Comparison of PENG Block and FICB in Hip Fracture Patients

NCT04677348 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 80

Last updated 2022-03-23

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) has been considered the block of choice for patients with hip fracture. However, pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block, one of the relatively newly-developed blocks, could be also used for analgesia in patients with hip fracture. Since PENG block could block the accessory obturator nerve, PENG block might have greater analgesic effects compared to FICB theoretically. However, the comparison of these two blocks in patients with hip fracture has not performed in clinical setting. Thus, we aimed to compare the analgesic effect of PENG block and FICB.

Conditions

  • Hip Fractures
  • Regional Anesthesia

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block

ultrasound-guided PENG block with 0.3% ropivacaine 20cc

PROCEDURE

Fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB)

ultrasound-guided suprainguinal FICB with 0.3% ropivacaine 30cc

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Asan Medical Center

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Won Uk Koh, MD, PhD · Asan Medical Center

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
19 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-01-21
Primary Completion
2022-01-26
Completion
2022-02-11

Countries

  • South Korea

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04677348 on ClinicalTrials.gov