Comparison of TOETVA and Conventional Thyroidectomy

NCT04647006 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 40

Last updated 2020-11-30

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Introduction-Objective:

The application of transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA) is gradually increasing recently. However, it is not clear whether TOETVA is a true minimally invasive thyroidectomy compared to open conventional thyroidectomy.

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the TOETVA and open conventional thyroidectomy techniques in terms of postoperative inflammatory response, pain and patient satisfaction.

Material and Method:

In this prospective study, 40 female patients between the ages of 18-65 were divided into 2 groups of 20 patients: TOETVA: 20 patients, open thyroidectomy: 20 patients. Operation time, inflammatory response with IL-6, white blood cell (WBC) and C-reactive protein (CRP), postoperative pain, postoperative complications and patient satisfaction were evaluated in both groups.

Conditions

  • Thyroid
  • Thyroid Nodule
  • Surgery

Interventions

PROCEDURE

thyroid

Conventional Thyroidectomy and Transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital

    collaborator OTHER
  • MUnlu

    lead OTHER_GOV

Principal Investigators

  • Mehmet Uludag, 1 · Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Research Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
65 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2019-09-23
Primary Completion
2020-01-28
Completion
2020-03-30

Countries

  • Turkey (Türkiye)

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04647006 on ClinicalTrials.gov