Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Mobile Application to Promote Self-management and Improve Outcomes in Heart Failure (NCT NCT04755816)
NCT ID: NCT04755816
Last Updated: 2024-09-19
Results Overview
Time to all-cause mortality (ACM), time to heart failure hospital readmission (HFHR), and decline in quality of life will be analyzed using the Finkelstein-Schoenfeld method. The method combines these three endpoints in a hierarchical fashion using ACM first, HRHR second, and change in HRQOL third. The method pairs every participant receiving the diet intervention with every participant not receiving the diet intervention within each stratum. Within each pairing, a +1 is assigned to the "better" participant, -1 to the "worse" participant, and 0 if they are "tied". The comparison begins with ACM. Tied pairings are then compared using HFHR. Any remaining tied pairings are compared using change in HRQOL. A 'Win' represents a participant doing better within each pairing (receiving +1) based on the hierarchical comparison. The reported unit is the total "wins" for each intervention group from performing such a hierarchical comparison across all strata.
TERMINATED
PHASE3
62 participants
12 weeks
2024-09-19
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Control Group
Standard heart failure educational information.
Educational content: Standard heart failure educational information and a daily symptom survey.
|
Dietary Sodium Intervention
The dietary sodium intervention facilitates lower sodium choices using tailored push notifications.
Sodium intervention: The sodium dietary intervention provides uses location services to determine when a participant is at home, arrives at a grocery store or arrives at a restaurant. The user receives a tailored message to assist with making dietary choices based on sodium content.
|
Clinical Worsening Intervention
The clinical worsening intervention promotes self-monitoring and self-management and is linked tailored push notifications.
Clinical worsening intervention: The intervention adapts to the participant's reported symptoms and provides feedback with a global health status indicator (HSI). Users will receive tailored push notification based on their HSI status.
|
Dietary Sodium and Clinical Worsening
Full access to all content in the control, dietary sodium, and clinical worsening interventions.
Sodium intervention: The sodium dietary intervention provides uses location services to determine when a participant is at home, arrives at a grocery store or arrives at a restaurant. The user receives a tailored message to assist with making dietary choices based on sodium content.
Clinical worsening intervention: The intervention adapts to the participant's reported symptoms and provides feedback with a global health status indicator (HSI). Users will receive tailored push notification based on their HSI status.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
12
|
20
|
12
|
18
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
12
|
20
|
12
|
18
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
A Mobile Application to Promote Self-management and Improve Outcomes in Heart Failure
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Control Group
n=12 Participants
Standard heart failure educational information.
Educational content: Standard heart failure educational information and a daily symptom survey.
|
Dietary Sodium Intervention
n=20 Participants
The dietary sodium intervention facilitates lower sodium choices using tailored push notifications.
Sodium intervention: The sodium dietary intervention provides uses location services to determine when a participant is at home, arrives at a grocery store or arrives at a restaurant. The user receives a tailored message to assist with making dietary choices based on sodium content.
|
Clinical Worsening Intervention
n=12 Participants
The clinical worsening intervention promotes self-monitoring and self-management and is linked tailored push notifications.
Clinical worsening intervention: The intervention adapts to the participant's reported symptoms and provides feedback with a global health status indicator (HSI). Users will receive tailored push notification based on their HSI status.
|
Dietary Sodium and Clinical Worsening
n=18 Participants
Full access to all content in the control, dietary sodium, and clinical worsening interventions.
Sodium intervention: The sodium dietary intervention provides uses location services to determine when a participant is at home, arrives at a grocery store or arrives at a restaurant. The user receives a tailored message to assist with making dietary choices based on sodium content.
Clinical worsening intervention: The intervention adapts to the participant's reported symptoms and provides feedback with a global health status indicator (HSI). Users will receive tailored push notification based on their HSI status.
|
Total
n=62 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
7 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
34 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
8 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
46 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
4 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
56.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.04 • n=99 Participants
|
54.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.6 • n=107 Participants
|
54 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.53 • n=206 Participants
|
54.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.6 • n=7 Participants
|
54.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.44 • n=31 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
3 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
9 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
42 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
11 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
60 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
4 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeksPopulation: Subjects randomized to the Dietary intervention only (n=20) + those randomized to both interventions (n=18) vs Subjects randomized to the Clinical Worsening intervention only (n=12) + those randomized to Neither intervention (n=12)
Time to all-cause mortality (ACM), time to heart failure hospital readmission (HFHR), and decline in quality of life will be analyzed using the Finkelstein-Schoenfeld method. The method combines these three endpoints in a hierarchical fashion using ACM first, HRHR second, and change in HRQOL third. The method pairs every participant receiving the diet intervention with every participant not receiving the diet intervention within each stratum. Within each pairing, a +1 is assigned to the "better" participant, -1 to the "worse" participant, and 0 if they are "tied". The comparison begins with ACM. Tied pairings are then compared using HFHR. Any remaining tied pairings are compared using change in HRQOL. A 'Win' represents a participant doing better within each pairing (receiving +1) based on the hierarchical comparison. The reported unit is the total "wins" for each intervention group from performing such a hierarchical comparison across all strata.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dietary Sodium Intervention
n=38 Participants
The sodium dietary intervention provides the user with tailored messages to assist with making dietary choices based on sodium content when they arrive at a grocery store or a restaurant.
This includes group B and D.
|
No Dietary Sodium Intervention
n=24 Participants
Access to all content in the control, and clinical worsening interventions. This includes group A and C.
|
Clinical Worsening Intervention
The clinical worsening intervention promotes self-monitoring and self-management and is linked tailored push notifications.
Clinical worsening intervention: The intervention adapts to the participant's reported symptoms and provides feedback with a global health status indicator (HSI). Users will receive tailored push notification based on their HSI status.
|
Dietary Sodium and Clinical Worsening
Full access to all content in the control, dietary sodium, and clinical worsening interventions.
Sodium intervention: The sodium dietary intervention provides uses location services to determine when a participant is at home, arrives at a grocery store or arrives at a restaurant. The user receives a tailored message to assist with making dietary choices based on sodium content.
Clinical worsening intervention: The intervention adapts to the participant's reported symptoms and provides feedback with a global health status indicator (HSI). Users will receive tailored push notification based on their HSI status.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hierarchical Combination ("Win Ratio") of Time to All-cause Mortality, Time to Heart Failure Hospital Readmission, and Decline in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQOL) [ Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 12 ]
Time to All-Cause Death
|
0 Total number of wins
|
0 Total number of wins
|
—
|
—
|
|
Hierarchical Combination ("Win Ratio") of Time to All-cause Mortality, Time to Heart Failure Hospital Readmission, and Decline in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQOL) [ Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 12 ]
Time to Heart-Failure Readmission
|
136 Total number of wins
|
156 Total number of wins
|
—
|
—
|
|
Hierarchical Combination ("Win Ratio") of Time to All-cause Mortality, Time to Heart Failure Hospital Readmission, and Decline in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQOL) [ Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 12 ]
Change in MLHFQ from Baseline to 12 Weeks
|
146 Total number of wins
|
63 Total number of wins
|
—
|
—
|
|
Hierarchical Combination ("Win Ratio") of Time to All-cause Mortality, Time to Heart Failure Hospital Readmission, and Decline in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQOL) [ Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 12 ]
Overall (across 3 outcomes)
|
282 Total number of wins
|
219 Total number of wins
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeksPopulation: Subjects randomized to the Clinical Worsening intervention only (n=12) + those randomized to both interventions (n=18) vs Subjects randomized to the Dietary intervention only (n=20) + those randomized to Neither intervention (n=12)
Time to all-cause mortality (ACM), time to heart failure hospital readmission (HFHR), and decline in quality of life will be analyzed using the Finkelstein-Schoenfeld method. The method combines these three endpoints in a hierarchical fashion using ACM first, HRHR second, and change in HRQOL third. The method pairs every participant receiving the clinical worsening intervention with every participant not receiving the clinical worsening intervention within each stratum. Within each pairing, a +1 is assigned to the "better" participant, -1 to the "worse" participant, and 0 if they are "tied". The comparison begins with ACM. Tied pairings are then compared using HFHR. Any remaining tied pairings are compared using change in HRQOL. A 'Win' represents a participant doing better within each pairing (receiving +1) based on the hierarchical comparison. The reported unit is the total "wins" for each intervention group from performing such a hierarchical comparison across all strata.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dietary Sodium Intervention
n=30 Participants
The sodium dietary intervention provides the user with tailored messages to assist with making dietary choices based on sodium content when they arrive at a grocery store or a restaurant.
This includes group B and D.
|
No Dietary Sodium Intervention
n=32 Participants
Access to all content in the control, and clinical worsening interventions. This includes group A and C.
|
Clinical Worsening Intervention
The clinical worsening intervention promotes self-monitoring and self-management and is linked tailored push notifications.
Clinical worsening intervention: The intervention adapts to the participant's reported symptoms and provides feedback with a global health status indicator (HSI). Users will receive tailored push notification based on their HSI status.
|
Dietary Sodium and Clinical Worsening
Full access to all content in the control, dietary sodium, and clinical worsening interventions.
Sodium intervention: The sodium dietary intervention provides uses location services to determine when a participant is at home, arrives at a grocery store or arrives at a restaurant. The user receives a tailored message to assist with making dietary choices based on sodium content.
Clinical worsening intervention: The intervention adapts to the participant's reported symptoms and provides feedback with a global health status indicator (HSI). Users will receive tailored push notification based on their HSI status.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hierarchical Combination ("Win Ratio") of Time to All-cause Mortality, Time to Heart Failure Hospital Readmission, and Decline in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQOL) [ Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 12 ]
Time to All-Cause Death
|
0 Total number of wins
|
0 Total number of wins
|
—
|
—
|
|
Hierarchical Combination ("Win Ratio") of Time to All-cause Mortality, Time to Heart Failure Hospital Readmission, and Decline in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQOL) [ Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 12 ]
Time to Heart-Failure Readmission
|
136 Total number of wins
|
156 Total number of wins
|
—
|
—
|
|
Hierarchical Combination ("Win Ratio") of Time to All-cause Mortality, Time to Heart Failure Hospital Readmission, and Decline in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQOL) [ Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 12 ]
Change in MLHFQ from Baseline to 12 Weeks
|
146 Total number of wins
|
63 Total number of wins
|
—
|
—
|
|
Hierarchical Combination ("Win Ratio") of Time to All-cause Mortality, Time to Heart Failure Hospital Readmission, and Decline in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQOL) [ Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 12 ]
Overall (across 3 outcomes)
|
282 Total number of wins
|
219 Total number of wins
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeksPopulation: no deaths in the study and this outcome could not be assessed
Time to all-cause mortality will be analyzed up to week 12.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeksPopulation: Subjects randomized to the Dietary intervention only (n=20) + those randomized to both interventions (n=18) vs Subjects randomized to the Clinical Worsening intervention only (n=12) + those randomized to Neither intervention (n=12)
Time to first heart-failure related hospitalization will be analyzed up to week 12.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dietary Sodium Intervention
n=38 Participants
The sodium dietary intervention provides the user with tailored messages to assist with making dietary choices based on sodium content when they arrive at a grocery store or a restaurant.
This includes group B and D.
|
No Dietary Sodium Intervention
n=24 Participants
Access to all content in the control, and clinical worsening interventions. This includes group A and C.
|
Clinical Worsening Intervention
The clinical worsening intervention promotes self-monitoring and self-management and is linked tailored push notifications.
Clinical worsening intervention: The intervention adapts to the participant's reported symptoms and provides feedback with a global health status indicator (HSI). Users will receive tailored push notification based on their HSI status.
|
Dietary Sodium and Clinical Worsening
Full access to all content in the control, dietary sodium, and clinical worsening interventions.
Sodium intervention: The sodium dietary intervention provides uses location services to determine when a participant is at home, arrives at a grocery store or arrives at a restaurant. The user receives a tailored message to assist with making dietary choices based on sodium content.
Clinical worsening intervention: The intervention adapts to the participant's reported symptoms and provides feedback with a global health status indicator (HSI). Users will receive tailored push notification based on their HSI status.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Heart Failure-related Hospitalizations [ Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 12 ]
|
43.4285714 Days since randomization
Standard Deviation 24.4871200
|
48.5000000 Days since randomization
Standard Deviation 19.3649167
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeksPopulation: Subjects randomized to the Dietary intervention only (n=20) + those randomized to both interventions (n=18) vs Subjects randomized to the Clinical Worsening intervention only (n=12) + those randomized to Neither intervention (n=12)
Change from baseline to week 12 in health-related quality of life as measured by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dietary Sodium Intervention
n=27 Participants
The sodium dietary intervention provides the user with tailored messages to assist with making dietary choices based on sodium content when they arrive at a grocery store or a restaurant.
This includes group B and D.
|
No Dietary Sodium Intervention
n=12 Participants
Access to all content in the control, and clinical worsening interventions. This includes group A and C.
|
Clinical Worsening Intervention
The clinical worsening intervention promotes self-monitoring and self-management and is linked tailored push notifications.
Clinical worsening intervention: The intervention adapts to the participant's reported symptoms and provides feedback with a global health status indicator (HSI). Users will receive tailored push notification based on their HSI status.
|
Dietary Sodium and Clinical Worsening
Full access to all content in the control, dietary sodium, and clinical worsening interventions.
Sodium intervention: The sodium dietary intervention provides uses location services to determine when a participant is at home, arrives at a grocery store or arrives at a restaurant. The user receives a tailored message to assist with making dietary choices based on sodium content.
Clinical worsening intervention: The intervention adapts to the participant's reported symptoms and provides feedback with a global health status indicator (HSI). Users will receive tailored push notification based on their HSI status.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life [ Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 12 ]
|
-39.70 Points on MLHFQ scale
Standard Deviation 33.908
|
-24.33 Points on MLHFQ scale
Standard Deviation 24.828
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeksPopulation: Subjects randomized to the Clinical Worsening intervention only (n=12) + those randomized to both interventions (n=18) vs Subjects randomized to the Dietary intervention only (n=20) + those randomized to Neither intervention (n=12)
Time to first heart-failure related hospitalization will be analyzed up to week 12.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dietary Sodium Intervention
n=30 Participants
The sodium dietary intervention provides the user with tailored messages to assist with making dietary choices based on sodium content when they arrive at a grocery store or a restaurant.
This includes group B and D.
|
No Dietary Sodium Intervention
n=32 Participants
Access to all content in the control, and clinical worsening interventions. This includes group A and C.
|
Clinical Worsening Intervention
The clinical worsening intervention promotes self-monitoring and self-management and is linked tailored push notifications.
Clinical worsening intervention: The intervention adapts to the participant's reported symptoms and provides feedback with a global health status indicator (HSI). Users will receive tailored push notification based on their HSI status.
|
Dietary Sodium and Clinical Worsening
Full access to all content in the control, dietary sodium, and clinical worsening interventions.
Sodium intervention: The sodium dietary intervention provides uses location services to determine when a participant is at home, arrives at a grocery store or arrives at a restaurant. The user receives a tailored message to assist with making dietary choices based on sodium content.
Clinical worsening intervention: The intervention adapts to the participant's reported symptoms and provides feedback with a global health status indicator (HSI). Users will receive tailored push notification based on their HSI status.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Heart Failure-related Hospitalizations [ Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 12 ]
|
53.7500000 Days since randomization
Standard Deviation 14.4308697
|
40.4285714 Days since randomization
Standard Deviation 24.8720535
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksPopulation: Subjects randomized to the Clinical Worsening intervention only (n=12) + those randomized to both interventions (n=18) vs Subjects randomized to the Dietary intervention only (n=20) + those randomized to Neither intervention (n=12)
Change from baseline to week 12 in health-related quality of life as measured by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dietary Sodium Intervention
n=17 Participants
The sodium dietary intervention provides the user with tailored messages to assist with making dietary choices based on sodium content when they arrive at a grocery store or a restaurant.
This includes group B and D.
|
No Dietary Sodium Intervention
n=22 Participants
Access to all content in the control, and clinical worsening interventions. This includes group A and C.
|
Clinical Worsening Intervention
The clinical worsening intervention promotes self-monitoring and self-management and is linked tailored push notifications.
Clinical worsening intervention: The intervention adapts to the participant's reported symptoms and provides feedback with a global health status indicator (HSI). Users will receive tailored push notification based on their HSI status.
|
Dietary Sodium and Clinical Worsening
Full access to all content in the control, dietary sodium, and clinical worsening interventions.
Sodium intervention: The sodium dietary intervention provides uses location services to determine when a participant is at home, arrives at a grocery store or arrives at a restaurant. The user receives a tailored message to assist with making dietary choices based on sodium content.
Clinical worsening intervention: The intervention adapts to the participant's reported symptoms and provides feedback with a global health status indicator (HSI). Users will receive tailored push notification based on their HSI status.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life [ Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 12 ]
|
-42.29 Points on MLHFQ scale
Standard Deviation 28.169
|
-29.32 Points on MLHFQ scale
Standard Deviation 34.036
|
—
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Control Group
Dietary Sodium Intervention
Clinical Worsening Intervention
Dietary Sodium and Clinical Worsening
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Control Group
n=12 participants at risk
Standard heart failure educational information.
Educational content: Standard heart failure educational information and a daily symptom survey.
|
Dietary Sodium Intervention
n=20 participants at risk
The dietary sodium intervention facilitates lower sodium choices using tailored push notifications.
Sodium intervention: The sodium dietary intervention provides uses location services to determine when a participant is at home, arrives at a grocery store or arrives at a restaurant. The user receives a tailored message to assist with making dietary choices based on sodium content.
|
Clinical Worsening Intervention
n=12 participants at risk
The clinical worsening intervention promotes self-monitoring and self-management and is linked tailored push notifications.
Clinical worsening intervention: The intervention adapts to the participant's reported symptoms and provides feedback with a global health status indicator (HSI). Users will receive tailored push notification based on their HSI status.
|
Dietary Sodium and Clinical Worsening
n=18 participants at risk
Full access to all content in the control, dietary sodium, and clinical worsening interventions.
Sodium intervention: The sodium dietary intervention provides uses location services to determine when a participant is at home, arrives at a grocery store or arrives at a restaurant. The user receives a tailored message to assist with making dietary choices based on sodium content.
Clinical worsening intervention: The intervention adapts to the participant's reported symptoms and provides feedback with a global health status indicator (HSI). Users will receive tailored push notification based on their HSI status.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization
|
0.00%
0/12 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
5.0%
1/20 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
0.00%
0/12 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization
|
16.7%
2/12 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
25.0%
5/20 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
16.7%
2/12 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
5.6%
1/18 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
|
Endocrine disorders
Inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization
|
8.3%
1/12 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
5.0%
1/20 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
0.00%
0/12 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization
|
0.00%
0/12 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
0.00%
0/20 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
8.3%
1/12 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization
|
0.00%
0/12 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
5.0%
1/20 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
0.00%
0/12 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization
|
8.3%
1/12 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
0.00%
0/20 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
0.00%
0/12 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization
|
16.7%
2/12 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
0.00%
0/20 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
0.00%
0/12 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
5.6%
1/18 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
|
Investigations
Inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization
|
0.00%
0/12 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
0.00%
0/20 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
0.00%
0/12 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
5.6%
1/18 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization
|
0.00%
0/12 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
5.0%
1/20 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
0.00%
0/12 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization
|
8.3%
1/12 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
0.00%
0/20 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
0.00%
0/12 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
11.1%
2/18 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization
|
0.00%
0/12 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
5.0%
1/20 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
16.7%
2/12 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Life Threatening
|
0.00%
0/12 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
0.00%
0/20 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
0.00%
0/12 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
5.6%
1/18 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Other
|
0.00%
0/12 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
5.0%
1/20 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
0.00%
0/12 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Control Group
n=12 participants at risk
Standard heart failure educational information.
Educational content: Standard heart failure educational information and a daily symptom survey.
|
Dietary Sodium Intervention
n=20 participants at risk
The dietary sodium intervention facilitates lower sodium choices using tailored push notifications.
Sodium intervention: The sodium dietary intervention provides uses location services to determine when a participant is at home, arrives at a grocery store or arrives at a restaurant. The user receives a tailored message to assist with making dietary choices based on sodium content.
|
Clinical Worsening Intervention
n=12 participants at risk
The clinical worsening intervention promotes self-monitoring and self-management and is linked tailored push notifications.
Clinical worsening intervention: The intervention adapts to the participant's reported symptoms and provides feedback with a global health status indicator (HSI). Users will receive tailored push notification based on their HSI status.
|
Dietary Sodium and Clinical Worsening
n=18 participants at risk
Full access to all content in the control, dietary sodium, and clinical worsening interventions.
Sodium intervention: The sodium dietary intervention provides uses location services to determine when a participant is at home, arrives at a grocery store or arrives at a restaurant. The user receives a tailored message to assist with making dietary choices based on sodium content.
Clinical worsening intervention: The intervention adapts to the participant's reported symptoms and provides feedback with a global health status indicator (HSI). Users will receive tailored push notification based on their HSI status.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Hyperkalemia (Potassium > 6.0 meq/dl or requiring change in therapy)
|
8.3%
1/12 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
0.00%
0/20 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
0.00%
0/12 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Symptomatic bradycardia
|
8.3%
1/12 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
0.00%
0/20 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
0.00%
0/12 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Symptomatic hypotension
|
8.3%
1/12 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
5.0%
1/20 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
16.7%
2/12 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Worsening renal function (increase in creatinine by 0.5 mg/dl from last visit or requiring change in
|
0.00%
0/12 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
15.0%
3/20 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
8.3%
1/12 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
11.1%
2/18 • The adverse event data were collected from September of 2021 to June of 2022, so a total of 9 months. Each participants was assessed for AEs for the follow-up period of 12 weeks from baseline.
The number of participants at risk for All-Cause Mortality is zero because there were no deaths reported in the study.
|
Additional Information
Dr. MICHAEL DORSCH
University of Michigan College of Pharmacy
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place