Comparing Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) and Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block in Inguinal Hernia

NCT04750512 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50

Last updated 2022-08-15

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The Erectore Spinae Plane Block (ESP Block) is a recently described technique for regional anesthesia that has shown promising results in the treatment of pain after thoracic surgery. It involves the injection of local anesthetic behind the musculature of the back.

The investigators intend to compare this technique with a more standardized one, the TAP Block, which involves injection of anesthetic behind the musculature of the abdomen.

50 patients undergoing robotic inguinal hernia repair under general anesthesia will be randomly selected to receive, in addition to general anesthesia, either the ESP block or the TAP block. Patients receiving an ESP Block will also receive an injection of saline solution in the TAP injection site, and the other way around. This will prevent preconceived ideas on either technique to influence the evaluationso of the effect.

Pain scores and consumption of pain medication will be recorded during the 24 hours following the operation to compare the effect of the two techniques.

Conditions

  • Inguinal Hernia
  • Postoperative Pain
  • Anesthesia, Local
  • Anesthesia Complication

Interventions

PROCEDURE

ESP block

US guided ESP infiltration (saline solution vs Ropivacaine 0.2% according to randomization): bilateral injection of 30ml (60ml total) under US guidance between the deep fascia of erector spinae muscle and the the two transverse process at the level of the 10th thoracic vertebrae

PROCEDURE

TAP block

US guided TAP block (saline solution vs Ropivacaine 0.2% according to randomization): bilateral injection of 30ml (total 60ml) under US guidance in the plane between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles at the level of the midaxillary line in the Petit triangle.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Ghielmini Enea

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-01-11
Primary Completion
2022-05-31
Completion
2022-05-31

Countries

  • Switzerland

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04750512 on ClinicalTrials.gov