Trial Outcomes & Findings for Severe Asthma, MepolizumaB and Affect: SAMBA Study (NCT NCT04680611)

NCT ID: NCT04680611

Last Updated: 2026-07-13

Results Overview

A 20-item self-report questionnaire identifying 20 discrete emotions with positive or negative valence. Emotions with positive valence are Interest, Amusement, Pride, Joy, Pleasure, Acceptance, Love, Admiration, relief, Compassion. Emotions with negative valence are: Sadness, Guilt, Regret, Shame, Disappointment, Hopelessness, Fear, Contempt, Hate and Anger. The intensity of each emotion can be marked on a 6-point Likert-type scale with circles indicating intensities. For the statistical analysis, these were computed between 0 ( smallest circles ) to 5 ( largest circles) . Lower scores indicate lower intensity of emotions, higher scores indicate higher intensity of emotions. Changes in the individual emotion scores were the outcomes of interest and are given below.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Target enrollment

120 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Change to one year after start of treatment

Results posted on

2026-07-13

Participant Flow

Participants were recruited from severe asthma specialist centres in 5 locations in the United Kingdom.

This study had three phases. Participants in Phase 1 were 30 individuals who have already received mepolizumab treatment and were a different cohort from the participants in Phase 2. Participants in Phase 2 consisted of 45 individuals who were mepolizumab treatment naive at the time of enrolment and their romantic partners (n=45). Participants in Phase 3 were sub-set of participants from Phase 2.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Phase 1
Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma on mepolizumab treatment no study intervention. Patients received standard clinical care: no intervention. observational study Participants in phase 1 was a different cohort from Phase 2 and 3
Partners of Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma in Phase 2
Romantic partners of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. This arm was included in Phase 2 and 3 only
Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Phase 2
Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma who were biologiic naive at baseline and were to start mepolizumab treatment no study intervention. Patients received standard clinical care: no intervention. observational study Participants in phase 1 was a different cohort from Phase 2 and 3
Phase 1
STARTED
30
0
0
Phase 1
COMPLETED
30
0
0
Phase 1
NOT COMPLETED
0
0
0
Phase 2
STARTED
0
45
45
Phase 2
COMPLETED
0
39
40
Phase 2
NOT COMPLETED
0
6
5
Phase 3
STARTED
0
12
12
Phase 3
COMPLETED
0
8
8
Phase 3
NOT COMPLETED
0
4
4

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Phase 1
Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma on mepolizumab treatment no study intervention. Patients received standard clinical care: no intervention. observational study Participants in phase 1 was a different cohort from Phase 2 and 3
Partners of Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma in Phase 2
Romantic partners of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. This arm was included in Phase 2 and 3 only
Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Phase 2
Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma who were biologiic naive at baseline and were to start mepolizumab treatment no study intervention. Patients received standard clinical care: no intervention. observational study Participants in phase 1 was a different cohort from Phase 2 and 3
Phase 2
Physician Decision
0
2
2
Phase 2
Lost to Follow-up
0
2
2
Phase 2
Withdrawal by Subject
0
2
1
Phase 3
Physician Decision
0
1
1
Phase 3
Lost to Follow-up
0
3
3

Baseline Characteristics

Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Phase 1
n=30 Participants
Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma on mepolizumab treatment no study intervention. Patients receive standard clinical care: no intervention. observational study
Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Phase 2
n=45 Participants
Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma to start mepolizumab treatment no study intervention. Patients receive standard clinical care: no intervention. observational study
Partners of Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Phase 2
n=45 Participants
Partners of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma to start mepolizumab treatment observational study. no intervention
Phase 3: Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma From Phase 2
A sub-group of patients who participate in Phase 2 no study intervention. Patients receive standard clinical care: no intervention. qualitative sub-study
Phase 3: Partners of Patients in Phase 3
Partners of the sub-group of patients who participate in Phase 3 qualitative stub-study. no intervention.
Total
n=120 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
Phase 1 patients with severe eosinophilic asthma
57 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.26 • n=30 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
57 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.26 • n=30 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
Age, Continuous
Phase 2 partients with severe eosinophilic asthma
57.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7 • n=45 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
57.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7 • n=45 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
Age, Continuous
Partners of Phase 2 patients
57.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.9 • n=44 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
57.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.9 • n=44 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
Sex: Female, Male
Phase 1 Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma · Female
17 Participants
n=30 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
17 Participants
n=30 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
Sex: Female, Male
Phase 1 Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma · Male
13 Participants
n=30 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
13 Participants
n=30 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
Sex: Female, Male
Phase 2 patients with severe eosinophilic asthma · Female
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
24 Participants
n=45 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
24 Participants
n=45 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
Sex: Female, Male
Phase 2 patients with severe eosinophilic asthma · Male
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
21 Participants
n=45 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
21 Participants
n=45 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
Sex: Female, Male
Partners of Phase 2 patients · Female
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
22 Participants
n=44 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
22 Participants
n=44 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
Sex: Female, Male
Partners of Phase 2 patients · Male
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
22 Participants
n=44 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
22 Participants
n=44 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Phase 1 patients with severe eosinophilic asthma · Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
n=30 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
n=30 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Phase 1 patients with severe eosinophilic asthma · Not Hispanic or Latino
29 Participants
n=30 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
29 Participants
n=30 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Phase 1 patients with severe eosinophilic asthma · Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
n=30 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
1 Participants
n=30 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Phase 2 patients with severe eosinophilic asthma · Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
n=45 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
n=45 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Phase 2 patients with severe eosinophilic asthma · Not Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
45 Participants
n=45 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
45 Participants
n=45 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Phase 2 patients with severe eosinophilic asthma · Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
n=45 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
n=45 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Partners of Phase 2 patients · Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
n=45 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
n=45 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Partners of Phase 2 patients · Not Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
42 Participants
n=45 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
42 Participants
n=45 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Partners of Phase 2 patients · Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
3 Participants
n=45 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
3 Participants
n=45 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
working status
Phase 1 patients with severe eosinophic asthma · working full time
9 Participants
n=29 Participants • SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
9 Participants
n=29 Participants • SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
working status
Phase 1 patients with severe eosinophic asthma · working part-time for asthma related reason
1 Participants
n=29 Participants • SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
1 Participants
n=29 Participants • SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
working status
Phase 1 patients with severe eosinophic asthma · working part time due to other reasons than asthma
4 Participants
n=29 Participants • SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
4 Participants
n=29 Participants • SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
working status
Phase 1 patients with severe eosinophic asthma · not working due to asthma related reasons
2 Participants
n=29 Participants • SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
2 Participants
n=29 Participants • SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
working status
Phase 1 patients with severe eosinophic asthma · not working due to other reasons
13 Participants
n=29 Participants • SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
13 Participants
n=29 Participants • SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
working status
Phase 2 patients with severe eosinophilic asthma · working full time
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
23 Participants
n=45 Participants • SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
23 Participants
n=45 Participants • SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
working status
Phase 2 patients with severe eosinophilic asthma · working part-time for asthma related reason
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
1 Participants
n=45 Participants • SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
1 Participants
n=45 Participants • SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
working status
Phase 2 patients with severe eosinophilic asthma · working part time due to other reasons than asthma
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
3 Participants
n=45 Participants • SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
3 Participants
n=45 Participants • SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
working status
Phase 2 patients with severe eosinophilic asthma · not working due to asthma related reasons
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
1 Participants
n=45 Participants • SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
1 Participants
n=45 Participants • SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
working status
Phase 2 patients with severe eosinophilic asthma · not working due to other reasons
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
17 Participants
n=45 Participants • SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
17 Participants
n=45 Participants • SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
working status
Partners of Phase 2 patients · working full time
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
23 Participants
n=44 Participants • SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
23 Participants
n=44 Participants • SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
marital status
Phase 1 patients with severe eosinophilic asthma · single
5 Participants
n=30 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
5 Participants
n=30 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
working status
Partners of Phase 2 patients · working part-time for asthma related reason
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
n=44 Participants • SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
n=44 Participants • SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
working status
Partners of Phase 2 patients · working part time due to other reasons than asthma
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
5 Participants
n=44 Participants • SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
5 Participants
n=44 Participants • SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
working status
Partners of Phase 2 patients · not working due to asthma related reasons
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
n=44 Participants • SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
n=44 Participants • SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
working status
Partners of Phase 2 patients · not working due to other reasons
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
16 Participants
n=44 Participants • SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
16 Participants
n=44 Participants • SAMBA Phase 1 working status was available for 29 participants Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
marital status
Phase 1 patients with severe eosinophilic asthma · married/civil partnership
19 Participants
n=30 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
19 Participants
n=30 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
marital status
Phase 1 patients with severe eosinophilic asthma · co-habiting
2 Participants
n=30 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
2 Participants
n=30 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
marital status
Phase 1 patients with severe eosinophilic asthma · divorced
3 Participants
n=30 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
3 Participants
n=30 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
marital status
Phase 1 patients with severe eosinophilic asthma · widowed
1 Participants
n=30 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
1 Participants
n=30 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
marital status
Phase 2 patients with severe eosinophilic asthma · married/civil partnership
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
37 Participants
n=45 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
37 Participants
n=45 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
marital status
Phase 2 patients with severe eosinophilic asthma · co-habiting
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
8 Participants
n=45 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
8 Participants
n=45 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
marital status
Phase 2 patients with severe eosinophilic asthma · single
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
n=45 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
n=45 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
marital status
Phase 2 patients with severe eosinophilic asthma · divorced
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
n=45 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
n=45 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
marital status
Phase 2 patients with severe eosinophilic asthma · widowed
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
n=45 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
n=45 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
marital status
Partners of Phase 2 patients · married/civil partnership
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
37 Participants
n=44 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
37 Participants
n=44 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
marital status
Partners of Phase 2 patients · co-habiting
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
7 Participants
n=44 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
7 Participants
n=44 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
marital status
Partners of Phase 2 patients · single
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
n=44 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
n=44 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
marital status
Partners of Phase 2 patients · divorced
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
n=44 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
n=44 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
marital status
Partners of Phase 2 patients · widowed
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
n=44 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
n=44 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
Lenght of relationship
Phase 1 patients with severe eosinophilic asthma
29.18 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.65 • n=22 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
29.18 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.65 • n=22 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
Lenght of relationship
Phase 2 patients with severe eosinophilic asthma
27.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.8 • n=45 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
27.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.8 • n=45 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
Lenght of relationship
Partners of Phase 2 patients
27.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.9 • n=44 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
27.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.9 • n=44 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
Same sex partner
Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma Phase 1 · No same sex partner
25 Participants
n=25 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
25 Participants
n=25 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
Same sex partner
Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma Phase 1 · Yes same sex partner
0 Participants
n=25 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
0 Participants
n=25 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
Same sex partner
Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma Phase 2 · No same sex partner
0 Participants
Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
41 Participants
n=45 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
41 Participants
n=45 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
Same sex partner
Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma Phase 2 · Yes same sex partner
4 Participants
n=45 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
4 Participants
n=45 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
Same sex partner
Partners of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma Phase 2 · No same sex partner
41 Participants
n=44 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
41 Participants
n=44 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
Same sex partner
Partners of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma Phase 2 · Yes same sex partner
3 Participants
n=44 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
3 Participants
n=44 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
Weight
Phase 1 patients with severe eosinophilic asthma
83.51 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.8 • n=30 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
83.51 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.8 • n=30 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
Weight
Phase 2 patients with severe eosinophilic asthma
88.8 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.5 • n=45 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
88.8 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.5 • n=45 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
Weight
Partners of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma in Phase 2
83 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.5 • n=42 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
83 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.5 • n=42 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
Height
Phase 1 patients with severe eosinophilic asthma
1.70 meters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.1 • n=30 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
1.70 meters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.1 • n=30 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
Height
Phase 2 patients with severe eosinophilic asthma
1.68 meters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.1 • n=45 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
1.68 meters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.1 • n=45 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
Height
Partners of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma in Phase 2
1.72 meters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.11 • n=42 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.
1.72 meters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.11 • n=42 Participants • Phase 2: age, gender, working status. marital status, same sex partner and length of relationship was available for 44 partners. Ethnicity, height and weight data was available for 42 partners. Phase 3 participants were a sub-set of Phase 2 participants, baseline measures have not been collected separately.

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Change to one year after start of treatment

Population: Phase 1 was cross sectional .This measure therefore was not applicable ( change from baseline to 1 year on treatment). Phase 3 was a qualitative substudy with participants from Phase 2 cohort and did not include this outcome measure.

A 20-item self-report questionnaire identifying 20 discrete emotions with positive or negative valence. Emotions with positive valence are Interest, Amusement, Pride, Joy, Pleasure, Acceptance, Love, Admiration, relief, Compassion. Emotions with negative valence are: Sadness, Guilt, Regret, Shame, Disappointment, Hopelessness, Fear, Contempt, Hate and Anger. The intensity of each emotion can be marked on a 6-point Likert-type scale with circles indicating intensities. For the statistical analysis, these were computed between 0 ( smallest circles ) to 5 ( largest circles) . Lower scores indicate lower intensity of emotions, higher scores indicate higher intensity of emotions. Changes in the individual emotion scores were the outcomes of interest and are given below.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Partners of Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Phase 2
n=45 Participants
Partners of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma to start Nucala(R) treatment
Phase 3: Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma From Phase 2
A sub-group of patients who participate in Phase 2 no study intervention. Patients receive standard clinical care: no intervention. observational study
Phase 3: Partners of Patients in Phase 3
Partners of the sub-group of patients who participate in Phase 3
Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Phase 1
Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma on Nucala(R) treatment no study intervention. Patients receive standard clinical care: no intervention. observational study
Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Phase 2
n=45 Participants
Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma to start Nucala(R) treatment no study intervention. Patients receive standard clinical care: no intervention. observational study
Change in Emotional Composition (Using the Geneva Emotions Wheel)
Interest
0.1 score
Interval -0.8 to 0.9
0.9 score
Interval 0.0 to 1.8
Change in Emotional Composition (Using the Geneva Emotions Wheel)
Amusement
0.0 score
Interval -0.9 to 0.8
0.7 score
Interval -0.2 to 1.7
Change in Emotional Composition (Using the Geneva Emotions Wheel)
Pride
0.2 score
Interval -0.6 to 1.0
0.0 score
Interval -1.0 to 1.1
Change in Emotional Composition (Using the Geneva Emotions Wheel)
Joy
0.7 score
Interval -0.1 to 1.6
1.1 score
Interval 0.2 to 2.0
Change in Emotional Composition (Using the Geneva Emotions Wheel)
Pleasure
0.1 score
Interval -0.7 to 0.9
1.0 score
Interval 0.1 to 2.0
Change in Emotional Composition (Using the Geneva Emotions Wheel)
Acceptance
0.7 score
Interval 0.0 to 1.3
0.8 score
Interval -0.1 to 1.7
Change in Emotional Composition (Using the Geneva Emotions Wheel)
Love
0.2 score
Interval -0.7 to 1.0
-0.1 score
Interval -1.2 to 1.0
Change in Emotional Composition (Using the Geneva Emotions Wheel)
Admiration
-0.2 score
Interval -1.0 to 0.7
0.8 score
Interval -0.2 to 1.7
Change in Emotional Composition (Using the Geneva Emotions Wheel)
Relief
0.8 score
Interval -0.1 to 1.7
1.3 score
Interval 0.2 to 2.3
Change in Emotional Composition (Using the Geneva Emotions Wheel)
Compassion
0.6 score
Interval -0.3 to 1.5
-1.1 score
Interval -1.9 to -0.3
Change in Emotional Composition (Using the Geneva Emotions Wheel)
Sadness
-0.5 score
Interval -1.2 to 0.2
-1.1 score
Interval -1.8 to -0.3
Change in Emotional Composition (Using the Geneva Emotions Wheel)
Guilt
-0.3 score
Interval -1.0 to 0.4
-0.3 score
Interval -1.1 to 0.5
Change in Emotional Composition (Using the Geneva Emotions Wheel)
Regret
-0.7 score
Interval -1.4 to 0.0
0.1 score
Interval -0.7 to 0.9
Change in Emotional Composition (Using the Geneva Emotions Wheel)
Shame
-0.3 score
Interval -1.0 to 0.4
0.2 score
Interval -0.6 to 1.0
Change in Emotional Composition (Using the Geneva Emotions Wheel)
Disappointment
-0.5 score
Interval -1.3 to 0.2
-0.3 score
Interval -1.1 to 0.5
Change in Emotional Composition (Using the Geneva Emotions Wheel)
Hopelessness
-0.7 score
Interval -1.4 to -0.1
-0.9 score
Interval -1.6 to -0.1
Change in Emotional Composition (Using the Geneva Emotions Wheel)
Fear
-0.7 score
Interval -1.4 to -0.1
-1.2 score
Interval -1.9 to -0.4
Change in Emotional Composition (Using the Geneva Emotions Wheel)
Contempt
0.0 score
Interval -0.7 to 0.8
0.9 score
Interval -0.1 to 1.8
Change in Emotional Composition (Using the Geneva Emotions Wheel)
Hate
-0.5 score
Interval -1.2 to 0.2
-0.1 score
Interval -0.8 to 0.6
Change in Emotional Composition (Using the Geneva Emotions Wheel)
Anger
-0.5 score
Interval -1.2 to 0.1
-0.5 score
Interval -1.2 to 0.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Change from baseline to 1 year after start of treatment

Population: Phase 1 was cross sectional .This measure therefore was not applicable ( change from baseline to 1 year on treatment). Phase 3 was a qualitative substudy with participants from Phase 2 cohort and did not include this outcome measure.

Clinical diagnostic self-report questionnaire to assess psychological distress. Consists of anxiety and depression sub-scales. It consists of seven questions for anxiety and seven questions for depression that are in mixed order in the questionnaire. Each question has four possible answers scored from 0-3. There are separate sub-scale scores for anxiety and depression each with cut-off scores 0-7: normal, 8-10: borderline abnormal and 11-21: abnormal. Lower scores mean better outcomes. The HADS is a self-report tool and takes 2-5minutes to complete.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Partners of Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Phase 2
n=39 Participants
Partners of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma to start Nucala(R) treatment
Phase 3: Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma From Phase 2
A sub-group of patients who participate in Phase 2 no study intervention. Patients receive standard clinical care: no intervention. observational study
Phase 3: Partners of Patients in Phase 3
Partners of the sub-group of patients who participate in Phase 3
Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Phase 1
Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma on Nucala(R) treatment no study intervention. Patients receive standard clinical care: no intervention. observational study
Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Phase 2
n=40 Participants
Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma to start Nucala(R) treatment no study intervention. Patients receive standard clinical care: no intervention. observational study
Change in Affective State (Using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale)
-7 score
Interval -11.0 to -4.0
-5.3 score
Interval -7.9 to -2.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Change from baseline to 1 year after start of treatment

Population: Phase 1 was cross sectional therefore this outcome measure ( change from baseline to 1 year on treatment ) was not applicable. Phase 3 was a qualitative sub-study and this outcome was not measured. In Phase 2, where this outcome was measured. it was only applicable and therefore measured only in patients who had severe eosinophilic asthma and not their partners.

6-item clinical questionnaire to establish self-assessed asthma control (questions 1-6) and lung function measured by healthcare professional (item 7). 6 of the questions are patients self-report about their asthma during the previous week regarding symptoms and bronchodilator use. Responses are given on a 7-point scale (0=no impairment, 6= maximum impairment). The ACQ score is the mean of all the questions and therefore between 0 (totally controlled) and 6 (severely uncontrolled). In general, patients with a score below 1.0 have adequately controlled asthma and above 1.0 their asthma is not controlled. Patients with a score between 0.75 and 1.25 have borderline of adequate control. The smallest clinically important change is 0.5.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Partners of Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Phase 2
Partners of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma to start Nucala(R) treatment
Phase 3: Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma From Phase 2
A sub-group of patients who participate in Phase 2 no study intervention. Patients receive standard clinical care: no intervention. observational study
Phase 3: Partners of Patients in Phase 3
Partners of the sub-group of patients who participate in Phase 3
Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Phase 1
Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma on Nucala(R) treatment no study intervention. Patients receive standard clinical care: no intervention. observational study
Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Phase 2
n=38 Participants
Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma to start Nucala(R) treatment no study intervention. Patients receive standard clinical care: no intervention. observational study
Change in Self-reported Asthma Symptom Control (Using the Asthma Control Questionnaire)
-1.5 score
Interval -1.8 to -1.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Change from baseline to 1 year after start of treatment

Population: Phase 1 was cross sectional therefore this outcome measure ( change from baseline to 1 year on treatment ) was not applicable. Phase 3 was a qualitative sub-study and this outcome was not measured. In Phase 2, where this outcome was measured. it was only applicable and therefore measured only in patients who had severe eosinophilic asthma and not their partners.

Clinical questionnaire to assess disease impact on quality of life. The questionnaire has two parts. Part 1 (Questions 1 to 8) covers the patients' recollection of their symptoms over the preceding period (range 1 month to 1 year). Part 2 (Questions 9 to 16) is related to the patients' current state. The answers to the questions can be grouped in to 3 subscales. The Symptom score is reflective of physical wellbeing over the last year .The Activity score covers functioning related to patients' current daily physical activity. The Impacts score relates to the psychosocial functioning. Subscale total scores can be between 0 (no impairment ) to 100 ( maximum impairment). Scoring is weighted and higher scores indicate worse outcomes. Clinically, the total score is used as a meaningful outcome measure.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Partners of Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Phase 2
Partners of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma to start Nucala(R) treatment
Phase 3: Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma From Phase 2
A sub-group of patients who participate in Phase 2 no study intervention. Patients receive standard clinical care: no intervention. observational study
Phase 3: Partners of Patients in Phase 3
Partners of the sub-group of patients who participate in Phase 3
Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Phase 1
Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma on Nucala(R) treatment no study intervention. Patients receive standard clinical care: no intervention. observational study
Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Phase 2
n=37 Participants
Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma to start Nucala(R) treatment no study intervention. Patients receive standard clinical care: no intervention. observational study
Change in Functioning and Quality of Life (Using the St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire)
-27 score
Interval -32.0 to -21.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Change from baseline to 1 year after start of treatment

Population: Phase 1 was cross sectional therefore this outcome measure ( change from baseline to 1 year on treatment ) was not applicable. Phase 3 was a qualitative sub-study and this outcome was not measured. In Phase 2, where this outcome was measured. it was only applicable and therefore measured only in patients who had severe eosinophilic asthma and not their partners.

Severe Asthma Questionnaire (SAQ) assesses the impact of severe asthma and the effects of treatment on patient's self-reported health-related quality of life. The questionnaire produces two scores: a total domain score and a global quality of life score.1. The total domain score is the aggregation of 16 different Quality of Life (QoL) domains ( individual scores are between 1 and 7) where higher scores indicate higher adverse impact on the responder's life. The total score for this domain is obtained by the sum of scores divided by the number of questions answered and can be between 1 and 7. 2. SAQ-global score where participants scire their quality of life on a 100-point scale. Higher scores mean better quality of life. The scale takes between 3 to 6 minutes to complete, but completion time reduces on subsequent occasions.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Partners of Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Phase 2
Partners of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma to start Nucala(R) treatment
Phase 3: Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma From Phase 2
A sub-group of patients who participate in Phase 2 no study intervention. Patients receive standard clinical care: no intervention. observational study
Phase 3: Partners of Patients in Phase 3
Partners of the sub-group of patients who participate in Phase 3
Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Phase 1
Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma on Nucala(R) treatment no study intervention. Patients receive standard clinical care: no intervention. observational study
Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Phase 2
n=38 Participants
Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma to start Nucala(R) treatment no study intervention. Patients receive standard clinical care: no intervention. observational study
Change in Asthma-related Quality of Life (Using the Severe Asthma Questionnaire)
1.3 score
Interval 0.9 to 1.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Change from baseline to 1 year after start of treatment

Population: Phase 1 was cross sectional therefore this outcome measure ( change from baseline to 1 year on treatment ) was not applicable. Phase 3 was a qualitative sub-study and this outcome was not measured.

Questionnaire assessing the beliefs individuals have about the cause, controllability and impact on them of the illness. Comprises 9 questions. 8 questions use a Likert scale response. Question 9 can be answered by free text about the perceived cause of illness. Total scores can be between 0 and 80 with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Partners of Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Phase 2
n=36 Participants
Partners of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma to start Nucala(R) treatment
Phase 3: Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma From Phase 2
A sub-group of patients who participate in Phase 2 no study intervention. Patients receive standard clinical care: no intervention. observational study
Phase 3: Partners of Patients in Phase 3
Partners of the sub-group of patients who participate in Phase 3
Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Phase 1
Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma on Nucala(R) treatment no study intervention. Patients receive standard clinical care: no intervention. observational study
Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Phase 2
n=38 Participants
Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma to start Nucala(R) treatment no study intervention. Patients receive standard clinical care: no intervention. observational study
Change in Illness Perception (Using the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire)
-7 score
Interval -11.0 to -4.0
-27 score
Interval -32.0 to -21.0

Adverse Events

Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Phase 1

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Phase 2

Serious events: 3 serious events
Other events: 6 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Partners of Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Phase 2

Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 2 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Phase 3: Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma From Phase 2

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Phase 3: Partners of Patients in Phase 3

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Phase 1
n=30 participants at risk
Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma on Nucala(R) treatment no study intervention. Patients receive standard clinical care: no intervention. observational study
Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Phase 2
n=45 participants at risk
Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma to start Nucala(R) treatment no study intervention. Patients receive standard clinical care: no intervention. observational study
Partners of Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Phase 2
n=45 participants at risk
Partners of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma to start Nucala(R) treatment
Phase 3: Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma From Phase 2
n=12 participants at risk
A sub-group of patients who participate in Phase 2 no study intervention. Patients receive standard clinical care: no intervention. observational study
Phase 3: Partners of Patients in Phase 3
n=12 participants at risk
Partners of the sub-group of patients who participate in Phase 3
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary track infecion and acute kidney injury
0.00%
0/30 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
2.2%
1/45 • Number of events 1 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
0.00%
0/45 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
0.00%
0/12 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
0.00%
0/12 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Diagnosis of very low proliferation mantle cell lymphoma
0.00%
0/30 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
2.2%
1/45 • Number of events 1 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
0.00%
0/45 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
0.00%
0/12 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
0.00%
0/12 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
Vascular disorders
Transient loss of consciousness
0.00%
0/30 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
2.2%
1/45 • Number of events 1 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
0.00%
0/45 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
0.00%
0/12 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
0.00%
0/12 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
Cardiac disorders
Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction
0.00%
0/30 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
2.2%
1/45 • Number of events 1 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
0.00%
0/45 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
0.00%
0/12 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
0.00%
0/12 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
Renal and urinary disorders
AKI on background CKD
0.00%
0/30 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
2.2%
1/45 • Number of events 1 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
0.00%
0/45 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
0.00%
0/12 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
0.00%
0/12 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Infective exacerbation of asthma
0.00%
0/30 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
2.2%
1/45 • Number of events 1 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
0.00%
0/45 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
0.00%
0/12 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
0.00%
0/12 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
Cardiac disorders
Left pontine infarction
0.00%
0/30 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
0.00%
0/45 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
2.2%
1/45 • Number of events 1 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
0.00%
0/12 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
0.00%
0/12 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Phase 1
n=30 participants at risk
Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma on Nucala(R) treatment no study intervention. Patients receive standard clinical care: no intervention. observational study
Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Phase 2
n=45 participants at risk
Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma to start Nucala(R) treatment no study intervention. Patients receive standard clinical care: no intervention. observational study
Partners of Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Phase 2
n=45 participants at risk
Partners of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma to start Nucala(R) treatment
Phase 3: Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma From Phase 2
n=12 participants at risk
A sub-group of patients who participate in Phase 2 no study intervention. Patients receive standard clinical care: no intervention. observational study
Phase 3: Partners of Patients in Phase 3
n=12 participants at risk
Partners of the sub-group of patients who participate in Phase 3
Infections and infestations
Covid 19
0.00%
0/30 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
2.2%
1/45 • Number of events 1 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
0.00%
0/45 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
0.00%
0/12 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
0.00%
0/12 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
Vascular disorders
Headache
0.00%
0/30 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
2.2%
1/45 • Number of events 1 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
0.00%
0/45 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
0.00%
0/12 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
0.00%
0/12 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary tract infection
0.00%
0/30 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
2.2%
1/45 • Number of events 1 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
2.2%
1/45 • Number of events 1 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
0.00%
0/12 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
0.00%
0/12 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin irritation/infection Forehead and sinus area
0.00%
0/30 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
2.2%
1/45 • Number of events 1 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
0.00%
0/45 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
0.00%
0/12 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
0.00%
0/12 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
Infections and infestations
Acute Sinusitis
0.00%
0/30 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
2.2%
1/45 • Number of events 1 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
0.00%
0/45 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
0.00%
0/12 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
0.00%
0/12 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
Infections and infestations
Viral Illness
0.00%
0/30 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
2.2%
1/45 • Number of events 1 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
2.2%
1/45 • Number of events 1 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
0.00%
0/12 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
0.00%
0/12 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Worsening of menopause symptoms
0.00%
0/30 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
2.2%
1/45 • Number of events 1 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
0.00%
0/45 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
0.00%
0/12 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).
0.00%
0/12 • Phase 1: cross-sectional, one visit only. Adverse Event data were collected from enrolment until the end of the visit, last timepoint 4 weeks from enrolment. Phase 2: from enrolment until end of follow-up, last timepoint 1 year after start of mepolizumab clinical treatment
Phase 1 was cross sectional, one visit. Phase 3 was a parallel qualitative sub-study with participants from Phase 2 and adverse events were not collected separately for this phase ( as they were covered in Phase 2 ).

Additional Information

Judit Varkonyi-Sepp Chief Investigator

University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust

Phone: +442381202000

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place