Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study of Efficacy and Safety of Canakinumab in Japanese Patients With AOSD (NCT NCT04717635)
NCT ID: NCT04717635
Last Updated: 2026-03-31
Results Overview
Adapted ACR30 response was defined as a ≥30% improvement from baseline in at least 3 of the following 5 core response variables, with no more than one of these variables worsening by \>30%: 1. Physicians global assessment of disease activity (PhGA) on a 0-100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) (0=very good and 100=very poor). 2. Participant's assessment of disease activity (PtGA) on a 0-100 mm VAS (0=very good and 100=very poor). 3. Health Assessment Questionnaire- disability index (HAQ-DI): 20 questions across 8 domains assessing the functional abilities. The total score was calculated as the average of the scores for each domain, ranging from 0 (no disability) to 3 (very severe disability). 4. Number of active joints (68 joints evaluated for pain/tenderness and 66 for swelling) 5. Index of inflammation: C-reactive Protein (CRP) levels Additionally, participants were required to have no intermittent fever during the preceding week.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
14 participants
Baseline, Week 8
2026-03-31
Participant Flow
The enrollment was completed with 14 participants following the preliminary consultation with Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) held on 22-Feb-2023
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Canakinumab
All participants received canakinumab as open-label study medication. Canakinumab was administered subcutaneously at a dose of 4 mg/kg every four weeks, with a maximum allowable single dose of 300 mg.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
14
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
8
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
6
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Canakinumab
All participants received canakinumab as open-label study medication. Canakinumab was administered subcutaneously at a dose of 4 mg/kg every four weeks, with a maximum allowable single dose of 300 mg.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Subject Decision
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Unsatisfactory Therapeutic Effect
|
3
|
Baseline Characteristics
Study of Efficacy and Safety of Canakinumab in Japanese Patients With AOSD
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Canakinumab
n=14 Participants
All participants received canakinumab as open-label study medication. Canakinumab was administered subcutaneously at a dose of 4 mg/kg every four weeks, with a maximum allowable single dose of 300 mg.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
50.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.23 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
10 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
4 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
14 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment
Adapted ACR30 response was defined as a ≥30% improvement from baseline in at least 3 of the following 5 core response variables, with no more than one of these variables worsening by \>30%: 1. Physicians global assessment of disease activity (PhGA) on a 0-100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) (0=very good and 100=very poor). 2. Participant's assessment of disease activity (PtGA) on a 0-100 mm VAS (0=very good and 100=very poor). 3. Health Assessment Questionnaire- disability index (HAQ-DI): 20 questions across 8 domains assessing the functional abilities. The total score was calculated as the average of the scores for each domain, ranging from 0 (no disability) to 3 (very severe disability). 4. Number of active joints (68 joints evaluated for pain/tenderness and 66 for swelling) 5. Index of inflammation: C-reactive Protein (CRP) levels Additionally, participants were required to have no intermittent fever during the preceding week.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Canakinumab
n=14 Participants
All participants received canakinumab as open-label study medication. Canakinumab was administered subcutaneously at a dose of 4 mg/kg every four weeks, with a maximum allowable single dose of 300 mg.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Adapted American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 30 Response at Week 8
|
50.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 20.2 to 79.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 28Population: FAS: all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment
Number of participants achieving successful corticosteroid tapering at Week 28 was assessed. Successful tapering was defined as meeting any one of the following criteria and maintaining a minimum Adapted ACR30 response: * Participants with a baseline prednisone equivalent dose \> 0.8 mg/kg/day must reduce to ≤ 0.5 mg/kg/day * Participants with a baseline dose between ≥ 0.5 and ≤ 0.8 mg/kg/day must reduce by ≥ 0.3 mg/kg/day * Participants with any baseline dose must reduce to ≤ 0.2 mg/kg/day * Participants with a baseline dose ≤ 0.2 mg/kg/day must achieve any reduction The Adapted ACR30 response requires ≥30% improvement in at least 3 of the following 5 variables, with no more than one worsening by \>30%, and no intermittent fever in the preceding week: 1. PhGA \[0-100 VAS\] 2. PtGA \[0-100 VAS\] 3. HAQ-DI \[0-3 scale\] 4. Number of active joints (pain/tenderness: 0-68; swelling: 0-66) 5. CRP levels
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Canakinumab
n=14 Participants
All participants received canakinumab as open-label study medication. Canakinumab was administered subcutaneously at a dose of 4 mg/kg every four weeks, with a maximum allowable single dose of 300 mg.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Were Able to Taper Corticosteroids Based on Success Criteria at Week 28.
|
7 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 15, Weeks 4, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, 156, 168, 180, 192, and End of Study visit (assesed up to approx. 208 weeks)Population: FAS: all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. At each time point, only participants with non-missing values were included in the analysis
Adapted ACR30 response was defined as a ≥30% improvement from baseline in at least 3 of the following 5 core response variables, with no more than one of these variables worsening by \>30%: 1. Physicians global assessment of disease activity (PhGA) on a 0-100 mm VAS (0=very good and 100=very poor). 2. Participant's assessment of disease activity (PtGA) on a 0-100 mm VAS (0=very good and 100=very poor). 3. Health Assessment Questionnaire- disability index (HAQ-DI): 20 questions across 8 domains assessing the functional abilities. The total score was calculated as the average of the scores for each domain, ranging from 0 (no disability) to 3 (very severe disability). 4. Number of active joints (68 joints evaluated for pain/tenderness and 66 for swelling) 5. Index of inflammation: C-reactive Protein (CRP) levels Additionally, participants were required to have no intermittent fever during the preceding week.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Canakinumab
n=14 Participants
All participants received canakinumab as open-label study medication. Canakinumab was administered subcutaneously at a dose of 4 mg/kg every four weeks, with a maximum allowable single dose of 300 mg.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 30 Response Criteria
Day 15
|
11 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 30 Response Criteria
Week 4
|
11 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 30 Response Criteria
Week 12
|
11 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 30 Response Criteria
Week 16
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 30 Response Criteria
Week 20
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 30 Response Criteria
Week 24
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 30 Response Criteria
Week 28
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 30 Response Criteria
Week 32
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 30 Response Criteria
Week 36
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 30 Response Criteria
Week 40
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 30 Response Criteria
Week 44
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 30 Response Criteria
Week 48
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 30 Response Criteria
Week 60
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 30 Response Criteria
Week 72
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 30 Response Criteria
Week 84
|
7 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 30 Response Criteria
Week 96
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 30 Response Criteria
Week 108
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 30 Response Criteria
Week 120
|
7 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 30 Response Criteria
Week 132
|
7 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 30 Response Criteria
Week 144
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 30 Response Criteria
Week 156
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 30 Response Criteria
Week 168
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 30 Response Criteria
Week 180
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 30 Response Criteria
Week 192
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 30 Response Criteria
End of Study
|
10 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 15, Weeks 4, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, 156, 168, 180, 192, and End of Study visit (assesed up to approx. 208 weeks)Population: FAS: all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. At each time point, only participants with non-missing values were included in the analysis
Adapted ACR50 response was defined as 50% reduction between baseline in at least 3 of the 5 response variables, with no more than one of these variables worsening by more than 30%: 1. Physicians global assessment of disease activity on a 0-100 mm VAS (0=very good and 100=very poor). 2. Participant's assessment of disease activity (PtGA) on a 0-100 mm VAS (0=very good and 100=very poor). 3. Health Assessment Questionnaire- disability index (HAQ-DI): 20 questions across 8 domains assessing the functional abilities. The total score was calculated as the average of the scores for each domain, ranging from 0 (no disability) to 3 (very severe disability). 4. Number of active joints (68 joints evaluated for pain/tenderness and 66 for swelling) 5. Index of inflammation: C-reactive Protein (CRP) levels Additionally, participants were required to have no intermittent fever during the preceding week.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Canakinumab
n=14 Participants
All participants received canakinumab as open-label study medication. Canakinumab was administered subcutaneously at a dose of 4 mg/kg every four weeks, with a maximum allowable single dose of 300 mg.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 50 Response Criteria
Day 15
|
10 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 50 Response Criteria
Week 4
|
10 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 50 Response Criteria
Week 8
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 50 Response Criteria
Week 12
|
10 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 50 Response Criteria
Week 16
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 50 Response Criteria
Week 20
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 50 Response Criteria
Week 24
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 50 Response Criteria
Week 28
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 50 Response Criteria
Week 32
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 50 Response Criteria
Week 36
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 50 Response Criteria
Week 40
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 50 Response Criteria
Week 44
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 50 Response Criteria
Week 48
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 50 Response Criteria
Week 60
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 50 Response Criteria
Week 72
|
7 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 50 Response Criteria
Week 84
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 50 Response Criteria
Week 96
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 50 Response Criteria
Week 108
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 50 Response Criteria
Week 120
|
7 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 50 Response Criteria
Week 132
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 50 Response Criteria
Week 144
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 50 Response Criteria
Week 156
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 50 Response Criteria
Week 168
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 50 Response Criteria
Week 180
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 50 Response Criteria
Week 192
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 50 Response Criteria
End of Study
|
8 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 15, Weeks 4, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, 156, 168, 180, 192, and End of Study visit (assesed up to approx. 208 weeks)Population: FAS: all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. At each time point, only participants with non-missing values were included in the analysis
Adapted ACR70 response was defined as 70% reduction between baseline in at least 3 of the 5 response variables, with no more than one of these variables worsening by more than 30%: 1. Physicians global assessment of disease activity (PhGA) on a 0-100 mm VAS (0=very good and 100=very poor). 2. Participant's assessment of disease activity (PtGA) on a 0-100 mm VAS (0=very good and 100=very poor). 3. Health Assessment Questionnaire- disability index (HAQ-DI): 20 questions across 8 domains assessing the functional abilities. The total score was calculated as the average of the scores for each domain, ranging from 0 (no disability) to 3 (very severe disability). 4. Number of active joints (68 joints evaluated for pain/tenderness and 66 for swelling) 5. Index of inflammation: C-reactive Protein (CRP) levels Additionally, participants were required to have no intermittent fever during the preceding week.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Canakinumab
n=14 Participants
All participants received canakinumab as open-label study medication. Canakinumab was administered subcutaneously at a dose of 4 mg/kg every four weeks, with a maximum allowable single dose of 300 mg.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 70 Response Criteria
Day 15
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 70 Response Criteria
Week 4
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 70 Response Criteria
Week 8
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 70 Response Criteria
Week 12
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 70 Response Criteria
Week 16
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 70 Response Criteria
Week 20
|
7 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 70 Response Criteria
Week 24
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 70 Response Criteria
Week 28
|
7 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 70 Response Criteria
Week 32
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 70 Response Criteria
Week 36
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 70 Response Criteria
Week 40
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 70 Response Criteria
Week 44
|
7 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 70 Response Criteria
Week 48
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 70 Response Criteria
Week 60
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 70 Response Criteria
Week 72
|
7 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 70 Response Criteria
Week 84
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 70 Response Criteria
Week 96
|
7 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 70 Response Criteria
Week 108
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 70 Response Criteria
Week 120
|
7 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 70 Response Criteria
Week 132
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 70 Response Criteria
Week 144
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 70 Response Criteria
Week 156
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 70 Response Criteria
Week 168
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 70 Response Criteria
Week 180
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 70 Response Criteria
Week 192
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 70 Response Criteria
End of Study
|
6 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 15, Weeks 4, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, 156, 168, 180, 192, and End of Study visit (assesed up to approx. 208 weeks)Population: FAS: all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. At each time point, only participants with non-missing values were included in the analysis
Adapted ACR90 response was defined as 90% reduction between baseline in at least 3 of the 5 response variables, with no more than one of these variables worsening by more than 30%: 1. Physicians global assessment of disease activity (PhGA) on a 0-100 mm VAS (0=very good and 100=very poor). 2. Participant's assessment of disease activity (PtGA) on a 0-100 mm VAS (0=very good and 100=very poor). 3. Health Assessment Questionnaire- disability index (HAQ-DI): 20 questions across 8 domains assessing the functional abilities. The total score was calculated as the average of the scores for each domain, ranging from 0 (no disability) to 3 (very severe disability). 4. Number of active joints (68 joints evaluated for pain/tenderness and 66 for swelling) 5. Index of inflammation: C-reactive Protein (CRP) levels Additionally, participants were required to have no intermittent fever during the preceding week.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Canakinumab
n=14 Participants
All participants received canakinumab as open-label study medication. Canakinumab was administered subcutaneously at a dose of 4 mg/kg every four weeks, with a maximum allowable single dose of 300 mg.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 90 Response Criteria
Day 15
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 90 Response Criteria
Week 4
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 90 Response Criteria
Week 8
|
7 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 90 Response Criteria
Week 12
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 90 Response Criteria
Week 16
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 90 Response Criteria
Week 20
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 90 Response Criteria
Week 24
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 90 Response Criteria
Week 28
|
7 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 90 Response Criteria
Week 32
|
7 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 90 Response Criteria
Week 36
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 90 Response Criteria
Week 40
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 90 Response Criteria
Week 44
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 90 Response Criteria
Week 48
|
7 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 90 Response Criteria
Week 60
|
7 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 90 Response Criteria
Week 72
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 90 Response Criteria
Week 84
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 90 Response Criteria
Week 96
|
7 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 90 Response Criteria
Week 108
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 90 Response Criteria
Week 120
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 90 Response Criteria
Week 132
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 90 Response Criteria
Week 144
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 90 Response Criteria
Week 156
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 90 Response Criteria
Week 168
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 90 Response Criteria
Week 180
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 90 Response Criteria
Week 192
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 90 Response Criteria
End of Study
|
6 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 15, Weeks 4, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, 156, 168, 180, 192, and End of Study visit (assesed up to approx. 208 weeks)Population: FAS: all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. At each time point, only participants with non-missing values were included in the analysis
Adapted ACR100 response was defined as 100% reduction between baseline in at least 3 of the 5 response variables, with no more than one of these variables worsening by more than 30%: 1. Physicians global assessment of disease activity (PhGA) on a 0-100 mm VAS (0=very good and 100=very poor). 2. Participant's assessment of disease activity (PtGA) on a 0-100 mm VAS (0=very good and 100=very poor). 3. Health Assessment Questionnaire- disability index (HAQ-DI): 20 questions across 8 domains assessing the functional abilities. The total score was calculated as the average of the scores for each domain, ranging from 0 (no disability) to 3 (very severe disability). 4. Number of active joints (68 joints evaluated for pain/tenderness and 66 for swelling) 5. Index of inflammation: C-reactive Protein (CRP) levels Additionally, participants were required to have no intermittent fever during the preceding week.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Canakinumab
n=14 Participants
All participants received canakinumab as open-label study medication. Canakinumab was administered subcutaneously at a dose of 4 mg/kg every four weeks, with a maximum allowable single dose of 300 mg.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 100 Response Criteria
Day 15
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 100 Response Criteria
Week 4
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 100 Response Criteria
Week 8
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 100 Response Criteria
Week 12
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 100 Response Criteria
Week 16
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 100 Response Criteria
Week 20
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 100 Response Criteria
Week 24
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 100 Response Criteria
Week 28
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 100 Response Criteria
Week 32
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 100 Response Criteria
Week 36
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 100 Response Criteria
Week 40
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 100 Response Criteria
Week 44
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 100 Response Criteria
Week 48
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 100 Response Criteria
Week 60
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 100 Response Criteria
Week 72
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 100 Response Criteria
Week 84
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 100 Response Criteria
Week 96
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 100 Response Criteria
Week 108
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 100 Response Criteria
Week 120
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 100 Response Criteria
Week 132
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 100 Response Criteria
Week 144
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 100 Response Criteria
Week 156
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 100 Response Criteria
Week 168
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 100 Response Criteria
Week 180
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 100 Response Criteria
Week 192
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adapted ACR 100 Response Criteria
End of Study
|
5 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 15, Weeks 4, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, 156, 168, 180, 192, and End of Study visit (assesed up to approx. 208 weeks)Population: FAS: all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. At each time point, only participants with non-missing values were included in the analysis
The SFS evaluated 10 features, each scored as 1 (present) or 0 (absent). The total score ranged from 0 (none present) to 10 (all present). A negative change from baseline indicated clinical improvement. Clinical features: * Fever (\>37.5°C for ≥5 consecutive days) * Rash (salmon-pink during febrile episodes) * Serositis * Lymphadenopathy (\>1.5 cm) * Hepatomegaly/splenomegaly (confirmed by ultrasound or palpation) Laboratory features: At baseline, considered present if: * ESR ≥20 mm/hour * CRP ≥10 mg/L * WBC count ≥12×10⁹/L * Hemoglobin ≤11 g/dL * Platelets ≥400×10⁹/L During treatment and follow-up: * ESR: 0 if \<20 mm/hour or decreased ≥30%; 1 if increased or decreased \<30% * CRP: 0 if \<10 mg/L or decreased ≥30%; 1 if increased or decreased \<30% * WBC count: 0 if \<12×10⁹/L or decreased ≥20%; 1 if increased or decreased \<20% * Hemoglobin: 0 if \>11 g/dL or increased ≥20%; 1 if decreased or increased \<20% * Platelets: 0 if \<400×10⁹/L or decreased ≥20%; 1 if increased or decreased \<20%
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Canakinumab
n=14 Participants
All participants received canakinumab as open-label study medication. Canakinumab was administered subcutaneously at a dose of 4 mg/kg every four weeks, with a maximum allowable single dose of 300 mg.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Systemic Feature Score (SFS)
Day 15
|
-3.4 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.95
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systemic Feature Score (SFS)
Week 4
|
-3.6 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.60
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systemic Feature Score (SFS)
Week 8
|
-3.6 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.5
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systemic Feature Score (SFS)
Week 12
|
-3.6 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.87
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systemic Feature Score (SFS)
Week 16
|
-3.8 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.77
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systemic Feature Score (SFS)
Week 20
|
-3.9 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.71
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systemic Feature Score (SFS)
Week 24
|
-3.8 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 2.24
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systemic Feature Score (SFS)
Week 28
|
-4.3 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.86
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systemic Feature Score (SFS)
Week 32
|
-4.1 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 2.12
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systemic Feature Score (SFS)
Week 36
|
-4.4 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.86
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systemic Feature Score (SFS)
Week 40
|
-4.5 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.81
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systemic Feature Score (SFS)
Week 44
|
-4.2 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.94
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systemic Feature Score (SFS)
Week 48
|
-4.1 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 2.02
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systemic Feature Score (SFS)
Week 60
|
-3.7 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 2.61
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systemic Feature Score (SFS)
Week 72
|
-4.1 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 2.13
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systemic Feature Score (SFS)
Week 84
|
-3.8 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.92
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systemic Feature Score (SFS)
Week 96
|
-4.2 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 2.25
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systemic Feature Score (SFS)
Week 108
|
-4.2 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 2.33
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systemic Feature Score (SFS)
Week 120
|
-4.0 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 2.65
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systemic Feature Score (SFS)
Week 132
|
-4.4 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 2.19
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systemic Feature Score (SFS)
Week 144
|
-4.5 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 2.07
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systemic Feature Score (SFS)
Week 156
|
-5.3 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 2.06
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systemic Feature Score (SFS)
Week 168
|
-5.0 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 3.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systemic Feature Score (SFS)
Week 180
|
-5.3 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 2.52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systemic Feature Score (SFS)
Week 192
|
-5.0 Score on a Scale
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systemic Feature Score (SFS)
Enf of Study
|
-4.0 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.92
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: aseline, Day 15, Weeks 4, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, 156, 168, 180, 192, and End of Study visit (assesed up to approx. 208 weeks)Population: FAS: all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. At each time point, only participants with non-missing values were included in the analysis
The physician rated the participant's disease activity on a 0-100 mm VAS, ranging from no disease activity (0 mm) to very severe disease activity (100 mm). A negative change from baseline indicated improvement
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Canakinumab
n=14 Participants
All participants received canakinumab as open-label study medication. Canakinumab was administered subcutaneously at a dose of 4 mg/kg every four weeks, with a maximum allowable single dose of 300 mg.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Day 15
|
-47.6 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 20.29
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 4
|
-52.7 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 14.90
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 8
|
-52.8 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 15.58
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 12
|
-52.6 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 23.82
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 16
|
-48.7 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 27.21
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 20
|
-52.3 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 17.11
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 24
|
-51.1 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 23.84
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 28
|
-51.0 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 19.92
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 32
|
-56.5 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 16.01
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 36
|
-62.7 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 10.32
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 40
|
-59.5 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 14.40
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 44
|
-57.2 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 13.12
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 48
|
-55.5 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 15.05
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 60
|
-55.9 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 20.98
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 72
|
-56.0 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 13.91
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 84
|
-50.8 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 17.43
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 96
|
-59.3 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 9.39
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 108
|
-61.7 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 10.58
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 120
|
-58.8 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 19.18
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 132
|
-62.0 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 10.09
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 144
|
-61.8 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 10.62
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 156
|
-61.3 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 11.35
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 168
|
-62.0 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 5.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 180
|
-58.7 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 11.37
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 192
|
-68.0 Score on a Scale
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
End of Study
|
-48.9 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 30.70
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 15, Weeks 4, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, 156, 168, 180, 192, and End of Study visit (assesed up to approx. 208 weeks)Population: FAS: all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. At each time point, only participants with non-missing values were included in the analysis
The participant's assessment of disease activity was assessed on the VAS. The VAS scale ranges from 0-100 mm, from no pain/very well (0 mm) to very severe pain/very poor (100 mm). A negative change from baseline indicated improvement
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Canakinumab
n=14 Participants
All participants received canakinumab as open-label study medication. Canakinumab was administered subcutaneously at a dose of 4 mg/kg every four weeks, with a maximum allowable single dose of 300 mg.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 168
|
-27.7 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 33.55
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Day 15
|
-32.9 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 30.78
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 4
|
-33.4 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 27.56
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 8
|
-29.6 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 30.21
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 12
|
-35.8 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 30.57
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 16
|
-40.2 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 29.01
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 20
|
-37.0 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 23.14
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 24
|
-40.9 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 27.83
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 28
|
-40.3 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 26.49
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 32
|
-39.2 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 26.03
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 36
|
-43.7 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 28.45
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 40
|
-43.5 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 27.23
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 44
|
-30.1 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 41.92
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 48
|
-41.0 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 25.91
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 60
|
-40.0 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 25.68
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 72
|
-35.6 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 29.79
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 84
|
-34.4 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 22.62
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 96
|
-44.5 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 28.54
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 108
|
-47.2 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 29.03
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 120
|
-47.0 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 34.75
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 132
|
-35.2 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 37.19
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 144
|
-40.1 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 31.06
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 156
|
-40.3 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 35.53
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 180
|
-30.7 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 39.8
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 192
|
-49.0 Score on a Scale
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
End of Study
|
-30.5 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 33.15
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 15, Weeks 4, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, 156, 168, 180, 192, and End of Study visit (assesed up to approx. 208 weeks)Population: FAS: all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. At each time point, only participants with non-missing values were included in the analysis
The HAQ was used to assess physical ability and functional status of participants as well as quality of life. The disability dimension consisted of 20 multiple choice items concerning difficulty in performing eight common activities of daily living; dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and usual activities. Each item is scored from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). The score for each domain is the highest item score, and the total score is the mean of the domain scores., ranging from 0 (no disability) to 3 (severe disability). A negative change from baseline indicated improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Canakinumab
n=14 Participants
All participants received canakinumab as open-label study medication. Canakinumab was administered subcutaneously at a dose of 4 mg/kg every four weeks, with a maximum allowable single dose of 300 mg.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
Day 15
|
-0.5893 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 0.58718
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
Week 4
|
-0.5714 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 0.62733
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
Week 8
|
-0.6339 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 0.65498
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
Week 12
|
-0.6786 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 0.72177
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
Week 16
|
-0.7500 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 0.70895
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
Week 20
|
-0.7212 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 0.65779
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
Week 24
|
-0.7115 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 0.70597
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
Week 28
|
-0.7083 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 0.73146
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
Week 32
|
-0.5568 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 0.74028
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
Week 36
|
-0.6818 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 0.6623
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
Week 40
|
-0.7045 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 0.72945
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
Week 44
|
-0.7159 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 0.67567
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
Week 48
|
-0.7955 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 0.71649
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
Week 60
|
-0.6250 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 0.76035
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
Week 72
|
-0.5500 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 0.66978
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
Week 84
|
-0.6111 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 0.71656
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
Week 96
|
-0.6000 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 0.72839
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
Week 108
|
-0.5694 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 0.75029
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
Week 120
|
-0.6389 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 0.7742
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
Week 132
|
-0.5694 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 0.83411
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
Week 144
|
-0.6250 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 0.76474
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
Week 156
|
-1.0000 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.03582
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
Week 168
|
-0.5417 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 0.93819
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
Week 180
|
-0.6250 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 0.875
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
Week 192
|
0.0000 Score on a Scale
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
End of Study
|
-0.7212 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 0.71653
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 15, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, 156, 168, 180, 192, End of Study (up to approx. 208 weeks)Population: FAS: all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. At each time point, only participants with non-missing values were included in the analysis
Active joints were defined as joints with swelling or pain/tenderness. 68 joints were assessed for pain/tenderness and 66 joints for swelling. The number of active joints ranged from 0 (no active joints) to 68 (all joints tender and /or swollen). A negative change from baseline indicated improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Canakinumab
n=14 Participants
All participants received canakinumab as open-label study medication. Canakinumab was administered subcutaneously at a dose of 4 mg/kg every four weeks, with a maximum allowable single dose of 300 mg.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Number of Active Joints
Day 15
|
-6.6 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 4.64
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Number of Active Joints
Week 4
|
-7.4 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 5.53
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Number of Active Joints
Week 8
|
-6.9 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 7.09
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Number of Active Joints
Week 12
|
-7.6 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 6.62
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Number of Active Joints
Week 16
|
-5.8 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 7.89
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Number of Active Joints
Week 20
|
-7.0 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 7.51
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Number of Active Joints
Week 24
|
-7.8 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 6.73
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Number of Active Joints
Week 28
|
-6.9 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 6.88
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Number of Active Joints
Week 32
|
-6.7 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 7.32
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Number of Active Joints
Week 36
|
-7.5 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 7.62
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Number of Active Joints
Week 40
|
-7.4 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 7.55
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Number of Active Joints
Week 44
|
-7.1 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 7.23
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Number of Active Joints
Week 48
|
-7.1 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 7.56
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Number of Active Joints
Week 60
|
-7.9 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 7.42
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Number of Active Joints
Week 72
|
-6.5 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 7.68
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Number of Active Joints
Week 84
|
-4.1 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 0.22
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Number of Active Joints
Week 96
|
-6.7 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 7.47
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Number of Active Joints
Week 108
|
-5.7 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 8.67
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Number of Active Joints
Week 120
|
-4.8 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 9.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Number of Active Joints
Week 132
|
-4.0 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 9.73
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Number of Active Joints
Week 144
|
-6.5 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 8.35
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Number of Active Joints
Week 156
|
-7.8 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 2.71
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Number of Active Joints
Week 168
|
-11.7 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 2.66
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Number of Active Joints
Week 180
|
-11.0 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 3.08
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Number of Active Joints
Week 192
|
-2.0 Score on a Scale
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: Number of Active Joints
End of Study
|
-5.9 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 7.32
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 15, Weeks 4, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, 156, 168, 180, 192, and End of Study visit (assesed up to approx. 208 weeks)Population: FAS: all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. At each time point, only participants with non-missing values were included in the analysis
CRP levels in the blood were determined A negative change from baseline indicated improvement in systemic inflammation
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Canakinumab
n=14 Participants
All participants received canakinumab as open-label study medication. Canakinumab was administered subcutaneously at a dose of 4 mg/kg every four weeks, with a maximum allowable single dose of 300 mg.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Levels
Week 48
|
-314.6797 mg/L
Standard Deviation 268.05969
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Levels
Week 60
|
-298.8312 mg/L
Standard Deviation 269.87606
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Levels
Week 72
|
-286.2095 mg/L
Standard Deviation 242.63735
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Levels
Week 84
|
-258.3175 mg/L
Standard Deviation 265.91859
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Levels
Week 96
|
-297.4381 mg/L
Standard Deviation 265.76445
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Levels
Week 108
|
-311.9048 mg/L
Standard Deviation 280.69952
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Levels
Week 120
|
-313.5714 mg/L
Standard Deviation 281.25153
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Levels
Week 132
|
-309.4444 mg/L
Standard Deviation 277.55579
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Levels
Week 144
|
-320.8929 mg/L
Standard Deviation 291.79268
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Levels
Week 156
|
-377.3214 mg/L
Standard Deviation 376.72974
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Levels
Week 168
|
-222.6190 mg/L
Standard Deviation 206.96585
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Levels
Week 180
|
-220.7143 mg/L
Standard Deviation 209.04423
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Levels
Week 192
|
-127.8571 mg/L
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Levels
End of Study
|
-347.7177 mg/L
Standard Deviation 330.84951
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Levels
Week 32
|
-312.7879 mg/L
Standard Deviation 267.65072
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Levels
Week 36
|
-322.3333 mg/L
Standard Deviation 266.82606
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Levels
Week 40
|
-316.6104 mg/L
Standard Deviation 270.88848
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Levels
Week 44
|
-310.6494 mg/L
Standard Deviation 260.99974
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Levels
Week 8
|
-358.6973 mg/L
Standard Deviation 336.45356
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Levels
Week 12
|
-315.3299 mg/L
Standard Deviation 331.26901
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Levels
Week 16
|
-253.7326 mg/L
Standard Deviation 283.94286
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Levels
Week 20
|
-273.7619 mg/L
Standard Deviation 318.23766
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Levels
Week 24
|
-280.6557 mg/L
Standard Deviation 299.62927
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Levels
Week 28
|
-271.1270 mg/L
Standard Deviation 274.53517
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Levels
Day 15
|
-372.7041 mg/L
Standard Deviation 337.34921
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Component of Adapted ACR: C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Levels
Week 4
|
-359.5374 mg/L
Standard Deviation 332.57891
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 15, Weeks 4, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, 156, 168, 180, 192, and End of Study visit (assesed up to approx. 208 weeks)Population: FAS: all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. At each time point, only participants with non-missing values were included in the analysis
The number of participants without intermittent fever associated to AOSD (defined as oral, rectal, or axillary body temperature \> 38°C only for several hours during the day) was assessed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Canakinumab
n=14 Participants
All participants received canakinumab as open-label study medication. Canakinumab was administered subcutaneously at a dose of 4 mg/kg every four weeks, with a maximum allowable single dose of 300 mg.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Absence of Intermittent Fever in the Preceding Week (Component of the Adapted ACR)
Baseline
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Absence of Intermittent Fever in the Preceding Week (Component of the Adapted ACR)
Day 15
|
14 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Absence of Intermittent Fever in the Preceding Week (Component of the Adapted ACR)
Week 4
|
12 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Absence of Intermittent Fever in the Preceding Week (Component of the Adapted ACR)
Week 8
|
12 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Absence of Intermittent Fever in the Preceding Week (Component of the Adapted ACR)
Week 12
|
13 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Absence of Intermittent Fever in the Preceding Week (Component of the Adapted ACR)
Week 16
|
12 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Absence of Intermittent Fever in the Preceding Week (Component of the Adapted ACR)
Week 20
|
12 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Absence of Intermittent Fever in the Preceding Week (Component of the Adapted ACR)
Week 24
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Absence of Intermittent Fever in the Preceding Week (Component of the Adapted ACR)
Week 28
|
12 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Absence of Intermittent Fever in the Preceding Week (Component of the Adapted ACR)
Week 32
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Absence of Intermittent Fever in the Preceding Week (Component of the Adapted ACR)
Week 36
|
10 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Absence of Intermittent Fever in the Preceding Week (Component of the Adapted ACR)
Week 40
|
10 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Absence of Intermittent Fever in the Preceding Week (Component of the Adapted ACR)
Week 44
|
11 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Absence of Intermittent Fever in the Preceding Week (Component of the Adapted ACR)
Week 48
|
11 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Absence of Intermittent Fever in the Preceding Week (Component of the Adapted ACR)
Week 60
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Absence of Intermittent Fever in the Preceding Week (Component of the Adapted ACR)
Week 72
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Absence of Intermittent Fever in the Preceding Week (Component of the Adapted ACR)
Week 84
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Absence of Intermittent Fever in the Preceding Week (Component of the Adapted ACR)
Week 96
|
10 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Absence of Intermittent Fever in the Preceding Week (Component of the Adapted ACR)
Week 108
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Absence of Intermittent Fever in the Preceding Week (Component of the Adapted ACR)
Week 120
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Absence of Intermittent Fever in the Preceding Week (Component of the Adapted ACR)
Week 132
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Absence of Intermittent Fever in the Preceding Week (Component of the Adapted ACR)
Week 144
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Absence of Intermittent Fever in the Preceding Week (Component of the Adapted ACR)
Week 156
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Absence of Intermittent Fever in the Preceding Week (Component of the Adapted ACR)
Week 168
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Absence of Intermittent Fever in the Preceding Week (Component of the Adapted ACR)
Week 180
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Absence of Intermittent Fever in the Preceding Week (Component of the Adapted ACR)
Week 192
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Absence of Intermittent Fever in the Preceding Week (Component of the Adapted ACR)
End of Study
|
13 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, 156, 168, 180, 192, End of Study visit (assessed up to approx. 208 weeks)Population: FAS: all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. At each time point, only participants with non-missing values were included in the analysis
The oral corticosteroid dose was derived from the prednisone equivalent dose per day. The change from baseline was assessed. A negative change from baseline indicated reduced corticosteroid use.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Canakinumab
n=14 Participants
All participants received canakinumab as open-label study medication. Canakinumab was administered subcutaneously at a dose of 4 mg/kg every four weeks, with a maximum allowable single dose of 300 mg.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose
Week 8
|
0.71 mg/day
Standard Deviation 6.157
|
|
Change From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose
Week 12
|
-3.68 mg/day
Standard Deviation 7.178
|
|
Change From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose
Week 16
|
-5.42 mg/day
Standard Deviation 8.772
|
|
Change From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose
Week 20
|
-5.65 mg/day
Standard Deviation 9.560
|
|
Change From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose
Week 24
|
-7.12 mg/day
Standard Deviation 0.090
|
|
Change From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose
Week 28
|
-9.29 mg/day
Standard Deviation 0.215
|
|
Change From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose
Week 32
|
-11.5 mg/day
Standard Deviation 0.430
|
|
Change From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose
Week 36
|
-11.32 mg/day
Standard Deviation 12.248
|
|
Change From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose
Week 40
|
-12.82 mg/day
Standard Deviation 11.292
|
|
Change From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose
Week 44
|
-12.77 mg/day
Standard Deviation 12.003
|
|
Change From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose
Week 48
|
-11.14 mg/day
Standard Deviation 15.346
|
|
Change From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose
Week 60
|
-12.14 mg/day
Standard Deviation 14.297
|
|
Change From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose
Week 72
|
-13.55 mg/day
Standard Deviation 13.351
|
|
Change From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose
Week 84
|
-14.50 mg/day
Standard Deviation 13.299
|
|
Change From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose
Week 96
|
-14.50 mg/day
Standard Deviation 12.065
|
|
Change From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose
Week 108
|
-16.11 mg/day
Standard Deviation 11.516
|
|
Change From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose
Week 120
|
-16.44 mg/day
Standard Deviation 11.069
|
|
Change From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose
Week 132
|
-15.67 mg/day
Standard Deviation 12.510
|
|
Change From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose
Week 144
|
-18.75 mg/day
Standard Deviation 8.763
|
|
Change From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose
Week 156
|
-21.50 mg/day
Standard Deviation 11.358
|
|
Change From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose
Week 168
|
-22.00 mg/day
Standard Deviation 13.856
|
|
Change From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose
Week 180
|
-30.00 mg/day
|
|
Change From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose
End of Study
|
-6.57 mg/day
Standard Deviation 20.418
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 15, Weeks 4, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, 156, 168, 180, 192, and End of Study visit (assesed up to approx. 208 weeks)Population: FAS: all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. At each time point, only participants with non-missing values were included in the analysis
The absence or presence of skin rash was assessed based on physical exam findings including whether it is typical or/and atypical. Participants with a rash showing both typical and atypical features were counted in both sub-categories. In the summary table, for each visit participants are classified as: rash present (typical and/or atypical), rash present (typical), rash present (atypical), or rash absent. For every visit, the denominator used to calculate percentages corresponds to the number of participants with available data at that visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Canakinumab
n=14 Participants
All participants received canakinumab as open-label study medication. Canakinumab was administered subcutaneously at a dose of 4 mg/kg every four weeks, with a maximum allowable single dose of 300 mg.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 20: Present - Typical
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 28: Present - Typical
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 36: Present - Typical
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Baseline: Present - Typical and/or Atypical
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Baseline: Present - Typical
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Baseline: Present- Atypical
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Baseline: Absent
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Day 15: Present - Typical and/or Atypical
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Day 15: Present- Typical
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Day 15: Present - Atypical
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Day 15: Absent
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 4: Present - Typical and/or Atypical
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 4: Present - Typical
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 4: Present - Atypical
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 4: Absent
|
10 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 8: Present - Typical and/or Atypical
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 8: Present - Typical
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 8: Present - Atypical
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 8: Absent
|
12 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 12: Present - Typical and/or Atypical
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 12: Present - Typical
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 12: Present - Atypical
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 12: Absent
|
12 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 16: Present - Typical and/or Atypical
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 16: Present - Typical
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 16: Present - Atypical
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 16: Absent
|
11 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 20: Present - Typical and/or Atypical
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 20: Present - Atypical
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 20: Absent
|
11 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 24: Present - Typical and/or Atypical
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 24: Present - Typical
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 24: Present - Atypical
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 24: Absent
|
12 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 28: Present - Typical and/or Atypical
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 28: Present - Atypical
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 28: Absent
|
11 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 32: Present - Typical and/or Atypical
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 32: Present - Typical
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 32: Present - Atypical
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 32: Absent
|
10 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 36: Present - Typical and/or Atypical
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 36: Present - Atypical
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 36: Absent
|
10 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 40: Present - Typical and/or Atypical
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 40: Present - Typical
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 40: Present - Atypical
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 40: Absent
|
10 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 44: Present - Typical and/or Atypical
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 44: Present - Typical
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 44: Present - Atypical
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 44: Absent
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 48: Present - Typical and/or Atypical
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 48: Present - Typical
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 48: Present - Atypical
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 48: Absent
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 60: Present - Typical and/or Atypical
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 60: Present - Typical
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 60: Present - Atypical
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 60: Absent
|
10 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 72: Present - Typical and/or Atypical
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 72: Present - Typical
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 72: Present - Atypical
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 72: Absent
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 84: Present - Typical and/or Atypical
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 84: Present - Typical
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 84: Present - Atypical
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 84: Absent
|
7 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 96: Present - Typical and/or Atypical
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 96: Present - Typical
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 96: Present - Atypical
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 96: Absent
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 108: Present - Typical and/or Atypical
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 108: Present - Typical
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 108: Present - Atypical
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 108: Absent
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 120: Present - Typical and/or Atypical
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 120: Present - Typical
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 120: Present - Atypical
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 120: Absent
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 132: Present - Typical and/or Atypical
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 132: Present - Typical
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 132: Present - Atypical
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 132: Absent
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 144: Present - Typical and/or Atypical
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 144: Present - Typical
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 144: Present - Atypical
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 144: Absent
|
7 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 156: Present - Typical and/or Atypical
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 156: Present - Typical
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 156: Present - Atypical
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 156: Absent
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 168: Present - Typical and/or Atypical
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 168: Present - Typical
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 168: Present - Atypical
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 168: Absent
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 180: Present - Typical and/or Atypical
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 180: Present - Typical
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 180: Present - Atypical
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 180: Absent
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 192: Present - Typical and/or Atypical
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 192: Present - Typical
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 192: Present - Atypical
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
Week 192: Absent
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
End of Study: Present - Typical and/or Atypical
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
End of Study: Present - Typical
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
End of Study: Present - Atypical
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Rash (Typical vs. Atypical)
End of Study: Absent
|
12 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 15, Weeks 4, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, 156, 168, 180, 192, and End of Study visit (assesed up to approx. 208 weeks)Population: FAS: all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. At each time point, only participants with non-missing values were included in the analysis
DAS28-CRP was a composite index validated for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It took into account the following components: tender joint count (0-28), swollen joint count (0-28), C-reactive protein (CRP, mg/L), and the Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (Global Health), rated from 0 (best) to 100 (worst). These results were combined to produce the DAS28-CRP score, which ranged from 1.0 (disease remission) to 9.4 (high disease activity). A negative change from baseline in DAS28-CRP indicated an improvement
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Canakinumab
n=14 Participants
All participants received canakinumab as open-label study medication. Canakinumab was administered subcutaneously at a dose of 4 mg/kg every four weeks, with a maximum allowable single dose of 300 mg.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS)28 - CRP
Day 15
|
-2.921 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.3182
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS)28 - CRP
Week 4
|
-3.059 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.2112
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS)28 - CRP
Week 8
|
-2.941 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.4491
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS)28 - CRP
Week 12
|
-3.220 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.4276
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS)28 - CRP
Week 16
|
-3.007 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.7702
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS)28 - CRP
Week 20
|
-3.105 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.6442
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS)28 - CRP
Week 24
|
-3.364 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.4588
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS)28 - CRP
Week 28
|
-3.295 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.4465
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS)28 - CRP
Week 32
|
-3.371 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.6432
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS)28 - CRP
Week 36
|
-3.597 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.3827
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS)28 - CRP
Week 40
|
-3.400 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.4587
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS)28 - CRP
Week 44
|
-3.114 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.5727
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS)28 - CRP
Week 48
|
-3.359 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.6293
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS)28 - CRP
Week 60
|
-3.297 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.6971
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS)28 - CRP
Week 72
|
-3.219 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.4698
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS)28 - CRP
Week 84
|
-2.808 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.7141
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS)28 - CRP
Week 96
|
-3.291 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.3736
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS)28 - CRP
Week 108
|
-3.372 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.5808
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS)28 - CRP
Week 120
|
-3.416 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.6970
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS)28 - CRP
Week 132
|
-3.208 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.6398
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS)28 - CRP
Week 144
|
-3.510 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.5109
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS)28 - CRP
Week 156
|
-3.635 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.9722
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS)28 - CRP
Week 168
|
-3.508 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 2.1401
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS)28 - CRP
Week 180
|
-3.421 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 2.4161
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS)28 - CRP
Week 192
|
-3.308 Score on a Scale
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS)28 - CRP
End of Study
|
-2.958 Score on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.6210
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (pre-dose), Day 3, Day 15, and pre-dose at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, 156, 168, 180, 192.Population: FAS: all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. At each time point, only participants with evaluable values were included in the analysis
Serum canakinumab concentrations by visit
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Canakinumab
n=14 Participants
All participants received canakinumab as open-label study medication. Canakinumab was administered subcutaneously at a dose of 4 mg/kg every four weeks, with a maximum allowable single dose of 300 mg.
|
|---|---|
|
Canakinumab Concentrations Over Time
Week 132 (pre-dose)
|
45900 nanogram (ng) / mililiter (mL)
Standard Deviation 19300
|
|
Canakinumab Concentrations Over Time
Week 144 (pre-dose)
|
48400 nanogram (ng) / mililiter (mL)
Standard Deviation 21200
|
|
Canakinumab Concentrations Over Time
Week 156 (pre-dose)
|
40700 nanogram (ng) / mililiter (mL)
Standard Deviation 18600
|
|
Canakinumab Concentrations Over Time
Week 168 (pre-dose)
|
32600 nanogram (ng) / mililiter (mL)
|
|
Canakinumab Concentrations Over Time
Week 180 (pre-dose)
|
39900 nanogram (ng) / mililiter (mL)
|
|
Canakinumab Concentrations Over Time
Week 192 (pre-dose)
|
31800 nanogram (ng) / mililiter (mL)
|
|
Canakinumab Concentrations Over Time
Baseline (predose)
|
0.00 nanogram (ng) / mililiter (mL)
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Canakinumab Concentrations Over Time
Day 3
|
12700 nanogram (ng) / mililiter (mL)
Standard Deviation 8140
|
|
Canakinumab Concentrations Over Time
Day 15
|
17700 nanogram (ng) / mililiter (mL)
Standard Deviation 5490
|
|
Canakinumab Concentrations Over Time
Week 4 (pre-dose)
|
11800 nanogram (ng) / mililiter (mL)
Standard Deviation 4140
|
|
Canakinumab Concentrations Over Time
Week 12 (pre-dose)
|
25500 nanogram (ng) / mililiter (mL)
Standard Deviation 12600
|
|
Canakinumab Concentrations Over Time
Week 24 (pre-dose)
|
38000 nanogram (ng) / mililiter (mL)
Standard Deviation 22000
|
|
Canakinumab Concentrations Over Time
Week 36 (pre-dose)
|
39600 nanogram (ng) / mililiter (mL)
Standard Deviation 21700
|
|
Canakinumab Concentrations Over Time
Week 48 (pre-dose)
|
40800 nanogram (ng) / mililiter (mL)
Standard Deviation 22000
|
|
Canakinumab Concentrations Over Time
Week 60 (pre-dose)
|
36000 nanogram (ng) / mililiter (mL)
Standard Deviation 14300
|
|
Canakinumab Concentrations Over Time
Week 72 (pre-dose)
|
43300 nanogram (ng) / mililiter (mL)
Standard Deviation 21400
|
|
Canakinumab Concentrations Over Time
Week 84 (pre-dose)
|
27400 nanogram (ng) / mililiter (mL)
Standard Deviation 5910
|
|
Canakinumab Concentrations Over Time
Week 96 (pre-dose)
|
41400 nanogram (ng) / mililiter (mL)
Standard Deviation 21500
|
|
Canakinumab Concentrations Over Time
Week 108 (pre-dose)
|
45200 nanogram (ng) / mililiter (mL)
Standard Deviation 20000
|
|
Canakinumab Concentrations Over Time
Week 120 (pre-dose)
|
41800 nanogram (ng) / mililiter (mL)
Standard Deviation 29400
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (pre-dose), Day 3, Day 15, and pre-dose at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, 156, 168, 180, 192.Population: FAS: all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. At each time point, only participants with evaluable values were included in the analysis
Total IL-1β (sum of IL-1β free and bound to canakinumab) in serum was assessed
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Canakinumab
n=14 Participants
All participants received canakinumab as open-label study medication. Canakinumab was administered subcutaneously at a dose of 4 mg/kg every four weeks, with a maximum allowable single dose of 300 mg.
|
|---|---|
|
Total IL-1β Levels
Baseline (predose)
|
0.254 picogram (pg) / mL
Standard Deviation 0.449
|
|
Total IL-1β Levels
Day 3
|
63.9 picogram (pg) / mL
Standard Deviation 66.4
|
|
Total IL-1β Levels
Day 15
|
80.3 picogram (pg) / mL
Standard Deviation 85.5
|
|
Total IL-1β Levels
Week 4 (predose)
|
75.0 picogram (pg) / mL
Standard Deviation 74.5
|
|
Total IL-1β Levels
Week 12 (predose)
|
31.1 picogram (pg) / mL
Standard Deviation 25.5
|
|
Total IL-1β Levels
Week 24 (predose)
|
53.2 picogram (pg) / mL
Standard Deviation 48.7
|
|
Total IL-1β Levels
Week 36 (predose)
|
58.7 picogram (pg) / mL
Standard Deviation 39.8
|
|
Total IL-1β Levels
Week 48 (predose)
|
37.1 picogram (pg) / mL
Standard Deviation 14.3
|
|
Total IL-1β Levels
Week 60 (predose)
|
64.7 picogram (pg) / mL
Standard Deviation 60.2
|
|
Total IL-1β Levels
Week 72 (predose)
|
52.1 picogram (pg) / mL
Standard Deviation 36.0
|
|
Total IL-1β Levels
Week 84 (predose)
|
53.4 picogram (pg) / mL
Standard Deviation 56.2
|
|
Total IL-1β Levels
Week 96 (predose)
|
61.2 picogram (pg) / mL
Standard Deviation 49.8
|
|
Total IL-1β Levels
Week 108 (predose)
|
36.6 picogram (pg) / mL
Standard Deviation 17.5
|
|
Total IL-1β Levels
Week 120 (predose)
|
39.5 picogram (pg) / mL
Standard Deviation 2.55
|
|
Total IL-1β Levels
Week 132 (predose)
|
44.5 picogram (pg) / mL
Standard Deviation 23.1
|
|
Total IL-1β Levels
Week 144 (predose)
|
48.5 picogram (pg) / mL
Standard Deviation 30.6
|
|
Total IL-1β Levels
Week 156 (predose)
|
41.8 picogram (pg) / mL
Standard Deviation 29.8
|
|
Total IL-1β Levels
Week 168 (predose)
|
26.5 picogram (pg) / mL
|
|
Total IL-1β Levels
Week 180 (predose)
|
24.8 picogram (pg) / mL
|
|
Total IL-1β Levels
Week 192 (predose)
|
39.0 picogram (pg) / mL
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose at baseline, Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144Population: AS: all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. At each time point, only participants with evaluable values were included in the analysis
The ADAs against canakinumab were assessed in serum using a validated immunoassay assay. The number of participants who had a canakinumab ADA positive result was assessed
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Canakinumab
n=14 Participants
All participants received canakinumab as open-label study medication. Canakinumab was administered subcutaneously at a dose of 4 mg/kg every four weeks, with a maximum allowable single dose of 300 mg.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Canakinumab Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)
Baseline
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Canakinumab Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)
Week 24
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Canakinumab Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)
Week 48
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Canakinumab Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)
Week 72
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Canakinumab Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)
Week 96
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Canakinumab Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)
Week 120
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Canakinumab Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)
Week 144
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Canakinumab Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)
Week 168
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Canakinumab Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)
Week 192
|
0 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Canakinumab
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Canakinumab
n=14 participants at risk
All participants received canakinumab as open-label study medication. Canakinumab was administered subcutaneously at a dose of 4 mg/kg every four weeks, with a maximum allowable single dose of 300 mg.
|
|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Enteritis
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Intestinal haemorrhage
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic function abnormal
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Infections and infestations
COVID-19
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Infections and infestations
COVID-19 pneumonia
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Infections and infestations
Osteomyelitis
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Lumbar spinal stenosis
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Still's disease
|
21.4%
3/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Canakinumab
n=14 participants at risk
All participants received canakinumab as open-label study medication. Canakinumab was administered subcutaneously at a dose of 4 mg/kg every four weeks, with a maximum allowable single dose of 300 mg.
|
|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
14.3%
2/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Iron deficiency anaemia
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiomegaly
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Endocrine disorders
Adrenal insufficiency
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Eye disorders
Blepharitis
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Eye disorders
Conjunctival haemorrhage
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Eye disorders
Conjunctivitis allergic
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Eye disorders
Dry eye
|
21.4%
3/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye discharge
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Eye disorders
Eyelid ptosis
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Eye disorders
Punctate keratitis
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal discomfort
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
14.3%
2/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Chronic gastritis
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dental caries
|
28.6%
4/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
21.4%
3/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Enterocolitis
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastric polyps
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haemorrhoids
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
28.6%
4/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomatitis
|
14.3%
2/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
General disorders and administration site conditions
Chest pain
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
General disorders and administration site conditions
Chills
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
General disorders and administration site conditions
Injection site pain
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
General disorders and administration site conditions
Malaise
|
14.3%
2/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
General disorders and administration site conditions
Oedema
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
General disorders and administration site conditions
Oedema peripheral
|
21.4%
3/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
General disorders and administration site conditions
Pyrexia
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic function abnormal
|
14.3%
2/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic steatosis
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Immune system disorders
Anaphylactic reaction
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Immune system disorders
Hypersensitivity
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Infections and infestations
Abscess
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Infections and infestations
COVID-19
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Infections and infestations
Conjunctivitis
|
21.4%
3/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cystitis
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Infections and infestations
Folliculitis
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Infections and infestations
Fungal skin infection
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis viral
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Infections and infestations
Genital herpes
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Infections and infestations
Genitourinary chlamydia infection
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gingivitis
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes simplex
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster
|
21.4%
3/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
14.3%
2/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
42.9%
6/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Infections and infestations
Otitis externa fungal
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Infections and infestations
Periodontitis
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis
|
14.3%
2/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
14.3%
2/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
14.3%
2/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Animal scratch
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Skin abrasion
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Skin injury
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Wound
|
14.3%
2/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Investigations
Blood magnesium increased
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Investigations
Faecal occult blood positive
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetes mellitus inadequate control
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Steroid diabetes
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Cervical spinal stenosis
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Flank pain
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Intervertebral disc protrusion
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
|
14.3%
2/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Rotator cuff syndrome
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Still's disease
|
21.4%
3/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Temporomandibular pain and dysfunction syndrome
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Haemangioma of skin
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
14.3%
2/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
21.4%
3/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hypoaesthesia
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Sciatica
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Tremor
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Delirium
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depressed mood
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary retention
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Dysmenorrhoea
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Uterine cyst
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
14.3%
2/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Interstitial lung disease
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Upper respiratory tract inflammation
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Acne
|
14.3%
2/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermal cyst
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis contact
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Drug eruption
|
14.3%
2/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dyshidrotic eczema
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Eczema
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Haemorrhage subcutaneous
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Hyperkeratosis
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
21.4%
3/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
21.4%
3/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash papular
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Seborrhoeic dermatitis
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin exfoliation
|
7.1%
1/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Urticaria
|
21.4%
3/14 • From start of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to approx. 208 weeks
The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The terms and conditions of Novartis' agreements with its investigators may vary. However, Novartis does not prohibit any investigator from publishing. Any publications from a single-site are postponed until the publication of the pooled data (i.e., data from all sites) in the clinical trial.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER