Prophylactic Implantation of Biologic Mesh in Peritonitis
NCT04681326 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 90
Last updated 2020-12-23
Summary
Patients undergoing emergency surgery for peritonitis are at increased risk of abdominal wall-related complications. In patients with peritonitis the risk of incisional hernia (IH) is extremely elevated. The incidence of IH in patients operated with peritonitis is up to 54 %, compared with an incidence of 11-26 % in the general surgical population. Moreover, up to 24.1 % of patients with peritonitis undergoing emergency laparotomy may develop fascial dehiscence. The evaluation of quality of life of patients with IH showed lower mean scores on physical components of health-related quality of life and body image. The prophylactic mesh implantation demonstrated to reduce the incisional hernia rate in patients undergoing vascular or bariatric procedures. However, the intraperitoneal non absorbable mesh implantation in infected fields is generally considered at least of doubtful safety because of the theoretical increased risk of chronic mesh infection and enterocutaneous fistula. Most incisional hernias develop during the first three months after surgery, which represents the critical period for the healing of transected muscular and fibrous layers of the abdominal wall. However, most studies recommended a long-term follow up period of up to at least 5 years for midline abdominal incisions to determine the real incisional hernia rate. The midline abdominal incision is preferred in abdominal surgery, as it provides wide and rapid access compared other incisions. However, the incidence of incisional hernias is higher following midline abdominal incisions than in other abdominal incisions. In emergency surgery the midline incision in the majority of cases is a necessity. Several factors affect the process of wound healing: surgical site infection, poor surgical technique, and patient-related factors (i.e. peritonitis, old age, obesity, diabetes mellitus, nutritional deficiencies, hepatic cirrhosis, jaundice, renal impairment, malignancy, cardiac disease, chest problems, previous abdominal incisions, steroid therapy). Data about the use of biological prosthesis in infected fields are scarce and derive principally from case reports and case series. However, indications about their use and usefulness in infected fields have been recently published by the Italian Biological Prosthesis Working Group (IBPWG). A previously published prospective observational study evaluated the efficacy of implantation of biological prosthesis in high risk patients in order to reduce the incidence of incisional hernia. This study suggested the efficacy of this kind of prosthesis in reducing incisional hernia rate in patients with multiple risk factors. A recently published meta-analysis showed as the use of biological prosthesis in ventral hernia repair resulted in a lower infectious wound complication rate but in an similar recurrence rate. These results supports the application of biological prosthesis in high risk patients. One recent systematic review evaluated the positive effect on incisional hernia rate of the prophylactic mesh positioning in high risk patients. No randomized trials have been published since now about the use of biological prosthesis in contaminated or infected fields. The rationale of the trial is to evaluate the efficacy of the use of swine dermal collagen prosthesis implanted preperitoneally as a prophylactic procedure against incisional hernia in patients operated in urgency/emergency setting in contaminated/infected fields with peritonitis. The aim of the study is to reduce the incidence of incisional hernia from 50% to 20%.
Conditions
- Incisional Hernia
- Peritonitis
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
biological prosthesis
retro-muscular positioning of a swine dermal collagen prosthesis
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2020-12-01
- Primary Completion
- 2023-12-01
- Completion
- 2023-12-01
Countries
- Italy
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
The Mesh-RTL Project, for Prevention of Incisional Hernia
NCT04134455 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
BP as a Super-light Mesh and as a New Fixation Device for General Surgery -DM108/2008-B
NCT02341222 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
RCT Comparing Lightweight vs. Heavyweight Meshes in Incisional Hernia Repair
NCT04961346 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Use of Synthetic Mesh in Contaminated and Infected Abdominal Wall Repairs. A Long-term Prospective Clinical Trial
NCT03702153 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Hernia-Prophylaxis in Acute Care Surgery H-PACS
NCT03090022 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Performance of Biologic Mesh Materials in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction
NCT02703662 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Hernia Prevention in Stomas
NCT00907842 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Reducing the Incidence of Incisional Hernia After Stoma Closure Using a Prophylactic Mesh
NCT04510558 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
PROphylactic Mesh to Prevent Incisional Hernias at the Former Stoma Site: the PROMISS-trial
NCT03750942 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of a Lightweight Mesh in the Laparoscopic Prevention of Parastomal Hernia
NCT00908661 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prophylaxis of Ileostomy Closure Site Hernia by Placing Mesh
NCT02226887 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Intraperitoneal Mesh-Implementation After Laparotomy
NCT01003067 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Use of Parietex Plug and Patch Hernia System in Open Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT01590940 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Feasibility of Permacol Use in Infected Fields
NCT00820040 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Parastomal Reinforcement With Strattice
NCT00771407 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Does the Use of Prophylactic Mesh Reduce Incisional Hernia?
NCT04700956 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prevention of Parastomal Hernia by Primary Mesh Insertion
NCT00641342 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Primary Prevention of Peristomial Hernias Via Parietal Prostheses
NCT01380860 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Study of Absorbable Biosynthetic Meshes in Contaminated Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT04132986 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Mesh Fixation in Lichtenstein Hernioplasty
NCT01592942 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Permacol Dutch Cohort Study
NCT02166112 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
The Immunologic Reaction to Polypropylene Mesh in Inguinal Hernioplasty
NCT01090284 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
ProGripTM Self-Gripping Polyester Mesh in Incisional Hernia Prevention
NCT03912662 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Synthetic Mesh Explant Study
NCT01880021 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Long-term Follow-up of Prophylactic Mesh Reinforcement After Emergency Laparotomy.
NCT04578561 ·Status: COMPLETED