Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study of Tirzepatide (LY3298176) In Participants After A Lifestyle Weight Loss Program (NCT NCT04657016)
NCT ID: NCT04657016
Last Updated: 2024-05-16
Results Overview
Percent change from baseline in body weight. Least Squares (LS) mean was determined by mixed-model repeated measures (MMRM) model for post-baseline measures: Variable = Baseline + Analysis Country + Sex + Treatment + Time + Treatment\*Time (Type III sum of squares).
COMPLETED
PHASE3
579 participants
Baseline, 72 Weeks
2024-05-16
Participant Flow
There was a 12-week lead-in period wherein the participants underwent intensive lifestyle modification program to reduce their daily caloric energy intake and increase their physical activity, followed by which they were randomized to receive Tirzepatide or Placebo.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Placebo
Participants received matching placebo subcutaneously (SC) once weekly (QW).
|
Tirzepatide
Participants received weekly doses of tirzepatide SC for 72 weeks, starting at 2.5 milligrams (mg) for 4 weeks. Subsequently, the dose was increased by 2.5 mg every 4 weeks up to the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of either 10 mg or 15 mg.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
292
|
287
|
|
Overall Study
Received at Least One Dose of Study Drug
|
292
|
287
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
227
|
252
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
65
|
35
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Placebo
Participants received matching placebo subcutaneously (SC) once weekly (QW).
|
Tirzepatide
Participants received weekly doses of tirzepatide SC for 72 weeks, starting at 2.5 milligrams (mg) for 4 weeks. Subsequently, the dose was increased by 2.5 mg every 4 weeks up to the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of either 10 mg or 15 mg.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
2
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
24
|
12
|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
1
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Pregnancy
|
2
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Deviation
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
28
|
14
|
|
Overall Study
Other - as reported by the investigator
|
6
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study of Tirzepatide (LY3298176) In Participants After A Lifestyle Weight Loss Program
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Placebo
n=292 Participants
Participants received matching placebo SC QW.
|
Tirzepatide
n=287 Participants
Participants received weekly doses of tirzepatide SC for 72 weeks, starting at 2.5 mg for 4 weeks. Subsequently, the dose was increased by 2.5 mg every 4 weeks up to the MTD of either 10 mg or 15 mg.
|
Total
n=579 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
2 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
4 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
2 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
45.70 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.79 • n=39 Participants
|
45.40 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.59 • n=41 Participants
|
45.60 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.18 • n=35 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
183 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
181 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
364 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
109 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
106 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
215 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
161 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
151 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
312 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
129 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
132 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
261 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
32 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
63 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
252 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
246 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
498 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
2 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Argentina
|
44 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
43 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
87 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Brazil
|
60 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
59 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
119 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
188 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
185 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
373 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Body weight
|
101.29 Kilograms (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.67 • n=39 Participants
|
102.47 Kilograms (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.11 • n=41 Participants
|
101.87 Kilograms (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.39 • n=35 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 72 WeeksPopulation: All randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug, had a baseline and at least 1 post- baseline value for this outcome, excluding data after discontinuation of study drug.
Percent change from baseline in body weight. Least Squares (LS) mean was determined by mixed-model repeated measures (MMRM) model for post-baseline measures: Variable = Baseline + Analysis Country + Sex + Treatment + Time + Treatment\*Time (Type III sum of squares).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=291 Participants
Participants received matching placebo SC once weekly QW.
|
Tirzepatide
n=284 Participants
Participants received weekly doses of tirzepatide SC for 72 weeks, starting at 2.5 mg for 4 weeks. Subsequently, the dose was increased by 2.5 mg every 4 weeks up to the MTD of either 10 mg or 15 mg.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Body Weight
|
3.3 Percent change
Standard Error 0.60
|
-21.1 Percent change
Standard Error 0.59
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 72Population: All randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug, had a baseline and at least 1 post- baseline value for this outcome, excluding data after discontinuation of study drug.
Percentage of participants with ≥5% body weight reduction was analysed by Logistic regression model using imputed data with baseline body weight, Analysis Country, Sex, Treatment as factors.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=291 Participants
Participants received matching placebo SC once weekly QW.
|
Tirzepatide
n=284 Participants
Participants received weekly doses of tirzepatide SC for 72 weeks, starting at 2.5 mg for 4 weeks. Subsequently, the dose was increased by 2.5 mg every 4 weeks up to the MTD of either 10 mg or 15 mg.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to (≥) 5% Body Weight Reduction
|
10.65 percentage of participants
|
94.37 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 72 WeeksPopulation: All randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug, had a baseline and at least 1 post- baseline value for this outcome, excluding data after discontinuation of study drug.
Percentage of participants who maintain ≥80% of the body weight lost during intensive lifestyle program was analysed by logistic regression model using imputed data with baseline body weight, analysis country, sex, treatment as factors.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=291 Participants
Participants received matching placebo SC once weekly QW.
|
Tirzepatide
n=284 Participants
Participants received weekly doses of tirzepatide SC for 72 weeks, starting at 2.5 mg for 4 weeks. Subsequently, the dose was increased by 2.5 mg every 4 weeks up to the MTD of either 10 mg or 15 mg.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Maintain ≥80% of the Body Weight Lost During Intensive Lifestyle Program
|
37.80 percentage of participants
|
98.59 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 72 WeeksPopulation: All randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug, had a baseline and at least 1 post- baseline value for this outcome, excluding data after discontinuation of study drug.
Percentage of participants who achieve ≥10% body weight reduction was analysed by logistic regression model using imputed data with baseline body weight, analysis country, sex, treatment as factors.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=291 Participants
Participants received matching placebo SC once weekly QW.
|
Tirzepatide
n=284 Participants
Participants received weekly doses of tirzepatide SC for 72 weeks, starting at 2.5 mg for 4 weeks. Subsequently, the dose was increased by 2.5 mg every 4 weeks up to the MTD of either 10 mg or 15 mg.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve ≥10%Body Weight Reduction
|
4.81 percentage of participants
|
88.03 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 72 WeeksPopulation: All randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug, had a baseline and at least 1 post- baseline value for this outcome, excluding data after discontinuation of study drug.
Percentage of participants who achieve ≥15% body weight reduction was analysed by logistic regression model using imputed data with baseline body weight, analysis country, sex, treatment as factors.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=291 Participants
Participants received matching placebo SC once weekly QW.
|
Tirzepatide
n=284 Participants
Participants received weekly doses of tirzepatide SC for 72 weeks, starting at 2.5 mg for 4 weeks. Subsequently, the dose was increased by 2.5 mg every 4 weeks up to the MTD of either 10 mg or 15 mg.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve ≥15% Body Weight Reduction
|
2.06 Percentage of participants
|
73.94 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 72 WeeksPopulation: All randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug, had a baseline and at least 1 post- baseline value for this outcome, excluding data after discontinuation of study drug.
Percentage of participants who achieve ≥20% body weight reduction was analysed by logistic regression model using imputed data with baseline body weight, analysis country, sex, treatment as factors.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=291 Participants
Participants received matching placebo SC once weekly QW.
|
Tirzepatide
n=284 Participants
Participants received weekly doses of tirzepatide SC for 72 weeks, starting at 2.5 mg for 4 weeks. Subsequently, the dose was increased by 2.5 mg every 4 weeks up to the MTD of either 10 mg or 15 mg.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve ≥20% Body Weight Reduction
|
1.03 Percentage of participants
|
54.93 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 72 WeeksPopulation: All randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug, had a baseline and at least 1 post- baseline value for this outcome, excluding data after discontinuation of study drug.
Change from baseline in waist circumference. LS mean was determined by MMRM model for post-baseline measures: Variable = Baseline + Analysis Country + Sex + Lead-In Weight Loss % + Treatment + Time + Treatment\*Time (Type III sum of squares).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=291 Participants
Participants received matching placebo SC once weekly QW.
|
Tirzepatide
n=284 Participants
Participants received weekly doses of tirzepatide SC for 72 weeks, starting at 2.5 mg for 4 weeks. Subsequently, the dose was increased by 2.5 mg every 4 weeks up to the MTD of either 10 mg or 15 mg.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference
|
1.1 Centimeters (Cms)
Standard Error 0.58
|
-16.8 Centimeters (Cms)
Standard Error 0.56
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 72 WeeksPopulation: All randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug, had a baseline and at least 1 post- baseline value for this outcome, excluding data after discontinuation of study drug.
Change from baseline in body weight. LS mean was determined by MMRM model for post-baseline measures: Variable = Baseline + Analysis Country + Sex + Treatment + Time + Treatment\*Time (Type III sum of squares).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=291 Participants
Participants received matching placebo SC once weekly QW.
|
Tirzepatide
n=284 Participants
Participants received weekly doses of tirzepatide SC for 72 weeks, starting at 2.5 mg for 4 weeks. Subsequently, the dose was increased by 2.5 mg every 4 weeks up to the MTD of either 10 mg or 15 mg.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Body Weight
|
3.5 kg
Standard Error 0.67
|
-21.5 kg
Standard Error 0.65
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 72 WeeksPopulation: All randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug, had a baseline and at least 1 post- baseline value for this outcome, excluding data after discontinuation of study drug.
Change from baseline in BMI. LS mean was determined by MMRM model for post-baseline measures: Variable = Baseline + Analysis Country + Sex + Treatment + Time + Treatment\*Time (Type III sum of squares).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=291 Participants
Participants received matching placebo SC once weekly QW.
|
Tirzepatide
n=284 Participants
Participants received weekly doses of tirzepatide SC for 72 weeks, starting at 2.5 mg for 4 weeks. Subsequently, the dose was increased by 2.5 mg every 4 weeks up to the MTD of either 10 mg or 15 mg.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI)
|
1.2 kilogram per meter square (kg/m^2)
Standard Error 0.23
|
-7.7 kilogram per meter square (kg/m^2)
Standard Error 0.23
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 72 WeeksPopulation: All randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug, had a baseline and at least 1 post- baseline value for this outcome, excluding data after discontinuation of study drug.
Change from baseline in SBP. LS mean was determined by MMRM model for post-baseline measures: Variable = Baseline + Analysis Country + Sex + Lead-In Weight Loss % + Treatment + Time + Treatment\*Time (Type III sum of squares).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=291 Participants
Participants received matching placebo SC once weekly QW.
|
Tirzepatide
n=284 Participants
Participants received weekly doses of tirzepatide SC for 72 weeks, starting at 2.5 mg for 4 weeks. Subsequently, the dose was increased by 2.5 mg every 4 weeks up to the MTD of either 10 mg or 15 mg.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)
|
4.4 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Error 0.76
|
-5.8 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Error 0.73
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 72 WeeksPopulation: All randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug, had a baseline and at least 1 post- baseline value for this outcome, excluding data after discontinuation of study drug.
Change from baseline in DBP. LS mean was determined by MMRM model for post-baseline measures: Variable = Baseline + Analysis Country + Sex + Lead-In Weight Loss % + Treatment + Time + Treatment\*Time (Type III sum of squares).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=291 Participants
Participants received matching placebo SC once weekly QW.
|
Tirzepatide
n=284 Participants
Participants received weekly doses of tirzepatide SC for 72 weeks, starting at 2.5 mg for 4 weeks. Subsequently, the dose was increased by 2.5 mg every 4 weeks up to the MTD of either 10 mg or 15 mg.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
|
2.3 mmHg
Standard Error 0.53
|
-3.4 mmHg
Standard Error 0.51
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 72 WeeksPopulation: All randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug, had a baseline and at least 1 post- baseline value for this outcome, excluding data after discontinuation of study drug.
Percent change from baseline in total cholesterol. LS mean was determined by MMRM model for post-baseline measures: log(Actual Measurement/Baseline) = log(Baseline) + Analysis Country + Sex + Lead-In Weight Loss % + Treatment + Time + Treatment\*Time (Type III sum of squares).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=252 Participants
Participants received matching placebo SC once weekly QW.
|
Tirzepatide
n=263 Participants
Participants received weekly doses of tirzepatide SC for 72 weeks, starting at 2.5 mg for 4 weeks. Subsequently, the dose was increased by 2.5 mg every 4 weeks up to the MTD of either 10 mg or 15 mg.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol
|
5.19 Percent change
Standard Error 1.11
|
-3.00 Percent change
Standard Error 0.97
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 72 WeeksPopulation: All randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug, had a baseline and at least 1 post- baseline value for this outcome, excluding data after discontinuation of study drug.
Percent change from baseline in HDL cholesterol. LS mean was determined by MMRM model for post-baseline measures: log(Actual Measurement/Baseline) = log(Baseline) + Analysis Country + Sex + Lead-In Weight Loss % + Treatment + Time + Treatment\*Time (Type III sum of squares).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=252 Participants
Participants received matching placebo SC once weekly QW.
|
Tirzepatide
n=263 Participants
Participants received weekly doses of tirzepatide SC for 72 weeks, starting at 2.5 mg for 4 weeks. Subsequently, the dose was increased by 2.5 mg every 4 weeks up to the MTD of either 10 mg or 15 mg.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol
|
3.6 Percent change
Standard Error 1.12
|
15.4 Percent change
Standard Error 1.19
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 72 WeeksPopulation: All randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug, had a baseline and at least 1 post- baseline value for this outcome, excluding data after discontinuation of study drug.
Percent change from baseline in LDL cholesterol. LS mean was determined by MMRM model for post-baseline measures: log(Actual Measurement/Baseline) = log(Baseline) + Analysis Country + Sex + Lead-In Weight Loss % + Treatment + Time + Treatment\*Time (Type III sum of squares).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=252 Participants
Participants received matching placebo SC once weekly QW.
|
Tirzepatide
n=263 Participants
Participants received weekly doses of tirzepatide SC for 72 weeks, starting at 2.5 mg for 4 weeks. Subsequently, the dose was increased by 2.5 mg every 4 weeks up to the MTD of either 10 mg or 15 mg.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol
|
6.14 Percent change
Standard Error 1.71
|
-6.07 Percent change
Standard Error 1.44
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 72 WeeksPopulation: All randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug, had a baseline and at least 1 post- baseline value for this outcome, excluding data after discontinuation of study drug.
Percent change from baseline in VLDL cholesterol. LS mean was determined by MMRM model for post-baseline measures: log(Actual Measurement/Baseline) = log(Baseline) + Analysis Country + Sex + Lead-In Weight Loss % + Treatment + Time + Treatment\*Time (Type III sum of squares).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=252 Participants
Participants received matching placebo SC once weekly QW.
|
Tirzepatide
n=261 Participants
Participants received weekly doses of tirzepatide SC for 72 weeks, starting at 2.5 mg for 4 weeks. Subsequently, the dose was increased by 2.5 mg every 4 weeks up to the MTD of either 10 mg or 15 mg.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Very Low-Density Lipoprotein (VLDL) Cholesterol
|
3.0 Percent change
Standard Error 2.32
|
-25.6 Percent change
Standard Error 1.60
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 72 WeeksPopulation: All randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug, had a baseline and at least 1 post- baseline value for this outcome, excluding data after discontinuation of study drug.
Percent change from baseline in triglycerides. LS mean was determined by MMRM model for post-baseline measures: log(Actual Measurement/Baseline) = log(Baseline) + Analysis Country + Sex + Lead-In Weight Loss % + Treatment + Time + Treatment\*Time (Type III sum of squares).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=252 Participants
Participants received matching placebo SC once weekly QW.
|
Tirzepatide
n=263 Participants
Participants received weekly doses of tirzepatide SC for 72 weeks, starting at 2.5 mg for 4 weeks. Subsequently, the dose was increased by 2.5 mg every 4 weeks up to the MTD of either 10 mg or 15 mg.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides
|
3.0 Percent change
Standard Error 2.34
|
-25.8 Percent change
Standard Error 1.61
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 72 WeeksPopulation: All randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug, had a baseline and at least 1 post- baseline value for this outcome, excluding data after discontinuation of study drug.
Percent change from baseline in free fatty acids. LS mean was determined by MMRM model for post-baseline measures: log(Actual Measurement/Baseline) = log(Baseline) + Analysis Country + Sex + Lead-In Weight Loss % + Treatment + Time + Treatment\*Time (Type III sum of squares).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=251 Participants
Participants received matching placebo SC once weekly QW.
|
Tirzepatide
n=263 Participants
Participants received weekly doses of tirzepatide SC for 72 weeks, starting at 2.5 mg for 4 weeks. Subsequently, the dose was increased by 2.5 mg every 4 weeks up to the MTD of either 10 mg or 15 mg.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Free Fatty Acids
|
-15.0 Percent change
Standard Error 2.95
|
-33.1 Percent change
Standard Error 2.20
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 72 WeeksPopulation: All randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug, had a baseline and at least 1 post- baseline value for this outcome, excluding data after discontinuation of study drug.
Change from baseline in fasting glucose. LS mean was determined by MMRM model for post-baseline measures: Variable = Baseline + Analysis Country + Sex + Lead-In Weight Loss % + Treatment + Time + Treatment\*Time (Type III sum of squares).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=276 Participants
Participants received matching placebo SC once weekly QW.
|
Tirzepatide
n=275 Participants
Participants received weekly doses of tirzepatide SC for 72 weeks, starting at 2.5 mg for 4 weeks. Subsequently, the dose was increased by 2.5 mg every 4 weeks up to the MTD of either 10 mg or 15 mg.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Fasting Glucose
|
2.4 Milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)
Standard Error 0.86
|
-8.8 Milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)
Standard Error 0.82
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 72 WeeksPopulation: All randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug, had a baseline and at least 1 post- baseline value for this outcome, excluding data after discontinuation of study drug.
HbA1c is the glycosylated fraction of hemoglobin A. HbA1c is measured primarily to identify average plasma glucose concentration over prolonged periods of time. LS mean was determined by MMRM model for post-baseline measures: Variable = Baseline + Analysis Country + Sex + Lead-In Weight Loss % + Treatment + Time + Treatment\*Time (Type III sum of squares).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=275 Participants
Participants received matching placebo SC once weekly QW.
|
Tirzepatide
n=278 Participants
Participants received weekly doses of tirzepatide SC for 72 weeks, starting at 2.5 mg for 4 weeks. Subsequently, the dose was increased by 2.5 mg every 4 weeks up to the MTD of either 10 mg or 15 mg.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)
|
0.01 Percentage of HbA1c
Standard Deviation 0.022
|
-0.46 Percentage of HbA1c
Standard Deviation 0.020
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 72 WeeksPopulation: All randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug, had a baseline and at least 1 post- baseline value for this outcome, excluding data after discontinuation of study drug.
Percent change from baseline in fasting insulin. LS mean was determined by MMRM model for post-baseline measures: log(Actual Measurement/Baseline) = log(Baseline) + Analysis Country + Sex + Lead-In Weight Loss % + Treatment + Time + Treatment\*Time (Type III sum of squares).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=275 Participants
Participants received matching placebo SC once weekly QW.
|
Tirzepatide
n=277 Participants
Participants received weekly doses of tirzepatide SC for 72 weeks, starting at 2.5 mg for 4 weeks. Subsequently, the dose was increased by 2.5 mg every 4 weeks up to the MTD of either 10 mg or 15 mg.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin
|
17.3 Percent change
Standard Error 4.95
|
-39.1 Percent change
Standard Error 2.46
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 72 WeeksPopulation: All randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug, had a baseline and at least 1 post- baseline value for this outcome, excluding data after discontinuation of study drug.
The SF-36v2 acute form assesses health-related quality of life (HRQoL) on 8 domains: Physical Functioning, Role-Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role-Emotional, and Mental Health. The Physical-Functioning domain assesses limitations due to health "now" and consists of 10-items, each rated on a 3-point Likert scale. Scoring of the domain is norm-based and presented in the form of T-scores, with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10; higher scores indicate better levels of function. Range cannot be specified in norm-based scores. LS mean was determined using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model using Baseline + Analysis Country + Sex + Lead-In Weight Loss % + Treatment (Type III sum of squares) as variables.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=209 Participants
Participants received matching placebo SC once weekly QW.
|
Tirzepatide
n=231 Participants
Participants received weekly doses of tirzepatide SC for 72 weeks, starting at 2.5 mg for 4 weeks. Subsequently, the dose was increased by 2.5 mg every 4 weeks up to the MTD of either 10 mg or 15 mg.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Version 2 Health Survey Version 2 (SF 36v2) Acute Form Physical Functioning Domain Score
|
-0.6 T-score
Standard Error 0.39
|
3.3 T-score
Standard Error 0.37
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 72 WeeksPopulation: All randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug, had a baseline and at least 1 post- baseline value for this outcome, excluding data after discontinuation of study drug.
The IWQOL Lite-CT consists of 20 items, assessing 2 primary domains of obesity related HRQoL: Physical (7 items) and Psychosocial (13 items). A 5-item subset of the Physical domain - the Physical Function composite - is also supported. Items in the Physical Function composite describe physical impacts related to general and specific physical activities. All items in the physical domain are rated on either a 5-point frequency ("never" to "always") scale or a 5-point truth ("not at all true" to "completely true") scale. Total score of IWQOL-Lite-CT composite ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting better health-related quality of life. LS mean was determined using ANCOVA model with Baseline + Analysis Country + Sex + Lead-In Weight Loss % + Treatment (Type III sum of squares) as variables.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=201 Participants
Participants received matching placebo SC once weekly QW.
|
Tirzepatide
n=226 Participants
Participants received weekly doses of tirzepatide SC for 72 weeks, starting at 2.5 mg for 4 weeks. Subsequently, the dose was increased by 2.5 mg every 4 weeks up to the MTD of either 10 mg or 15 mg.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Impact of Weight on Quality of Life Lite Clinical Trials Version (IWQOL-Lite-CT) Physical Function Composite Score
|
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.17
|
13.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.10
|
Adverse Events
Placebo
Tirzepatide
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=292 participants at risk
Participants received matching placebo SC once weekly QW.
|
Tirzepatide
n=287 participants at risk
Participants received weekly doses of tirzepatide SC for 72 weeks, starting at 2.5 mg for 4 weeks. Subsequently, the dose was increased by 2.5 mg every 4 weeks up to the MTD of either 10 mg or 15 mg.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
|
0.00%
0/292 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
0.35%
1/287 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial infarction
|
0.34%
1/292 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
0.00%
0/287 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.34%
1/292 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
0.00%
0/287 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis microscopic
|
0.00%
0/292 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
0.35%
1/287 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haematochezia
|
0.00%
0/292 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
0.35%
1/287 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Impaired gastric emptying
|
0.34%
1/292 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
0.00%
0/287 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis
|
0.00%
0/292 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
0.35%
1/287 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis acute
|
0.34%
1/292 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
0.00%
0/287 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Small intestinal obstruction
|
0.34%
1/292 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
0.35%
1/287 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Umbilical hernia
|
0.00%
0/292 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
0.35%
1/287 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.34%
1/292 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
0.00%
0/287 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis acute
|
0.00%
0/292 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
0.35%
1/287 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Appendicitis
|
0.34%
1/292 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
0.00%
0/287 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
0.34%
1/292 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
0.35%
1/287 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.34%
1/292 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
0.00%
0/287 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pyelonephritis
|
0.34%
1/292 • Number of events 2 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
0.00%
0/287 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
0.34%
1/292 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
0.35%
1/287 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Toxoplasmosis
|
0.00%
0/292 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
0.35%
1/287 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.34%
1/292 • Number of events 3 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
0.00%
0/287 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Limb injury
|
0.34%
1/292 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
0.00%
0/287 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Muscle strain
|
0.00%
0/292 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
0.35%
1/287 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
0.00%
0/292 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
0.35%
1/287 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Bladder transitional cell carcinoma
|
0.00%
0/292 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
0.35%
1/287 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Breast cancer
|
0.34%
1/292 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
0.00%
0/287 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Colorectal adenoma
|
0.00%
0/292 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
0.35%
1/287 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Malignant melanoma
|
0.00%
0/292 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
0.35%
1/287 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Papillary thyroid cancer
|
0.00%
0/292 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
0.35%
1/287 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Renal cancer
|
0.00%
0/292 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
0.35%
1/287 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Anembryonic gestation
|
0.00%
0/292 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
0.35%
1/287 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute kidney injury
|
0.00%
0/292 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
0.35%
1/287 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Nephrolithiasis
|
1.0%
3/292 • Number of events 3 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
0.00%
0/287 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Asthma
|
0.34%
1/292 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
0.00%
0/287 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary thrombosis
|
0.34%
1/292 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
0.00%
0/287 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=292 participants at risk
Participants received matching placebo SC once weekly QW.
|
Tirzepatide
n=287 participants at risk
Participants received weekly doses of tirzepatide SC for 72 weeks, starting at 2.5 mg for 4 weeks. Subsequently, the dose was increased by 2.5 mg every 4 weeks up to the MTD of either 10 mg or 15 mg.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
2.4%
7/292 • Number of events 10 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
10.5%
30/287 • Number of events 38 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
6.8%
20/292 • Number of events 24 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
23.0%
66/287 • Number of events 89 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
9.2%
27/292 • Number of events 53 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
31.0%
89/287 • Number of events 233 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
3.1%
9/292 • Number of events 10 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
9.4%
27/287 • Number of events 47 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Eructation
|
1.0%
3/292 • Number of events 3 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
5.6%
16/287 • Number of events 26 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Flatulence
|
2.7%
8/292 • Number of events 8 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
6.6%
19/287 • Number of events 24 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrooesophageal reflux disease
|
2.4%
7/292 • Number of events 9 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
6.6%
19/287 • Number of events 44 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
14.0%
41/292 • Number of events 112 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
39.7%
114/287 • Number of events 499 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
1.4%
4/292 • Number of events 4 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
18.1%
52/287 • Number of events 133 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
3.1%
9/292 • Number of events 9 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
7.0%
20/287 • Number of events 23 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site reaction
|
1.0%
3/292 • Number of events 3 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
11.1%
32/287 • Number of events 204 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Covid-19
|
25.3%
74/292 • Number of events 80 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
23.0%
66/287 • Number of events 69 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
8.6%
25/292 • Number of events 30 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
4.2%
12/287 • Number of events 13 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
5.5%
16/292 • Number of events 18 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
2.1%
6/287 • Number of events 6 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
7.2%
21/292 • Number of events 32 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
8.7%
25/287 • Number of events 37 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
4.1%
12/292 • Number of events 13 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
9.4%
27/287 • Number of events 33 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
5.1%
15/292 • Number of events 16 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
2.4%
7/287 • Number of events 8 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
5.1%
15/292 • Number of events 16 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
5.9%
17/287 • Number of events 19 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
2.1%
6/292 • Number of events 6 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
7.0%
20/287 • Number of events 24 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
7.5%
22/292 • Number of events 27 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
9.4%
27/287 • Number of events 37 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
6.5%
19/292 • Number of events 19 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
3.1%
9/287 • Number of events 9 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Alopecia
|
1.4%
4/292 • Number of events 6 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
7.0%
20/287 • Number of events 20 • Baseline up to week 76
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Based on the planned safety analysis, adverse events were collected per the treatment regimen, irrespective of each dose level.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: GT60