Participants
One sham group will be receiving transspinal stimulation during standing at an intensity where sensation is absent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Autonomic Function
Bowel subscore, post-intervention (4-6 months)
|
10 units on subscale
Standard Deviation 0
|
9 units on subscale
Standard Deviation 1.4
|
5 units on subscale
Standard Deviation 3.5
|
|
Autonomic Function
Bladder subscore, pre-intervention (baseline)
|
15 units on subscale
Standard Deviation 0 • Interval 0.0 to 0.0
|
11.5 units on subscale
Standard Deviation 3.5 • Interval -1.0 to -1.0
|
5.0 units on subscale
Standard Deviation 8.7
|
|
Autonomic Function
Bladder subscore, post-intervention (4-6 months)
|
15 units on subscale
Standard Deviation 0
|
12.0 units on subscale
Standard Deviation 4.2
|
5.0 units on subscale
Standard Deviation 10.6
|
|
Autonomic Function
Bowel subscore, pre-intervention (baseline)
|
10 units on subscale
Standard Deviation 0
|
7.5 units on subscale
Standard Deviation 3.5
|
5 units on subscale
Standard Deviation 3.5
|
Adverse Events
Real Transspinal Stimulation Delivered During Standing Followed by Locomotor Training
Real Transspinal Stimulation Delivered While Lying Supine Followed by Locomotor Training
Sham Transspinal Stimulation Delivered During Standing Followed by Locomotor Training
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Real Transspinal Stimulation Delivered During Standing Followed by Locomotor Training
n=4 participants at risk
Transspinal tonic stimulation of the thoracolumbar region will be delivered at a frequency of 30 Hz during standing with as needed body weight support (BWS) in a standing frame or in the Lokomat to ensure safety.
|
Real Transspinal Stimulation Delivered While Lying Supine Followed by Locomotor Training
n=5 participants at risk
Transspinal tonic stimulation will be delivered at a frequency of 30 Hz while lying supine.
|
Sham Transspinal Stimulation Delivered During Standing Followed by Locomotor Training
n=5 participants at risk
One sham group will be receiving transspinal stimulation during standing at an intensity where sensation is absent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Abrasion
|
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment through the final followup, up to 1 week.
|
40.0%
2/5 • Number of events 3 • From enrollment through the final followup, up to 1 week.
|
40.0%
2/5 • Number of events 3 • From enrollment through the final followup, up to 1 week.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
UTI
|
0.00%
0/4 • From enrollment through the final followup, up to 1 week.
|
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment through the final followup, up to 1 week.
|
0.00%
0/5 • From enrollment through the final followup, up to 1 week.
|
|
Infections and infestations
COVID
|
0.00%
0/4 • From enrollment through the final followup, up to 1 week.
|
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment through the final followup, up to 1 week.
|
0.00%
0/5 • From enrollment through the final followup, up to 1 week.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
fecal incontinence
|
0.00%
0/4 • From enrollment through the final followup, up to 1 week.
|
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 2 • From enrollment through the final followup, up to 1 week.
|
0.00%
0/5 • From enrollment through the final followup, up to 1 week.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place