Appropriate Strategy of Surgical Treatment in Ischemic Diabetic Foot

NCT04709887 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 332

Last updated 2021-01-19

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This cohort study aims to evaluate the outcomes of appropriate surgical treatment strategies in diabetic foot ulcers with different rate of popliteal artery stenosis(\<50% or ≥50%). In this study, patients with Texas university grade 2-4(stage C-D) ischemic diabetic foot ulcers will be included. Data of patients who underwent surgical treatment in the past will be retrospectively collected. The patients with follow-up time less than 12 months will continue to follow up. Also the postoperative patients will be prospectively collected. Effects of different surgical strategies, including wound healing therapy, interventional therapy and tibial transverse bone transport therapy will be measured by several indexes.

Conditions

  • Diabetic Foot
  • Ischemic Diabetic Foot Ulcer
  • Popliteal Artery Stenosis

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Wound treatment

According to the guidelines and recommendations of the International Diabetic Foot Working Group, ulcer surface debridement, negative pressure suction drainage, and routine dressing were performed until the wound healed or the end of the trial.

PROCEDURE

Vascular intervention surgery

Segmented distal angiography under the guidance of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) were perform after local anesthesia. The superficial artery is expanded by a 3-4 mm balloon.

PROCEDURE

Tibial transverse transport surgery

In the anteromedial area of the proximal tibia of the affected limb, the external fixation frame was compared with the area along the midline of the medial longitudinal axis of the proximal tibia. Subsequently, two 3.0 Steinmann pins were inserted through the single layer of cortical bone. The skin was cut along the long axis with the 3.0 Steinmann pin as the centre, and the subcutaneous tissue was separate bluntly to expose the periosteum. The Steinmann pins were used as the centre point for the drilling on four sides with a 2.0 drill bit and use of a rapid osteotomy device; the length of each side was 2.5 cm. Subperiosteal osteotomy was performed with a 5-mm narrow bone knife at an angle of 15°-30° to the bone surface. The surgeons should pay attention to protect the blood supply of the periosteum during this procedure. The external fixators were fixed with 4.0 Steinmann pins at the distal and proximal ends. The subcutaneous tissue and skin were sutured.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Peking University People's Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Hailin Xu, MD · Peking University People's Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2017-01-01
Primary Completion
2022-01-01
Completion
2024-01-01

Countries

  • China

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04709887 on ClinicalTrials.gov