Trial Outcomes & Findings for Shrinking the Size of the Tobacco Power Wall (NCT NCT04632030)
NCT ID: NCT04632030
Last Updated: 2023-10-25
Results Overview
A two item self-report assessment: 1) If one of your best friends offered you an unflavored cigarette would you use it? 2) If one of your best friends offered you a menthol cigarette would you use it? Responses to each item are made on a 10-point scale where 1 = definitely not; and 10 = definitely yes and responses across the two items are summed for a total scale score. Total scale scores are dichotomized: scores of 2 are coded as '0' (no risk) and any score greater than 2 is coded as '1' (at risk). Outcome is proportion at risk of cigarette smoking (number of participants at risk over number of participants within condition).
COMPLETED
NA
275 participants
within 5 minutes of the intervention
2023-10-25
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Control
The tobacco power wall and number of products appears in a typical format: large power wall with a large number of products (defined here as three large cabinets)
Tobacco power wall size and tobacco products displayed: The intervention varies the size of the tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products displayed on it.
|
Small
The tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products appear in their smallest format: small power wall with a small number of products displayed (defined here as one large cabinet)
Tobacco power wall size and tobacco products displayed: The intervention varies the size of the tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products displayed on it.
|
Medium
The tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products appear in a format sized between the control and small conditions: a medium sized power wall with a medium number of products displayed (defined here as two large cabinets).
Tobacco power wall size and tobacco products displayed: The intervention varies the size of the tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products displayed on it.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
96
|
86
|
93
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
96
|
86
|
93
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Shrinking the Size of the Tobacco Power Wall
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Control
n=96 Participants
The tobacco power wall and number of products appears in a typical format: large power wall with a large number of products (defined here as three large cabinets)
Tobacco power wall size and tobacco products displayed: The intervention varies the size of the tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products displayed on it.
|
Small
n=86 Participants
The tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products appear in their smallest format: small power wall with a small number of products displayed (defined here as one large cabinet)
Tobacco power wall size and tobacco products displayed: The intervention varies the size of the tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products displayed on it.
|
Medium
n=93 Participants
The tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products appear in a format sized between the control and small conditions: a medium sized power wall with a medium number of products displayed (defined here as two large cabinets).
Tobacco power wall size and tobacco products displayed: The intervention varies the size of the tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products displayed on it.
|
Total
n=275 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
16.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.2 • n=99 Participants
|
16.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.1 • n=107 Participants
|
16.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.0 • n=206 Participants
|
16.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.1 • n=7 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
|
26 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
82 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
|
65 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
55 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
58 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
178 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Nonbinary/other
|
5 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
6 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
90 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
82 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
90 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
262 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
13 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
43 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
7 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
66 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
64 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
55 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
185 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
7 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
3 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
96 participants
n=99 Participants
|
86 participants
n=107 Participants
|
93 participants
n=206 Participants
|
275 participants
n=7 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: within 5 minutes of the interventionPopulation: Sample size may differ from baseline because of missing data.
A two item self-report assessment: 1) If one of your best friends offered you an unflavored cigarette would you use it? 2) If one of your best friends offered you a menthol cigarette would you use it? Responses to each item are made on a 10-point scale where 1 = definitely not; and 10 = definitely yes and responses across the two items are summed for a total scale score. Total scale scores are dichotomized: scores of 2 are coded as '0' (no risk) and any score greater than 2 is coded as '1' (at risk). Outcome is proportion at risk of cigarette smoking (number of participants at risk over number of participants within condition).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control
n=82 Participants
The tobacco power wall and number of products appears in a typical format: large power wall with a large number of products (defined here as three large cabinets)
Tobacco power wall size and tobacco products displayed: The intervention varies the size of the tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products displayed on it.
|
Small
n=80 Participants
The tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products appear in their smallest format: small power wall with a small number of products displayed (defined here as one large cabinet)
Tobacco power wall size and tobacco products displayed: The intervention varies the size of the tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products displayed on it.
|
Medium
n=78 Participants
The tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products appear in a format sized between the control and small conditions: a medium sized power wall with a medium number of products displayed (defined here as two large cabinets).
Tobacco power wall size and tobacco products displayed: The intervention varies the size of the tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products displayed on it.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Proportion at Risk for Cigarette Smoking
|
.18 proportion of participants
Interval 0.11 to 0.29
|
.39 proportion of participants
Interval 0.27 to 0.53
|
.26 proportion of participants
Interval 0.16 to 0.38
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: within 5 minutes of the interventionPopulation: Sample sizes may differ from baseline because of missing data.
A three item, self-report assessment: 1) If one of your best friends offered you an unflavored vaping product would you use it? 2) If one of your best friends offered you a vaping product flavored with menthol or mint, would you use it? 3) If one of your best friends offered you a vaping product flavored with fruit, candy, alcohol or non-alcohol drink, or some other sweet flavor, would you use it? Responses to each item are made on a 10-point scale where 1 = definitely not; and 10 = definitely yes and responses across the three items are summed for a total scale score. Total scale scores are dichotomized: scores of 3 are coded as '0' (no risk) and any score greater than 3 is coded as '1' (at risk). Outcome is proportion at risk of ENDS use (number of participants at risk over number of participants within condition).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control
n=81 Participants
The tobacco power wall and number of products appears in a typical format: large power wall with a large number of products (defined here as three large cabinets)
Tobacco power wall size and tobacco products displayed: The intervention varies the size of the tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products displayed on it.
|
Small
n=78 Participants
The tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products appear in their smallest format: small power wall with a small number of products displayed (defined here as one large cabinet)
Tobacco power wall size and tobacco products displayed: The intervention varies the size of the tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products displayed on it.
|
Medium
n=81 Participants
The tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products appear in a format sized between the control and small conditions: a medium sized power wall with a medium number of products displayed (defined here as two large cabinets).
Tobacco power wall size and tobacco products displayed: The intervention varies the size of the tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products displayed on it.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Proportion at Risk of Using Electronic Nicotine Delivery Devices (ENDS)
|
.34 proportion of participants
Interval 0.22 to 0.47
|
.59 proportion of participants
Interval 0.46 to 0.72
|
.59 proportion of participants
Interval 0.45 to 0.72
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: within 5 minutes of the interventionPopulation: Sample size may differ from baseline due to missing data.
A three item self report assessment: : 1) If one of your best friends offered you unflavored smokeless tobacco would you use it? 2) If one of your best friends offered you smokeless tobacco flavored with flavored with menthol, mint, spearmint, or wintergreen would you use it? 3) If one of your best friends offered you smokeless tobacco flavored with fruit would you use it? Responses to each item are made on a 10-point scale where 1 = definitely not; and 10 = definitely yes and responses across the three items are summed for a total scale score. Total scale scores are dichotomized: scores of 3 are coded as '0' (no risk) and any score greater than 3 is coded as '1' (at risk).Outcome is proportion at risk of smokeless tobacco use (number of participants at risk over number of participants within condition).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control
n=81 Participants
The tobacco power wall and number of products appears in a typical format: large power wall with a large number of products (defined here as three large cabinets)
Tobacco power wall size and tobacco products displayed: The intervention varies the size of the tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products displayed on it.
|
Small
n=77 Participants
The tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products appear in their smallest format: small power wall with a small number of products displayed (defined here as one large cabinet)
Tobacco power wall size and tobacco products displayed: The intervention varies the size of the tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products displayed on it.
|
Medium
n=78 Participants
The tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products appear in a format sized between the control and small conditions: a medium sized power wall with a medium number of products displayed (defined here as two large cabinets).
Tobacco power wall size and tobacco products displayed: The intervention varies the size of the tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products displayed on it.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Proportion at Risk of Using Smokeless Tobacco
|
.12 proportion of participants
Interval 0.06 to 0.21
|
.20 proportion of participants
Interval 0.12 to 0.31
|
.17 proportion of participants
Interval 0.1 to 0.27
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: within 5 minutes of the interventionPopulation: Sample sizes may differ from baseline due to missing data.
A three item, self report assessment: 1) If one of your best friends offered you an unflavored cigarillos/filtered cigar would you use it? 2) If one of your best friends offered you a cigarillos/filtered cigar flavored with menthol or mint would you use it? 3) If one of your best friends offered you a cigarillos/filtered cigar flavored with fruit, candy, alcohol, or some other sweet flavor, would you use it? Responses to each item are made on a 10-point scale where 1 = definitely not; and 10 = definitely yes and responses across the three items are summed for a total scale score. Total scale scores are dichotomized: scores of 3 are coded as '0' (no risk) and any score greater than 3 is coded as '1' (at risk). Outcome is proportion at risk of LCC use (number of participants at risk over number of participants within condition).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control
n=80 Participants
The tobacco power wall and number of products appears in a typical format: large power wall with a large number of products (defined here as three large cabinets)
Tobacco power wall size and tobacco products displayed: The intervention varies the size of the tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products displayed on it.
|
Small
n=77 Participants
The tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products appear in their smallest format: small power wall with a small number of products displayed (defined here as one large cabinet)
Tobacco power wall size and tobacco products displayed: The intervention varies the size of the tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products displayed on it.
|
Medium
n=77 Participants
The tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products appear in a format sized between the control and small conditions: a medium sized power wall with a medium number of products displayed (defined here as two large cabinets).
Tobacco power wall size and tobacco products displayed: The intervention varies the size of the tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products displayed on it.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Proportion at Risk of Using Little Cigar/Cigarillos (LCC)
|
.17 proportion of participants
Interval 0.1 to 0.27
|
.31 proportion of participants
Interval 0.2 to 0.44
|
.20 proportion of participants
Interval 0.12 to 0.32
|
Adverse Events
Control
Small
Medium
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place